目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组4...目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组45例。参照组采用常规护理方式展开疾病护理,研究组采用时间康复护理方式展开疾病护理,对比分析两组患者的护理总满意度、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)评分、洼田饮水试验评分。结果研究组护理总满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理前,两组患者WHOQOL-BREF评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组环境因素评分、社会关系评分、生理因素评分、心理因素评分均高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。护理前,两组患者的洼田饮水试验评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组洼田饮水试验评分为(1.29±0.29)分低于参照组的(2.53±0.65)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.687,P<0.05)。结论时间康复护理方式的合理运用,可显著提升脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者护理满意度、生存质量,有效改善吞咽功能。展开更多
In accord with new European university reforms initiated by the Bologna Process, our objective was to evaluate influences on the relationship between psychological quality of life (QoL) and the acquisition of academic...In accord with new European university reforms initiated by the Bologna Process, our objective was to evaluate influences on the relationship between psychological quality of life (QoL) and the acquisition of academic employability skills (AES) among first-year students at the University in Luxembourg. At the beginning (2 months in) and the end (9 months) of the academic year, 973 newly registered students participated in this study involving two cross-university surveys. Students who redoubled or who had studied at other universities were excluded. Data were collected with an online questionnaire comprising the psychological Whoqol-bref subscale, AES scale, and questions about other related factors. The AES score decreased from 74.2 to 65.6. At both time points, the psychological Whoqol-bref was positively correlated with environmental and social relations QoL and perceived general health. Multiple regression models including interaction terms showed that a higher psychological QoL was associated with better general health (difference satisfied-dissatisfied 9.44), AES (slope 0.099), social relationships QoL (0.321), and environmental QoL (0.298). No interaction with time effects was significant, which indicates that the effects remain stable with time. If the university could maintain the QoL indicators at appropriate levels or manage decreases as they occur, it would have implications for health promotion and the creation of new student support systems. The SQA- LES project provides valuable information for universities aiming to develop a European Higher Educational Area.展开更多
This study is aimed to evaluate the quality of life （QOL） for individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus （HIV）/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome （AIDS） in Hubei province-central China by using WHOQOL-...This study is aimed to evaluate the quality of life （QOL） for individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus （HIV）/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome （AIDS） in Hubei province-central China by using WHOQOL-BREF instrument （Chinese version）. One hundred and thirty six respondents （HIV/AIDS individuals） attending out-patient department of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention （Chinese CDC） were administered a structured questionnaire developed by investigators. QOL was evaluated by using WHOQOL-BREF instrument （Chinese version）. The results showed that the mean score of overall QOL on a scale of 0-100 was 25.8. The mean scores in 4 domains of QOL on a scale of 0-100 were 82.9 （social domain）, 27.5 （psychological domain）, 17.7 （physical domain） and 11.65 （environmental domain）. The significant difference of QOL was noted in the score of physical domain between asymptomatic （14.6） and early symptomatic individuals （12） （P=0.014）, and between patients with early symptoms （12） and those with AIDS （10.43） （P〈0.001）. QOL in psychological domain was significantly lower in early symptomatic （12.1） （P〈0.05） and AIDS patients （12.4） （P〈0.006） than in asymptomatic individuals （14.2）. The difference in QOL scores in the psychological domain was significant with respect to the income of patients （P〈0.048） and educational status （P〈0.037）. Significantly better QOL scores in the physical domain （P〈0.040） and environmental domain （P〈0.017） were noted with respect to the occupation of the patients. Patients with family support had better QOL scores in environmental domain. In our research, QOL for HIV/AIDS individuals was associated with education, occupation, income, family support and clinical categories of the patients. It was concluded that WHOQOL-BREF Chinese version was successfully used in the evaluation of QOL of HIV/AIDS individuals in Chinese population and proved to be a reliable and useful tool.展开更多
目的评价世界卫生组织生活质量测定简表(World Health Organization quality of life scale-brief form questionnaire,WHOQOL-BREF)在测定HIV感染者生活质量中应用的信度和效度,比较不同特征HIV感染者的生活质量,为下一步评价感染者的...目的评价世界卫生组织生活质量测定简表(World Health Organization quality of life scale-brief form questionnaire,WHOQOL-BREF)在测定HIV感染者生活质量中应用的信度和效度,比较不同特征HIV感染者的生活质量,为下一步评价感染者的生活质量和制定有效的关怀措施提供参考依据。方法采用方便抽样的方法在云南省红河哈尼族彝族自治州选择符合条件的HIV感染者。采用Cronbach’sα系数和分半信度评价其信度;探索性因子分析(exploratory factor analysis,EFA)和验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis,CFA)检验其效度;单因素方差分析比较不同特征感染者在WHOQOL-BREF各维度上的得分情况。结果共获得410份有效问卷。WHOQOL-BREF及生理领域、心理领域、社会领域和环境领域的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.901、0.779、0.819、0.729和0.743,分半信度分别为0.798、0.716、0.822、0.736和0.697。EFA共获取4个公因子,对总体方差的贡献率为54.542%;CFA结果显示最终拟合模型的主要指标χ^(2)/df和估计误差均方根(root-mean-square error of approximation,RMSEA)分别为2.169和0.076;拟合优度模型指数(goodness of fit index,GFI)、比较拟合指数(comparative fit index,CFI)和Tucker-Lewis指数(Tucker-Lewis index,TLI)分别为0.820、0.861和0.844,均接近0.900,表示拟合结果可以接受。单因素方差分析结果显示,是否接受抗逆转录病毒治疗、民族、职业、文化程度和最近一次CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数等不同特征感染者的生活质量有所不同。结论WHOQOL-BREF在测定HIV感染者的生活质量具有较好的信度和效度,不同特征感染者的生活质量有所差异,在制定有针对性的干预策略和措施时需加以考虑。展开更多
文摘目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组45例。参照组采用常规护理方式展开疾病护理,研究组采用时间康复护理方式展开疾病护理,对比分析两组患者的护理总满意度、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)评分、洼田饮水试验评分。结果研究组护理总满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理前,两组患者WHOQOL-BREF评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组环境因素评分、社会关系评分、生理因素评分、心理因素评分均高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。护理前,两组患者的洼田饮水试验评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组洼田饮水试验评分为(1.29±0.29)分低于参照组的(2.53±0.65)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.687,P<0.05)。结论时间康复护理方式的合理运用,可显著提升脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者护理满意度、生存质量,有效改善吞咽功能。
文摘In accord with new European university reforms initiated by the Bologna Process, our objective was to evaluate influences on the relationship between psychological quality of life (QoL) and the acquisition of academic employability skills (AES) among first-year students at the University in Luxembourg. At the beginning (2 months in) and the end (9 months) of the academic year, 973 newly registered students participated in this study involving two cross-university surveys. Students who redoubled or who had studied at other universities were excluded. Data were collected with an online questionnaire comprising the psychological Whoqol-bref subscale, AES scale, and questions about other related factors. The AES score decreased from 74.2 to 65.6. At both time points, the psychological Whoqol-bref was positively correlated with environmental and social relations QoL and perceived general health. Multiple regression models including interaction terms showed that a higher psychological QoL was associated with better general health (difference satisfied-dissatisfied 9.44), AES (slope 0.099), social relationships QoL (0.321), and environmental QoL (0.298). No interaction with time effects was significant, which indicates that the effects remain stable with time. If the university could maintain the QoL indicators at appropriate levels or manage decreases as they occur, it would have implications for health promotion and the creation of new student support systems. The SQA- LES project provides valuable information for universities aiming to develop a European Higher Educational Area.
文摘This study is aimed to evaluate the quality of life （QOL） for individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus （HIV）/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome （AIDS） in Hubei province-central China by using WHOQOL-BREF instrument （Chinese version）. One hundred and thirty six respondents （HIV/AIDS individuals） attending out-patient department of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention （Chinese CDC） were administered a structured questionnaire developed by investigators. QOL was evaluated by using WHOQOL-BREF instrument （Chinese version）. The results showed that the mean score of overall QOL on a scale of 0-100 was 25.8. The mean scores in 4 domains of QOL on a scale of 0-100 were 82.9 （social domain）, 27.5 （psychological domain）, 17.7 （physical domain） and 11.65 （environmental domain）. The significant difference of QOL was noted in the score of physical domain between asymptomatic （14.6） and early symptomatic individuals （12） （P=0.014）, and between patients with early symptoms （12） and those with AIDS （10.43） （P〈0.001）. QOL in psychological domain was significantly lower in early symptomatic （12.1） （P〈0.05） and AIDS patients （12.4） （P〈0.006） than in asymptomatic individuals （14.2）. The difference in QOL scores in the psychological domain was significant with respect to the income of patients （P〈0.048） and educational status （P〈0.037）. Significantly better QOL scores in the physical domain （P〈0.040） and environmental domain （P〈0.017） were noted with respect to the occupation of the patients. Patients with family support had better QOL scores in environmental domain. In our research, QOL for HIV/AIDS individuals was associated with education, occupation, income, family support and clinical categories of the patients. It was concluded that WHOQOL-BREF Chinese version was successfully used in the evaluation of QOL of HIV/AIDS individuals in Chinese population and proved to be a reliable and useful tool.
文摘目的评价世界卫生组织生活质量测定简表(World Health Organization quality of life scale-brief form questionnaire,WHOQOL-BREF)在测定HIV感染者生活质量中应用的信度和效度,比较不同特征HIV感染者的生活质量,为下一步评价感染者的生活质量和制定有效的关怀措施提供参考依据。方法采用方便抽样的方法在云南省红河哈尼族彝族自治州选择符合条件的HIV感染者。采用Cronbach’sα系数和分半信度评价其信度;探索性因子分析(exploratory factor analysis,EFA)和验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis,CFA)检验其效度;单因素方差分析比较不同特征感染者在WHOQOL-BREF各维度上的得分情况。结果共获得410份有效问卷。WHOQOL-BREF及生理领域、心理领域、社会领域和环境领域的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.901、0.779、0.819、0.729和0.743,分半信度分别为0.798、0.716、0.822、0.736和0.697。EFA共获取4个公因子,对总体方差的贡献率为54.542%;CFA结果显示最终拟合模型的主要指标χ^(2)/df和估计误差均方根(root-mean-square error of approximation,RMSEA)分别为2.169和0.076;拟合优度模型指数(goodness of fit index,GFI)、比较拟合指数(comparative fit index,CFI)和Tucker-Lewis指数(Tucker-Lewis index,TLI)分别为0.820、0.861和0.844,均接近0.900,表示拟合结果可以接受。单因素方差分析结果显示,是否接受抗逆转录病毒治疗、民族、职业、文化程度和最近一次CD4^(+)T淋巴细胞计数等不同特征感染者的生活质量有所不同。结论WHOQOL-BREF在测定HIV感染者的生活质量具有较好的信度和效度,不同特征感染者的生活质量有所差异,在制定有针对性的干预策略和措施时需加以考虑。
