Purpose: To design and test a method for normalizing book citations in Google Scholar.Design/methodology/approach: A hybrid citing-side, cited-side normalization method was developed and this was tested on a sample of...Purpose: To design and test a method for normalizing book citations in Google Scholar.Design/methodology/approach: A hybrid citing-side, cited-side normalization method was developed and this was tested on a sample of 285 research monographs. The results were analyzed and conclusions drawn.Findings: The method was technically feasible but required extensive manual intervention because of the poor quality of the Google Scholar data. Research limitations: The sample of books was limited and also all were from one discipline —business and management. Also, the method has only been tested on Google Scholar, it would be useful to test it on Web of Science or Scopus.Practical limitations: Google Scholar is a poor source of data although it does cover a much wider range citation sources that other databases. Originality/value: This is the first method that has been developed specifically for normalizing books which have so far not been able to be normalized.展开更多
[目的/意义]目前,国际领域关于论文影响力的研究越来越多,选取的评价指标也不尽相同,国内学者论文在国际领域的影响力备受中国学者的关注。掌握中国学者国际学术论文影响力对提升我国软实力具有重要作用。[方法/过程]文章基于Web of Sci...[目的/意义]目前,国际领域关于论文影响力的研究越来越多,选取的评价指标也不尽相同,国内学者论文在国际领域的影响力备受中国学者的关注。掌握中国学者国际学术论文影响力对提升我国软实力具有重要作用。[方法/过程]文章基于Web of Science数据库,借助可视化软件对中国学者在社会科学领域的文献进行分析,获知中国学者学术论文在国际领域的影响力。通过采用文献共被引分析、关键词共现分析、共被引作者分析来探测中国学者在社会科学领域的国际学术论文影响力。[结果/结论]通过对中国学者在社会科学领域的国际学术论文影响力分析,发现学术论文影响力与论文的引用行为十分密切,并根据论文的引用行为,构造预测论文影响力模型。希望对后续研究者提供借鉴与参考作用。展开更多
从期刊被引频次的角度出发,采取实证研究的方法,选择国际权威的引文数据库Web of Science和著名的搜索引擎GoogleScholar,以《美国信息科学和技术学会杂志》为文献源进行相关分析,得出在数字科研时代引文分析有必要采取多个引文分析工具...从期刊被引频次的角度出发,采取实证研究的方法,选择国际权威的引文数据库Web of Science和著名的搜索引擎GoogleScholar,以《美国信息科学和技术学会杂志》为文献源进行相关分析,得出在数字科研时代引文分析有必要采取多个引文分析工具,使得引文分析能跟上时代发展步伐的结论。展开更多
文摘Purpose: To design and test a method for normalizing book citations in Google Scholar.Design/methodology/approach: A hybrid citing-side, cited-side normalization method was developed and this was tested on a sample of 285 research monographs. The results were analyzed and conclusions drawn.Findings: The method was technically feasible but required extensive manual intervention because of the poor quality of the Google Scholar data. Research limitations: The sample of books was limited and also all were from one discipline —business and management. Also, the method has only been tested on Google Scholar, it would be useful to test it on Web of Science or Scopus.Practical limitations: Google Scholar is a poor source of data although it does cover a much wider range citation sources that other databases. Originality/value: This is the first method that has been developed specifically for normalizing books which have so far not been able to be normalized.
文摘[目的/意义]目前,国际领域关于论文影响力的研究越来越多,选取的评价指标也不尽相同,国内学者论文在国际领域的影响力备受中国学者的关注。掌握中国学者国际学术论文影响力对提升我国软实力具有重要作用。[方法/过程]文章基于Web of Science数据库,借助可视化软件对中国学者在社会科学领域的文献进行分析,获知中国学者学术论文在国际领域的影响力。通过采用文献共被引分析、关键词共现分析、共被引作者分析来探测中国学者在社会科学领域的国际学术论文影响力。[结果/结论]通过对中国学者在社会科学领域的国际学术论文影响力分析,发现学术论文影响力与论文的引用行为十分密切,并根据论文的引用行为,构造预测论文影响力模型。希望对后续研究者提供借鉴与参考作用。
