Objective:To investigate the effect of arterial interventional chemotherapy before radical operation for gastric cancer on serum tumor markers and cell growth in the lesion.Methods:90 patients with primary gastric can...Objective:To investigate the effect of arterial interventional chemotherapy before radical operation for gastric cancer on serum tumor markers and cell growth in the lesion.Methods:90 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent radical operation for gastric cancer in our hospital were chosen as the research subjects and divided into the control group (n=48) (did not receive preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy) and the arterial interventional chemotherapy group (n=42) (received preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy). The differences in tumor markers in serum as well as proliferation and apoptosis gene expression in gastric cancer tissues were compared.Results: Before surgery started, serum CA199, CA153, CA724 and AFP levels of arterial interventional chemotherapy group were significantly lower than those immediately after admission whereas serum CA199, CA153, CA724 and AFP levels of control group were not significantly different from those immediately after admission. After surgery, proliferation genes CUL4A and NTSR1 mRNA expression in gastric cancer tissues of arterial interventional chemotherapy group were lower than those of control group whereas DADS and FAM96B mRNA expression were higher than those of control group;apoptosis genes Livin and Bcl-2 mRNA expression were lower than those of control group whereas p53, p21 and Bax mRNA expression were higher than those of control group.Conclusion:Preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy combined with radical operation for gastric cancer can more effectively inhibit the malignant degree of tumor and delay the growth of cancer cells.展开更多
BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concent...BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations.However,there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study.The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),tumor response and adverse events.Hazard ratios(HR)and odds ratios(OR)with a 95% confidence interval(CI)were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.42-0.72;HR=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.78;OR=2.86,95%CI:1.37-5.98;OR=5.45,95%CI:3.57-8.30;OR=7.15,95%CI:4.06-12.58;OR=2.89,95%CI:1.99-4.19;OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.92,respectively)and transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)(HR=0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.75;HR=0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.98;OR=3.08,95%CI:1.36-6.98;OR=2.07,95%CI:1.54-2.80;OR=3.16,95%CI:1.71-5.85;OR=2.67,95%CI:1.59-4.50;OR=0.16,95%CI:0.05-0.54,respectively)in terms of efficacy and safety.HAIC+lenvatinib+ablation,HAIC+ablation,HAIC+anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1),and HAIC+radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone.HAIC+TACE+S-1,HAIC+lenvatinib,HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE,and HAIC+sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC.HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE+S-1 and HAIC+TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE.Furthermore,combined with other interventions,HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Fistula formation is a severe adverse event related to antiangiogenetic agents such as bevacizumab and inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula(IMAVF) is a result of acquired factor, especially colon surge...BACKGROUND Fistula formation is a severe adverse event related to antiangiogenetic agents such as bevacizumab and inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula(IMAVF) is a result of acquired factor, especially colon surgery. However, IMAVF occurs very rarely and there are few reports in patients during chemotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed IMAVF during treatment with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) after colon surgery.CASE SUMMARY An 81-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer and underwent left hemicolectomy without any complications. He was definitely diagnosed with high-risk stage 2 and received tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy. Three years and 6 mo after the operation, the cancer relapsed with peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent CyberKnife radiosurgery targeting the recurrent tumor and received chemotherapy with S-1 plus bevacizumab. At 1 year after chemotherapy, he complained of severe diarrhea, which is suspected drug-induced colitis. As diarrhea worsened despite the termination of treatment, he underwent colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scans that revealed edematous change from sigmoid to rectosigmoid colon. CT scans also revealed an aneurysm adjacent to the inferior mesenteric vein and multidetector CT angiography showed the IMAVF. Elective angiography confirmed the diagnosis of an IMAVF and it was successfully treated by arterial embolization. The patient resumed chemotherapy with only S-1 6 mo after embolization.CONCLUSION Clinicians should keep in mind the probability of severe diarrhea arose from IMAVF in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab.展开更多
Objective:To study the effects of different administration routes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cancer cell growth signal pathway function in cervical cancer.Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who received neoadj...Objective:To study the effects of different administration routes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cancer cell growth signal pathway function in cervical cancer.Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Fufeng People's Hospital between July 2008 and July 2016 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into intervention group and intravenous group who accepted the neoadjuvant interventional arterial chemotherapy and neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy respectively. After surgical resection, the contents of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin and MEK/ERK signaling pathway in cervical cancer lesions were determined.Results:p-PI3K, p-AKT, mTOR, MMP2, VEGF,β-catenin, CyclinD1, Twist, Slug, Snail, MEK1, MEK2, ERK1/2 and Bcl-2 protein levels in cervical cancer lesion of intervention group were significantly lower than those of intravenous group whereas E-cadherin and Bax protein levels were significantly higher than those of intravenous group.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant interventional arterial chemotherapy can be more effective than neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy to inhibit the cancer cell growth mediated by PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin and MEK/ERK signaling pathway in cervical cancer.展开更多
目的评估新辅助动脉介入化疗(NAIC)和新辅助全身静脉化疗(NIVC)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的有效性与安全性。方法通过检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库获取符合主题的随机对照试验(RCT),经文献质量评估和数据...目的评估新辅助动脉介入化疗(NAIC)和新辅助全身静脉化疗(NIVC)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的有效性与安全性。方法通过检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库获取符合主题的随机对照试验(RCT),经文献质量评估和数据提取后使用Stata 17.0进行统计学分析,使用GRADE质量评价系统对结局进行质量评估。结果共纳入14项RCT,合计1063例LACC患者。Meta分析结果表明,NAIC和NIVC在有效性指标方面:完全缓解(CR)[RR=1.23,95%CI(0.91,1.67),P=0.174]、部分缓解(PR)[RR=1.10,95%CI(0.86,1.20),P=0.874]、总缓解(TR)[RR=1.10,95%CI(0.95,1.25),P=0.212]、无变化(NC)[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.33,1.16),P=0.137]和进展(PD)[RR=1.43,95%CI(0.41,4.99),P=0.574]间的差异无统计学意义;在安全性指标方面:胃肠道反应[RR=0.96,95%CI(0.76,1.23),P=0.755]、肝肾功能损害[RR=0.71,95%CI(0.41,1.23),P=0.226]差异无统计学意义,而在骨髓抑制[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.45,0.86),P=0.04]的发生率方面,NAIC较NIVC更优。此外,GRADE评分结果显示CR、PR、TR、NC为高质量证据。结论对于LACC患者,NAIC在治疗后骨髓抑制的发生率较NIVC更低、更安全,在其他有效性与安全性指标上两者并未发现显著差异。临床医师根据患者的实际情况综合评估,选择适宜新辅助化疗方案。展开更多
文摘Objective:To investigate the effect of arterial interventional chemotherapy before radical operation for gastric cancer on serum tumor markers and cell growth in the lesion.Methods:90 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent radical operation for gastric cancer in our hospital were chosen as the research subjects and divided into the control group (n=48) (did not receive preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy) and the arterial interventional chemotherapy group (n=42) (received preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy). The differences in tumor markers in serum as well as proliferation and apoptosis gene expression in gastric cancer tissues were compared.Results: Before surgery started, serum CA199, CA153, CA724 and AFP levels of arterial interventional chemotherapy group were significantly lower than those immediately after admission whereas serum CA199, CA153, CA724 and AFP levels of control group were not significantly different from those immediately after admission. After surgery, proliferation genes CUL4A and NTSR1 mRNA expression in gastric cancer tissues of arterial interventional chemotherapy group were lower than those of control group whereas DADS and FAM96B mRNA expression were higher than those of control group;apoptosis genes Livin and Bcl-2 mRNA expression were lower than those of control group whereas p53, p21 and Bax mRNA expression were higher than those of control group.Conclusion:Preoperative arterial interventional chemotherapy combined with radical operation for gastric cancer can more effectively inhibit the malignant degree of tumor and delay the growth of cancer cells.
文摘BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations.However,there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study.The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),tumor response and adverse events.Hazard ratios(HR)and odds ratios(OR)with a 95% confidence interval(CI)were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.42-0.72;HR=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.78;OR=2.86,95%CI:1.37-5.98;OR=5.45,95%CI:3.57-8.30;OR=7.15,95%CI:4.06-12.58;OR=2.89,95%CI:1.99-4.19;OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.92,respectively)and transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)(HR=0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.75;HR=0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.98;OR=3.08,95%CI:1.36-6.98;OR=2.07,95%CI:1.54-2.80;OR=3.16,95%CI:1.71-5.85;OR=2.67,95%CI:1.59-4.50;OR=0.16,95%CI:0.05-0.54,respectively)in terms of efficacy and safety.HAIC+lenvatinib+ablation,HAIC+ablation,HAIC+anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1),and HAIC+radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone.HAIC+TACE+S-1,HAIC+lenvatinib,HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE,and HAIC+sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC.HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE+S-1 and HAIC+TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE.Furthermore,combined with other interventions,HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.
文摘BACKGROUND Fistula formation is a severe adverse event related to antiangiogenetic agents such as bevacizumab and inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula(IMAVF) is a result of acquired factor, especially colon surgery. However, IMAVF occurs very rarely and there are few reports in patients during chemotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed IMAVF during treatment with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) after colon surgery.CASE SUMMARY An 81-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer and underwent left hemicolectomy without any complications. He was definitely diagnosed with high-risk stage 2 and received tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy. Three years and 6 mo after the operation, the cancer relapsed with peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent CyberKnife radiosurgery targeting the recurrent tumor and received chemotherapy with S-1 plus bevacizumab. At 1 year after chemotherapy, he complained of severe diarrhea, which is suspected drug-induced colitis. As diarrhea worsened despite the termination of treatment, he underwent colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scans that revealed edematous change from sigmoid to rectosigmoid colon. CT scans also revealed an aneurysm adjacent to the inferior mesenteric vein and multidetector CT angiography showed the IMAVF. Elective angiography confirmed the diagnosis of an IMAVF and it was successfully treated by arterial embolization. The patient resumed chemotherapy with only S-1 6 mo after embolization.CONCLUSION Clinicians should keep in mind the probability of severe diarrhea arose from IMAVF in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab.
文摘Objective:To study the effects of different administration routes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cancer cell growth signal pathway function in cervical cancer.Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Fufeng People's Hospital between July 2008 and July 2016 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into intervention group and intravenous group who accepted the neoadjuvant interventional arterial chemotherapy and neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy respectively. After surgical resection, the contents of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin and MEK/ERK signaling pathway in cervical cancer lesions were determined.Results:p-PI3K, p-AKT, mTOR, MMP2, VEGF,β-catenin, CyclinD1, Twist, Slug, Snail, MEK1, MEK2, ERK1/2 and Bcl-2 protein levels in cervical cancer lesion of intervention group were significantly lower than those of intravenous group whereas E-cadherin and Bax protein levels were significantly higher than those of intravenous group.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant interventional arterial chemotherapy can be more effective than neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy to inhibit the cancer cell growth mediated by PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin and MEK/ERK signaling pathway in cervical cancer.
文摘目的评估新辅助动脉介入化疗(NAIC)和新辅助全身静脉化疗(NIVC)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的有效性与安全性。方法通过检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库获取符合主题的随机对照试验(RCT),经文献质量评估和数据提取后使用Stata 17.0进行统计学分析,使用GRADE质量评价系统对结局进行质量评估。结果共纳入14项RCT,合计1063例LACC患者。Meta分析结果表明,NAIC和NIVC在有效性指标方面:完全缓解(CR)[RR=1.23,95%CI(0.91,1.67),P=0.174]、部分缓解(PR)[RR=1.10,95%CI(0.86,1.20),P=0.874]、总缓解(TR)[RR=1.10,95%CI(0.95,1.25),P=0.212]、无变化(NC)[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.33,1.16),P=0.137]和进展(PD)[RR=1.43,95%CI(0.41,4.99),P=0.574]间的差异无统计学意义;在安全性指标方面:胃肠道反应[RR=0.96,95%CI(0.76,1.23),P=0.755]、肝肾功能损害[RR=0.71,95%CI(0.41,1.23),P=0.226]差异无统计学意义,而在骨髓抑制[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.45,0.86),P=0.04]的发生率方面,NAIC较NIVC更优。此外,GRADE评分结果显示CR、PR、TR、NC为高质量证据。结论对于LACC患者,NAIC在治疗后骨髓抑制的发生率较NIVC更低、更安全,在其他有效性与安全性指标上两者并未发现显著差异。临床医师根据患者的实际情况综合评估,选择适宜新辅助化疗方案。
