Folfirinox chemotherapy prolongs stent patency in patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to unresectable pancreatic cancer

Background:Stent insertion for biliary decompression to relieve jaundice and subsequent biliary infection is necessary for patients with biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer,and it is important to keep the stent patent as long as possible.However,few studies have compared stent patency in terms of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.This study aimed to evaluate the differences in stent patency in terms of recently evolving chemotherapy.Methods:Between January 2015 and May 2017,161 patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone biliary stent insertion with a metal stent were retrospectively analyzed.The relationship between chemotherapy and stent patency was assessed.Additionally,overall survival according to the treatment,risk factors for stent patency,and long-term adverse events were evaluated.Results:Median stent patency was 42 days for patients with the best supportive care and 217 days for patients with chemotherapy(conventional gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and folfirinox)(P<0.001).Furthermore,the folfirinox group showed the longest median stent patency and overall survival,with 283 days and 466 days,respectively(P<0.001)despite higher adverse events rate.Patients who underwent folfirinox chemotherapy after stent insertion had better stent patency in multivariate analysis(HR=0.26;95%CI:0.12–0.60;P=0.001).Conclusions:Compared with patients who received best supportive care only,patients who underwent chemotherapy after stent insertion had better stent patency.More prolonged stent patency can be expected for patients with folfirinox than conventional gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Effect of external beam radiotherapy on patency of uncovered metallic stents in patients with inoperable bile duct cancer

BACKGROUND： Although biliary decompression with metallic stenting is the preferred treatment for inoperable bile duct cancer（BDC）, maintenance of patency is still unsatisfactory.We tried to assess the effectiveness and safety of external beam radiotherapy（EBRT） for prolonging stent patency in patients having uncovered metallic stents.METHOD： We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who received endoscopic stenting, of whom 18 received EBRT（RT group） and 32 did not（non-RT group）.RESULTS： No difference was found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Although stent patency was longer in the RT group than that in the non-RT group（140.7±51.3 vs136.4±34.9 days, P=0.94）, the difference was not statistically significant. There were a lower rate of stent occlusion（27.8% vs50.0% of patients, P=0.12） and a longer overall survival（420.1 ±73.2 vs 269.1±41.7 days, P=0.11） in the RT group than in the non-RT group, and the difference again was not statistically significant. The development of adverse reactions did not differ（55.6% vs 53.1% of patients, P=0.91）. There was no serious adverse reaction in both groups（P=0.99）.CONCLUSIONS： EBRT did not significantly improve stent patency in patients with inoperable BDC having uncovered metallic stents. However, EBRT was safe. Future trials withrefined protocols for better efficacy are expected.