To determine the possibility that diabetes mellitus promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via glyceraldehyde (GA)-derived advanced glycation-end products (GA-AGEs). METHODSPANC-1, a human pancreatic cancer cell li...To determine the possibility that diabetes mellitus promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via glyceraldehyde (GA)-derived advanced glycation-end products (GA-AGEs). METHODSPANC-1, a human pancreatic cancer cell line, was treated with 1-4 mmol/L GA for 24 h. The cell viability and intracellular GA-AGEs were measured by WST-8 assay and slot blotting. Moreover, immunostaining of PANC-1 cells with an anti-GA-AGE antibody was performed. Western blotting (WB) was used to analyze the molecular weight of GA-AGEs. Heat shock proteins 90α, 90β, 70, 27 and cleaved caspase-3 were analyzed by WB. In addition, PANC-1 cells were treated with GA-AGEs-bovine serum albumin (GA-AGEs-BSA), as a model of extracellular GA-AGEs, and proliferation of PANC-1 cells was measured. RESULTSIn PANC-1 cells, GA induced the production of GA-AGEs and cell death in a dose-dependent manner. PANC-1 cell viability was approximately 40% with a 2 mmol/L GA treatment and decreased to almost 0% with a 4 mmol/L GA treatment (each significant difference was P < 0.01). Cells treated with 2 and 4 mmol/L GA produced 6.4 and 21.2 μg/mg protein of GA-AGEs, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). The dose-dependent production of some high-molecular-weight (HMW) complexes of HSP90β, HSP70, and HSP27 was observed following administration of GA. We considered HMW complexes to be dimers and trimers with GA-AGEs-mediated aggregation. Cleaved caspase-3 could not be detected with WB. Furthermore, 10 and 20 μg/mL GA-AGEs-BSA was 27% and 34% greater than that of control cells, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONAlthough intracellular GA-AGEs induce pancreatic cancer cell death, their secretion and release may promote the proliferation of other pancreatic cancer cells.展开更多
BACKGROUND Liver cancer has a high mortality and morbidity rate throughout the world.In clinical practice,the prognosis of liver cancer patients is poor,and the complex reasons contribute to treatment failures,includi...BACKGROUND Liver cancer has a high mortality and morbidity rate throughout the world.In clinical practice,the prognosis of liver cancer patients is poor,and the complex reasons contribute to treatment failures,including fibrosis,hepatitis viral infection,drug resistance and metastasis.Thus,screening novel prognostic biomarkers is of great importance for guiding liver cancer therapy.Orosomucoid genes(ORMs)encode acute phase plasma proteins,including orosomucoid 1(ORM1)and ORM2.Previous studies showed their upregulation upon inflammation,but the specific function of ORMs has not yet been determined,especially in the development of liver cancer.AIM To determine the expression of ORMs and their potential function in liver cancer.METHODS Analysis of the expression of ORMs in different human tissues was performed on data from the HPA RNA-seq normal tissues project.The expression ratio of ORMs was determined using the HCCDB database,including the ratio between liver cancer and other cancers,normal liver and other normal tissues,liver cancer and adjacent normal liver tissues.Analysis of ORM expression in different cancer types was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and TIMER database.The expression of ORMs in liver tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues were further confirmed using Gene Expression Omnibus data,including GSE36376 and GSE14520.The 10-year overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS)and relapse-free survival(RFS)rates between high and low ORM expression groups in liver cancer patients were determined using the Kaplan-Meier plotter tool.Gene Set Enrichment Analysis(GSEA)was employed to explore the ORM2-associated signaling network.Correlations between ORM2 expression and tumor purity or the infiltration level of macrophages in liver tumor tissues were determined using the TIMER database.The correlation between ORM2 gene levels,tumor-associated macrophage(TAM)markers(including CD68 and TGFβ1)and T cell immunosuppression(including CTLA4 and PD-1)in liver tumor tissues and liver GTEx was determined using the GEPIA database.RESULTS ORM1 and ORM2 were highly expressed in normal liver and liver tumor tissues.ORM1 and ORM2 expression was significantly decreased in liver tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues,and similar results were also noted in cholangiocarcinoma,esophageal carcinoma,and lung squamous cell carcinoma.Further analysis of the Gene Expression Omnibus Database also confirmed the downregulation of ORM1 and ORM2 in liver tumors.Survival analysis showed that the high ORM2 group had better survival rates in OS,PFS and RFS.ORM1 only represented better performance in PFS,but not in OS or RFS.GSEA analysis of ORM2 from The Cancer Genome Atlas liver cancer data identified that ORM2 positively associated with the G2/M checkpoint,E2F target signaling,as well as Wnt/β-catenin and Hedgehog signaling.Moreover,apoptosis,IFN-αresponses,IFN-γresponses and humoral immune responses were upregulated in the ORM2 high group.ORM2 expression was negatively correlated with the macrophage infiltration level,CD68,TGFβ1,CTLA4 and PD-1 levels.CONCLUSION The results showed that ORM1 and ORM2 were highly expressed specifically in liver tissues,whereas ORM1 and ORM2 were downregulated in liver tumor tissues.ORM2 is a better prognostic factor for liver cancer.Furthermore,ORM2 is closely associated with cancer-promoting pathways.展开更多
The present study investigates the contribution of AMPK response and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathways through high protein diet to the pancreas cancer susceptibility. The hypothalamic modulation of the ...The present study investigates the contribution of AMPK response and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathways through high protein diet to the pancreas cancer susceptibility. The hypothalamic modulation of the AMPK/ACC and mTOR signaling pathways induce by HPD and are followed by assaying the tumorigenicity. The results demonstrate that AMPK and mTOR cooperated in the hypothalamus during HPD and resulted in reducing AMPK activity, and increasing mTOR activity.展开更多
基金Supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS)KAKENHI Grant,No.25282029,No.26750056,and No.16H01811a grant from the Hokkoku Foundation for Cancer Research
文摘To determine the possibility that diabetes mellitus promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via glyceraldehyde (GA)-derived advanced glycation-end products (GA-AGEs). METHODSPANC-1, a human pancreatic cancer cell line, was treated with 1-4 mmol/L GA for 24 h. The cell viability and intracellular GA-AGEs were measured by WST-8 assay and slot blotting. Moreover, immunostaining of PANC-1 cells with an anti-GA-AGE antibody was performed. Western blotting (WB) was used to analyze the molecular weight of GA-AGEs. Heat shock proteins 90α, 90β, 70, 27 and cleaved caspase-3 were analyzed by WB. In addition, PANC-1 cells were treated with GA-AGEs-bovine serum albumin (GA-AGEs-BSA), as a model of extracellular GA-AGEs, and proliferation of PANC-1 cells was measured. RESULTSIn PANC-1 cells, GA induced the production of GA-AGEs and cell death in a dose-dependent manner. PANC-1 cell viability was approximately 40% with a 2 mmol/L GA treatment and decreased to almost 0% with a 4 mmol/L GA treatment (each significant difference was P < 0.01). Cells treated with 2 and 4 mmol/L GA produced 6.4 and 21.2 μg/mg protein of GA-AGEs, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). The dose-dependent production of some high-molecular-weight (HMW) complexes of HSP90β, HSP70, and HSP27 was observed following administration of GA. We considered HMW complexes to be dimers and trimers with GA-AGEs-mediated aggregation. Cleaved caspase-3 could not be detected with WB. Furthermore, 10 and 20 μg/mL GA-AGEs-BSA was 27% and 34% greater than that of control cells, respectively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONAlthough intracellular GA-AGEs induce pancreatic cancer cell death, their secretion and release may promote the proliferation of other pancreatic cancer cells.
基金Supported by Medicine and Health Science and Technology Plan Projects of Zhejiang Province,No.2018KY569Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China,No.LY17H030002
文摘BACKGROUND Liver cancer has a high mortality and morbidity rate throughout the world.In clinical practice,the prognosis of liver cancer patients is poor,and the complex reasons contribute to treatment failures,including fibrosis,hepatitis viral infection,drug resistance and metastasis.Thus,screening novel prognostic biomarkers is of great importance for guiding liver cancer therapy.Orosomucoid genes(ORMs)encode acute phase plasma proteins,including orosomucoid 1(ORM1)and ORM2.Previous studies showed their upregulation upon inflammation,but the specific function of ORMs has not yet been determined,especially in the development of liver cancer.AIM To determine the expression of ORMs and their potential function in liver cancer.METHODS Analysis of the expression of ORMs in different human tissues was performed on data from the HPA RNA-seq normal tissues project.The expression ratio of ORMs was determined using the HCCDB database,including the ratio between liver cancer and other cancers,normal liver and other normal tissues,liver cancer and adjacent normal liver tissues.Analysis of ORM expression in different cancer types was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and TIMER database.The expression of ORMs in liver tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues were further confirmed using Gene Expression Omnibus data,including GSE36376 and GSE14520.The 10-year overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS)and relapse-free survival(RFS)rates between high and low ORM expression groups in liver cancer patients were determined using the Kaplan-Meier plotter tool.Gene Set Enrichment Analysis(GSEA)was employed to explore the ORM2-associated signaling network.Correlations between ORM2 expression and tumor purity or the infiltration level of macrophages in liver tumor tissues were determined using the TIMER database.The correlation between ORM2 gene levels,tumor-associated macrophage(TAM)markers(including CD68 and TGFβ1)and T cell immunosuppression(including CTLA4 and PD-1)in liver tumor tissues and liver GTEx was determined using the GEPIA database.RESULTS ORM1 and ORM2 were highly expressed in normal liver and liver tumor tissues.ORM1 and ORM2 expression was significantly decreased in liver tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues,and similar results were also noted in cholangiocarcinoma,esophageal carcinoma,and lung squamous cell carcinoma.Further analysis of the Gene Expression Omnibus Database also confirmed the downregulation of ORM1 and ORM2 in liver tumors.Survival analysis showed that the high ORM2 group had better survival rates in OS,PFS and RFS.ORM1 only represented better performance in PFS,but not in OS or RFS.GSEA analysis of ORM2 from The Cancer Genome Atlas liver cancer data identified that ORM2 positively associated with the G2/M checkpoint,E2F target signaling,as well as Wnt/β-catenin and Hedgehog signaling.Moreover,apoptosis,IFN-αresponses,IFN-γresponses and humoral immune responses were upregulated in the ORM2 high group.ORM2 expression was negatively correlated with the macrophage infiltration level,CD68,TGFβ1,CTLA4 and PD-1 levels.CONCLUSION The results showed that ORM1 and ORM2 were highly expressed specifically in liver tissues,whereas ORM1 and ORM2 were downregulated in liver tumor tissues.ORM2 is a better prognostic factor for liver cancer.Furthermore,ORM2 is closely associated with cancer-promoting pathways.
文摘The present study investigates the contribution of AMPK response and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathways through high protein diet to the pancreas cancer susceptibility. The hypothalamic modulation of the AMPK/ACC and mTOR signaling pathways induce by HPD and are followed by assaying the tumorigenicity. The results demonstrate that AMPK and mTOR cooperated in the hypothalamus during HPD and resulted in reducing AMPK activity, and increasing mTOR activity.