Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Vs Open Tension-Free Hernia Repair in Treating Inguinal Hernia

Objective:To investigate and analyze the clinical outcomes of inguinal hernia patients treated with transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair(TAPP)versus open tension-free hernia repair.Methods:The study was carried out from January 2021 to August 2023,and a total of 50 inguinal hernia patients were selected for this study.The patients were randomly divided into a study group(n=25)and a control group(n=25)by the numerical table method.The patients in the control group were treated with open tension-free hernia repair,whereas the patients in the study group were treated with TAPP.The surgical and postoperative recovery indexes,complication rates,and recurrence rates of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05),and the postoperative feeding time,time out of bed,and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05);the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);and there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of the two groups after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared to open tension-free hernia repair,TAPP offers a shorter postoperative recovery duration and hospitalization time,and reduces the incidence of complications.Therefore,this surgical method should be popularized in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Comparative study of open tension-free and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in hernioplasty and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in hernioplasty and simultaneous cholecystectomy. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with symptomatic chronic calculous cholecystitis and synchronous unilateral primary inguinal hernia were performed combined surgery between October 2001 and March 2005. Of them, 10 cases underwent laparoscopic totally extraperiloneal mesh hernia repair (TEP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), 3 cases underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernia repair (TAPP) and LC, and 15 cases underwent LC and open tension free hernia repair. Results: All the procedures were performed successfully, 2 patients occurred urinary retention in LC + open group and 1 patient occurred scrotum seroma in LC + TEP procedures. During the 6 to 24 months' follow-up, no hernia recurrences occurred in all patients. There were 6 patients (40%) in LC + open group had discomfort pain in the inguinal region and lasted 1 to 3 months. The operating time was longer in the totally laparoscopic group (TEP + LC and TAPP + LC) (104±31 min) than in the LC+open group (80±28 min) (P<0. 05). The intensity of postoperative pain at rest was greater in the LC + open group at 24 h (P<0. 05) and 48 h (P<0. 05). No differences between the 2 groups were found in the mean operating costs and oral intake of the postoperative period. But the time resume to walking (2. 9 vs 1. 8 d) (P<0. 01) and the mean hospital stay (8. 2 vs 4. 6 d) (P<0. 001) was longer in the LC + open group than in the totally laparoscopic group. Conclusion: In the same operating costs, the totally laparoscopic precedure has more advantages of low postoperative pain, quicker resume to walking and less hospital stay than open tension-free hernia repair in hernioplasty and simultaneous LC. Thus, the totally laparoscopic approach is considered to be advantage of the hernioplasty and simultaneous LC.

The Effect of Tension-Free Herniorrhaphy in the Preperitoneal Space on the Treatment of Hernia

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space in patients with hernia.Methods:The study period was from January 2020 to December 2022.198 samples of hernia patients admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into a research group(n=99)and a control group(n=99).Patients in the control group underwent tension-free herniorrhaphy with plain films,and patients in the study group underwent tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space.The surgical and postoperative recovery-related indicators,incidence of complications,and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results:The intraoperative and postoperative recovery indexes of the study group were better than those of the control group(P<0.05);the incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space shortens the operation and postoperative recovery time of hernia patients and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications,so it should be popularized.

Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Tension-Free Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

Objective:To explore the value of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block(IINB)in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients.Methods:A total of 70 elderly patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair who treated in the hospital from April 2018 to November 2019 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method,with 35 cases each.The control group underwent infiltration of local anesthesia(LA),and the study group added with IINB.The visual analogue scale(VAS)scores of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:The VAS score of the study group when pulling the hernia sac was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:IINB has good analgesic effect in tensionfree inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients,and it is worth promoting.

单节段椎旁神经阻滞在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨单节段椎旁神经阻滞(pavavertebral nerve block,PVNB)在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中应用的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2016年1月~2022年12月58例老年患者接受开放式无张力腹股沟疝修补术的临床资料,依据麻醉方式分为2组:单节段PVNB组(P组)和单次蛛网膜下腔阻滞组(S组),每组29例。P组在超声联合外周神经刺激器或单纯外周神经刺激器引导下行L1单节段PVNB,给予0.4%罗哌卡因20 ml。S组在L3/4棘突间隙进行穿刺,给予0.5%布比卡因10 mg。记录患者麻醉前(T_(0))、手术切皮时(T_(1))、疝囊剥离时(T_(2))和关切口时(T_(3))患者的平均动脉压和心率,麻醉阻滞平面、麻醉效果、芬太尼补救率、局麻药毒性反应、外周神经损伤、尿潴留、谵妄和恶心呕吐的发生情况,随访患者的麻醉满意度。结果58例均顺利完成手术。2组患者麻醉阻滞平面差异有显著性(Z=-4.144,P=0.000),芬太尼补救率、麻醉效果和麻醉满意度差异均无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.269,P=0.604;Z=-1.430,P=0.153;Z=-1.395,P=0.163)。2组患者不同时点的平均动脉压和心率变化差异无统计学意义(F=0.002,P=0.960;F=0.260,P=0.612)。P组患者尿潴留发生率显著低于S组(0.0%vs.24.1%,Fisher精确检验,P=0.010)。2组患者谵妄和恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者围术期均未发生局麻药毒性反应和外周神经损伤。结论单节段PVNB可以为接受腹股沟疝修补术的老年患者提供完善的麻醉与镇痛,有助于维持术中血流动力学状态的稳定,并降低术后不良反应的发生风险。

程序化耻骨肌孔区域空间解剖在全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用分析

目的探讨程序化耻骨肌孔区域空间解剖手术技术在腹腔镜下全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中的应用效果。方法选取2019年5月—2021年5月在江苏大学附属武进医院行TEP的121例单侧腹股沟疝患者进行回顾性队列研究。按照不同的手术方式分为程序化组(63例)和传统组(58例)。程序化组行程序化耻骨肌孔空间解剖联合TEP;传统组行TEP。观察并比较两组围手术期相关评估指标及术后并发症的情况。结果程序化组术中手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间、术中处理疝囊时间,以及VAS-24、VAS-48时间较传统组缩短(P<0.05),术中出血量较传统组减少(P<0.05)。程序化组在腹膜破损、腹壁下动脉损伤、感觉神经异常及慢性疼痛占比较传统组下降(P<0.05),而术后血清肿比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论程序化耻骨肌孔区域空间解剖手术技术的应用可显著提高TEP的临床效果,可明显改善患者术中及术后相关临床指标,降低术后并发症的发生率,适用于在年轻医师和基础医院中推广。

单孔与双孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患儿的疗效比较

目的 比较单孔与双孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患儿的疗效。方法 150例腹股沟疝患儿,以随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组75例。观察组患儿接受单孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,对照组患儿接受双孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗。比较两组患儿围术期指标(术中出血量、下床活动时间、手术耗时、住院耗时)及治疗前后血清应激反应[去甲肾上腺素(NE)、醛固酮(ALD)、皮质醇(Cor)]、血清疼痛介质[β-内啡肽(β-EP)、P物质(SP)、5-羟色胺(5-HT)]。结果 观察组患儿术中出血量(4.31±0.39)ml少于对照组的(6.42±0.47)ml,下床活动时间(3.52±0.28)h、住院耗时(1.51±0.09)d均短于对照组的(5.31±0.34)h、(2.02±0.18)d,手术耗时(39.87±3.38)min长于对照组的(32.33±2.87)min(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组NE、ALD、Cor水平均高于治疗前,但观察组NE(164.29±6.39)ng/ml、ALD(416.34±24.33)ng/ml、Cor(130.55±6.77)ng/ml均低于对照组的(195.55±8.29)ng/ml、(462.25±27.48)ng/ml、(149.24±6.94)ng/ml(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患儿β-EP水平低于治疗前, SP、5-HT水平高于治疗前,但观察组患儿β-EP(108.44±6.54)ng/ml高于对照组的(78.29±5.35)ng/ml, SP(87.66±7.11)pg/ml、5-HT(288.83±13.25)nmol/L均低于对照组(103.55±8.44)pg/ml、(365.87±16.95)nmol/L(P<0.05)。结论 单孔与双孔腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患儿疗效对比,虽然单孔腹腔镜下操作耗时更长,但围术期整体指标更优,术后血清应激反应指标以及血清疼痛介质水平更低,临床应用价值显著。

Analysis of the Effect and Efficiency of Tension- Free Hernia Repair and Traditional Surgery in The Treatment of Hernia

Objective: To analyze the efficiency of tension-free hernia repair and traditional surgery in the treatment of hernia. Methods: A total of 80 patients with hernias were selected and randomly into a control group (traditional hernia repair) and an observation group (tension-free hernia repair), of 40 cases each. The perioperative indicators, pain, physiological stress indicators, complications, and recurrence rates between the two groups were compared. Results: The perioperative indexes of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The postoperative pain score, postoperative physiological stress index level, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of hernia, tension-free hernia repair was less traumatic and had a better effect than traditional hernia repair.

优质护理在腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术中的应用效果分析

目的:探讨优质护理在腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术中的应用效果。方法:选取2022年1—12月于如皋市第四人民医院行无张力疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者80例作为研究对象,随机分为参照组与优质组,每组40例。参照组给予常规护理,优质组给予优质护理。比较两组护理效果。结果:护理后,优质组生理职能、心理职能、社会领域、总体健康、健康知识水平、自我责任感、自我概念、自我护理技能评分,总遵医率高于参照组,焦虑、抑郁评分低于参照组,胃肠道恢复时间、首次下床活动时间早于参照组,住院时间短于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:优质护理在腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术中的应用效果显著,可改善患者生活质量、自护能力,稳定患者情绪,优化遵医行为,促进患者恢复。

腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的临床应用

目的研究腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的临床应用效果。方法70例接受无张力疝修补手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为传统组以及新式组,各35例。传统组患者接受腰硬联合麻醉,新式组接受腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞。比较两组手术相关情况、疼痛情况、心率及平均动脉压、不良事件发生情况。结果新式组患者的麻醉起效时间、手术时间、术后下地活动时间以及住院时间分别为(4.03±1.57)min、(44.05±10.05)min、(3.81±1.17)h、(3.35±1.33)d,均显著短于传统组的(6.14±2.70)min、(59.03±13.18)min、(5.77±1.44)h、(4.72±1.71)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后30 min,新式组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分(2.35±0.73)分显著低于传统组的(3.06±0.67)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。麻醉后15、30 min,新式组患者的心率及平均动脉压均显著低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。新式组术后不良事件发生率为2.86%,传统组为20.00%;新式组患者术后不良反应发生率显著低于传统组(P<0.05)。结论相对于传统的腰硬联合麻醉,腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞的方式镇痛效果更好、安全性更高、术后恢复效果更佳,值得在临床上推广使用。

Fascinating history of groin hernias:Comprehensive recognition of anatomy,classic considerations for herniorrhaphy,and current controversies in hernioplasty

Groin hernias include indirect inguinal,direct inguinal,femoral,obturator,and supravesical hernias.Here,we summarize historical turning points,anatomical recognition and surgical repairs.Groin hernias have a fascinating history in the fields of anatomy and surgery.The concept of tension-free repair is generally accepted among clinicians.Surgical repair with mesh is categorized as hernioplasty,while classic repair without mesh is considered herniorrhaphy.Although various surgical approaches have been developed,the surgical technique should be carefully chosen for each patient.Regarding as interesting history,crucial anatomy and important surgeries in the field of groin hernia,we here summarized them in detail,respectively.Points of debate are also reviewed;important points are shown using illustrations and schemas.We hope this systematic review is surgical guide for general surgeons including residents.Both a skillful technique and anatomical knowledge are indispensable for successful hernia surgery in the groin.

Laparoscopic Hernioplasty Using Omega-3 Coating Mesh

Background: Laparoscopic hernioplasty has gained popularity with significant advances in prostheses. Omega-3 coating mesh (C-Qur) is a prosthesis that can be used in the abdominal cavity, and the coating prevents adhesion of the mesh to the viscera. We planned a prospective observational study of laparoscopic hernioplasty using C-Qur. Methods: C-Qur was used in laparoscopic hernioplasty over the course of 1 year. We considered laparoscopic approaches as our primary treatment method for abdominal wall hernias. Although only a single incision was made for the majority of the laparoscopic hernioplasties, additional incisions were made when severe adhesions were encountered. For incisional or ventral hernias, a lateral lower incision was made. For inguinal hernias, an umbilical incision was made. Sex, age, diagnosis, number of incisions, additional incisions, morbidity, and follow-up period were evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients who underwent surgery between May 2010 and April 2011 were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 14 months. The most common early complications included wound pain and edema;however, there were no persistent complications.

Recurrent abdominal pain due to small bowel volvulus after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Compared with open mesh repair,transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP)hernioplasty results in less chronic postoperative inguinal pain and faster postoperative recovery.However,it may still lead to rare but serious complications.Here we report a case of intestinal volvulus with recurrent abdominal pain as the only clinical symptom,which occurred 3 mo after TAPP repair for bilateral inguinal hernia.CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old male patient underwent laparoscopic TAPP for bilateral inguinal hernias.After the operation,he experienced recurring pain in his lower right abdomen around the surgical area,which was relieved after symptomatic treatment.Three months after the surgery,the abdominal pain became severe and was aggravated over time.The whirlpool sign of the mesentery was seen on contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT).Laparoscopic exploration confirmed that a barb of the V-Loc™suture penetrated the peritoneum,which caused the adhesion of the small intestinal wall to the site of peritoneal injury,forming intestinal volvulus.Since there was no closed-loop obstruction or intestinal ischemia,recurrent abdominal pain became the only clinical manifestation in this case.After laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and reduction of intestinal volvulus,the patient recovered and was discharged.CONCLUSION The possibility of intestinal volvulus should be considered in patients who experience recurrent abdominal pain following TAPP surgery during which barbed V-Loc sutures are used for closing the peritoneum.Contrast-enhanced CT and active laparoscopic exploration can confirm the diagnosis and prevent serious complications.

开放式腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗非洲成人腹股沟疝60例的效果观察

目的了解开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗非洲赤道几内亚成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法120例赤道几内亚巴塔总医院收治的腹股沟疝患者随机分为A、B组(每组60例),分别采用开放式腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术、平片无张力疝修补治疗。观察及对比两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后恢复时间、住院费用和患者术后并发症的发生情况。结果两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后恢复时间和住院费用的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。A组阴囊水肿、慢性疼痛、皮下血清肿及术后异物感的发生率均低于B组(均P<0.01)。两组术后伤口感染、复发的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论开放式腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗非洲成人腹股沟疝并发症少、安全、有效,可成为基层医院的选择。

分析腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗疝气的临床疗效

目的探讨腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗疝气的临床疗效。方法80例疝气患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各40例。对照组接受疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗,观察组接受腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗。比较两组患者的疗效、围术期指标、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、血清炎性因子指标[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素-6(IL-6)]、并发症发生情况、复发率。结果观察组治疗总有效率95.00%高于对照组的72.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组住院时间(3.32±1.02)d、下地活动时间(7.81±1.02)h、手术时间(36.54±4.21)min短于对照组的(4.65±1.01)d、(8.54±1.01)h、(42.69±4.32)min,术中出血量(27.32±0.21)ml少于对照组的(32.32±0.21)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1、3 d的VAS评分分别为(5.65±0.21)、(3.21±0.15)分,低于对照组的(6.68±0.25)、(4.68±0.12)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,观察组的IL-6(421.21±12.21)ng/L、TNF-α(53.21±1.32)ng/L低于对照组的(556.35±12.02)、(69.21±1.25)ng/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率5.00%低于对照组的22.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床治疗疝气可采用腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术,相比于疝环填充式无张力疝修补术,其治疗方式更具无创性,术后疼痛、炎性反应等均更轻微,并具有恢复速度快、并发症发生率低等优势,值得推广。

腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用效果

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2020年7月至2022年7月我院收治的90例腹股沟疝患者,随机分为两组各45例。对照组行开放式无张力疝修补术(OTFH)治疗,研究组行TAPP治疗,比较两组的围术期指标及并发症发生情况。结果研究组术中出血量低于对照组,首次排气时间、离床活动时间及住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率为4.44%,低于对照组的20.00%(P<0.05)。结论与OTFH相比,TAPP治疗腹股沟疝可明显降低患者术中出血量,缩短术后恢复时间,降低并发症发生率。

腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果对比

目的 比较成人腹股沟疝采用腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)和开放式无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法 将60例成人腹股沟疝患者随机分为两组,对照组使用开放式无张力疝修补术,观察组使用TAPP,对两组患者的治疗情况进行综合分析。结果 两组患者手术后的手术时间、出血量、疼痛感、住院时间等进行比较,观察组改善情况比对照组更优(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症率显著比对照组低(P<0.05);观察组硬结、异物感、腹股沟麻木的消失时间比对照组明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论 在使用TAPP治疗以后,患者的术后疼痛感会更轻一些,创伤也比较小,应激反应程度低,恢复快,并发症少。

Intestinal erosion caused by meshoma displacement:A case report

BACKGROUND A meshoma formation and erosion to the small intestine is rare.Herein,we report one case of a meshoma that was not treated early;causing it to displace and erode the small intestine,with infection,complete control of symptoms was achieved after removal of the infected patch mass,no recurrence of hernia after 2 years of follow-up.CASE SUMMARY A 62-year-old male patient presented with recurrent abdominal pain repeatedly for 1 wk,which has worsened 2 d before admition,accompanied by fever.Five years before presentation he underwent right inguinal hernia Plug and patch repair approach.Two years ago,a computed tomography scan revealed a right lower abdominal mass with soft tissue density,measuring approximately 30 mm×17 mm,which was diagnosed as meshoma that was not treated.The patient had poorly controlled diabetes in the past year.CONCLUSION The formation of meshoma is rare,and that if not treated in time it might erode and require resection of the involved organ.

单侧GilbertⅢ型腹股沟斜疝患者腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中完全剥离与横断疝囊的临床效果比较

目的对比观察疝囊完全剥离与横断两种处理方式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗单侧GilbertⅢ型腹股沟斜疝中的临床效果。方法回顾性分析82例单侧GilbertⅢ型腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料,根据术中疝囊处理方式不同分为横断组(n=44)和剥离组(n=38);比较两组手术时间、疝囊处理时间、术中出血量、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、住院时间、住院费用以及术后并发症情况。结果横断组手术时间、疝囊处理时间短于剥离组,术中出血量少于剥离组,差异均有统计学意义(t分别=7.03、10.45、6.14,P均<0.05);两组术后12 h、24 h和48 h的VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(t分别=1.42、1.43、1.53,P均>0.05);两组术后住院时间、住院费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(t分别=0.98、0.47,P均>0.05);横断组血清肿发生率低于剥离组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.64,P<0.05),两组术后尿潴留、暂时性感觉神经障碍和切口感染发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ^(2)分别=0.21、1.39、1.17,P均>0.05)。结论疝囊完全剥离与横断两种方式在TAPP治疗GilbertⅢ型腹股沟斜疝术中均安全、有效,对于疝囊剥离困难时,横断疝囊有助于缩短手术时间,减少术后血清肿发生。

补中益气汤联合无张力疝气修补术对腹股沟疝的治疗效果

目的 探究补中益气汤联合无张力疝气修补术对腹股沟疝的治疗效果。方法 用随机数字表法将2021年7月—2022年7月于栖霞市中医医院治疗腹股沟疝的80例患者分为对照组和观察组,各40例。两组均行无张力疝气修补术,对照组术后行常规西医治疗,观察组术前术后均予补中益气汤治疗,比较两组患者术后恢复指标、中医证候评分、术后并发症。结果 观察组术后引流量少于对照组,术后拔除引流管时间和术后首次离床活动时间均短于对照组,中医证候评分低于对照组,术后并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。结论 对腹股沟疝患者采取补中益气汤联合无张力疝气修补术治疗能改善患者术后恢复指标,促进患者恢复的同时减少并发症的发生,具有较好的临床应用效果。