Patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners expect health care providers to provide sexual counseling to assist them in maintaining sexual quality of life. Evidence suggests however, that there is a gap in...Patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners expect health care providers to provide sexual counseling to assist them in maintaining sexual quality of life. Evidence suggests however, that there is a gap in integrating evidence into practice and that relatively few cardiac patients receive sexual counseling. This can result in negative psychological, physical, and quality of life outcomes for couples who may needlessly decide sexual activity is too risky and cease all sexual activity. Two scientific statements now exist that provide ample guidance to health care providers in discussing this important topic. Using a team approach that includes physicians, nurses, physical therapists, rehabilitation staff, and others is important to ensure that sexual counseling occurs throughout recovery. In addition, several trials using interventional approaches for sexual counseling provide insight into successful approaches for sexual counseling in practice. This article provides practical strategies and evidence-based approaches for assessment and sexual counseling for all cardiac patients and their partners, and specific counseling for those with ischemic conditions, heart failure, and implanted devices.展开更多
Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5...Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5 （PDE5） therapy prefer tadalafil 20-mg （on-demand） versus sildenafil 100-mg （on-demand）. Differences in psychosocial outcomes may help to explain treatment preference in favor of tadalafih This open-label, randomized, crossover study compared psychosocial outcomes and drug attribute choices between tadalafil and sildenafil in Chinese men with ED na＇（ve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafU/lOO-mg sildenafil （n = 190） or 100-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil （n = 193） for 8 weeks each and were asked which treatment they preferred to take for the 8-week extension phase. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale （PAIRS）, Drug Attributes Questionnaire （DRAQ）, and Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire （SLQQ）. When taking tadalafil versus sildenafil, men had a higher mean endpoint score on the PAIRS Spontaneity Domain （tadalafil = 2.86 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P 〈 0.001）, and a lower mean endpoint score on the Time Concerns Domain （tadalafil = 2.41 vs sildenafil = 2.55; P 〈 0.001）. A numerical increase in the Sexual Self-Confidence Domain was observed when taking tadalafil versus sildenafil （tadalafil -- 2.76 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P= 0.102）. The most frequently chosen drug attributes explaining treatment preference were able to get an erection long after having drug, and ability to get an erection every time. SLQQ results were comparable between treatment groups. These psychosocial outcomes may explain why more Chinese men preferred tadalafil versus sildenafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.展开更多
文摘Patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners expect health care providers to provide sexual counseling to assist them in maintaining sexual quality of life. Evidence suggests however, that there is a gap in integrating evidence into practice and that relatively few cardiac patients receive sexual counseling. This can result in negative psychological, physical, and quality of life outcomes for couples who may needlessly decide sexual activity is too risky and cease all sexual activity. Two scientific statements now exist that provide ample guidance to health care providers in discussing this important topic. Using a team approach that includes physicians, nurses, physical therapists, rehabilitation staff, and others is important to ensure that sexual counseling occurs throughout recovery. In addition, several trials using interventional approaches for sexual counseling provide insight into successful approaches for sexual counseling in practice. This article provides practical strategies and evidence-based approaches for assessment and sexual counseling for all cardiac patients and their partners, and specific counseling for those with ischemic conditions, heart failure, and implanted devices.
文摘Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5 （PDE5） therapy prefer tadalafil 20-mg （on-demand） versus sildenafil 100-mg （on-demand）. Differences in psychosocial outcomes may help to explain treatment preference in favor of tadalafih This open-label, randomized, crossover study compared psychosocial outcomes and drug attribute choices between tadalafil and sildenafil in Chinese men with ED na＇（ve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafU/lOO-mg sildenafil （n = 190） or 100-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil （n = 193） for 8 weeks each and were asked which treatment they preferred to take for the 8-week extension phase. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale （PAIRS）, Drug Attributes Questionnaire （DRAQ）, and Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire （SLQQ）. When taking tadalafil versus sildenafil, men had a higher mean endpoint score on the PAIRS Spontaneity Domain （tadalafil = 2.86 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P 〈 0.001）, and a lower mean endpoint score on the Time Concerns Domain （tadalafil = 2.41 vs sildenafil = 2.55; P 〈 0.001）. A numerical increase in the Sexual Self-Confidence Domain was observed when taking tadalafil versus sildenafil （tadalafil -- 2.76 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P= 0.102）. The most frequently chosen drug attributes explaining treatment preference were able to get an erection long after having drug, and ability to get an erection every time. SLQQ results were comparable between treatment groups. These psychosocial outcomes may explain why more Chinese men preferred tadalafil versus sildenafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.
