A Practical Method to Evaluate and Verify Dose Calculation Algorithms in the Treatment Planning System of Radiation Therapy

Purpose: To introduce a practical method of using an Electron Density Phantom (EDP) to evaluate different dose calculation algorithms for photon beams in a treatment planning system (TPS) and to commission the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) with inhomogeneity correction in Varian Eclipse TPS. Methods and Materials: The same EDP with various tissue-equivalent plugs (water, lung exhale, lung inhale, liver, breast, muscle, adipose, dense bone, trabecular bone) used to calibrate the computed tomography (CT) simulator was adopted to evaluate different dose calculation algorithms in a TPS by measuring the actual dose delivered to the EDP. The treatment plans with a 6-Megavolt (MV) single field of 20 × 20, 10 × 10, and 4 × 4 cm2 field sizes were created based on the CT images of the EDP. A dose of 200 cGy was prescribed to the exhale-lung insert. Dose calculations were performed with AAA with inhomogeneity correction, Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC), and AAA without inhomogeneity correction. The plans were delivered and the actual doses were measured using radiation dosimetry devices MapCheck, EDR2-film, and ionization chamber respectively. Measured doses were compared with the calculated doses from the treatment plans. Results: The calculated dose using the AAA with inhomogeneity correction was most consistent with the measured dose. The dose discrepancy for all types of tissues covered by beam fields is at the level of 2%. The effect of AAA inhomogeneity correction for lung tissues is over 14%. Conclusions: The use of EDP and Map Check to evaluate and commission the dose calculation algorithms in a TPS is practical. In Varian Eclipse TPS, the AAA with inhomogeneity correction should be used for treatment planning especially when lung tissues are involved in a small radiation field.

Dose Distributions in Simulated Electron Radiotherapy with Intraoral Cones Using Treatment Planning System

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the difference between depth data from an intraoral cone and a conventional irradiation tube calculated using a treatment planning system (TPS), and that measured using an intraoral cone for electron radiotherapy. Background: A TPS is only compatible with conventional irradiation tubes. However, such systems are not suitable for determining dose distributions when a special cone is employed. Materials and Methods: Dose distributions were calculated using the beam data for mounted intraoral cones using a TPS. Then, the dose distribution by field size was calculated for a low-melting-point lead alloy using the beam data for a mounted conventional tube. The calculated data were evaluated against the measured intraoral-cone depth data based on the dose and depth differences. Results: The calculated data for the intraoral cone case did not match the measured data. However, the depth data obtained considering the field size determined for the lead alloy using the conventional tube were close to the measured values for the intraoral cone case. The difference in the depth at which the absorbed dose was 50% of the maximum value of the percentage depth dose was less than ±4 mm for the generalized Gaussian pencil beam convolution algorithm and less than ±1 mm for the electron Monte Carlo algorithm. Conclusion: It was found that the measured and calculated dose distributions were in agreement, especially when then electron Monte Carlo algorithm was used. Thus, the TPS can be employed to determine dose distributions for intraoral cone applications.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs c-IMRT in esophageal cancer:A treatment planning comparison

AIM： To compare the volumetric-modulated arc ther- apy （VMAT） plans with conventional sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy （c-IMRT） plans in esophageal cancer （EC）. METHODS： Twenty patients with EC were selected, including 5 cases located in the cervical, the upper, the middle and the lower thorax, respectively. Five plans were generated with the eclipse planning sys- tem： three using c-IMRT with 5 fields （5F）, 7 fields （7F） and 9 fields （gF）, and two using VMAT with a single arc （1A） and double arcs （2A）. The treatment plans were designed to deliver a dose of 60 Gy to the plan-ning target volume （PTV） with the same constrains in a 2.0 Gy daily fraction, 5 d a week. Plans were normal- ized to 95% of the PTV that received 100% of the pre- scribed dose. We examined the dose-volume histogram parameters of PTV and the organs at risk （OAR） such as lungs, spinal cord and heart. Monitor units （MU） and normal tissue complication probability （NTCP） of OAR were also reported. RESULTS： Both c-IMRT and VMAT plans resulted in abundant dose coverage of PTV for EC of different Io- cations. The dose conformity to PTV was improved as the number of field in c-IMRT or rotating arc in VMAT was increased. The doses to PTV and OAR in VMAT plans were not statistically different in comparison with c-IMRT plans, with the following exceptions： in cervical and upper thoracic EC, the conformity index （CI） was higher in VMAT （1A 0.78 and 2A 0.8） than in c-IMRT （5F 0.62, 7F 0.66 and 9F 0.73） and homogeneity was slightly better in c-IMRT （7F 1.09 and 9F 1.07） than in VMAT （1A 1,1 and 2A 1.09）, Lung V30 was lower in VMAT （1A 12.52 and 2A 12.29） than in c-IMRT （7F 14.35 and 9F 14.81）. The humeral head doses were significantly increased in VMAT as against c-IMRT. In the middle and lower thoracic EC, CI in VMAT （1A 0.76 and 2A 0.74） was higher than in c-IMRT （5F 0.63 Gy and 7F 0.67 Gy）, and homogeneity was almost similar between VMAT and c-IMRT. V20 （2A 21.49 Gy vs 7F 24.59 Gy and 9F 24.16 Gy） and V30 （2A 9.73 Gy vs 5F 12.61 Gy, 7F 11.5 Gy and 9F 11.37 Gy） of lungs in VMAT were lower than in c-IMRT, but low doses to lungs （V5 and Vl0） were increased. V30 （1A 48.12 Gy vs 5F 59.2 Gy, 7F 58.59 Gy and 9F 57.2 Gy）, V40 and V50 of heart in VMAT was lower than in c-IMRT. MUs in VMAT plans were significantly reduced in comparison with c-IMRT, maximum doses to the spinal cord and mean doses of lungs were similar between the two techniques. NTCP of spinal cord was 0 for all cases. NTCP of lungs and heart in VMAT were lower than in c-IMRT. The advantage of VMAT plan was enhanced by doubling the arc. CONCLUSION： Compared with c-IMRT, VMAT, especial- ly the 2A, slightly improves the OAR dose sparing, such as lungs and heart, and reduces NTCP and MU with a better PTV coverage.

CT image fusion in the evaluation of radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: We studied the application of CT image fusion in the evaluation of radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Eleven patients with NSCLC, who were treated with three-dimensional con-formal radiation therapy, were studied. Each patient underwent twice sequential planning CT scan, i.e., at pre-treatment, and at mid-treatment for field reduction planning. Three treatment plans were established in each patient: treatment plan A was based on the pre-treatment planning CT scans for the first course of treatment, plan B on the mid-treatment planning CT scans for the second course of treatment, and treatment plan F on the fused images for the whole treatment. The irradiation doses received by organs at risk in the whole treatment with treatment A and B plans were estimated by the plus of the parameters in treatment plan A and B, assuming that the parameters involve the different tissues (i.e. V20=AV20+BV20), or the same tissues within an organ (i.e. Dmax=ADmax+BDmax). The assessment parameters in the treatment plan F were calculated on the basis of the DVH of the whole treatment. Then the above assessment results were compared. Results: There were marked differ-ences between the assessment results derived from the plus of assessment parameters in treatment plan A and B, and the ones derived from treatment plan F. Conclusion: When a treatment plan is altered during the course of radiation treatment, image fusion technique should be performed in the establishment of a new one. The estimation of the assessment parameters for the whole treatment with treatment plan A and B by simple plus, is inaccurate.

Validation of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations: Experience Working with Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.

Recently published Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a. (MPPG 5.a.) by American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) sets the minimum requirements for treatment planning system (TPS) dose algorithm commissioning and quality assurance (QA). The guideline recommends some validation tests and tolerances based primarily on published AAPM task group reports and the criteria used by IROC Houston. We performed the commissioning and validation of the dose algorithms for both megavoltage photon and electron beams on three linacs following MPPG 5.a. We designed the validation experiments in an attempt to highlight the evaluation method and tolerance criteria recommended by the guideline. It seems that comparison of dose profiles using in-water scan is an effective technique for basic photon and electron validation. IMRT/VMAT dose calculation is recommended to be tested with some TG-119 and clinical cases, but no consensus of the tolerance exists. Extensive validation tests have provided the better understanding of the accuracy and limitation of a specific dose calculation algorithm. We believe that some tests and evaluation criteria given in the guideline can be further refined.

Comparison between 4D robust optimization methods for carbon-ion treatment planning

Intensity-modulated particle therapy(IMPT)with carbon ions is comparatively susceptible to various uncertainties caused by breathing motion,including range,setup,and target positioning uncertainties.To determine relative biological effectiveness-weighted dose(RWD)distributions that are resilient to these uncertainties,the reference phase-based four-dimensional(4D)robust optimization(RP-4DRO)and each phase-based 4D robust optimization(EP-4DRO)method in carbon-ion IMPT treatment planning were evaluated and compared.Based on RWD distributions,4DRO methods were compared with 4D conventional optimization using planning target volume(PTV)margins(PTV-based optimization)to assess the effectiveness of the robust optimization methods.Carbon-ion IMPT treatment planning was conducted in a cohort of five lung cancer patients.The results indicated that the EP-4DRO method provided better robustness(P=0.080)and improved plan quality(P=0.225)for the clinical target volume(CTV)in the individual respiratory phase when compared with the PTV-based optimization.Compared with the PTV-based optimization,the RP-4DRO method ensured the robustness(P=0.022)of the dose distributions in the reference breathing phase,albeit with a slight sacrifice of the target coverage(P=0.450).Both 4DRO methods successfully maintained the doses delivered to the organs at risk(OARs)below tolerable levels,which were lower than the doses in the PTV-based optimization(P<0.05).Furthermore,the RP-4DRO method exhibited significantly superior performance when compared with the EP-4DRO method in enhancing overall OAR sparing in either the individual respiratory phase or reference respiratory phase(P<0.05).In general,both 4DRO methods outperformed the PTV-based optimization in terms of OAR sparing and robustness.

Tridimensional Treatment Planning and Rapid Prototyping for Maxillofacial Prosthesis

The current simulation planning systems for maxillofacial prosthesis surgery were used to extrapolate 3D surgical movements and outcomes based on the 2D radiographs, which were inadequate for complex surgical movements.A 3D treatment planning system based on the computerized tomography (CT) data was presented. A 3D data field was constructed out of the sectional image stack through linear interpolation. After objective tissue segmentation and using the marching cubes algorithm method, the triangular mesh model and 3D geometric model of diseased facial skeleton were reconstructed. Then the model was cut, the segments were moved or rotated to their predicted positions, and angles and distances were measured. After triangular mesh model was decimated, a RP model was manufactured for surgical simulation and prosthesis design. The system was used in clinic with more than fifty cases and technically validated with success.

Comparative Study between Field-in-Field and IMRT Techniques in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Treatment Planning Study

Introduction: Field-in-Field (FIF) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are two advanced radiation therapy planning techniques. Both of them are being used to achieve the same two related aims which are, to expose the targeted tumor to the full radiation dose and to spare the nearby normal tissues (or organs) from being exposed to high amounts of radiation more than its tolerance dose limits. FIF is a forward planning while IMRT is an inverse planning and FIF is a forward IMRT. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare between Field-in-Field and IMRT techniques in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Method: A treatment planning system supporting both inverse and forward planning facilities is used. Ten prostate cancer patients were planned with both FIF and IMRT planning techniques. Doses received by the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and Organs at Risk (OARs) were compared in the two methods quantitatively from Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs) and qualitatively from (axial cuts). Results: The results showed that the IMRT planning technique achieved better dose coverage to the PTV than the FIF planning technique but, except RT and LT Femoral Heads, FIF achieved a better protection to the Rectum and the Bladder (OARs) than IMRT. Conclusions: The results showed that the inverse planning based IMRT technique is better and recommended in the prostate cancer radiotherapy than the FIF technique.

Complex Target Volume Delineation and Treatment Planning in Radiotherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM)

Introduction: Radiotherapy alone or combined with surgery and/or chemotherapy is being investigated in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study aimed to simulate a Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment of a patient with MPM. Materials and Methods: CT images from a patient with intact lungs were imported via DICOM into the Pinnacle3 treatment planning (TP) system (TPS) and used as a model for MPM to delineate organs at risk (OAR) and both clinical and planning target volumes (CTV and PTV) with a margin of 5 mm. Elekta Synergy with 6 MV photons and 80 leafs MLCi2 was employed. VMAT plans were generated using two coplanar arcs with gantry rotation angles of 178° - 182°, the collimator angles of each arc were set to 90°, Octavius® 4D 729 was employed for quality assurance while the calculated and measured doses were compared using VeriSoft. Results: A TP was achieved. The Gamma volume analysis with criteria of 3 mm distance to agreement and 3% dose difference yielded the gamma passing rate = 99.9%. The reference isodose was 42.75 Gy with the coverage constraints for the PTV D95 and V95 = 95.0% of 45 Gy. The remaining dosimetric parameters met the recommendations from the clinically acceptable guidelines for the radiotherapy of MPM. Conclusion: Using well-defined TV and VMAT, a consistent TP compared to similar ones from publications was achieved. We obtained a high agreement between the 3D dose reconstructed and the dose calculated.

Comparison of the dose to lung volume between supine and prone position during treatment planning

Objective The aim of the study was to compare the dose to lung volume in the supine and prone posi- tion while designing CyberKnife treatment plans to treat metastatic tumors in the spinous processes of the thoracic vertebrae, and offer a reference for reducing damage to normal tissues. Methods Nine cases of metastatic tumors in the spinous processes of the thoracic vertebrae were selected, and then we designed treatment plans based on the supine and prone positions and compared the results. Results In contrast with the treatment plan based on the prone position, the one for the supine position required 14862-36337 MU more; the lung D5% was 5.20-7.90 Gy higher; and the lung D20% was 2.61-5.73 Gy higher. The difference of dose to spine volume between the two plans was -2.21-2.67 Gy; to the skin volume was -3.93-7.85 Gy; and to the esophagus was 0.28-6.39 Gy. Conclusion The treatment plan based on the prone position of patients can better protect lung tissues than the one based on the supine position, and can also improve the avaUabilitv of beams.

Effect of Non-Delineated Normal Volumes in IMRT Treatment for Left Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study

Introduction: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) planning dose calculation process depends on IMRT dose constraints. So, if there was any structure along the treatment beam path not delineated, it would not be taken into account during that calculation process. During IMRT routine practical work, it is noticed that there are some non-delineated normal tissue volumes that received un-aimed dose. Aim: The purpose of this study was to study the effect of unusually delineated normal volumes in IMRT treatment for left sided breast cancer. Method: Ten left sided breast cancer patients were planned with IMRT inverse planning system. The unusually delineated normal volumes were delineated and taken into account in IMRT dose constraints as an Organ at Risk. Doses received by that volume were compared in the two methods quantitatively from Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs) and qualitatively from (axial cuts). Results: The results showed that doses received by the unusually delineated volume when they were delineated and taken into account in IMRT dose constraints were significantly higher than when they were not. Conclusions: The results showed that for IMRT planning technique used for treating left-sided breast cancer, all of the normal tissues/structures that are closed to the treatment targets must be delineated and taken into account in the IMRT planning dose constraints.

Advanced Treatment Planning in Cancer Thermal Therapies

CEM43 thermal dose is a very common concept in thermal oncology.Thermal dose is the maximum amount of energy that can be transmitted during hyperthermia therapy conducted on temperature-sensitive tissue.Thermal dose is also the maximum value of local energy accumulation in human bodies,which can lead to tissue injury and pain.Thermal dose can also decrease the finishing temperature and reduce the energy to the tolerable range.There are two functions of the individualized hyperthermia treatment plan:it determines the setting and location that can realize the best tumor hyperthermia therapy;at the same time,it can decrease the effect of hyperthermia therapy on healthy tissues.There are four steps in the treatment plan of hyperthermia therapy for tumors:the first step is to establish a three dimensional human body model and its corresponding an atomical structure that can be used in numerical algorithm via medical imaging resources;the second step is to determine the volume of the electromagnetic energy accumulation.Based on the peculiarity of frequency and materials,even full-wave electromagnetic wave or quasi-static technique can be used to determine the tissue distribution.Evaluation of the therapy can be conducted based on thermal dose and the corresponding tissue damage model;the third step is to use Arrhenius model to provide direct evaluation of tissues in the thermal ablation zone,solidification zone,as well as the necrotic area;the last step is the optimization of the treatment plan.

Research Progress on Individualized Treatment of Splenic Aneurysm

Splenic artery aneurysm has a hidden onset and atypical symptoms.There are various diagnostic methods for splenic aneurysms,among which ultrasound is the first choice for aneurysm screening.The diagnostic rate of CTA and DSA reaches 100%.In clinical practice,it is necessary to integrate medical history,symptoms and signs,and multiple imaging results to improve the diagnostic rate.In terms of treatment plans,both intervention and surgical procedures have their strengths,and the application of intervention will be more extensive.We need to adhere to the principle of individualization and choose a reasonable treatment plan for patients.At present,there are many reports on pregnant women with large splenic aneurysms both domestically and internationally.Some scholars believe that large splenic aneurysms may be related to hormonal imbalances during pregnancy,and the specific pathogenic mechanism will become a hot topic in future research.

AiPlan放射治疗计划系统的临床剂量学测试

目的对AiPlan三维放射治疗计划系统(Treatment Planning System,TPS)进行临床剂量学验证,以检验AiPlan系统在临床正常使用条件下的有效性和安全性。方法随机选取60例在Pinnacle计划系统上已完成放射治疗计划设计的患者,将60例患者的CT图像及RT Structures通过DICOM网络传输至AiPlanTPS,并应用AiPlan系统对60例临床病例重新进行放射治疗计划设计。分别对Pinnacle和AiPan两组放射治疗计划进行绝对点剂量以及二维面剂量验证,同时比较两组放射治疗计划等中心及附近层面剂量分布情况,运用统计学方法对两组计划剂量验证结果进行分析。结果 AiPlanTPS能够实现逆向调强放射治疗计划设计所需的各项功能;经AiPlan系统设计的60例放射治疗计划均能满足临床剂量要求;绝对点剂量误差范围为-3.27%~3.98%,二维面剂量验证Gamma通过率为97.5%±2.8%,该结果与Pinnacle系统计划验证结果相比无统计学差异(t=0.149、1.858,P=0.882、0.068)。结论 Aiplan三维TPS在剂量计算精度上达同类进口产品相似水平,能够满足临床要求。

基于临床质子加速器的DeepPlan笔形束模型构建

目的:基于佛罗里达大学质子放疗中心(University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute,UFHPTI)质子加速器在笔形束扫描模式下的临床实验数据,在DeepPlan中构建相应模型,验证模型构建的准确性并初步应用于临床前列腺癌的剂量计算。方法:在DeepPlan质子模块中建立UFHPTI质子加速器的笔形束计算模型,并将剂量计算结果与临床实验数据进行对比,包括30组积分深度剂量(Integrated Depth Dose,IDD)、30组空气中质子束斑发散大小、1组多能量多点照射下的纵向扩展布拉格峰(Spread Out Bragg Peak,SOBP)和横向剂量分布,以此验证模型构建的准确性。最后以UFHPTI的两个前列腺癌临床放疗计划为指导,将DeepPlan计算结果与商用放疗计划系统RayStation计算结果通过PTW公司的VeriSoft软件进行gamma分析。结果:DeepPlan质子模块计算产生的30组IDD与UFHPTI加速器的临床实验数据平均相对误差为0.01%,最大相对误差为0.23%;30组空气质子束斑发散大小与临床实验数据平均相对误差为0.15%,最大相对误差为1.14%。在多能量多点照射下,DeepPlan质子模块计算产生的SOBP与临床实验数据平均相对误差为1.07%,最大相对误差为3.91%;横向剂量分布和临床实验数据平均相对误差为1.92%,最大相对误差为4.09%。针对两个前列腺癌的放疗计划,DeepPlan质子模块与RayStation计算的三维剂量结果在以3 mm/3%的标准下每个子野的gamma通过率都达到95%以上,其中病例1两个子野(270°和90°方向)的gamma通过率分别为96.4%和97.5%,病例2两个子野(270°和90°方向)的gamma通过率分别为99.3%和98.9%。结论:在DeepPlan中构建了与UFHPTI质子加速器相匹配的笔形束模型,该模型可初步应用于临床前列腺癌的剂量计算。

Optimal scheme of Shengmai Injection in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease based on Louvain algorithm: A real world study

Objective:To explore the optimal scheme of Shengmai Injection combined with other drugs for clinical doctors.Methods:Based on the large-scale data warehouse established by the institute of Clinical Basic Medicine,Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,the hospital information system of 22 large-scale tertiary hospitals in China was collected and 1751 patients with angina pectoris who were treated with Shengmai Injection were selected.Louvain algorithm and complex network analysis are used to build the model to summarize the rule of Shengmai Injection in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease.Results:On the basis of Shengmai Injection,according to the symptom treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease,nitrates or Suxiao Jiuxin Pill was used to dilate coronary artery;for the treatment of risk factors of angina pectoris,a combination of"insulin+acarbose+bisoprolol+nifedipine+captopril+estazolam"was used to control blood glucose and blood pressure;"Ganmao Qingre Granule+levofloxacin"to treat upper respiratory tract infection and other medication regimens were used as well.For the complications of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease,"furosemide+spironolactone+potassium chloride+magnesium sulfate"was used to reduce edema and“isosorbide nitrate+metoprolol+Shenmai injection+Wenxin Granule"was used to improve symptom of heart failure of qi and yin deficiency type.Conclusion:The therapeutic regimen of Shengmai Injection combined with traditional chinese medicine and western medicine is basically consistent with the current guidelines,but more clinical studies are still needed to explore more effective combination therapy.

Diagnosis and treatment discussion of congenital factor VII deficiency in pregnancy:A case report

BACKGROUND Congenital factor VII deficiency(FVIID)is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder.The clinical manifestations of this deficiency vary greatly.Predicting the risk of bleeding during and after childbirth of pregnant women with congenital FVIID is difficult.Recombinant factor VIIa is the most common replacement therapy for FVIID.However,no unified diagnosis and treatment plan for pregnant women with congenital FVIID has been established.CASE SUMMARY We report the clinical history of a pregnant woman who was considered to have congenital FVIID.Recombinant factor VIIa was prophylactically administered to the pregnant woman at the time of cervical fully opening.She successfully delivered a live infant without any complications,such as postpartum hemorrhage,neonatal abnormalities,and so on.CONCLUSION Prophylaxis of recombinant factor VIIa during delivery can effectively reduce the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage among pregnant women with congenital FVIID associated with a high risk of bleeding.

放疗计划系统DeepPlan光子放疗剂量计算的临床可行性验证

目的:评估DeepPlan放疗计划系统患者计划剂量计算的准确性和临床应用的可行性。方法:剂量算法准确性评估主要是针对YY 0775号和YY/T 0889号报告中的例题内容进行测量验证。临床病例验证是基于Pinnacle计划系统设计的前列腺肿瘤患者9例、胸部肿瘤患者13例和头颈部肿瘤患者5例,试验将各病例原计划优化的子野等信息直接导入DeepPlan进行重新剂量计算,比较不同计划系统得到的靶区和危及器官剂量分布,并用PTW VeriSoft软件对两组计算结果进行全空间剂量γ分析。结果:DeepPlan光子剂量算法通过了剂量计算准确性验证,YY 0775号报告中所有测试例题误差均在2%以内。YY/T 0889号报告中所有患者计划的γ通过率均在96.8%以上,复合野的γ通过率平均值为98.1%。在病例验证中,前列腺肿瘤病例的等中心层面2Dγ通过率平均值为97.6%,3Dγ通过率平均值为96.9%。胸部肿瘤病例的等中心层面2Dγ通过率平均值为98.7%,3Dγ通过率平均值为98.3%。头颈部肿瘤病例的中间层面2Dγ通过率为98.6%,3Dγ通过率平均值为98.8%。结论:通过模体实际测量和临床病例测试,验证了DeepPlan光子放疗剂量计算的准确性和临床应用的可行性。

Clear aligner treatment for a four-year-old patient with anterior crossbite and facial asymmetry:A case report

BACKGROUND Clear aligners have been widely used to treat malocclusions from crowding,extraction cases to orthodontic-orthognathic cases,and practitioners are exploring the border of it.For the first time,clear aligners were used to early intervene anterior cross-bite and facial asymmetry.CASE SUMMARY This case report described a four-year-old child presented with anterior cross-bite and facial asymmetry associated with functional mandibular shift,who had undergone a failed treatment with conventional appliances.The total treatment time was 18 weeks,and a stable outcome was obtained.CONCLUSION The increasing need in early treatment highlights the need for clinicians to thoroughly investigate for the patient regarding clinical manifestation as well as patient compliance.We hope that our case will be contemplated by clinicians when seeking for treatment alternatives.

Evolving role of salvage reirradiation: Is global harmonization required before treatment guidelines can be developed?

Up to 90% of patients initially treated with curativeintent radiotherapy(RT) will experience locoregional failure. Historically, reirradiation(Re RT) was offered purely with palliative intent, if considered at all, due to concerns surrounding toxicity, tolerance of normal tissues, and choice of appropriate dose schedule. With technological advancements in RT delivery, coupled with longer survival in many malignancies secondary to improvements in systemic therapy, a small subset of patients presenting with localized recurrence is increasingly being offered salvage Re RT. However, this is largely on an ad hoc basis, guided mainly by small retrospective, single-institution reports. The patient population retreated, RT modality, dose received, degree of attrition and follow-up are extremely variable. The opportunity presently exists to apply lessons learned from the harmonization of the research efforts within the bone metastases community to the salvage Re RT situation: the adoption of common endpoints, minimum features to be incorporated into clinical trial design, and methods of data analysis and reporting. The Re RT data available must be harmonized so that valid, clinically applicable conclusions can be drawn. Collaboration in the form of an international registry of prospectively collected outcomes of patients reirradiated for cure for a variety of tumour sites would further support the evolution of Radiation Oncology towards personalized medicine, and away from the current "one-dose-fits-all" approach.