AIM： To study the effect of combined indwelling catheter, hemofiltration, respiration support and traditional Chinese medicine （e.g. Dahuang） in treating abdominal compartment syndrome of fulminant acute pancreatit...AIM： To study the effect of combined indwelling catheter, hemofiltration, respiration support and traditional Chinese medicine （e.g. Dahuang） in treating abdominal compartment syndrome of fulminant acute pancreatitis. METHODS： Patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis were divided randomly into 2 groups of combined indwelling catheter celiac drainage and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring and routine conservative measures group （group 1） and control group （group 2）. Routine non-operative conservative treatments including hemofiltration, respiration support, gastrointestinal TCM ablution were also applied in control group patients. Effectiveness of the two groups was observed, and APACHE Ⅱ scores were applied for analysis. RESULTS： On the second and fifth days after treatment, APACHE Ⅱ scores of group 1 and 2 patients were significantly different. Comparison of effectiveness （abdominalgia and burbulence relief time, hospitalization time） between groups 1 and 2 showed significant difference, as well as incidence rates of cysts formation. Mortality rates of groups 1 and 2 were 10.0% and 20.7%, respectively. For patients in group 1, celiac drainage quantity and intra-abdominal pressure, and hospitalization time were positively correlated （r = 0.552, 0.748, 0.923, P 〈 0.01） with APACHE Ⅱ scores. CONCLUSION： Combined indwelling catheter celiac drainage and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring, short veno-venous hemofiltration （SVVH）, gastrointestinal TCM ablution, respiration support have preventive and treatment effects on abdominal compartment syndrome of fulminant acute pancreatitis.展开更多
BACKGROUND:Catheter-related infection(CRI)of the central vein is a common cause of nosocomial infection.This study was undertaken to investigate the pathogen culturing and risk factors of CRI in emergency intensive ca...BACKGROUND:Catheter-related infection(CRI)of the central vein is a common cause of nosocomial infection.This study was undertaken to investigate the pathogen culturing and risk factors of CRI in emergency intensive care unit(EICU)in order to provide the beneficial reference.METHODS:From January 2008 to December 2010,a total of 1 363 patients were subjected to catheterization.In these patients,the peak CRI rate of the patients was determined by bacterial cultivation and blood bacterial cultivation.RESULTS:CRI happened in 147 of the 1 363 patients using the central venous catheter.The peak rate of CRI was 10.79%,with an incidence of 3.05 episodes per 1 000 catheter days.Of the147 patients,46.94%had gram-negative bacilli,40.14%had gram-positive cocci,and 12.92%had fungi.Unconditional logistic regression analysis suggests that multiple catheterization,femoral vein catheterization,the application of multicavity catheter,and the duration of catheterization were the independent risk factors for CRI.CONCLUSION:The risk factors for catheter-related infections should be controlled to prevent the occurrence of nosocomial infection.展开更多
目的检索、评价并总结成人中心静脉导管(central venous catheter,CVC)堵塞处置及预防措施的相关循证证据,为临床护理实践提供循证依据。方法计算机检索2012年1月—2023年7月共19个中英文文献数据库、临床指南数据库及相关协会网站中关...目的检索、评价并总结成人中心静脉导管(central venous catheter,CVC)堵塞处置及预防措施的相关循证证据,为临床护理实践提供循证依据。方法计算机检索2012年1月—2023年7月共19个中英文文献数据库、临床指南数据库及相关协会网站中关于成人CVC管理、堵塞预防及处置的所有证据,包括指南、专家共识、证据总结、证据实践、系统评价和Meta分析。采用临床指南研究与评价系统Ⅱ(appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluationⅡ,AGREEⅡ)、系统综述评价工具2(a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2,AMSTAR 2)及澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心专家意见与专家共识质量评价工具(joanna briggs institute text and expert opinion critical appraisal tool,JBI TEOCAT)进行文献质量评定,采用澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心(joanna briggs institute,JBI)证据分级和推荐系统进行证据质量评定。结果初步检索共获得文献891篇,最终纳入文献15篇,汇总了26条最佳证据。结论CVC的堵塞可从导管的全生命周期和全程管理入手进行有效预防,堵塞发生后应根据堵塞性质尽快处理。临床护士可以应用证据总结,结合实际情况制定护理策略进行CVC管理,降低CVC堵塞发生率。展开更多
目的探讨末端瓣膜耐高压注射型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(application of power peripherally inserted central catheter solo,Power PICC Solo)与经锁骨下中心静脉置管(central venous catheter,CVC)在造血干细胞移植患者中的应用...目的探讨末端瓣膜耐高压注射型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(application of power peripherally inserted central catheter solo,Power PICC Solo)与经锁骨下中心静脉置管(central venous catheter,CVC)在造血干细胞移植患者中的应用。方法选取2021年9月—2023年6月厦门大学附属第一医院收治的100例造血干细胞移植患者。根据患者置管方法分为外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)组(n=58)和CVC组(n=42),PICC组采用Power PICC Solo,CVC组采用CVC。比较2组患者的置管成功情况、操作时间、导管置留时间、置管费用、置管后舒适度、患者液体流速、并发症发生率、患者满意度。结果PICC组置管成功率优于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组操作时间短于CVC组,导管置留时间长于CVC组,置管费用高于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组患者舒适度优于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在置管后第1、10、20、30天,PICC组患者液体流速均低于CVC组,且2组患者置管后第30天流速均低于置管后第1天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组患者血栓性静脉炎发生率高于CVC组,导管感染发生率低于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),2组患者血气胸、导管异位、导管脱落等发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PICC组操作技术满意度评分为(17.24±2.17)分,高于CVC组的(14.07±2.68)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与CVC比较,Power PICC Solo能够提高造血干细胞移植患者一次置管成功率,降低置管操作时间,延长导管置留时间,提高患者置管后舒适度,但置管费用较高,且血栓性静脉炎发生率高。展开更多
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)combined with spontaneous pneumothorax,is characterized by significant decline in lung function,and even cause cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia.AIM To evaluate ...BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)combined with spontaneous pneumothorax,is characterized by significant decline in lung function,and even cause cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia.AIM To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters and indwelling pleural catheters(IPC)in managing closed thoracic drainage in patients diagnosed with COPD with concomitant by spontaneous pneumothorax.METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical information of 60 elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax admitted to the Shexian Branch of the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine between March 2020 and March 2023.The clinical efficacy,complications,hospitalization duration,and costs were compared between patients with an indwelling thoracic catheter and those with a central venous catheter.Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the causes of catheter displacement.RESULTS According to our findings,there were significant differences in the IPC group’s clinical efficacy,catheter operation time,and lung recruitment time(P<0.05).Comparing the complications after catheter treatment between the two groups revealed statistically significant variations in the incidence of postoperative analgesics,catheter abscission,catheter blockage,and subcutaneous emphysema in the IPC group(P<0.05).Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between patients with and without catheter dislodgement regarding duty nurse’s working years(less than three),Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II)scores(less than 15),lack of catheter suture fixation,and the proportion of catheters not fixed twice(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that when treating elderly COPD patients with spontaneous pneumothorax,indwelling thoracic catheters are more effective than the central venous catheter group.Patients’catheter shedding is influenced by the primary nurse’s working years,APACHE II scores,and catheter fixation technique.展开更多
文摘AIM： To study the effect of combined indwelling catheter, hemofiltration, respiration support and traditional Chinese medicine （e.g. Dahuang） in treating abdominal compartment syndrome of fulminant acute pancreatitis. METHODS： Patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis were divided randomly into 2 groups of combined indwelling catheter celiac drainage and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring and routine conservative measures group （group 1） and control group （group 2）. Routine non-operative conservative treatments including hemofiltration, respiration support, gastrointestinal TCM ablution were also applied in control group patients. Effectiveness of the two groups was observed, and APACHE Ⅱ scores were applied for analysis. RESULTS： On the second and fifth days after treatment, APACHE Ⅱ scores of group 1 and 2 patients were significantly different. Comparison of effectiveness （abdominalgia and burbulence relief time, hospitalization time） between groups 1 and 2 showed significant difference, as well as incidence rates of cysts formation. Mortality rates of groups 1 and 2 were 10.0% and 20.7%, respectively. For patients in group 1, celiac drainage quantity and intra-abdominal pressure, and hospitalization time were positively correlated （r = 0.552, 0.748, 0.923, P 〈 0.01） with APACHE Ⅱ scores. CONCLUSION： Combined indwelling catheter celiac drainage and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring, short veno-venous hemofiltration （SVVH）, gastrointestinal TCM ablution, respiration support have preventive and treatment effects on abdominal compartment syndrome of fulminant acute pancreatitis.
文摘BACKGROUND:Catheter-related infection(CRI)of the central vein is a common cause of nosocomial infection.This study was undertaken to investigate the pathogen culturing and risk factors of CRI in emergency intensive care unit(EICU)in order to provide the beneficial reference.METHODS:From January 2008 to December 2010,a total of 1 363 patients were subjected to catheterization.In these patients,the peak CRI rate of the patients was determined by bacterial cultivation and blood bacterial cultivation.RESULTS:CRI happened in 147 of the 1 363 patients using the central venous catheter.The peak rate of CRI was 10.79%,with an incidence of 3.05 episodes per 1 000 catheter days.Of the147 patients,46.94%had gram-negative bacilli,40.14%had gram-positive cocci,and 12.92%had fungi.Unconditional logistic regression analysis suggests that multiple catheterization,femoral vein catheterization,the application of multicavity catheter,and the duration of catheterization were the independent risk factors for CRI.CONCLUSION:The risk factors for catheter-related infections should be controlled to prevent the occurrence of nosocomial infection.
文摘目的检索、评价并总结成人中心静脉导管(central venous catheter,CVC)堵塞处置及预防措施的相关循证证据,为临床护理实践提供循证依据。方法计算机检索2012年1月—2023年7月共19个中英文文献数据库、临床指南数据库及相关协会网站中关于成人CVC管理、堵塞预防及处置的所有证据,包括指南、专家共识、证据总结、证据实践、系统评价和Meta分析。采用临床指南研究与评价系统Ⅱ(appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluationⅡ,AGREEⅡ)、系统综述评价工具2(a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2,AMSTAR 2)及澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心专家意见与专家共识质量评价工具(joanna briggs institute text and expert opinion critical appraisal tool,JBI TEOCAT)进行文献质量评定,采用澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心(joanna briggs institute,JBI)证据分级和推荐系统进行证据质量评定。结果初步检索共获得文献891篇,最终纳入文献15篇,汇总了26条最佳证据。结论CVC的堵塞可从导管的全生命周期和全程管理入手进行有效预防,堵塞发生后应根据堵塞性质尽快处理。临床护士可以应用证据总结,结合实际情况制定护理策略进行CVC管理,降低CVC堵塞发生率。
文摘目的探讨末端瓣膜耐高压注射型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(application of power peripherally inserted central catheter solo,Power PICC Solo)与经锁骨下中心静脉置管(central venous catheter,CVC)在造血干细胞移植患者中的应用。方法选取2021年9月—2023年6月厦门大学附属第一医院收治的100例造血干细胞移植患者。根据患者置管方法分为外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)组(n=58)和CVC组(n=42),PICC组采用Power PICC Solo,CVC组采用CVC。比较2组患者的置管成功情况、操作时间、导管置留时间、置管费用、置管后舒适度、患者液体流速、并发症发生率、患者满意度。结果PICC组置管成功率优于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组操作时间短于CVC组,导管置留时间长于CVC组,置管费用高于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组患者舒适度优于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在置管后第1、10、20、30天,PICC组患者液体流速均低于CVC组,且2组患者置管后第30天流速均低于置管后第1天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PICC组患者血栓性静脉炎发生率高于CVC组,导管感染发生率低于CVC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),2组患者血气胸、导管异位、导管脱落等发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PICC组操作技术满意度评分为(17.24±2.17)分,高于CVC组的(14.07±2.68)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与CVC比较,Power PICC Solo能够提高造血干细胞移植患者一次置管成功率,降低置管操作时间,延长导管置留时间,提高患者置管后舒适度,但置管费用较高,且血栓性静脉炎发生率高。
文摘BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)combined with spontaneous pneumothorax,is characterized by significant decline in lung function,and even cause cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia.AIM To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters and indwelling pleural catheters(IPC)in managing closed thoracic drainage in patients diagnosed with COPD with concomitant by spontaneous pneumothorax.METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical information of 60 elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax admitted to the Shexian Branch of the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine between March 2020 and March 2023.The clinical efficacy,complications,hospitalization duration,and costs were compared between patients with an indwelling thoracic catheter and those with a central venous catheter.Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the causes of catheter displacement.RESULTS According to our findings,there were significant differences in the IPC group’s clinical efficacy,catheter operation time,and lung recruitment time(P<0.05).Comparing the complications after catheter treatment between the two groups revealed statistically significant variations in the incidence of postoperative analgesics,catheter abscission,catheter blockage,and subcutaneous emphysema in the IPC group(P<0.05).Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between patients with and without catheter dislodgement regarding duty nurse’s working years(less than three),Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II)scores(less than 15),lack of catheter suture fixation,and the proportion of catheters not fixed twice(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that when treating elderly COPD patients with spontaneous pneumothorax,indwelling thoracic catheters are more effective than the central venous catheter group.Patients’catheter shedding is influenced by the primary nurse’s working years,APACHE II scores,and catheter fixation technique.
