BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)and craniotomy(CI)are the current treatments for spontaneous supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage(SSTICH).AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and CI for the treatment...BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)and craniotomy(CI)are the current treatments for spontaneous supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage(SSTICH).AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and CI for the treatment of SSTICH.METHODS Clinical and imaging data of 557 consecutive patients with SSTICH who underwent MIS or CI between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed.The patients were divided into two subgroups:The MIS group and CI group.Propensity score matching was performed to minimise case selection bias.The primary outcome was a dichotomous prognostic(favourable or unfavourable)outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score at 3 months;an mRS score of 0–2 was considered favourable.RESULTS In both conventional statistical and binary logistic regression analyses,the MIS group had a better outcome.The outcome of propensity score matching was unexpected(odds ratio:0.582;95%CI:0.281–1.204;P=0.144),which indicated that,after excluding the interference of each confounder,different surgical modalities were more effective,and there was no significant difference in their prognosis.CONCLUSION Deciding between MIS and CI should be made based on the individual patient,considering the hematoma size,degree of midline shift,cerebral swelling,and preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score.展开更多
Background: The eyebrow supraorbital keyhole approach could be considered a modified minimally invasive model for the classic pterional subfrontal approach in which an eyebrow incision and supraorbital mini craniotomy...Background: The eyebrow supraorbital keyhole approach could be considered a modified minimally invasive model for the classic pterional subfrontal approach in which an eyebrow incision and supraorbital mini craniotomy are performed for exposure of the anterior cranial fossa corridor. Methods: This study was retrospectively conducted on twenty four patients, age ranging from 20 to 65 years old, with anterior cranial fossa lesions who were meeting the eligibility criteria for eyebrow craniotomy in the period from August 2019 to January 2023. These patients were operated through eyebrow supraorbital approach in which microscopic endoscopic assisted technique were used. Extent of resection, clinical and cosmetic outcomes and complication incidence were assessed. Results: We included the twenty four patients who met inclusion criteria (17 females and 7 males) their ages ranged from 20 to 65 years. The most common pathology was meningioma in 19 patients. Two patients experienced supraorbital loss of sensation and only one patient experienced palsy of frontalis branch of facial nerve. Frontal sinus was breached in 3 patients with no patient experienced postoperative CSF leak. Total excision was accomplished for 23 patients. Four patients who had preoperative visual compromise, improvement of visual acuity and field defects was observed in 3 patients. No major intraoperative complications occurred. All patients filled cosmetic satisfaction questionnaire during their outpatient visits. For the eyebrow supraorbital approach, no incision related intolerable pain, no craniotomy defects or irregularities, no cosmetic complaints nor limitation of jaw opening were reported, and only minor symptoms in the form of limited eyebrow elevation, swelling and numbness in the forehead. Conclusions: The eyebrow craniotomy could be used safely as a more cosmetic and minimally invasive approach for a variety of anterior cranial fossa lesions. Endoscopic assistance has been found very useful for deeply seated lesions and hidden residuals with minimal brain retraction which couldn’t be accessed easily through microscopic field solely. Endoscopic assisted eyebrow supraorbital keyhole approach could be performed on a wider scale with great results but requires good selection of cases and more practice to expertise the needed skills.展开更多
BACKGROUND Deep vein thrombosis(DVT)of the lower extremity is one of the most common postoperative complications,especially after craniocerebral surgery.DVT may lead to pulmonary embolism,which has a devastating impac...BACKGROUND Deep vein thrombosis(DVT)of the lower extremity is one of the most common postoperative complications,especially after craniocerebral surgery.DVT may lead to pulmonary embolism,which has a devastating impact on patient prognosis.This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of DVT in the lower limbs following craniocerebral surgery.AIM To identify independent risk factors for the development of postoperative DVT and to develop an effective risk prediction model.METHODS The demographic and clinical data of 283 patients who underwent craniocerebral surgery between December 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The independent risk factors for lower extremity DVT were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.A nomogram was created to predict the likelihood of lower extremity DVT in patients who had undergone craniocerebral surgery.The efficacy of the prediction model was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve using the probability of lower extremity DVT for each sample.RESULTS Among all patients included in the analysis,47.7%developed lower extremity DVT following craniocerebral surgery.The risk of postoperative DVT was higher in those with a longer operative time,and patients with intraoperative intermittent pneumatic compression were less likely to develop postoperative DVT.CONCLUSION The incidence of lower extremity DVT following craniocerebral surgery is significant,highlighting the importance of identifying independent risk factors.Interventions such as the use of intermittent pneumatic compression during surgery may prevent the formation of postoperative DVT.展开更多
Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence ...Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence and intensity of acute and persistent pain after elective craniotomy. Methods: We carried out a prospective cohort study via a series of structured questionnaires to record acute pain intensity preoperatively and postoperatively, and the incidence of persistent pain 3 and 6 months after a craniotomy in a tertiary care center. Patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were interviewed the day before surgery, postoperatively before discharge from the hospital, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Pain was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0 - 10) at rest and movement, as well as expectations of pain before surgery, efficacy of pain therapy, and satisfaction with pain treatment. The incidence of adverse events, sleep time and interruptions caused by pain, different pain types, and drugs used for pain treatment were also recorded. Results: A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the preoperative questionnaire;123 (81%) completed postoperative questionnaire and 108 (72%) completed the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The average pain score at the time of the postoperative questionnaire was moderate, 4 at rest and 5 upon movement. The percentage of patients experiencing mild pain at rest and upon movement was 52% and 49%, and moderate pain was 15% and 16%, respectively. Severe postoperative pain was detected in 5% and 8% of patients at rest and upon movement, respectively. Three months after surgery, 6% of patients reported mild pain at rest, 3% moderate pain at rest, and 1% severe pain at rest. Persistent mild and moderate pain at rest after 6 months was reported by 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%) and abdominal discomfort (8%). During postoperative pain treatment in the intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit, 92% of patients received acetaminophen, 88% fentanyl, and 24% oxycodone. During neurosurgical ward care, ibuprofen was used in 61% of patients. Satisfaction with analgesia was high throughout the study period with a median satisfaction score of 9 postoperatively and 10 at 3 and 6 months on the 0 - 10 scale. Conclusion: The findings indicate that most patients experience moderate or mild pain after craniotomy, but patient satisfaction with pain treatment is high. Persistent pain after 3 and 6 months is rare and mild in nature.展开更多
Introduction: Brain abscess represents 8% of intracranial masses in developing countries. Despite the advances in neuro-imaging, still, the diagnosis of brain abscess is difficult and may need a biopsy in most cases t...Introduction: Brain abscess represents 8% of intracranial masses in developing countries. Despite the advances in neuro-imaging, still, the diagnosis of brain abscess is difficult and may need a biopsy in most cases to verify the diagnosis because may even lead to death. CT scan with contrast is a good tool for diagnosing and localizing brain abscesses in late stages, however, it is difficult to diagnose them in the early stages. The development of MRI helps to more accurately diagnose brain abscess. Surgical management of brain abscesses is either medical or surgical through craniotomy or burr holes. Indications of each are still a point of debate among most neurosurgeons. Methodology: This is a descriptive longitudinal prospective study to compare the outcomes of two surgical procedures used in The National Centre for Neurological Sciences-Khartoum-Sudan (NCNS) from 2012 to 2015, craniotomy and excision of the abscess membrane versus burr hole and aspiration of brain abscess in terms of duration of hospitalization, length of antibiotic use, recurrence rate, number of images needed for follow-up, and the final postoperative early and late outcomes. The data was collected through a designed questionnaire and was then analyzed using SPSS version 20. No significant ethical approval was required for this study. Results: Fifty-four patients were operated on through craniotomy (29/54) and burr hole (25/54). Their ages ranged from 1 year to 53 years with an average presentation at 13 years of age. Most patients presented with fever (23.1%), convulsions (16%), vomiting (16.7%) and headache (15.4%). The mean of illness for both groups was almost 2 months. The majority of patients in this study were having no risk factors (38.9%) while the major risk factors seen were cardiac diseases (14.8%), neurosurgical procedures (13%) and otitis media (11.1%). As most patients presented late, the diagnosis of most was made using CT brain with contrast (83.3%). In most of the patients (85.2%) there were no organisms separated in the culture. 8/54 patients had positive cultures, 7/8 were bacterial and only one (1/8) was fungal. Most patients received antibiotics for 45 days postoperatively in both craniotomy and burr hole groups. When both groups were compared, those operated with craniotomy were found to have a relatively higher length of hospital stay, however, no significant difference was found between both groups. Also, it was found that those operated on with craniotomy had a high cure rate and less recurrence in comparison with burr hole group. Deterioration and death were significantly higher among craniotomy group. Only CT brain was used as the imaging modality of choice for follow-up in both groups for 4 months’ duration and it was noted that complete evacuation was significantly higher among craniotomy group while remnants were higher among burr hole group. Conclusion: Brain abscess is still a challenging condition for neurosurgeons in Sudan. The limited number of Sudanese neurosurgeons, neurosurgical centers and diagnostic facilities contributed to delay in diagnosing brain abscess in most patients. It is important to design a strict protocol and precautions for any neurosurgical operation or bedside procedure to prevent infection and subsequent brain abscess development. CT brain with contrast is a good imaging tool for assessing the size, site and stage of brain abscesses. No significant difference between craniotomy or burr hole for clearance from brain abscess in terms of antibiotic used or duration of hospital stay. However, burr hole aspiration is associated with higher rates of recurrences. On the other hand, craniotomy and excision have relatively higher neurologic morbidity postoperative with expectantly higher post-operative hospitalization but no differences in the final outcome. Therefore, the selection of surgical technique should be individualized in each case based on the abscess site size source patient fitness for surgery and neurosurgeon’s preference.展开更多
Objective:To explore the effect of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative myocardial injury in craniotomy.Methods:120 cases of elective craniotomy were divid...Objective:To explore the effect of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative myocardial injury in craniotomy.Methods:120 cases of elective craniotomy were divided into the self-control group(continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent cuff non-invasive blood pressure monitoring,CNAP group)and propensity score matching group(only intermittent cuff non-invasive blood pressure measurement in previous craniotomy,PSM group);Goal-directed hemodynamic management in CNAP group included heart rate(HR),blood pressure(BP),stroke volume(SV),stroke variability(SVV),and systemic vascular resistance index(SVRI).The main index is to compare the troponin level within 72 hours after operation between the CNAP group and the PSM group;The secondary indicators are the comparison of the hemodynamic conditions between the CNAP group and the PSM at 10 specific time points.Results:The incidence of postoperative myocardial injury in the CNAP group was significantly lower than that in the PSM group(12%vs.30%,P=0.01);in the CNAP group hypotensive episodes(6 vs.3,P=0.01),positive balance of fluid therapy(700 vs.500 mL,P<0.001),more use of vasoactive drugs(29 vs.18,P=0.04),more stable hemodynamics medical status(P=0.03)were recorded.Conclusion:The hemodynamic management strategy based on continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring can reduce the incidence of myocardial injury after elective craniotomy and maintain a more stable hemodynamic state.展开更多
目的探讨左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定行头皮神经阻滞(SNB)对开颅手术患者镇痛的有效性。方法选取2021年2月至2023年2月浙江省丽水市中心医院收治的210例行开颅手术患者为研究对象,根据用药方法将其分为左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定SNB复...目的探讨左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定行头皮神经阻滞(SNB)对开颅手术患者镇痛的有效性。方法选取2021年2月至2023年2月浙江省丽水市中心医院收治的210例行开颅手术患者为研究对象,根据用药方法将其分为左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定SNB复合全身麻醉组(LD组)70例,左旋布比卡因SNB复合全身麻醉(L组)70例,与常规全身麻醉组(G组)70例。比较3组的术后疼痛情况、血流动力学、应激水平和不良反应。结果3组术后各时间段视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较,L组、LD组均低于G组,且LD组低于L组(P<0.05)。与术前(T0)比较,3组切皮即刻(T1)、切皮后5 min(T2)、缝皮结束即刻(T3)及苏醒拔管时(T4)平均动脉压、心率均出现明显波动(P<0.05);L组、LD组T1、T2、T3、T4平均动脉压、心率波动幅度较G组小(P<0.05),LD组T1、T2、T3、T4平均动脉压、心率波动幅度较L组小(P<0.05)。3组应激反应指标比较,L组、LD组苏醒拔管时、术后24 h去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)、肾上腺素(EP)水平较G组低(P<0.05);LD组苏醒拔管时、术后24 h EP、NE、Cor水平较L组低(P<0.05)。3组总不良反应发生率比较(26%、13%与14%),差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.790,P=0.091)。结论左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定行SNB可缓解开颅手术患者术后疼痛,减轻机体应激水平,改善血流动力学,且安全性较高。展开更多
目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,...目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,对照组采用经颞叶皮质入路手术治疗,观察组采用经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路手术治疗,比较两组手术情况、血肿清除率、再出血率、术后并发症、术后1个月格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma score,GOS)分级情况及术后1、3、6个月的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表(World Health Organization on quality of life brief scale,WHOQOL-BREF)评分。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、引流管放置时间、行大骨瓣减压例数、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义;观察组开始手术至颅内压下降时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后24 h血肿清除率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组再出血率比较差异无统计学意义。观察组术后1个月预后良好率为81.82%,高于对照组的61.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3、6个月,观察组NIHSS评分均低于对照组,WHOQOL-BREF评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为6.82%,低于对照组的25.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果显著,有助于提升血肿清除率,减少术后并发症发生率,促进术后神经功能的恢复,提高患者预后生存质量。展开更多
基金Supported by The Technology Innovation Guidance Programme of Science and Technology,Department of Hunan Province,No.2020SK51708The Scientific Research Programme of Hunan Provincial Health Commission,No.B2019110 and No.20201959The Hunan Nature Science Foundation,No.S2023JJMSXM1898.
文摘BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)and craniotomy(CI)are the current treatments for spontaneous supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage(SSTICH).AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and CI for the treatment of SSTICH.METHODS Clinical and imaging data of 557 consecutive patients with SSTICH who underwent MIS or CI between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed.The patients were divided into two subgroups:The MIS group and CI group.Propensity score matching was performed to minimise case selection bias.The primary outcome was a dichotomous prognostic(favourable or unfavourable)outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score at 3 months;an mRS score of 0–2 was considered favourable.RESULTS In both conventional statistical and binary logistic regression analyses,the MIS group had a better outcome.The outcome of propensity score matching was unexpected(odds ratio:0.582;95%CI:0.281–1.204;P=0.144),which indicated that,after excluding the interference of each confounder,different surgical modalities were more effective,and there was no significant difference in their prognosis.CONCLUSION Deciding between MIS and CI should be made based on the individual patient,considering the hematoma size,degree of midline shift,cerebral swelling,and preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score.
文摘Background: The eyebrow supraorbital keyhole approach could be considered a modified minimally invasive model for the classic pterional subfrontal approach in which an eyebrow incision and supraorbital mini craniotomy are performed for exposure of the anterior cranial fossa corridor. Methods: This study was retrospectively conducted on twenty four patients, age ranging from 20 to 65 years old, with anterior cranial fossa lesions who were meeting the eligibility criteria for eyebrow craniotomy in the period from August 2019 to January 2023. These patients were operated through eyebrow supraorbital approach in which microscopic endoscopic assisted technique were used. Extent of resection, clinical and cosmetic outcomes and complication incidence were assessed. Results: We included the twenty four patients who met inclusion criteria (17 females and 7 males) their ages ranged from 20 to 65 years. The most common pathology was meningioma in 19 patients. Two patients experienced supraorbital loss of sensation and only one patient experienced palsy of frontalis branch of facial nerve. Frontal sinus was breached in 3 patients with no patient experienced postoperative CSF leak. Total excision was accomplished for 23 patients. Four patients who had preoperative visual compromise, improvement of visual acuity and field defects was observed in 3 patients. No major intraoperative complications occurred. All patients filled cosmetic satisfaction questionnaire during their outpatient visits. For the eyebrow supraorbital approach, no incision related intolerable pain, no craniotomy defects or irregularities, no cosmetic complaints nor limitation of jaw opening were reported, and only minor symptoms in the form of limited eyebrow elevation, swelling and numbness in the forehead. Conclusions: The eyebrow craniotomy could be used safely as a more cosmetic and minimally invasive approach for a variety of anterior cranial fossa lesions. Endoscopic assistance has been found very useful for deeply seated lesions and hidden residuals with minimal brain retraction which couldn’t be accessed easily through microscopic field solely. Endoscopic assisted eyebrow supraorbital keyhole approach could be performed on a wider scale with great results but requires good selection of cases and more practice to expertise the needed skills.
文摘BACKGROUND Deep vein thrombosis(DVT)of the lower extremity is one of the most common postoperative complications,especially after craniocerebral surgery.DVT may lead to pulmonary embolism,which has a devastating impact on patient prognosis.This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of DVT in the lower limbs following craniocerebral surgery.AIM To identify independent risk factors for the development of postoperative DVT and to develop an effective risk prediction model.METHODS The demographic and clinical data of 283 patients who underwent craniocerebral surgery between December 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The independent risk factors for lower extremity DVT were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.A nomogram was created to predict the likelihood of lower extremity DVT in patients who had undergone craniocerebral surgery.The efficacy of the prediction model was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve using the probability of lower extremity DVT for each sample.RESULTS Among all patients included in the analysis,47.7%developed lower extremity DVT following craniocerebral surgery.The risk of postoperative DVT was higher in those with a longer operative time,and patients with intraoperative intermittent pneumatic compression were less likely to develop postoperative DVT.CONCLUSION The incidence of lower extremity DVT following craniocerebral surgery is significant,highlighting the importance of identifying independent risk factors.Interventions such as the use of intermittent pneumatic compression during surgery may prevent the formation of postoperative DVT.
文摘Introduction: The incidence of acute pain after craniotomy differs remarkably in previous studies, and the prevalence of persistent pain is not precisely known. We conducted 6-month follow-up surveys on the incidence and intensity of acute and persistent pain after elective craniotomy. Methods: We carried out a prospective cohort study via a series of structured questionnaires to record acute pain intensity preoperatively and postoperatively, and the incidence of persistent pain 3 and 6 months after a craniotomy in a tertiary care center. Patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were interviewed the day before surgery, postoperatively before discharge from the hospital, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Pain was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0 - 10) at rest and movement, as well as expectations of pain before surgery, efficacy of pain therapy, and satisfaction with pain treatment. The incidence of adverse events, sleep time and interruptions caused by pain, different pain types, and drugs used for pain treatment were also recorded. Results: A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the preoperative questionnaire;123 (81%) completed postoperative questionnaire and 108 (72%) completed the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The average pain score at the time of the postoperative questionnaire was moderate, 4 at rest and 5 upon movement. The percentage of patients experiencing mild pain at rest and upon movement was 52% and 49%, and moderate pain was 15% and 16%, respectively. Severe postoperative pain was detected in 5% and 8% of patients at rest and upon movement, respectively. Three months after surgery, 6% of patients reported mild pain at rest, 3% moderate pain at rest, and 1% severe pain at rest. Persistent mild and moderate pain at rest after 6 months was reported by 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%) and abdominal discomfort (8%). During postoperative pain treatment in the intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit, 92% of patients received acetaminophen, 88% fentanyl, and 24% oxycodone. During neurosurgical ward care, ibuprofen was used in 61% of patients. Satisfaction with analgesia was high throughout the study period with a median satisfaction score of 9 postoperatively and 10 at 3 and 6 months on the 0 - 10 scale. Conclusion: The findings indicate that most patients experience moderate or mild pain after craniotomy, but patient satisfaction with pain treatment is high. Persistent pain after 3 and 6 months is rare and mild in nature.
文摘Introduction: Brain abscess represents 8% of intracranial masses in developing countries. Despite the advances in neuro-imaging, still, the diagnosis of brain abscess is difficult and may need a biopsy in most cases to verify the diagnosis because may even lead to death. CT scan with contrast is a good tool for diagnosing and localizing brain abscesses in late stages, however, it is difficult to diagnose them in the early stages. The development of MRI helps to more accurately diagnose brain abscess. Surgical management of brain abscesses is either medical or surgical through craniotomy or burr holes. Indications of each are still a point of debate among most neurosurgeons. Methodology: This is a descriptive longitudinal prospective study to compare the outcomes of two surgical procedures used in The National Centre for Neurological Sciences-Khartoum-Sudan (NCNS) from 2012 to 2015, craniotomy and excision of the abscess membrane versus burr hole and aspiration of brain abscess in terms of duration of hospitalization, length of antibiotic use, recurrence rate, number of images needed for follow-up, and the final postoperative early and late outcomes. The data was collected through a designed questionnaire and was then analyzed using SPSS version 20. No significant ethical approval was required for this study. Results: Fifty-four patients were operated on through craniotomy (29/54) and burr hole (25/54). Their ages ranged from 1 year to 53 years with an average presentation at 13 years of age. Most patients presented with fever (23.1%), convulsions (16%), vomiting (16.7%) and headache (15.4%). The mean of illness for both groups was almost 2 months. The majority of patients in this study were having no risk factors (38.9%) while the major risk factors seen were cardiac diseases (14.8%), neurosurgical procedures (13%) and otitis media (11.1%). As most patients presented late, the diagnosis of most was made using CT brain with contrast (83.3%). In most of the patients (85.2%) there were no organisms separated in the culture. 8/54 patients had positive cultures, 7/8 were bacterial and only one (1/8) was fungal. Most patients received antibiotics for 45 days postoperatively in both craniotomy and burr hole groups. When both groups were compared, those operated with craniotomy were found to have a relatively higher length of hospital stay, however, no significant difference was found between both groups. Also, it was found that those operated on with craniotomy had a high cure rate and less recurrence in comparison with burr hole group. Deterioration and death were significantly higher among craniotomy group. Only CT brain was used as the imaging modality of choice for follow-up in both groups for 4 months’ duration and it was noted that complete evacuation was significantly higher among craniotomy group while remnants were higher among burr hole group. Conclusion: Brain abscess is still a challenging condition for neurosurgeons in Sudan. The limited number of Sudanese neurosurgeons, neurosurgical centers and diagnostic facilities contributed to delay in diagnosing brain abscess in most patients. It is important to design a strict protocol and precautions for any neurosurgical operation or bedside procedure to prevent infection and subsequent brain abscess development. CT brain with contrast is a good imaging tool for assessing the size, site and stage of brain abscesses. No significant difference between craniotomy or burr hole for clearance from brain abscess in terms of antibiotic used or duration of hospital stay. However, burr hole aspiration is associated with higher rates of recurrences. On the other hand, craniotomy and excision have relatively higher neurologic morbidity postoperative with expectantly higher post-operative hospitalization but no differences in the final outcome. Therefore, the selection of surgical technique should be individualized in each case based on the abscess site size source patient fitness for surgery and neurosurgeon’s preference.
文摘Objective:To explore the effect of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative myocardial injury in craniotomy.Methods:120 cases of elective craniotomy were divided into the self-control group(continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent cuff non-invasive blood pressure monitoring,CNAP group)and propensity score matching group(only intermittent cuff non-invasive blood pressure measurement in previous craniotomy,PSM group);Goal-directed hemodynamic management in CNAP group included heart rate(HR),blood pressure(BP),stroke volume(SV),stroke variability(SVV),and systemic vascular resistance index(SVRI).The main index is to compare the troponin level within 72 hours after operation between the CNAP group and the PSM group;The secondary indicators are the comparison of the hemodynamic conditions between the CNAP group and the PSM at 10 specific time points.Results:The incidence of postoperative myocardial injury in the CNAP group was significantly lower than that in the PSM group(12%vs.30%,P=0.01);in the CNAP group hypotensive episodes(6 vs.3,P=0.01),positive balance of fluid therapy(700 vs.500 mL,P<0.001),more use of vasoactive drugs(29 vs.18,P=0.04),more stable hemodynamics medical status(P=0.03)were recorded.Conclusion:The hemodynamic management strategy based on continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring can reduce the incidence of myocardial injury after elective craniotomy and maintain a more stable hemodynamic state.
文摘目的探讨左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定行头皮神经阻滞(SNB)对开颅手术患者镇痛的有效性。方法选取2021年2月至2023年2月浙江省丽水市中心医院收治的210例行开颅手术患者为研究对象,根据用药方法将其分为左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定SNB复合全身麻醉组(LD组)70例,左旋布比卡因SNB复合全身麻醉(L组)70例,与常规全身麻醉组(G组)70例。比较3组的术后疼痛情况、血流动力学、应激水平和不良反应。结果3组术后各时间段视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较,L组、LD组均低于G组,且LD组低于L组(P<0.05)。与术前(T0)比较,3组切皮即刻(T1)、切皮后5 min(T2)、缝皮结束即刻(T3)及苏醒拔管时(T4)平均动脉压、心率均出现明显波动(P<0.05);L组、LD组T1、T2、T3、T4平均动脉压、心率波动幅度较G组小(P<0.05),LD组T1、T2、T3、T4平均动脉压、心率波动幅度较L组小(P<0.05)。3组应激反应指标比较,L组、LD组苏醒拔管时、术后24 h去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)、肾上腺素(EP)水平较G组低(P<0.05);LD组苏醒拔管时、术后24 h EP、NE、Cor水平较L组低(P<0.05)。3组总不良反应发生率比较(26%、13%与14%),差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.790,P=0.091)。结论左旋布比卡因联合右美托咪定行SNB可缓解开颅手术患者术后疼痛,减轻机体应激水平,改善血流动力学,且安全性较高。
文摘目的分析不同入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法选取2019年1月至2022年3月丰城市人民医院收治的88例基底节区高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组44例。两组均行小骨窗开颅显微手术,对照组采用经颞叶皮质入路手术治疗,观察组采用经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路手术治疗,比较两组手术情况、血肿清除率、再出血率、术后并发症、术后1个月格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma score,GOS)分级情况及术后1、3、6个月的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表(World Health Organization on quality of life brief scale,WHOQOL-BREF)评分。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、引流管放置时间、行大骨瓣减压例数、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义;观察组开始手术至颅内压下降时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后24 h血肿清除率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组再出血率比较差异无统计学意义。观察组术后1个月预后良好率为81.82%,高于对照组的61.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3、6个月,观察组NIHSS评分均低于对照组,WHOQOL-BREF评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为6.82%,低于对照组的25.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经侧裂下Rolandic点-岛叶入路小骨窗开颅显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果显著,有助于提升血肿清除率,减少术后并发症发生率,促进术后神经功能的恢复,提高患者预后生存质量。
