Objective: To explore the change and feasibility of surgical techniques of laparoscopic transhiatal(TH)-lower mediastinal lymph node dissection(LMLND) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)according t...Objective: To explore the change and feasibility of surgical techniques of laparoscopic transhiatal(TH)-lower mediastinal lymph node dissection(LMLND) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)according to Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up(IDEAL) 2a standards.Methods: Patients diagnosed with AEG who underwent laparoscopic TH-LMLND were prospectively included from April 14, 2020, to March 26, 2021. Clinical and pathological information as well as surgical outcomes were quantitatively analyzed. Semistructured interviews with the surgeon after each operation were qualitatively analyzed.Results: Thirty-five patients were included. There were no cases of transition to open surgery, but three cases involved combination with transthoracic surgery. In qualitative analysis, 108 items under three main themes were detected: explosion, dissection, and reconstruction. Revised instruction was subsequently designed according to the change in surgical technique and the cognitive process behind it. Three patients had anastomotic leaks postoperatively, with one classified as Clavien-Dindo Ⅲa.Conclusions: The surgical technique of laparoscopic TH-LMLND is stable and feasible;further IDEAL 2b research is warranted.展开更多
Background： A large proportion of the patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are young women. Therefore, minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection （CND） emerged and showed wel...Background： A large proportion of the patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are young women. Therefore, minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection （CND） emerged and showed well-accepted results with improved cosmetic outcome, accelerated healing, and comforting the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via bilateral axillo-breast approach （BABA）, compared with conventional open procedure in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Methods： One-hundred patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma from March 2014 to January 2015 in Jinan Military General Hospital of People＇s Liberation Army （PLA） were randomly assigned to robotic group or conventional open approach group （17 = 50 in each group）. The total operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, numbers of lymph node removed, visual analog scale （VAS）, postoperative hospital stay time, complications, and numerical scoring system （NSS, used to assess cosmetic effect） were analyzed. Results： The robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via BABA was successfully performed in robotic group. There were no conversion from the robotic surgeries to open or endoscopic surgery. The subclinical central lymph node metastasis rate was 35%. The mean operative time of the robotic group was longer than that of the conventional open approach group （118.8± 16.5 min vs. 90.7± 10.3 min, P 〈 0.05）. The study showed significant differences between the two groups in terms of the VASs （2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ±~ 1.2, P 〈 0.05） and NSS （8.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.8 ± 1.7, P 〈 0.05）. The differences between the two groups in the estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay time, numbers of lymph node removed, postoperative thyroglobulin levels, and complications were not statistically significant （all P 〉 0.05）. Neither iatrogenic implantation nor metastasis occurred in punctured porous channel or chest wall in both groups. Postoperative cosmetic results were very satisfactory in the robotic group. Conclusions： Robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via BABA is safe and effective for Chinese patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma who worry about the neck scars.展开更多
目的比较腹腔镜经腹入路与胸腹腔镜联合入路治疗食管胃连接部腺癌(AEG)的预后效果。方法选择2021年12月-2023年12月该院行AEG切除术,并行淋巴结清扫的患者110例。根据手术方式,将患者分为腹腔镜组(n=62)和胸腹腔镜联合组(n=48)。采用倾...目的比较腹腔镜经腹入路与胸腹腔镜联合入路治疗食管胃连接部腺癌(AEG)的预后效果。方法选择2021年12月-2023年12月该院行AEG切除术,并行淋巴结清扫的患者110例。根据手术方式,将患者分为腹腔镜组(n=62)和胸腹腔镜联合组(n=48)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡组间差异,减少潜在混杂因素后,比较两组患者的一般资料、围手术期指标、营养状态指标、术后并发症和术后生存情况;采用广义估计方程(GEE),构建两组患者治疗前后的营养状态相关指标模型;采用Cox比例风险模型,分析治疗方式对AEG患者预后的影响。结果PSM前,两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、TNM分期、肿瘤最大直径和食管侵犯长度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PSM后,两组患者一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);胸腹腔镜联合组手术时间、术后卧床时间、术后住院时间明显长于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),术中出血量明显多于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),术后24 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)明显高于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、纵隔淋巴结清扫数量和腹腔淋巴结清扫数量明显多于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PAB)、转铁蛋白(TRF)和体重(W)术前术后差值明显大于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),两组患者术后并发症总发生率和1年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);GEE分析结果显示,腹腔镜治疗对Hb和TRF指标影响更大,胸腹腔镜联合治疗对ALB、PAB和W指标影响更大;腹腔镜治疗方式是AEG患者预后良好的保护因素(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗在手术时间、术后卧床时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量、24 h VAS和术后营养方面占优势;胸腹腔镜联合治疗在淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量,纵隔淋巴结清扫数量和腹腔淋巴结清扫数量方面占优势。综合考虑,腹腔镜治疗的短期预后更好。展开更多
基金supportedbyBeijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals(No.DFL20181103)Beijing Hospitals Authority Innovation Studio of Young Staff Funding Support(No.202123).
文摘Objective: To explore the change and feasibility of surgical techniques of laparoscopic transhiatal(TH)-lower mediastinal lymph node dissection(LMLND) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)according to Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up(IDEAL) 2a standards.Methods: Patients diagnosed with AEG who underwent laparoscopic TH-LMLND were prospectively included from April 14, 2020, to March 26, 2021. Clinical and pathological information as well as surgical outcomes were quantitatively analyzed. Semistructured interviews with the surgeon after each operation were qualitatively analyzed.Results: Thirty-five patients were included. There were no cases of transition to open surgery, but three cases involved combination with transthoracic surgery. In qualitative analysis, 108 items under three main themes were detected: explosion, dissection, and reconstruction. Revised instruction was subsequently designed according to the change in surgical technique and the cognitive process behind it. Three patients had anastomotic leaks postoperatively, with one classified as Clavien-Dindo Ⅲa.Conclusions: The surgical technique of laparoscopic TH-LMLND is stable and feasible;further IDEAL 2b research is warranted.
文摘Background： A large proportion of the patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are young women. Therefore, minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection （CND） emerged and showed well-accepted results with improved cosmetic outcome, accelerated healing, and comforting the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via bilateral axillo-breast approach （BABA）, compared with conventional open procedure in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Methods： One-hundred patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma from March 2014 to January 2015 in Jinan Military General Hospital of People＇s Liberation Army （PLA） were randomly assigned to robotic group or conventional open approach group （17 = 50 in each group）. The total operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, numbers of lymph node removed, visual analog scale （VAS）, postoperative hospital stay time, complications, and numerical scoring system （NSS, used to assess cosmetic effect） were analyzed. Results： The robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via BABA was successfully performed in robotic group. There were no conversion from the robotic surgeries to open or endoscopic surgery. The subclinical central lymph node metastasis rate was 35%. The mean operative time of the robotic group was longer than that of the conventional open approach group （118.8± 16.5 min vs. 90.7± 10.3 min, P 〈 0.05）. The study showed significant differences between the two groups in terms of the VASs （2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ±~ 1.2, P 〈 0.05） and NSS （8.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.8 ± 1.7, P 〈 0.05）. The differences between the two groups in the estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay time, numbers of lymph node removed, postoperative thyroglobulin levels, and complications were not statistically significant （all P 〉 0.05）. Neither iatrogenic implantation nor metastasis occurred in punctured porous channel or chest wall in both groups. Postoperative cosmetic results were very satisfactory in the robotic group. Conclusions： Robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via BABA is safe and effective for Chinese patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma who worry about the neck scars.
文摘目的比较腹腔镜经腹入路与胸腹腔镜联合入路治疗食管胃连接部腺癌(AEG)的预后效果。方法选择2021年12月-2023年12月该院行AEG切除术,并行淋巴结清扫的患者110例。根据手术方式,将患者分为腹腔镜组(n=62)和胸腹腔镜联合组(n=48)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡组间差异,减少潜在混杂因素后,比较两组患者的一般资料、围手术期指标、营养状态指标、术后并发症和术后生存情况;采用广义估计方程(GEE),构建两组患者治疗前后的营养状态相关指标模型;采用Cox比例风险模型,分析治疗方式对AEG患者预后的影响。结果PSM前,两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、TNM分期、肿瘤最大直径和食管侵犯长度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PSM后,两组患者一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);胸腹腔镜联合组手术时间、术后卧床时间、术后住院时间明显长于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),术中出血量明显多于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),术后24 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)明显高于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、纵隔淋巴结清扫数量和腹腔淋巴结清扫数量明显多于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PAB)、转铁蛋白(TRF)和体重(W)术前术后差值明显大于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),两组患者术后并发症总发生率和1年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);GEE分析结果显示,腹腔镜治疗对Hb和TRF指标影响更大,胸腹腔镜联合治疗对ALB、PAB和W指标影响更大;腹腔镜治疗方式是AEG患者预后良好的保护因素(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗在手术时间、术后卧床时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量、24 h VAS和术后营养方面占优势;胸腹腔镜联合治疗在淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量,纵隔淋巴结清扫数量和腹腔淋巴结清扫数量方面占优势。综合考虑,腹腔镜治疗的短期预后更好。
