BACKGROUND Few reports have described lumbar foraminal stenosis-induced radiculopathy after treatment by full-endoscopic spine surgery(FESS)combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in patients with vertebral comp...BACKGROUND Few reports have described lumbar foraminal stenosis-induced radiculopathy after treatment by full-endoscopic spine surgery(FESS)combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in patients with vertebral compression fractures.We herein report such a case,including the patient’s treatment process and doctor’s surgical experience.CASE SUMMARY A 79-year-old man presented with symptoms of radiculopathy after sustaining L4 vertebral compression fractures.Imaging and physical examination revealed L4 vertebral compression fractures combined with L3/4 Lumbar foraminal stenosis(LFS).The patient’s symptoms were low back pain with pain in the lateral left leg.Although many reports have described radiculopathy induced by osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures,the use of FESS combined with PVP has rarely been reported.This case report indicates that the combination of FESS and PVP is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of LFS-induced radiculopathy after vertebral compression fractures.This minimally invasive technique has great potential to replace traditional lumbar fixation and decompression surgery.Thus,we suggest the continued accumulation of similar cases to discuss the wider application of FESS.CONCLUSION For patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF)and LFS,PVP and FESS can be used to restore the vertebral height and reduce the pressure around the intervertebral foramen.Additionally,the combination of FESS and PVP can treat the pain or numbness of the low back and lower limbs and allow for recovery in a short time with excellent postoperative effects.In general,FESS is a good treatment for radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis after OVCF.展开更多
目的 探讨和总结远程线控推注骨水泥设备在经皮椎体成形术中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年6月—2021年12月解放军第九六〇医院脊柱外科收治的单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折患者52例,男性18例,女性34例;年龄59~84岁,平均67.6岁;摔...目的 探讨和总结远程线控推注骨水泥设备在经皮椎体成形术中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年6月—2021年12月解放军第九六〇医院脊柱外科收治的单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折患者52例,男性18例,女性34例;年龄59~84岁,平均67.6岁;摔伤32例,搬运重物6例,砸伤7例,无明显诱因7例。根据推注骨水泥方式的不同分为两组,对照组29例采用手动控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥;观察组23例采用远程线控推注设备控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥,具体操作是将螺旋推进器固定于控制舱前端,开机后使用线控操作板控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥。分析术前、术后3 d VAS,术中C型臂曝光次数,骨水泥分布率、骨水泥推注时间、推注量等指标。结果 两组在术后3 d VAS较术前均有显著改善(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组骨水泥渗漏发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组较对照组骨水泥注射时间更短[(187.0±14.1)s vs.(239.7±23.7)s]、骨水泥填充量更少[(4.50±0.64) mL vs.(6.21±1.01)mL]、C型臂曝光次数更少(8.4±1.6 vs.11.4±1.8)、骨水泥分布率更高[(82.96±6.29)%vs.(75.24±4.75)%],P<0.05。两组均未出现严重并发症。结论 两种推注方式的近期手术效果相比无明显差异,观察组在减少患者、医护人员所受辐射,缩短骨水泥注射时间方面优势更为明显,值得推广使用。展开更多
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81972108.
文摘BACKGROUND Few reports have described lumbar foraminal stenosis-induced radiculopathy after treatment by full-endoscopic spine surgery(FESS)combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in patients with vertebral compression fractures.We herein report such a case,including the patient’s treatment process and doctor’s surgical experience.CASE SUMMARY A 79-year-old man presented with symptoms of radiculopathy after sustaining L4 vertebral compression fractures.Imaging and physical examination revealed L4 vertebral compression fractures combined with L3/4 Lumbar foraminal stenosis(LFS).The patient’s symptoms were low back pain with pain in the lateral left leg.Although many reports have described radiculopathy induced by osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures,the use of FESS combined with PVP has rarely been reported.This case report indicates that the combination of FESS and PVP is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of LFS-induced radiculopathy after vertebral compression fractures.This minimally invasive technique has great potential to replace traditional lumbar fixation and decompression surgery.Thus,we suggest the continued accumulation of similar cases to discuss the wider application of FESS.CONCLUSION For patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF)and LFS,PVP and FESS can be used to restore the vertebral height and reduce the pressure around the intervertebral foramen.Additionally,the combination of FESS and PVP can treat the pain or numbness of the low back and lower limbs and allow for recovery in a short time with excellent postoperative effects.In general,FESS is a good treatment for radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis after OVCF.
文摘目的 探讨和总结远程线控推注骨水泥设备在经皮椎体成形术中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年6月—2021年12月解放军第九六〇医院脊柱外科收治的单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折患者52例,男性18例,女性34例;年龄59~84岁,平均67.6岁;摔伤32例,搬运重物6例,砸伤7例,无明显诱因7例。根据推注骨水泥方式的不同分为两组,对照组29例采用手动控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥;观察组23例采用远程线控推注设备控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥,具体操作是将螺旋推进器固定于控制舱前端,开机后使用线控操作板控制螺旋推进器注射骨水泥。分析术前、术后3 d VAS,术中C型臂曝光次数,骨水泥分布率、骨水泥推注时间、推注量等指标。结果 两组在术后3 d VAS较术前均有显著改善(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组骨水泥渗漏发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组较对照组骨水泥注射时间更短[(187.0±14.1)s vs.(239.7±23.7)s]、骨水泥填充量更少[(4.50±0.64) mL vs.(6.21±1.01)mL]、C型臂曝光次数更少(8.4±1.6 vs.11.4±1.8)、骨水泥分布率更高[(82.96±6.29)%vs.(75.24±4.75)%],P<0.05。两组均未出现严重并发症。结论 两种推注方式的近期手术效果相比无明显差异,观察组在减少患者、医护人员所受辐射,缩短骨水泥注射时间方面优势更为明显,值得推广使用。
