An ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-qTOF-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetic acid. T...An ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-qTOF-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetic acid. These analytes were separated on a reverse phase C18 column using a mobile phase of acetonitrile:2% acetic acid in water (75:25, v/v) with a flow rate of 200 μL/min. The qTOF-MS was operated under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the electrospray ionization (ESI) technique with positive ion polarity. A comparison of three different extraction techniques i.e. accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), extraction under ultrasonic waves (USW) and the classical extraction by percolation (CE) method was done and quantification of these extracts was also carried out by the proposed method.展开更多
<span style="font-family:Verdana;">The present work encompasses identification and characterization of major degradation product (DP) of OSM observed in base hydrolytic stress study. The separation of ...<span style="font-family:Verdana;">The present work encompasses identification and characterization of major degradation product (DP) of OSM observed in base hydrolytic stress study. The separation of DP was carried out on a non-polar stationary phase by using high-performance liquid chromatography system (HPLC). Using waters X-bridge (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) C18 column with gradient elution program. For the characterization study, stress samples were subjected to HPLC and UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and based on mass fragmentation pattern</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> plausible structure was deduced. Further</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the DP was isolated using semi-prepara</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tive liquid chromatography and concentrated the fractions using lyophiliza</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tion. The isolated DP was subjected to extensive 1D (1H, 13C, and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> DEPT-135) and 2D (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies to authenticate the structure. The impurity was unambiguously named as N-(2-((2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)-4-metho</span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">xy-5-((4-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)-3-methoxy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">propanamide.</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Add</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">itionally, the </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In-Silico</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> structure activity relation (QSAR) assessed through sta</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tistical based software’s DEREK Nexus</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">TM</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and MultiCASE, Case Ultra</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">TM</span></sup></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> widely accepted and respected software’s for DP and OSM</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span></span></span>展开更多
目的应用UHPLC/QTOF-MS对紫金锭提取物中的化学成分进行鉴定。方法色谱分离采用Agilent Eclipse Plus C18色谱柱(100mm×2.1mm,3.5μm),0.1%甲酸水溶液-乙腈梯度洗脱。质谱分析采用电喷雾离子源,负离子模式检测。结果通过二级质谱...目的应用UHPLC/QTOF-MS对紫金锭提取物中的化学成分进行鉴定。方法色谱分离采用Agilent Eclipse Plus C18色谱柱(100mm×2.1mm,3.5μm),0.1%甲酸水溶液-乙腈梯度洗脱。质谱分析采用电喷雾离子源,负离子模式检测。结果通过二级质谱裂解分析以及文献信息比对,从紫金锭中鉴定出了没食子酸、间二没食子酸、没食子酸甲酯、七叶内酯、柚皮苷、1,2,3,4,6-O-五没食子酰葡萄糖、1,4-二4-(葡萄糖氧)苄基-2-异丁基苹果酸酯、淫羊藿糖甙、Sarcogenin,大豆苷元、乌索酸等11个化合物。结论本法为紫金锭的化学成分鉴定提供快速和准确方法。展开更多
目的:优化山茶花瓣、叶和花蕊三部位的黄酮提取量,比较抗氧化活性并分析其化学成分。方法:以总黄酮提取量为评价指标,通过单因素实验和正交试验优化超声波辅助酶解法黄酮提取工艺。采用DPPH、ABTS+自由基清除实验和还原力实验评价优化...目的:优化山茶花瓣、叶和花蕊三部位的黄酮提取量,比较抗氧化活性并分析其化学成分。方法:以总黄酮提取量为评价指标,通过单因素实验和正交试验优化超声波辅助酶解法黄酮提取工艺。采用DPPH、ABTS+自由基清除实验和还原力实验评价优化后总黄酮提取物的抗氧化能力。通过超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱联用技术(UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS)分析各部位的化学成分。结果:在最优提取工艺下,山茶各部位总黄酮提取量依次为叶(63.14 RE mg/g)>花蕊(58.77 RE mg/g)>花瓣(20.26 RE mg/g)。抗氧化活性测定结果表明,花瓣、叶、花蕊中黄酮清除DPPH自由基的IC_(50)值分别为7.28、2.51、1.15 mg/mL,清除ABTS+自由基的IC_(50)值分别为2.85、0.95、0.59 mg/mL,还原力分别为63.25、214.11、475.90 Trolox mg/g,其抗氧化强弱顺序为:花蕊>叶>花瓣。通过UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS从花瓣、叶、花蕊三部位共鉴定出29种化合物,且B型原花青素二聚体、表儿茶素、槲皮素-3-O-半乳糖苷等黄酮单体化合物在三个部位中的分布规律与总黄酮提取量一致。结论:超声波辅助酶法能够有效提高黄酮类化合物的提取量,且山茶的叶和花蕊部位具有较高黄酮含量及抗氧化活性。展开更多
文摘An ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-qTOF-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetic acid. These analytes were separated on a reverse phase C18 column using a mobile phase of acetonitrile:2% acetic acid in water (75:25, v/v) with a flow rate of 200 μL/min. The qTOF-MS was operated under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the electrospray ionization (ESI) technique with positive ion polarity. A comparison of three different extraction techniques i.e. accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), extraction under ultrasonic waves (USW) and the classical extraction by percolation (CE) method was done and quantification of these extracts was also carried out by the proposed method.
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;">The present work encompasses identification and characterization of major degradation product (DP) of OSM observed in base hydrolytic stress study. The separation of DP was carried out on a non-polar stationary phase by using high-performance liquid chromatography system (HPLC). Using waters X-bridge (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) C18 column with gradient elution program. For the characterization study, stress samples were subjected to HPLC and UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and based on mass fragmentation pattern</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> plausible structure was deduced. Further</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the DP was isolated using semi-prepara</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tive liquid chromatography and concentrated the fractions using lyophiliza</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tion. The isolated DP was subjected to extensive 1D (1H, 13C, and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> DEPT-135) and 2D (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies to authenticate the structure. The impurity was unambiguously named as N-(2-((2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)-4-metho</span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">xy-5-((4-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)-3-methoxy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">propanamide.</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Add</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">itionally, the </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In-Silico</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> structure activity relation (QSAR) assessed through sta</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tistical based software’s DEREK Nexus</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">TM</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and MultiCASE, Case Ultra</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">TM</span></sup></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> widely accepted and respected software’s for DP and OSM</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span></span></span>
文摘目的应用UHPLC/QTOF-MS对紫金锭提取物中的化学成分进行鉴定。方法色谱分离采用Agilent Eclipse Plus C18色谱柱(100mm×2.1mm,3.5μm),0.1%甲酸水溶液-乙腈梯度洗脱。质谱分析采用电喷雾离子源,负离子模式检测。结果通过二级质谱裂解分析以及文献信息比对,从紫金锭中鉴定出了没食子酸、间二没食子酸、没食子酸甲酯、七叶内酯、柚皮苷、1,2,3,4,6-O-五没食子酰葡萄糖、1,4-二4-(葡萄糖氧)苄基-2-异丁基苹果酸酯、淫羊藿糖甙、Sarcogenin,大豆苷元、乌索酸等11个化合物。结论本法为紫金锭的化学成分鉴定提供快速和准确方法。
文摘目的:优化山茶花瓣、叶和花蕊三部位的黄酮提取量,比较抗氧化活性并分析其化学成分。方法:以总黄酮提取量为评价指标,通过单因素实验和正交试验优化超声波辅助酶解法黄酮提取工艺。采用DPPH、ABTS+自由基清除实验和还原力实验评价优化后总黄酮提取物的抗氧化能力。通过超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱联用技术(UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS)分析各部位的化学成分。结果:在最优提取工艺下,山茶各部位总黄酮提取量依次为叶(63.14 RE mg/g)>花蕊(58.77 RE mg/g)>花瓣(20.26 RE mg/g)。抗氧化活性测定结果表明,花瓣、叶、花蕊中黄酮清除DPPH自由基的IC_(50)值分别为7.28、2.51、1.15 mg/mL,清除ABTS+自由基的IC_(50)值分别为2.85、0.95、0.59 mg/mL,还原力分别为63.25、214.11、475.90 Trolox mg/g,其抗氧化强弱顺序为:花蕊>叶>花瓣。通过UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS从花瓣、叶、花蕊三部位共鉴定出29种化合物,且B型原花青素二聚体、表儿茶素、槲皮素-3-O-半乳糖苷等黄酮单体化合物在三个部位中的分布规律与总黄酮提取量一致。结论:超声波辅助酶法能够有效提高黄酮类化合物的提取量,且山茶的叶和花蕊部位具有较高黄酮含量及抗氧化活性。