目的探讨骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)术后再骨折风险,构建风险预测模型,确定有效防治措施。方法选取2021年8月至2022年6月北京积水潭医院收治的119例OVCF患者作为研究对象,根据术后再骨...目的探讨骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)术后再骨折风险,构建风险预测模型,确定有效防治措施。方法选取2021年8月至2022年6月北京积水潭医院收治的119例OVCF患者作为研究对象,根据术后再骨折与否分为再发组和非再发组,其中再发组22例,男11例,女11例;年龄55~86岁,平均(72.02±5.58)岁。非再发组97例,男50例,女47例;年龄55~86岁,平均(70.79±6.81)岁。统计两组一般资料,采用Lasso-Logistic回归模型筛选OVCF术后再发骨折自变量,采用赤池信息准则(Akaike’s information criterion,AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(Bayesian information criterion,BIC)比较全变量Logistic回归、逐步Logistic、Lasso-Logistic回归预测效能,构建诺莫图模型,采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)、校准曲线分析OVCF术后再发骨折诺莫图模型效能。结果术后随访8~20个月,平均(12.00±2.40)个月。单因素分析显示,再发组身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、骨密度T值、抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶(tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b,TPACP-5b)、核因子kB受体激活因子配体(receptor acti-vator nuclear factor kappa B ligand,RANKL)、骨保护素(osteoprotegrin,OPG)、术后抗骨质疏松治疗、白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-17、长期糖皮质激素使用史、脊柱畸形指数(spinal deformity index,SDI)值、手术段Cobb角、后凸角度与非再发组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Lasso-Logistic回归模型分析显示lambda.lse值0.049为最优模型,此时进入模型的变量涉及骨密度、SDI值、IL-17、术后抗骨质疏松治疗,经BIC、AIC验证表明所构建模型拟合和预测效果相对较好;诺莫图模型的ROC下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.865,敏感度及特异度分别为95.45%、68.04%,且校准曲线显示,其预测效能与实际吻合较好。结论OVCF术后再骨折的发生受围手术期多方面影响,涉及骨密度T值、SDI值、IL-17、术后抗骨质疏松治疗,基于以上因素可有效预测患者再骨折风险,为临床防治再骨折提供参考依据。展开更多
目的:经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数及继发邻椎骨折的影响。方法:选取112例OVCF患者为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为PVP组[椎体成形术(PVP)治疗]和PKP组(PKP治疗),每组各56例。比...目的:经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数及继发邻椎骨折的影响。方法:选取112例OVCF患者为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为PVP组[椎体成形术(PVP)治疗]和PKP组(PKP治疗),每组各56例。比较两组患者围手术期指标(骨水泥量、手术时间及住院时间)、并发症(骨水泥渗漏、术后感染)发生情况、术前及术后6个月疼痛程度[视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评分]、日常生活功能障碍[功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)评分]、影像学参数[胸椎后凸角(TK)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆入射角(PI)、脊柱骶骨角(SSA)]及继发骨折情况。结果:PKP组患者使用骨水泥量、手术时间高于PVP组(P<0.05)。两组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后7 d、6个月,两组患者VAS评分、ODI评分均逐渐降低(P<0.05),且术后7 d PKP组低于PVP组(P<0.05);术后6个月,两组TK均降低(P<0.05),LL、PT、SSA均升高(P<0.05),且术后6个月两组患者TK、LL差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者继发骨折率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:相较于PVP,PKP治疗OVCF手术时间较长,但可有效减轻患者术后疼痛,改善术后日常活动功能障碍,有利于改善脊柱矢状面平衡,值得临床推广。展开更多
<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span st...<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the robotic device used in lower limb rehabilitation to reduce motor impairment and improve motor performance in patients with traumatic spinal injury.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The data were obtained by retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lower extremity rehabilitation after traumatic spinal injury by robot-assisted rehabilitation in the hospital between December 2017 and December 2019. The results were statistically analyzed and shown as mean ± SD (min-max).</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A total of 51 patients with mean age of 59.51 ± 8.2 (38</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">72) were admitted to the clinic. Mean ages of thirty-one male patients and twenty females patients were 58.74 ± 8.88 (38 - 77) and 60.7 ± 7.09 (44</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">72), respectively. Comparing ages in terms of gender, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.441). Body mass indexes of male patients were 32.84 ± 6.52 (20 - 48) and 31.4 ± 7.73 (18 - 48) for females. Body mass index of patients was not statistically significant in terms of their gender (p = 0.478). Oswestry disability index scores were 32.04 ± 10.74 (16 - 58) before treatment and 30.69 ± 10.31 (15 - 55) after treatment. Oswestry disability index values before and after robotic rehabilitation were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Significant improvement was observed in ASIA scale values after rehabilitation.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The motor function gains obtained during the robot-assisted treatment of traumatic spinal injury patients showed robotic device was useful in the training program. Robotic rehabilitation was effective in the improvement of the lower extremities during motor examination.</span></span></span>展开更多
文摘目的探讨骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)术后再骨折风险,构建风险预测模型,确定有效防治措施。方法选取2021年8月至2022年6月北京积水潭医院收治的119例OVCF患者作为研究对象,根据术后再骨折与否分为再发组和非再发组,其中再发组22例,男11例,女11例;年龄55~86岁,平均(72.02±5.58)岁。非再发组97例,男50例,女47例;年龄55~86岁,平均(70.79±6.81)岁。统计两组一般资料,采用Lasso-Logistic回归模型筛选OVCF术后再发骨折自变量,采用赤池信息准则(Akaike’s information criterion,AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(Bayesian information criterion,BIC)比较全变量Logistic回归、逐步Logistic、Lasso-Logistic回归预测效能,构建诺莫图模型,采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)、校准曲线分析OVCF术后再发骨折诺莫图模型效能。结果术后随访8~20个月,平均(12.00±2.40)个月。单因素分析显示,再发组身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、骨密度T值、抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶(tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b,TPACP-5b)、核因子kB受体激活因子配体(receptor acti-vator nuclear factor kappa B ligand,RANKL)、骨保护素(osteoprotegrin,OPG)、术后抗骨质疏松治疗、白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-17、长期糖皮质激素使用史、脊柱畸形指数(spinal deformity index,SDI)值、手术段Cobb角、后凸角度与非再发组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Lasso-Logistic回归模型分析显示lambda.lse值0.049为最优模型,此时进入模型的变量涉及骨密度、SDI值、IL-17、术后抗骨质疏松治疗,经BIC、AIC验证表明所构建模型拟合和预测效果相对较好;诺莫图模型的ROC下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.865,敏感度及特异度分别为95.45%、68.04%,且校准曲线显示,其预测效能与实际吻合较好。结论OVCF术后再骨折的发生受围手术期多方面影响,涉及骨密度T值、SDI值、IL-17、术后抗骨质疏松治疗,基于以上因素可有效预测患者再骨折风险,为临床防治再骨折提供参考依据。
文摘目的:经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数及继发邻椎骨折的影响。方法:选取112例OVCF患者为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为PVP组[椎体成形术(PVP)治疗]和PKP组(PKP治疗),每组各56例。比较两组患者围手术期指标(骨水泥量、手术时间及住院时间)、并发症(骨水泥渗漏、术后感染)发生情况、术前及术后6个月疼痛程度[视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评分]、日常生活功能障碍[功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)评分]、影像学参数[胸椎后凸角(TK)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆入射角(PI)、脊柱骶骨角(SSA)]及继发骨折情况。结果:PKP组患者使用骨水泥量、手术时间高于PVP组(P<0.05)。两组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后7 d、6个月,两组患者VAS评分、ODI评分均逐渐降低(P<0.05),且术后7 d PKP组低于PVP组(P<0.05);术后6个月,两组TK均降低(P<0.05),LL、PT、SSA均升高(P<0.05),且术后6个月两组患者TK、LL差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者继发骨折率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:相较于PVP,PKP治疗OVCF手术时间较长,但可有效减轻患者术后疼痛,改善术后日常活动功能障碍,有利于改善脊柱矢状面平衡,值得临床推广。
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the robotic device used in lower limb rehabilitation to reduce motor impairment and improve motor performance in patients with traumatic spinal injury.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The data were obtained by retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lower extremity rehabilitation after traumatic spinal injury by robot-assisted rehabilitation in the hospital between December 2017 and December 2019. The results were statistically analyzed and shown as mean ± SD (min-max).</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A total of 51 patients with mean age of 59.51 ± 8.2 (38</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">72) were admitted to the clinic. Mean ages of thirty-one male patients and twenty females patients were 58.74 ± 8.88 (38 - 77) and 60.7 ± 7.09 (44</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">72), respectively. Comparing ages in terms of gender, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.441). Body mass indexes of male patients were 32.84 ± 6.52 (20 - 48) and 31.4 ± 7.73 (18 - 48) for females. Body mass index of patients was not statistically significant in terms of their gender (p = 0.478). Oswestry disability index scores were 32.04 ± 10.74 (16 - 58) before treatment and 30.69 ± 10.31 (15 - 55) after treatment. Oswestry disability index values before and after robotic rehabilitation were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Significant improvement was observed in ASIA scale values after rehabilitation.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The motor function gains obtained during the robot-assisted treatment of traumatic spinal injury patients showed robotic device was useful in the training program. Robotic rehabilitation was effective in the improvement of the lower extremities during motor examination.</span></span></span>