目的:应用UW-QOL第4版评价口腔鳞癌患者的生存质量(quality of life,QOL)。方法:采用直接翻译并经过适当修改的UW-QOL第4版,对97例确诊为口腔鳞癌的连续患者的术前QOL进行测量,术后3个月对其中55例患者的QOL作重复测量。采用SPSS12.0软...目的:应用UW-QOL第4版评价口腔鳞癌患者的生存质量(quality of life,QOL)。方法:采用直接翻译并经过适当修改的UW-QOL第4版,对97例确诊为口腔鳞癌的连续患者的术前QOL进行测量,术后3个月对其中55例患者的QOL作重复测量。采用SPSS12.0软件包分析量表的信度、效度和反应度。结果:量表总的克朗巴赫系数和分半信度分别为0.725和0.701;12个条目可提取4个因子,累计方差贡献率为65.4%;以SF-36中文版和FACT-H&N的头颈特异性子量表FACT-HN为效标,其效标效度分别为0.543和0.738;量表能敏感地区分已知的2组口腔癌患者术前QOL的差异及口腔癌患者QOL随时间的变化。结论:UW-QOL第4版具有良好的信度和反应度,其测定结构呈多维性,可用于中国人口腔癌患者生存质量的测量。展开更多
OBJECTIVE To assess the postoperative QOL(Quality of Life) of Chinese laryngeal cancer patients who have undergone a partial or total laryngec-tomy, and to analyze their prognostic factors, as well as to assess the fe...OBJECTIVE To assess the postoperative QOL(Quality of Life) of Chinese laryngeal cancer patients who have undergone a partial or total laryngec-tomy, and to analyze their prognostic factors, as well as to assess the feasibility of using the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire in QOL studies of laryngeal cancer patients, METHODS Using the UW-QOL questionnaire, a survey was conducted in patients treated by a partial or total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. RESULTS Questionnaires were sent to 142 patients who were disease-free for more than half a year after surgery. Replies were received from 130 patients (91% response rate) with 118 patients completing the questionnaire. These patients were divided into 2 groups: a partial-laryngectomy group (n=81; excluding cordectomy) and a total -laryngectomy group (n=37). The composite QOL scores of the partial-laryngectomy group (692.3±127.9) were higher than those of total-laryngectomy group (636.4±140.0), showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The partial-laryngectomy group (74.3±23.8; 80.9±20.3) was better than the total-laryngectomy group (40.3±25.8; 69.6±27.1) in speech and appearance (P<0.001; P<0.05); but the total-laryngectomy group (92.6±13.0) was superior to the partial-laryngectomy group (83.0±20.5) in pain (P< 0.01). Six factors including cancer stage, operative modality, complications, postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, living partners and chronic disease before or after operation were related to postlaryngecto-my QOL. CONCLUSION Partial laryngectomy is superior to total laryngectomy in speech, appearance and overall QOL. Besides operative modality, cancer stage, complications, postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, living partners and chronic diseases before or after operation are factors influencing postlaryngectomy QOL. As a whole, the UW-QOL questionnaire is a good instrument for studying QOL of laryngeal cancer patients in China, and it can be used to explore the QOL outcomes obtained from different reconstructive techniques.展开更多
目的分析口腔癌患者下颌骨区段缺损术后骨性重建对生活质量(quality of life,QOL)的影响。方法17例因口腔癌而致下颌骨区段切除的患者按重建术式的不同分为骨性重建组和非骨性重建组,同时采用SF-36、FACT-H&N和UW-QOL三种量表分别...目的分析口腔癌患者下颌骨区段缺损术后骨性重建对生活质量(quality of life,QOL)的影响。方法17例因口腔癌而致下颌骨区段切除的患者按重建术式的不同分为骨性重建组和非骨性重建组,同时采用SF-36、FACT-H&N和UW-QOL三种量表分别在术前、术后3个月和术后12个月进行生活质量的测量,比较两组患者生活质量的差异及纵向变化趋势。结果两组患者术前生活质量的差异无显著性,而在术后3个月和术后12个月两个时点,骨性重建组均有较好的外貌、进食、功能状况和总体生活质量(P<0.05)。术后12个月时,骨性重建组的生活质量恢复到了接近术前水平,而非骨性重建组仍遗留有较严重的口腔相关的特异性问题和较差的功能状况。结论下颌骨区段缺损后的骨性重建能改善患者的外形和功能,提高患者术后的QOL,值得在临床上推广使用。展开更多
目的:评价口腔癌患者术后的生存质量(quality of life,QOL),并探讨影响无瘤生存者术后QOL的可能因素。方法:采用SF-36及UW-QOL测量55例口腔癌患者术前和术后12个月的QOL,采用SPSS12.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:①复发患者术后的...目的:评价口腔癌患者术后的生存质量(quality of life,QOL),并探讨影响无瘤生存者术后QOL的可能因素。方法:采用SF-36及UW-QOL测量55例口腔癌患者术前和术后12个月的QOL,采用SPSS12.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:①复发患者术后的QOL显著低于无瘤生存者。②与术前相比,术后12个月时,无瘤生存者仍存在较严重的治疗相关的特异性问题和较差的社会功能状况。③文化程度、婚姻状况、共病、缺损范围及放疗影响无瘤生存者术后QOL,初、高级文化程度、配偶健在、不伴有共病、缺损最大径<6cm及术后未放疗的患者,术后QOL较高。④不同的颈清扫术式对无瘤生存者手术前后QOL总分的差值没有影响,但副神经保留组术后的肩功能明显优于副神经切除组。结论:保留副神经可改善颈清扫患者的肩功能;降低复发率、加强慢性病的预防及控制、改进放疗手段、增加社会支持及必要的康复指导和治疗可提高口腔癌患者术后的QOL。展开更多
目的:探讨薄型股前外侧皮瓣与前臂皮瓣2种方式修补老年口腔癌患者切除术后缺损的效果。方法:选取2017年1月—2019年10月期间在我院进行诊治的老年口腔癌患者54例,所有患者均实施口腔癌切除术,其中用前臂皮瓣进行缺损修补的24例为前臂组...目的:探讨薄型股前外侧皮瓣与前臂皮瓣2种方式修补老年口腔癌患者切除术后缺损的效果。方法:选取2017年1月—2019年10月期间在我院进行诊治的老年口腔癌患者54例,所有患者均实施口腔癌切除术,其中用前臂皮瓣进行缺损修补的24例为前臂组,用薄型股前外侧皮瓣进行缺损修补的30例为股前外侧组,用华盛顿大学生命质量问卷(the University of Washington quality of life,UW-QOL)、口腔健康影响程度量表(the 14-item oral health impact profile questionnaires,OHIP-14)对患者进行主观评价,对比2组量表评分及手术恢复情况。结果:前臂组中,皮瓣存活的例数为23例,股前外侧组为29例,2组患者皮瓣存活例数、血管危象例数、坏死例数、恢复时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。前臂组色素沉着发生率明显高于股前外侧组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而在瘢痕增生发生率方面,前臂组也明显高于股前外侧组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组UW-QOL问卷及OHIP-14量表评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于老年口腔癌切除术后缺损的修补,采用薄型股前外侧皮瓣相比于前臂皮瓣,缺损区恢复情况及术后量表评分无明显差别,但该方式可以减少皮瓣供区的相关并发症的发生。展开更多
文摘目的:应用UW-QOL第4版评价口腔鳞癌患者的生存质量(quality of life,QOL)。方法:采用直接翻译并经过适当修改的UW-QOL第4版,对97例确诊为口腔鳞癌的连续患者的术前QOL进行测量,术后3个月对其中55例患者的QOL作重复测量。采用SPSS12.0软件包分析量表的信度、效度和反应度。结果:量表总的克朗巴赫系数和分半信度分别为0.725和0.701;12个条目可提取4个因子,累计方差贡献率为65.4%;以SF-36中文版和FACT-H&N的头颈特异性子量表FACT-HN为效标,其效标效度分别为0.543和0.738;量表能敏感地区分已知的2组口腔癌患者术前QOL的差异及口腔癌患者QOL随时间的变化。结论:UW-QOL第4版具有良好的信度和反应度,其测定结构呈多维性,可用于中国人口腔癌患者生存质量的测量。
文摘OBJECTIVE To assess the postoperative QOL(Quality of Life) of Chinese laryngeal cancer patients who have undergone a partial or total laryngec-tomy, and to analyze their prognostic factors, as well as to assess the feasibility of using the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire in QOL studies of laryngeal cancer patients, METHODS Using the UW-QOL questionnaire, a survey was conducted in patients treated by a partial or total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. RESULTS Questionnaires were sent to 142 patients who were disease-free for more than half a year after surgery. Replies were received from 130 patients (91% response rate) with 118 patients completing the questionnaire. These patients were divided into 2 groups: a partial-laryngectomy group (n=81; excluding cordectomy) and a total -laryngectomy group (n=37). The composite QOL scores of the partial-laryngectomy group (692.3±127.9) were higher than those of total-laryngectomy group (636.4±140.0), showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The partial-laryngectomy group (74.3±23.8; 80.9±20.3) was better than the total-laryngectomy group (40.3±25.8; 69.6±27.1) in speech and appearance (P<0.001; P<0.05); but the total-laryngectomy group (92.6±13.0) was superior to the partial-laryngectomy group (83.0±20.5) in pain (P< 0.01). Six factors including cancer stage, operative modality, complications, postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, living partners and chronic disease before or after operation were related to postlaryngecto-my QOL. CONCLUSION Partial laryngectomy is superior to total laryngectomy in speech, appearance and overall QOL. Besides operative modality, cancer stage, complications, postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, living partners and chronic diseases before or after operation are factors influencing postlaryngectomy QOL. As a whole, the UW-QOL questionnaire is a good instrument for studying QOL of laryngeal cancer patients in China, and it can be used to explore the QOL outcomes obtained from different reconstructive techniques.
文摘目的分析口腔癌患者下颌骨区段缺损术后骨性重建对生活质量(quality of life,QOL)的影响。方法17例因口腔癌而致下颌骨区段切除的患者按重建术式的不同分为骨性重建组和非骨性重建组,同时采用SF-36、FACT-H&N和UW-QOL三种量表分别在术前、术后3个月和术后12个月进行生活质量的测量,比较两组患者生活质量的差异及纵向变化趋势。结果两组患者术前生活质量的差异无显著性,而在术后3个月和术后12个月两个时点,骨性重建组均有较好的外貌、进食、功能状况和总体生活质量(P<0.05)。术后12个月时,骨性重建组的生活质量恢复到了接近术前水平,而非骨性重建组仍遗留有较严重的口腔相关的特异性问题和较差的功能状况。结论下颌骨区段缺损后的骨性重建能改善患者的外形和功能,提高患者术后的QOL,值得在临床上推广使用。
文摘目的:评价口腔癌患者术后的生存质量(quality of life,QOL),并探讨影响无瘤生存者术后QOL的可能因素。方法:采用SF-36及UW-QOL测量55例口腔癌患者术前和术后12个月的QOL,采用SPSS12.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:①复发患者术后的QOL显著低于无瘤生存者。②与术前相比,术后12个月时,无瘤生存者仍存在较严重的治疗相关的特异性问题和较差的社会功能状况。③文化程度、婚姻状况、共病、缺损范围及放疗影响无瘤生存者术后QOL,初、高级文化程度、配偶健在、不伴有共病、缺损最大径<6cm及术后未放疗的患者,术后QOL较高。④不同的颈清扫术式对无瘤生存者手术前后QOL总分的差值没有影响,但副神经保留组术后的肩功能明显优于副神经切除组。结论:保留副神经可改善颈清扫患者的肩功能;降低复发率、加强慢性病的预防及控制、改进放疗手段、增加社会支持及必要的康复指导和治疗可提高口腔癌患者术后的QOL。
文摘目的:探讨薄型股前外侧皮瓣与前臂皮瓣2种方式修补老年口腔癌患者切除术后缺损的效果。方法:选取2017年1月—2019年10月期间在我院进行诊治的老年口腔癌患者54例,所有患者均实施口腔癌切除术,其中用前臂皮瓣进行缺损修补的24例为前臂组,用薄型股前外侧皮瓣进行缺损修补的30例为股前外侧组,用华盛顿大学生命质量问卷(the University of Washington quality of life,UW-QOL)、口腔健康影响程度量表(the 14-item oral health impact profile questionnaires,OHIP-14)对患者进行主观评价,对比2组量表评分及手术恢复情况。结果:前臂组中,皮瓣存活的例数为23例,股前外侧组为29例,2组患者皮瓣存活例数、血管危象例数、坏死例数、恢复时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。前臂组色素沉着发生率明显高于股前外侧组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而在瘢痕增生发生率方面,前臂组也明显高于股前外侧组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组UW-QOL问卷及OHIP-14量表评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于老年口腔癌切除术后缺损的修补,采用薄型股前外侧皮瓣相比于前臂皮瓣,缺损区恢复情况及术后量表评分无明显差别,但该方式可以减少皮瓣供区的相关并发症的发生。
