The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale(ASRS) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(SRS) have been widely used for screening autism spectrum disorder(ASD) in the general population during epidemiological studies, but studies o...The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale(ASRS) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(SRS) have been widely used for screening autism spectrum disorder(ASD) in the general population during epidemiological studies, but studies of individuals with intellectual disability(ID) are quite limited. Therefore, we recruited the parents/caregivers of 204 ASD cases, 71 ID cases aged 6–18 years from special education schools, and 402 typically developing(TD) children in the same age span from a communitybased population to complete the ASRS and SRS. The results showed that the ID group scored significantly lower on total and subscale scores than the ASD group on both scales(P \ 0.05) but higher than TD children(P \ 0.05).Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated a similar fair performance in discriminating ASD from ID with the ASRS(area under the curve(AUC) = 0.709,sensitivity = 77.0%, specificity = 52.1%, positive predictive value(PPV) = 82.2%) and the SRS(AUC = 0.742,sensitivity = 59.8%, specificity = 77.5%, PPV = 88.4%).The results showed that individuals with ID had clear autistic traits and discriminating ASD from ID cases was quite challenging, while assessment tools such as ASRS and SRS, help to some degree.展开更多
The reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorder（ASD） has been increasing rapidly in many parts of the world. However, data on its prevalence in China are largely missing. Here, we assessed the suitability of the...The reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorder（ASD） has been increasing rapidly in many parts of the world. However, data on its prevalence in China are largely missing. Here, we assessed the suitability of the modi？ed Chinese version of a newly-developed ASD screening tool, the Modi？ed Chinese Autism Spectrum Rating Scales（MC-ASRS） in screening for ASD in Chi nese children aged 6–12 years, through comparison with the Social Responsiveness Scale（SRS） that has been widely used for ASD screening. We recruited the par ents/caregivers of 1588 typically-developing children and190 children with ASD aged 6–12 years to complete the MC-ASRS and SRS, and evaluated the validity of both scales in discriminating children with ASD from those developing typically. The results showed that MC-ASRSperformed as well as SRS in sensitivity, speci？city, and area-under-the-curve（both [0.95） in receiver operating characteristic analysis, with a fair false-negative rate.These results suggest that MC-ASRS is a promising tool for screening for children with ASD in the general Chinese population.展开更多
该研究编制了适用于我国体育彩票市场的数字、乐透型彩票购彩行为评价量表(Scale of Gambling Behavior of Numbers and Lotto Lottery,以下简称SGB),包括迷信行为、控制失调、追逐行为、中介行为和号码关联5个维度,共15个条目。采用效...该研究编制了适用于我国体育彩票市场的数字、乐透型彩票购彩行为评价量表(Scale of Gambling Behavior of Numbers and Lotto Lottery,以下简称SGB),包括迷信行为、控制失调、追逐行为、中介行为和号码关联5个维度,共15个条目。采用效标效度、购彩者分类得分评价、对应分析、回归分析等方法对量表在甄别问题购彩者以及与购彩认知的关联度进行系统评价。统计结果显示,5个维度的量表因子结构稳定,各模型适配指标较为理想,模型与数据拟合程度较好,量表整体Cronbach’s α系数为0.862,5个维度Cronbach’s α系数区间为0.727~0.894,所有相关系数都具有统计学意义。分析结果认为,SGB有能力验证购彩者的消费问题,各维度得分升高时,有明显向问题购彩者发展的趋势,且能有效区分不同类型;行为向问题演化时,认知情况逐渐恶化,趋势较为明显;控制失调维度是判断购彩者是否开始出现问题的首要判断依据,受到控制错觉和无力戒赌两个认知维度的显著影响,同时在与迷信和代买两种行为的互动中使购彩者陷入消费的恶性循环;量表具有良好的信效度和稳定的结构,各评价指标符合心理学和统计学标准,各维度在判断购彩者行为变化中表现出良好的适应性和可操作性,可用于对我国体育彩票购彩者购彩行为的测量评价。展开更多
不当的企业社会责任(Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR)表现会让消费者感知企业伪善,从而产生极负面的影响。但"伪善"概念刚经由社会心理学引入营销学领域,亟需准确定义和科学的量表。为此,将以中国文化为背景,通过系列研...不当的企业社会责任(Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR)表现会让消费者感知企业伪善,从而产生极负面的影响。但"伪善"概念刚经由社会心理学引入营销学领域,亟需准确定义和科学的量表。为此,将以中国文化为背景,通过系列研究,(1)探究CSR活动中消费者感知企业伪善的内涵并与相关概念区分;(2)揭示企业伪善的构成结构,开发多维度的企业伪善量表并进行严格的信度、效度检验;(3)探索其前因后果,特别是实证检验其对消费者态度和行为三个层面的影响。展开更多
基金supported by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (201302002 ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT 02200679)
文摘The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale(ASRS) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(SRS) have been widely used for screening autism spectrum disorder(ASD) in the general population during epidemiological studies, but studies of individuals with intellectual disability(ID) are quite limited. Therefore, we recruited the parents/caregivers of 204 ASD cases, 71 ID cases aged 6–18 years from special education schools, and 402 typically developing(TD) children in the same age span from a communitybased population to complete the ASRS and SRS. The results showed that the ID group scored significantly lower on total and subscale scores than the ASD group on both scales(P \ 0.05) but higher than TD children(P \ 0.05).Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated a similar fair performance in discriminating ASD from ID with the ASRS(area under the curve(AUC) = 0.709,sensitivity = 77.0%, specificity = 52.1%, positive predictive value(PPV) = 82.2%) and the SRS(AUC = 0.742,sensitivity = 59.8%, specificity = 77.5%, PPV = 88.4%).The results showed that individuals with ID had clear autistic traits and discriminating ASD from ID cases was quite challenging, while assessment tools such as ASRS and SRS, help to some degree.
基金supported by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China(201302002)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81371270Clinical Trials.gov number NCT 02200679)
文摘The reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorder（ASD） has been increasing rapidly in many parts of the world. However, data on its prevalence in China are largely missing. Here, we assessed the suitability of the modi？ed Chinese version of a newly-developed ASD screening tool, the Modi？ed Chinese Autism Spectrum Rating Scales（MC-ASRS） in screening for ASD in Chi nese children aged 6–12 years, through comparison with the Social Responsiveness Scale（SRS） that has been widely used for ASD screening. We recruited the par ents/caregivers of 1588 typically-developing children and190 children with ASD aged 6–12 years to complete the MC-ASRS and SRS, and evaluated the validity of both scales in discriminating children with ASD from those developing typically. The results showed that MC-ASRSperformed as well as SRS in sensitivity, speci？city, and area-under-the-curve（both [0.95） in receiver operating characteristic analysis, with a fair false-negative rate.These results suggest that MC-ASRS is a promising tool for screening for children with ASD in the general Chinese population.
文摘该研究编制了适用于我国体育彩票市场的数字、乐透型彩票购彩行为评价量表(Scale of Gambling Behavior of Numbers and Lotto Lottery,以下简称SGB),包括迷信行为、控制失调、追逐行为、中介行为和号码关联5个维度,共15个条目。采用效标效度、购彩者分类得分评价、对应分析、回归分析等方法对量表在甄别问题购彩者以及与购彩认知的关联度进行系统评价。统计结果显示,5个维度的量表因子结构稳定,各模型适配指标较为理想,模型与数据拟合程度较好,量表整体Cronbach’s α系数为0.862,5个维度Cronbach’s α系数区间为0.727~0.894,所有相关系数都具有统计学意义。分析结果认为,SGB有能力验证购彩者的消费问题,各维度得分升高时,有明显向问题购彩者发展的趋势,且能有效区分不同类型;行为向问题演化时,认知情况逐渐恶化,趋势较为明显;控制失调维度是判断购彩者是否开始出现问题的首要判断依据,受到控制错觉和无力戒赌两个认知维度的显著影响,同时在与迷信和代买两种行为的互动中使购彩者陷入消费的恶性循环;量表具有良好的信效度和稳定的结构,各评价指标符合心理学和统计学标准,各维度在判断购彩者行为变化中表现出良好的适应性和可操作性,可用于对我国体育彩票购彩者购彩行为的测量评价。
文摘不当的企业社会责任(Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR)表现会让消费者感知企业伪善,从而产生极负面的影响。但"伪善"概念刚经由社会心理学引入营销学领域,亟需准确定义和科学的量表。为此,将以中国文化为背景,通过系列研究,(1)探究CSR活动中消费者感知企业伪善的内涵并与相关概念区分;(2)揭示企业伪善的构成结构,开发多维度的企业伪善量表并进行严格的信度、效度检验;(3)探索其前因后果,特别是实证检验其对消费者态度和行为三个层面的影响。
