Percutaneous transhepatic stenting for acute superior mesenteric vein stenosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein reconstruction:A case report

BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic stent placement has become a common strategy for the postoperative treatment of portal vein(PV)/superior mesenteric veins(SMV)stenosis/occlusion.It has been widely used after liver transplantation surgery;however,reports on stent placement for acute PV/SMV stenosis after pancreatic surgery within postoperative 3 d are rare.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we reported a case of intestinal edema and SMV stenosis 2 d after pancreatic surgery.The patient was successfully treated using stent grafts.Although the stenosis resolved after stent placement,complications,including bleeding,pancreatic fistula,bile leakage,and infection,made the treatment highly challenging.The use of anticoagulants was adjusted multiple times to prevent venous thromboembolism and the risk of bleeding.After careful treatment,the patient stabilized,and stent placement effectively managed postoperative PV/SMV stenosis.CONCLUSION Stent placement is effective and feasible for treating acute PV/SMV stenosis after pancreatic surgery even within postoperative 3 d.

Pulmonary vein stenosis:Etiology,diagnosis and management

Pulmonary vein stenosis(PVS) is rare condition characterized by a challenging diagnosis and unfavorable prognosis at advance stages. At present, injury from radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation has become the main cause of the disease. PVS is characterized by a progressive lumen size reduction of one or more pulmonary veins that, when hemodynamically significant, may raise lobar capillary pressure leading to signs and symptoms such as shortness of breath, cough, and hemoptysis. Image techniques(transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance and perfusion imaging) are essential to reach a final diagnosis and decide an appropriate therapy. In this regard, series from referral centers have shown that surgical and transcatheter interventions may improve prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review the etiology, assessment and management of PVS.

Safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty compared to stent-basedstrategies with pulmonary vein stenosis:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Pulmonary vein stenosis(PVS)is an uncommon but known cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children and can be managed with percutaneous revascularization strategies of pulmonary vein balloon angioplasty(PBA)or pulmonary vein stent implantation(PSI).AIM To study the safety and efficacy outcomes of PBA vs PSI in all patient categories with PVS.METHODS We performed a literature search of all studies comparing outcomes of patients evaluated by PBA vs PSI for PVS.We selected all published studies comparing PBA vs PSI for PVS with reported outcomes of restenosis and procedure-related complications in all patient categories.In adults,PVS following atrial fibrillation ablation and in children PVS related to congenital etiology or post-procedural PVS following total or partial anomalous pulmonary venous return repair were included.The patient-centered outcomes were risk of restenosis requiring re-intervention and procedural-related complications.The metaanalysis was performed by computing odds ratios(ORs)using the random effects model based on underlying statistical heterogeneity.RESULTS Eight observational studies treating 768 severe PVS in 487 patients met our inclusion criteria.The age range of patients was 6 months to 70 years and 67%were males.The primary outcome of the re-stenosis requiring re-intervention occurred in 196 of 325 veins in the PBA group and 111 of 443 veins in the PSI group.Compared to PSI,PBA was associated with a significantly increased risk of re-stenosis(OR 2.91,95%CI:1.15-7.37,P=0.025,I2=79.2%).Secondary outcomes of the procedurerelated complications occurred in 7 of 122 patients in the PBA group and 6 of 69 in the PSI group.There were no statistically significant differences in the safety outcomes between the two groups(OR:0.94,95%CI:0.23-3.76,P=0.929,I^(2)=0.0%).CONCLUSION Across all patient categories with PVS,PSI is associated with reduced risk of re-intervention and is as safe as PBA and should be considered first-line therapy for PVS.

Portal venous stent placement for treatment of portal hypertension caused by benign main portal vein stenosis

AIM: To evaluate the value of endovascular stent in the treatment of portal hypertension caused by benign main portal vein stenosis.METHODS: Portal vein stents were implanted in six patients with benign main portal vein stenosis (inflammatory stenosis in three cases, postprocedure of liver transplantation in another three cases). Changes in portal vein pressure, portal vein patency, relative clinical symptoms, complications, and survival were evaluated.RESULTS: Six metallic stents were successfully placed across the portal vein stenotic or obstructive lesions in six patients. Mean portal venous pressure decreased significantly after stent implantation from (37.3±4.7) cm H2O to (18.0±1.9) cm H2O. The portal blood flow restoredand the symptoms caused by portal hypertension were eliminated. There were no severe procedure-related complications. The patients were followed up for 1-48 mo. The portal vein remained patent during follow-up. All patients survived except for one patient who died of other complications of liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous portal vein stent placement for the treatment of portal hypertension caused by benign main portal vein stenosis is safe and effective.

Ischemic colitis secondary to inferior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula and portal vein stenosis in a liver transplant recipient

Arteriovenous fistula （AVF） involving the inferior mesenteric vessels is rare, and the affected patients usually present with abdominal pain, mass, or features of established portal hypertension. Colonic ischemia is a less common and more serious manifestation of AVE We report a case of ischemic colitis secondary to inferior mesentedc AVF in a patient who underwent a previous liver transplantation, subsequently developed portal vein stenosis, and then presented with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. He underwent percutaneous transhepatic placement of a portal vein stent and left colectomy.

Endovascular stent treatment of the iliac vein stenosis caused by a pelvic lymphocele secondary to gynecologic malignancy

Over the past two years,6 patients had iliac vein stenosis caused by radiation and pelvic lymphocele secondary to gynecologic malignancy.Patients had symptomatic lymphoceles induced lower limb edema.Poor treatment of symptomatic lymphoceles,compression symptoms persist,all patients were performed endovascular stent therapy,clinical symptoms of lower limb were completely relieved.Iliac vein stenosis caused by radiation and pelvic lymphocele secondary to gynecologic malignancy,endovascular stent placement is a nonsurgical alternative for the reestablishment of venous flow and sustained relief of symptoms.

Stent placement is effective on both postoperative hepatic arterial pseudoaneurysm and subsequent portal vein stricture:A case report

To treat postoperative bleeding after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery, interventional radiology has become essential. We report a case of coincidental pseudoan-eurysm and jejunal varices that were both successfully treated by stent-grafts. After a pancreaticoduodenec-tomy, the patient developed a pseudoaneurysm in the hepatic artery and a stenosis in its periphery. After establishing hepatic arterial flow by placing stent-grafts over both the pseudoaneurysm and the stenosis, the pseudoaneurysm was embolized with microcoils. Nine months later, the patient developed jejunal varices caused by a severe stricture in the main trunk of the portal vein. Percutaneous transhepatic portography was performed and stent-grafts were placed over the stenotic segment. A venoplasty using stent-grafts nor-malized the portal blood flow and the jejunal varices vanished. Although stenosis occurred due to scarred tissues from leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy, stent-grafts were useful for managing jejunal bleeding post-operatively.

Standardized Management of Acute Pulmonary Hemorrhage after Percutaneous Pulmonary Vein Intervention

Introduction:Pulmonary hemorrhage(PHm)is a life-threatening complication that can occur after catheter-based interventions in patients with pulmonary vein stenosis(PVS).Inhaled racemic epinephrine(iRE)and tra-nexamic acid(iTXA)have been used in other conditions,but a standardized approach in PVS has not been described.We aimed to describe the current management of PHm after PVS catheter-based interventions.Methods:We present a retrospective review of episodes of PHm from July 2022 to February 2024.PHm was defined as frank blood suctioned from the endotracheal tube including blood-tinged secretions and>3%decrease in saturations and/or ventilatory changes with or without acute chest X-ray changes.Each individual episode of PHm was considered a separate event.Incidence was calculated based on the total number of PVS interventions during the study period.Results:Eleven episodes of PHm were identified out of 108 PVS interventions,resulting in an incidence of 10.2%.Five(45.5%)had primary PVS,and seven(63.6%)had bilateral PVS.The median age at PHm was 23 months(3-91 months).Four episodes were treated with iRE,five with both iRE and iTXA,and two with only iTXA due to a history of suprasystemic right ventricular pressures.Median time on mechanical ventila-tion after PHm was 24 h(15-72 h)and a median ICU stay of 2 days(1-8 days).Hemostasis was achieved in all events.There were no adverse events after iTXA,however,transient hypertension was observed after iRE which was dose-related.Conclusions:The implementation of a standardized protocol for the treatment of PHm in PVS has the potential to improve procedural planning,has a wider availability of medications,and greater awareness by the providers involved,possibly leading to earlier detection of PHm and appropriate treatment.

Important Newborn Cardiac Diagnostic Dilemmas for the Neonatologist and Cardiologist-A Clinical Perspective

Most congenital heart disease(CHD)is readily recognisable in the newborn.Forewarned by previous fetal scanning,the presence of a murmur,tachypnoea,cyanosis and/or differential pulses and saturations all point to a cardiac abnormality.Yet serious heart disease may be missed on a fetal scan.There may be no murmur or clinical cyanosis,and tachypneoa may be attributed to non-cardiac causes.Tachypnoea on day 1 is usually non-cardiac except arising from ventricular failure or a large systemic arteriovenous fistula.A patent ductus arteriosus(PDA)may support either pulmonary or systemic duct dependent circulations.The initially high pulmonary vascular resistance(PVR)limits shunts so that murmurs even from large communications between the systemic and pulmonary circulations take days/weeks to develop.At times despite expert input,serious CHD maybe difficult to diagnose and warrants close interaction between the neonatologist and cardiologist to reach a timely diagnosis.Such conditions include obstructed total anomalous pulmonary venous connections(TAPVC)and the need to distinguish it from persistent pulmonary hypertension in the newborn(PPHN)–the treatment of the former is surgical the latter medical.A large duct shunting right to left may overshadow a suspected hypoplastic aortic isthmus and/or coarctation.Is the right to left shunting because of severe aortic obstruction or resulting from a high PVR with little obstruction.The diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis(PVS)remains problematic often developing in premature infants with ongoing bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD),still being cared for by the neonatologist.While there are other diagnostic dilemmas including deciding the contribution of a recognised CHD in a sick neonate,this paper will focus on the above-mentioned conditions with suggestions on what may be done to arrive at a timely diagnosis to achieve optimal outcomes.