The efficacy of full-thickness endoscopic resection of subepithelial tumors in the gastric cardia

BACKGROUND Gastric subepithelial tumors(SETs)may harbor potential malignancy.Although it is well recognized that large SETs should be resected,the precise treatment strategy remains controversial.Compared to surgical resection,endoscopic resection(ER)has many advantages;however,ER of SETs in the cardia is challenging.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)for the treatment of gastric cardia SETs.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with SETs originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric cardia that were treated by EFTR or submucosal tunneling ER(STER)at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University between November 2014 and May 2022.Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes,including procedure times and complications rates,were compared between groups of patients receiving EFTR and STER.RESULTS A total of 171 tumors were successfully removed[71(41.5%)tumors in the EFTR and 100(58.5%)tumors in the STER group].Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)were the most common SET.The en bloc resection rate was 100%in the EFTR group vs 97.0%in STER group(P>0.05).Overall,the EFTR group had a higher complete resection rate than the STER group(98.6%vs 91.0%,P<0.05).The procedure time was also shorter in the EFTR group(44.63±28.66 min vs 53.36±27.34,P<0.05).The most common major complication in both groups was electrocoagulation syndrome.There was no significant difference in total complications between the two groups(21.1%vs 22.0%,P=0.89).CONCLUSION EFTR of gastric cardia SETs is a very promising method to facilitate complete resection with similar complications and reduced operative times compared to STER.In cases of suspected GISTs or an unclear diagnosis,EFTR should be recommended to ensure complete resection.

Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery had been tailored to individual cases of gastric subepithelial tumors(SETs)after comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection(ER),laparoscopic resection(LR),and hybrid methods.AIM To study the use of Goldilocks principle to determine the best form of minimally invasive surgery for gastric SETs.METHODS In this retrospective study,194 patients of gastric SETs with high probability of surgical intervention were included.All patients underwent tumor resection in the operating theater between January 2013 and December 2021.The patients were divided into two groups,ER or LR,according to the tumor characteristics and the initial intent of intervention.Few patients in the ER group required further backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER.The patients who had converted open surgery were excluded.A logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of a treatment strategy.The area under the curve was used to assess the discriminative ability of tumor size and Youden’s index to determine the optimal cut-off tumor size.RESULTS One-hundred ninety-four patients(100 in the ER group and 94 in the LR group)underwent tumor resection in the operating theater.In the ER group,27 patients required backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER.The patients in the ER group had small tumor sizes and shorter procedure durations while the patients in the LR group had large tumor sizes,exophytic growth,malignancy,and tumors that were more often located in the middle or lower third of the stomach.Both groups had similar durations of hospital stays and a similar rate of major postoperative complications.The patients in the ER group who underwent backup surgery required longer procedures(56.4 min)and prolonged stays(2 d)compared to the patients in the LR group without the increased rate of major postoperative complications.The optimal cut-off point for the tumor size for laparoscopic surgery was 2.15 cm.CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary teamwork leads to the adoption of different strategies to yield efficient clinical outcomes according to the tumor characteristics.

Wedge gastrectomy:Robot-assisted with a hand-sewn repair versus a laparoscopic linear stapler technique for gastric subepithelial tumors

Objective:Minimally invasive surgery has become common in surgical resections of gastric subepithelial tumors.An endostapler technique is simple and easy to perform when cutting the stomach.Gastrotomy using a hand-sewn repair is a new approach for identifying and removing gastric subepithelial tumors,but few studies have evaluated its efficacy.In this study,we demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this novel technique using a robot-assisted approach.Materials and methods:A retrospective cohorts of all patients who presented with gastric subepithelial tumors and underwent robotic or laparoscopic resection at Ramathibodi Hospital from 2012 to 2018 was reviewed.Surgical outcomes and complications of the robot-assisted approach with a hand-sewn repair were analyzed and compared to those of the laparoscopic linear stapler technique.Results:In total,25 patients were included in this study.Most of the subepithelial tumors were gastrointestinal stromal tumors(17 patients,68%).Ten patients(40%)underwent a robot-assisted procedure with a hand-sewing technique,and 15 patients underwent a laparoscopic linear stapler procedure.Mean tumor size was 3.79±1.35 cm in the robot-assisted procedure with a hand-sewing technique group and 3.52±1.88 cm in the laparoscopic linear stapler procedure group.The former experienced a longer operative time(261±54 vs 144±64 minutes,p<0.001)and a longer time to return to a normal diet(5.7±2.0 vs 4.0±1.4 days,p=0.028).Neither group experienced perioperative complications or mortality.Conclusion:Although the time to return to a normal diet and operative time were significantly longer compared to a laparoscopic procedure using a linear stapler,the robot-assisted approach using a handsewn repair for gastric subepithelial tumors is feasible,effective,and safe.This can be an alternative for the surgical treatment of gastric subepithelial lesions.

Clinical course of subepithelial lesions detected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

AIM:To evaluate the natural history of subepithelial lesions.METHODS:We reviewed the medical records of 104 159 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the Center for Health Promotion of Samsung Medical Center between 1996 and 2003.Subepithelial lesions were detected in 795 patients(0.76%);252 patients were followed using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for 82.5 ± 29.2 mo(range,12-160 mo;median,84 mo;1st quartile,60 mo;3rd quartile,105 mo).The median interval of follow-up endoscopy was 12 mo(range,6-105 mo;1st quartile,12 mo;3rd quartile,24 mo).RESULTS:The mean patient age was 53 years(range,22-80 years),and the male-to-female ratio was 2.36:1(177/75).The lesion size at initial measurement averaged 8.9 mm(range,2-25 mm;median,8 mm;1st quartile,5 mm;3rd quartile,10 mm).Of the 252 lesions,244(96.8%) were unchanged and 8(3.2%) were significantly increased in size(from 12.9 ± 6.0 to 21.2 ± 12.2 mm) after a mean interval of 59.1 ± 27.5 mo(range,12-86 mo).Surgical resection of lesions was performed when the lesions were ≥ 3 cm in diameter.Two lesions were diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors with an intermediate or high risk of malignancy and one lesion was classified as a schwannoma.CONCLUSION:Most small subepithelial lesions do not change as shown by endoscopic examination,and regular follow-up with endoscopy may be considered in small,subepithelial lesions,especially lesions < 1 cm in size.

Recent advances in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)is a rare but an important clinical entity seen in our clinical practice.It is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract and most common malignancy of the small intestine.Although the exact prevalence of GIST is not known,the incidence of GIST has been increasing.GISTs arise from interstitial cells of Cajal.Most of the GISTs occur due to mutation in c-kit gene or platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha gene.15%of GISTs do not have these mutations and they are called wildtype GISTs.Almost all GISTs express KIT receptor tyrosine kinase.Histologically,GISTs look like spindle cell tumors most of the time but they can be epitheloid or mixed type.The median size of GISTs varies from 2.7 cm to 8.9 cm.Clinically,patients with small GISTs remain asymptomatic but as the GIST size increases,patients present with various symptoms depending on the location of the GIST.Most of GISTs are located in the stomach or small bowel.Diagnosis is suspected on imaging and endoscopic studies,and confirmed by tissue acquisition with immunohistochemical staining.The aggressiveness of GISTs depends on the size,mitotic index and location.Surgical resection is the treatment of choice.But various endoscopic modalities of resection are increasingly being tried.Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are extremely useful in the management of large GISTs,unresectable GISTs and metastatic GISTs.Treatment options for metastatic GISTs also include radiotherapy,chemotherapy,hepatic artery embolization,chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.