Outcomes of colon self-expandable metal stents for malignant vs benign indications at a tertiary care center and review of literature

BACKGROUND Endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent(SEMS)is a minimally invasive treatment for use in malignant and benign colonic obstruction.However,their widespread use is still limited with a nationwide analysis showing only 5.4%of patients with colon obstruction undergoing stent placement.This underutilization could be due to perceived increase risk of complications with stent placement.AIM To review long-and short-term clinical success of SEMS use for colonic obstruction at our center.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all the patients who underwent colonic SEMS placement over aeighteen year period (August 2004 through August 2022) at our academic center. Demographicsincluding age, gender, indication (malignant and benign), technical success, clinical success,complications (perforation, stent migration), mortality, and outcomes were recorded.RESULTSSixty three patients underwent colon SEMS over an 18-year period. Fifty-five cases were formalignant indications, 8 were for benign conditions. The benign strictures included diverticulardisease stricturing (n = 4), fistula closure (n = 2), extrinsic fibroid compression (n = 1), and ischemicstricture (n = 1). Forty-three of the malignant cases were due to intrinsic obstruction from primaryor recurrent colon cancer;12 were from extrinsic compression. Fifty-four strictures occurred on theleft side, 3 occurred on the right and the rest in transverse colon. The total malignant case (n = 55)procedural success rate was 95% vs 100% for benign cases (P = 1.0, NS). Overall complication ratewas significantly higher for benign group: Four complications were observed in the malignantgroup (stent migration, restenosis) vs 2 of 8 (25%) for benign obstruction (1-perforation, 1-stentmigration) (P = 0.02). When stratifying complications of perforation and stent migration there wasno significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.14, NS).CONCLUSIONColon SEMS remains a worthwhile option for colonic obstruction related to malignancy and has ahigh procedural and clinical success rate. Benign indications for SEMS placement appear to havesimilar success to malignant. While there appears to be a higher overall complication rate inbenign cases, our study is limited by sample size. When evaluating for perforation alone theredoes not appear to be any significant difference between the two groups. SEMS placement may bea practical option for indications other that malignant obstruction. Interventional endoscopistsshould be aware and discuss the risk for complications in setting of benign conditions. Indicationsin these cases should be discussed in a multi-disciplinary fashion with colorectal surgery.

Cholangiopancreatography troubleshooting:the usefulness of endoscopic retrieval of migrated biliary and pancreatic stents

BACKGROUND:Stent migration in the hepatopancreatic duct might arise as one of the rare complications associated with biliary or pancreatic stenting.Although there are some procedures to retrieve the migrated stent,including surgical,percutaneous,and endoscopic approaches,endoscopy should be attempted first because it is least invasive.This study set out to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic retrieval of migrated biliary and pancreatic stents.METHODS:Plastic stents that migrated in the bile duct(35 patients)or pancreatic duct(2)were retrieved with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Devices used were snare forceps,a basket catheter,grasping forceps,biopsy forceps,a balloon catheter,and the Soehendra stent retriever.RESULTS:Endoscopic retrieval of migrated stents was performed successfully in 36(97.0%)of the 37 patients.The devices utilized for successful treatment were basket catheter(13 patients),grasping forceps(10),snare forceps(8),balloon catheter(3),biopsy forceps(1),and the Soehendra stent retriever(1).The unsuccessfully treated patient with chronic pancreatitis underwent surgery since the guide wire did not move forward due to bile duct stenosis,and there was also duodenal stenosis.One patient developed mild pancreatitis after withdrawal of the stent;the pancreatitis was relieved with conservative treatment.CONCLUSIONS:Endoscopic retrieval of migrated biliary and pancreatic stents appears to be useful because of its safety and low invasiveness.However,various forceps should be prepared for the retrieval of a migrated stent.

Fully covered metal biliary stents: A review of the literature

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents(FCSEMS)represent the latest advancement of metal biliary stents used to endoscopically treat a variety of obstructive biliary pathology.A large stent diameter and synthetic covering over the tubular mesh prolong stent patency and reduce risk for tissue hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth.Additionally,FCSEMS can be easily removed.All these features address issues faced by plastic and uncovered metal stents.The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively review the application of FCSEMS in benign and malignant biliary strictures,biliary leak,and post-sphincterotomy bleeding.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreaticogastrostomy for symptomatic pancreatic duct obstruction caused by migrated pancreatic stent

Endoscopic pancreatic stenting has been widely used in various pancreatic conditions. With the increasing use of pancreatic stents, many complications have been recognized. Especially, proximal stent migration presents a serious condition because of subsequent pancreatic duct obstruction, impaired drainage, ductal dilation, and pancreatic pain. Although endoscopic retrieval is the preferred treatment for proximally migrated pancreatic stents, it is not always successful, resulting in conversion to surgery. To date, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage(EUS-PD) has never been reported for treatment of pancreatic duct obstruction caused by proximally migrated pancreatic stent. We herein describe a case of pancreatic duct rupture and obstruction caused by proximally migrated pancreatic stent that was successfully treated by EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy while keeping the former stent in situ after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We believe that this report adds to the increasing evidence of symptomatic pancreatic duct obstruction being successfully treated by EUS-PD.

Small bowel perforation from a migrated biliary stent: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Bowel perforation from biliary stent migration is a serious potential complication of biliary stents,but fortunately has an incidence of less than 1%.CASE SUMMARY We report a case of a 54-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of Human Immunodeficiency virus with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,alcoholic liver cirrhosis,portal vein thrombosis and extensive past surgical history who presented with acute abdominal pain and local peritonitis.On further evaluation she was diagnosed with small bowel perforation secondary to migrated biliary stents and underwent exploratory laparotomy with therapeutic intervention.CONCLUSION This case presentation reports on the unusual finding of two migrated biliary stents,with one causing perforation.In addition,we review the relevant literature on migrated stents.

The Placement of Esophageal Stents in Different Esophageal Disease Related Conditions—A Review

In the past, the esophagus diseases causing the patient to unable to intake oral diet such as esophageal strictures, leaks, tracheoesophageal fistulas, etc. were managed by surgical interventions and parenteral nutrition to meet the demand of the body. After the development of technique of stent placement in esopahgus, there was revolutionary change in the management of such conditions promoting patients to take diet orally and improve their nutritional status as well as quality of life. Different types of commercial stents are available in the market with their own pros and cons. Our aim of this study was to review the different stents being used currently in the clinical practice, comparing the stents on their therapeutic outcome and complications, optimal timing of removal of stents for benign conditions and the methods studied by different clinicians to lower the rate of complications and reinterventions.