Objective: To explore the operative procedure for pa-tients with primary liver cancer associated with portalhypertension (PLCPH).Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the effect of op-erative procedure for 9 patients w...Objective: To explore the operative procedure for pa-tients with primary liver cancer associated with portalhypertension (PLCPH).Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the effect of op-erative procedure for 9 patients with PLCPH compli-cated by severe esophageal varicosity and hyper-splenism.Results: All patients underwent liver resection andpericardiac devascularization with splenectomy. Of the9 patients, 2 died from liver cancer recurrence sepa-rately 13 and 16 months after operation, and 1 diedfrom massive duodenal ulcer bleeding and multipleorgans failure. Six patients survived 3, 4, 8, 10, 12 and25 months after operation.Conclusions: The patients with PLCPH undergoing si-multaneous operation could acquire curative effect ascompared with those who underwent liver resec-tion. This operation is beneficial to the patients withpoor liver function.展开更多
In this study,we have summarized the coordination of operating room nurses participating in the multidisciplinary team in diagnosing and treating a patient with a large abdominal tumor and multiple pelvic fractures.To...In this study,we have summarized the coordination of operating room nurses participating in the multidisciplinary team in diagnosing and treating a patient with a large abdominal tumor and multiple pelvic fractures.To perform surgical treatment on patients with various conditions,it is crucial to consider the patients from a holistic perspective.Thus,the existing medical model has shifted from a“disease-centered”approach focusing on single-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment,to a“patient-centered”approach that involves multiple disciplines in diagnosis and therapy.Operating room nurses,as crucial collaborators of surgeons,should make necessary adjustments to enhance their comprehension of patients,improving the overall quality of surgical coordination.展开更多
Introduction: Fibroid benign tumour of the uterus can be operated either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is not well vulgarised in our settings. Objective: The main objective was to compare the surgical and ...Introduction: Fibroid benign tumour of the uterus can be operated either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is not well vulgarised in our settings. Objective: The main objective was to compare the surgical and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy. Methods: We performed a comparative analytical cross sectional study from 1st January 2016 to 31st March 2018 consisted of two groups: group 1 of women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and group 2 of women who underwent abdominal myomectomy (AM). The data collected was entered in Epi Info 7.2 version and exported to IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 for analysis. We used alpha error margin of 5% and confidence interval of 95%. Results: We enrolled 50 cases of myomectomy consisted of 33 (66.0%) files for AM and 17 (34.0%) files for LM. The clinical presentation of fibroid was similar in both groups. The main operation time (H) was (1.27 ± 0.13) for laparoscopy which is much less than (2.05 ± 0.07) for laparotomy group (p = 0.006). In AM group we had 04 post-operatory complications against zero complications in LM group but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.387). In the second look laparoscopy, the types of adhesions were not statistically significant (p = 0.471). Conclusion: Laparoscopic offers advantages compared to abdominal myomectomy.展开更多
BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal infections(IAIs)is the most common type of surgical infection,with high associated morbidity and mortality rates.In recent years,due to the use of antibiotics,various drug-resistant bacteria...BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal infections(IAIs)is the most common type of surgical infection,with high associated morbidity and mortality rates.In recent years,due to the use of antibiotics,various drug-resistant bacteria have emerged,making the treatment of abdominal infections more challenging.Early surgical exploration can reduce the mortality of patients with abdominal infection and the occurrence of complications.However,available evidence regarding the optimal timing of IAI surgery is still weak.In study,we compared the effects of operation time on patients with abdominal cavity infection and tried to confirm the best timing of surgery.AIM To assess the efficacy of early vs delayed surgical exploration in the treatment of IAI,in terms of overall mortality.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Ovid,and ScienceDirect.The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses method.Based on the timing of the surgical operation,we divided the literature into two groups:Early surgery and delayed surgery.For the early and delayed surgery groups,the intervention was performed with and after 12 h of the initial surgical intervention,respectively.The main outcome measure was the mortality rate.The literature search was performed from May 5 to 20,2021.We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal and ClinicalTrials.gov on May 20,2021,for ongoing trials.This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.RESULTS We identified nine eligible trial comparisons.Early surgical exploration of patients with IAIs(performed within 12 h)has significantly reduced the mortality and complications of patients,improved the survival rate,and shortened the hospital stay.CONCLUSION Early surgical exploration within 12 h may be more effective for the treatment of IAIs relative to a delayed operation.展开更多
Objective:Surgical procedures manifest immense risks to patients.One of the adverse events that healthcare professionals see as a threat to the patient’s health is the development of complications known as surgical s...Objective:Surgical procedures manifest immense risks to patients.One of the adverse events that healthcare professionals see as a threat to the patient’s health is the development of complications known as surgical site infection(SSI).Although several effor ts are being under taken to determine the proper means to reduce such complications,there is still a high incidence of SSI worldwide.Surgery requires knowledge in infection control and high precision in maintaining a clean surgical site.This study tested the effectiveness of an operating room(OR)bundle of care in preventing SSI in patients undergoing elective exploratory laparotomy cholecystectomy surgery.Methods:A quasi-experimental pretest and posttest design was utilized to determine its effectiveness.The study was composed of 60 par ticipants divided into two groups:30 subjects were selected to receive the OR bundle of care,while the other 30 subjects received the usual care.The groupings were determined through a systematic random sampling technique.The OR bundle of care had three interventions,namely:(1)maintaining perioperative normothermia,(2)no pre-operative surgical site hair removal,and(3)changing gloves before abdominal wall closure.These patients were evaluated using the standard instrument,Bates–Jensen Wound Assessment Tool(BWAT)in the post-intervention phases of the wound healing process,which are as follows:hemostasis,inflammatory,and proliferative phases.To describe the difference in the patients’wound status after implementation of the OR bundle of care in each post-intervention phase,Friedman’s test was used.To describe the difference in the patients’wound status in both groups after implementation of the OR bundle of care,the Mann–Whitney U test was used.Results:The patient’s wound status was lower,indicating a more healing process.Differences between the wound status of the control and the experimental group were observed on the third postoperative day.This indicates that the experimental group’s wound status healed much faster and more effectively than the control group based on the BWAT scoring severity scoring.A significant difference in the patient’s wound status from the hemostasis phase compared with the proliferative phase was observed.Conclusions:The OR bundle of care has been shown to be effective in preventing SSI in patients who had undergone exploratory laparotomy cholecystectomy surgery in the selected hospital,if there is uniform and consistent implementation of the said intervention.展开更多
Nowadays there have been various advanced techniques to overcome disparate types of lumbar degenerative diseases. However, post-operation complications such as Surgical Site Infection (SSI) still give the surgeon with...Nowadays there have been various advanced techniques to overcome disparate types of lumbar degenerative diseases. However, post-operation complications such as Surgical Site Infection (SSI) still give the surgeon with a big challenge. This article is going to study the risk factor that causes the lumbar SSI by reviewing all the articles that can be assessed through PubMed, websites of science and other internet data base. Numerous articles have stated different reported prevalence rates of 0.7% to 16% for surgical site infection. This article will document the most common and significant risk factors for SSI. At last, we suggest that there should be preoperative patient screening and postoperative internal environment maintenance, this will be the best way to reduce postoperative SSI rate or prevent SSI from happening.展开更多
目的探讨多灶性肝母细胞瘤(hepatoblastoma,HB)手术切除治疗的可行性及有效性。方法本研究为回顾性研究,以2014年4月至2022年12月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院肿瘤外科收治的21例多灶性HB患儿为研究对象,收集患儿临床特征、手术方式及...目的探讨多灶性肝母细胞瘤(hepatoblastoma,HB)手术切除治疗的可行性及有效性。方法本研究为回顾性研究,以2014年4月至2022年12月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院肿瘤外科收治的21例多灶性HB患儿为研究对象,收集患儿临床特征、手术方式及远期预后等资料,并与同期收治的58例中高危单灶性HB患儿进行疗效对比。结果21例多灶性HB患儿中,11例为2个瘤灶,4例为3个瘤灶,1例为5个瘤灶,5例肝内瘤灶超过5个且无法明确计数。21例均接受肿瘤切除手术,其中9例行解剖性肝切除术,11例行不规则肝切除或瘤灶剜除术,1例行联合肝脏离断及门静脉结扎的分次肝切除术(associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy,ALPPS)。20例为R0切除,1例为R1切除,术后无一例发生严重并发症。本组多灶性HB患儿接受手术联合化疗的多学科综合治疗后,中位随访时间57个月,18例患儿无瘤生存,3例死亡。本组多灶性HB患儿3年无事件生存率(event-free survival,EFS)为57.58%,3年总生存率(overall survival,OS)为82.00%,局部进展累积发生率(cumulative incidence of local progression,CILP)为38.00%。同期收治的单灶性中高危HB患儿上述指标分别为91.84%、74.96%、20.04%。两组数据对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多灶性HB经规范外科手术切除辅助术前、术后化疗,可以获得较为满意的预后。展开更多
目的探讨急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)合并Neri C型冠状动脉(冠脉)受累细化分型的外科治疗策略。方法回顾性分析我院2020年11月~2024年2月21例ATAAD合并Neri C型冠脉受累的病例资料。夹层累及冠脉,发病时间...目的探讨急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)合并Neri C型冠状动脉(冠脉)受累细化分型的外科治疗策略。方法回顾性分析我院2020年11月~2024年2月21例ATAAD合并Neri C型冠脉受累的病例资料。夹层累及冠脉,发病时间<1周,行全主动脉弓替换、降主动脉支架象鼻人工血管置入、升主动脉置换及冠脉处理。细化分型及冠脉处理方法:C1型(冠脉开口局部损伤破裂,与假腔部分连接,冠脉开口内外膜无分离)7例以人工材料“铜钱样”修复;C2型(冠脉开口严重损伤撕脱,与假腔完全连接,冠脉近段累及轻微,内外膜局部分离,未形成套袖)3例以8 mm人工血管置换;C3型(冠脉开口严重损伤撕脱,与假腔完全连接,冠脉近段累及严重,内外膜完全分离,且形成套袖)11例以大隐静脉旁路移植。结果院内死亡2例(均为C3型),均心脏复跳困难,体外膜氧合(extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,ECMO)辅助循环,分别于术后当天、第2天死亡。19例出院患者出院前复查主动脉及冠脉CTA,无冠脉开口狭窄和桥血管狭窄。术后6、12、18个月复查主动脉及冠脉CTA。19例随访6~36个月,平均21个月,无冠脉开口狭窄和桥血管狭窄病例。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级Ⅰ级15例,Ⅱ级4例。结论ATAAD合并Neri C型冠脉受累的细化分型对外科实施精准治疗具有指导性意义。展开更多
文摘Objective: To explore the operative procedure for pa-tients with primary liver cancer associated with portalhypertension (PLCPH).Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the effect of op-erative procedure for 9 patients with PLCPH compli-cated by severe esophageal varicosity and hyper-splenism.Results: All patients underwent liver resection andpericardiac devascularization with splenectomy. Of the9 patients, 2 died from liver cancer recurrence sepa-rately 13 and 16 months after operation, and 1 diedfrom massive duodenal ulcer bleeding and multipleorgans failure. Six patients survived 3, 4, 8, 10, 12 and25 months after operation.Conclusions: The patients with PLCPH undergoing si-multaneous operation could acquire curative effect ascompared with those who underwent liver resec-tion. This operation is beneficial to the patients withpoor liver function.
文摘In this study,we have summarized the coordination of operating room nurses participating in the multidisciplinary team in diagnosing and treating a patient with a large abdominal tumor and multiple pelvic fractures.To perform surgical treatment on patients with various conditions,it is crucial to consider the patients from a holistic perspective.Thus,the existing medical model has shifted from a“disease-centered”approach focusing on single-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment,to a“patient-centered”approach that involves multiple disciplines in diagnosis and therapy.Operating room nurses,as crucial collaborators of surgeons,should make necessary adjustments to enhance their comprehension of patients,improving the overall quality of surgical coordination.
文摘Introduction: Fibroid benign tumour of the uterus can be operated either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is not well vulgarised in our settings. Objective: The main objective was to compare the surgical and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy. Methods: We performed a comparative analytical cross sectional study from 1st January 2016 to 31st March 2018 consisted of two groups: group 1 of women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and group 2 of women who underwent abdominal myomectomy (AM). The data collected was entered in Epi Info 7.2 version and exported to IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 for analysis. We used alpha error margin of 5% and confidence interval of 95%. Results: We enrolled 50 cases of myomectomy consisted of 33 (66.0%) files for AM and 17 (34.0%) files for LM. The clinical presentation of fibroid was similar in both groups. The main operation time (H) was (1.27 ± 0.13) for laparoscopy which is much less than (2.05 ± 0.07) for laparotomy group (p = 0.006). In AM group we had 04 post-operatory complications against zero complications in LM group but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.387). In the second look laparoscopy, the types of adhesions were not statistically significant (p = 0.471). Conclusion: Laparoscopic offers advantages compared to abdominal myomectomy.
基金Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province,No.2018092901.
文摘BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal infections(IAIs)is the most common type of surgical infection,with high associated morbidity and mortality rates.In recent years,due to the use of antibiotics,various drug-resistant bacteria have emerged,making the treatment of abdominal infections more challenging.Early surgical exploration can reduce the mortality of patients with abdominal infection and the occurrence of complications.However,available evidence regarding the optimal timing of IAI surgery is still weak.In study,we compared the effects of operation time on patients with abdominal cavity infection and tried to confirm the best timing of surgery.AIM To assess the efficacy of early vs delayed surgical exploration in the treatment of IAI,in terms of overall mortality.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Ovid,and ScienceDirect.The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses method.Based on the timing of the surgical operation,we divided the literature into two groups:Early surgery and delayed surgery.For the early and delayed surgery groups,the intervention was performed with and after 12 h of the initial surgical intervention,respectively.The main outcome measure was the mortality rate.The literature search was performed from May 5 to 20,2021.We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal and ClinicalTrials.gov on May 20,2021,for ongoing trials.This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.RESULTS We identified nine eligible trial comparisons.Early surgical exploration of patients with IAIs(performed within 12 h)has significantly reduced the mortality and complications of patients,improved the survival rate,and shortened the hospital stay.CONCLUSION Early surgical exploration within 12 h may be more effective for the treatment of IAIs relative to a delayed operation.
文摘Objective:Surgical procedures manifest immense risks to patients.One of the adverse events that healthcare professionals see as a threat to the patient’s health is the development of complications known as surgical site infection(SSI).Although several effor ts are being under taken to determine the proper means to reduce such complications,there is still a high incidence of SSI worldwide.Surgery requires knowledge in infection control and high precision in maintaining a clean surgical site.This study tested the effectiveness of an operating room(OR)bundle of care in preventing SSI in patients undergoing elective exploratory laparotomy cholecystectomy surgery.Methods:A quasi-experimental pretest and posttest design was utilized to determine its effectiveness.The study was composed of 60 par ticipants divided into two groups:30 subjects were selected to receive the OR bundle of care,while the other 30 subjects received the usual care.The groupings were determined through a systematic random sampling technique.The OR bundle of care had three interventions,namely:(1)maintaining perioperative normothermia,(2)no pre-operative surgical site hair removal,and(3)changing gloves before abdominal wall closure.These patients were evaluated using the standard instrument,Bates–Jensen Wound Assessment Tool(BWAT)in the post-intervention phases of the wound healing process,which are as follows:hemostasis,inflammatory,and proliferative phases.To describe the difference in the patients’wound status after implementation of the OR bundle of care in each post-intervention phase,Friedman’s test was used.To describe the difference in the patients’wound status in both groups after implementation of the OR bundle of care,the Mann–Whitney U test was used.Results:The patient’s wound status was lower,indicating a more healing process.Differences between the wound status of the control and the experimental group were observed on the third postoperative day.This indicates that the experimental group’s wound status healed much faster and more effectively than the control group based on the BWAT scoring severity scoring.A significant difference in the patient’s wound status from the hemostasis phase compared with the proliferative phase was observed.Conclusions:The OR bundle of care has been shown to be effective in preventing SSI in patients who had undergone exploratory laparotomy cholecystectomy surgery in the selected hospital,if there is uniform and consistent implementation of the said intervention.
文摘Nowadays there have been various advanced techniques to overcome disparate types of lumbar degenerative diseases. However, post-operation complications such as Surgical Site Infection (SSI) still give the surgeon with a big challenge. This article is going to study the risk factor that causes the lumbar SSI by reviewing all the articles that can be assessed through PubMed, websites of science and other internet data base. Numerous articles have stated different reported prevalence rates of 0.7% to 16% for surgical site infection. This article will document the most common and significant risk factors for SSI. At last, we suggest that there should be preoperative patient screening and postoperative internal environment maintenance, this will be the best way to reduce postoperative SSI rate or prevent SSI from happening.
文摘目的探讨多灶性肝母细胞瘤(hepatoblastoma,HB)手术切除治疗的可行性及有效性。方法本研究为回顾性研究,以2014年4月至2022年12月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院肿瘤外科收治的21例多灶性HB患儿为研究对象,收集患儿临床特征、手术方式及远期预后等资料,并与同期收治的58例中高危单灶性HB患儿进行疗效对比。结果21例多灶性HB患儿中,11例为2个瘤灶,4例为3个瘤灶,1例为5个瘤灶,5例肝内瘤灶超过5个且无法明确计数。21例均接受肿瘤切除手术,其中9例行解剖性肝切除术,11例行不规则肝切除或瘤灶剜除术,1例行联合肝脏离断及门静脉结扎的分次肝切除术(associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy,ALPPS)。20例为R0切除,1例为R1切除,术后无一例发生严重并发症。本组多灶性HB患儿接受手术联合化疗的多学科综合治疗后,中位随访时间57个月,18例患儿无瘤生存,3例死亡。本组多灶性HB患儿3年无事件生存率(event-free survival,EFS)为57.58%,3年总生存率(overall survival,OS)为82.00%,局部进展累积发生率(cumulative incidence of local progression,CILP)为38.00%。同期收治的单灶性中高危HB患儿上述指标分别为91.84%、74.96%、20.04%。两组数据对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多灶性HB经规范外科手术切除辅助术前、术后化疗,可以获得较为满意的预后。
文摘目的探讨新辅助化疗后保留肾单位手术(nephron sparing surgery,NSS)治疗单侧肾母细胞瘤的初步疗效。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年12月复旦大学附属儿科医院收治的7例单侧肾母细胞瘤患儿临床资料,均行新辅助化疗及NSS。收集患儿生存率、肾功能以及肿瘤复发情况,并与同期行根治性肿瘤切除术(radical nephrectomy,RN)的患儿进行疗效比较。结果7例中,男4例、女3例,发病年龄(38.86±18.23)个月,无一例合并肿瘤相关综合征或半侧肢体肥大;肿瘤位于肾脏一极1例,肾脏中央6例。7例经新辅助化疗后,肿瘤体积缩小(66.4±18.6)%。1例肿瘤位于肾脏一极的患儿行部分肾切除术(partial nephrectomy,PN),6例肿瘤位于肾中央的患儿行肿瘤剜除术(tumor enucleation,TE),术后病理检查结果提示镜下肿瘤切缘阳性2例。儿童肿瘤国际协会(International Society for Pediatric Oncology,SIOP)分期:Ⅱ期4例、Ⅲ期3例。随访时间(38.42±10.17)个月,无一例失访或死亡。无瘤生存6例,带瘤生存1例。NSS后出现肿瘤复发2例。NSS后复发率(28.6%)及5年生存率(100%)与同期行RN的患儿复发率(13.3%)和5年生存率(86.9%)相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单侧肾母细胞瘤通过合理的术前评估和新辅助化疗,可以增加NSS的机会,并取得与RN相似的治疗效果。
