Background： Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare lung disease, the most common type of which is autoimmune PAP. The gold standard therapy for PAP is whole lung lavage （WLL）. Few studies have reported th...Background： Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare lung disease, the most common type of which is autoimmune PAP. The gold standard therapy for PAP is whole lung lavage （WLL）. Few studies have reported the optimal technique with which to evaluate the response to WLL. In this study, we aimed to identify parameters with which to assess the need for repeat WLL during a long-term 8-year follow-up. Methods： We conducted a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with autoimmune PAP with 80 of whom underwent WLL. Physiologic, serologic, and radiologic features of the patients were analyzed during an 8-year follow-up after the first WLL treatment. Results： Of the 40 patients without any intervention, 39 patients either achieved remission or remained stable and only one died of pulmonary infection. Of the 56 patients who underwent WLL for 1 time, 55 remained free from a second WLL and 1 patient died of cancer. Twenty-four required additional treatments after their first WLL. The baseline PaO2, （P = 0.000）, PA-aO2 （P = 0.000）, shunt fraction rate （P = 0.001）, percent of predicted normal diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide （DLCO%Pred） （P = 0.016）, 6-rain walk test （P = 0.013）, carcinoembryonic antigen （CEA） （P = 0.007）, and neuron-specific enolase （NSE） （P = 0.003） showed significant differences among the three groups. The need for a second WLL was significantly associated with PaO2 （P = 0.000）, CEA （P= 0.050）, the 6-minute walk test （P= 0.026）, and DLCO%Pred （P = 0.041 ）. The DLCO%Pred on admission with a cut-off value of42.1% （P = 0.001） may help to distinguish whether patients with PAP require a second WLL. Conclusions： WLL is the optimal treatment method for PAP and provides remarkable improvements for affected patients. The DLCO%Pred on admission with a cut-offvalue of 42.1% may distinguish whether patients with PAP require a second WLL.展开更多
Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare diffuse lung disease, characterized by accumulation of surfactant-associated phosphor lipoproteinaceous material in the alvoli. Finding the periodic acid-Schiff （PAS）...Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare diffuse lung disease, characterized by accumulation of surfactant-associated phosphor lipoproteinaceous material in the alvoli. Finding the periodic acid-Schiff （PAS） positive substance in the alveolar lavage can help to make the diagnosis.展开更多
文摘Background： Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare lung disease, the most common type of which is autoimmune PAP. The gold standard therapy for PAP is whole lung lavage （WLL）. Few studies have reported the optimal technique with which to evaluate the response to WLL. In this study, we aimed to identify parameters with which to assess the need for repeat WLL during a long-term 8-year follow-up. Methods： We conducted a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with autoimmune PAP with 80 of whom underwent WLL. Physiologic, serologic, and radiologic features of the patients were analyzed during an 8-year follow-up after the first WLL treatment. Results： Of the 40 patients without any intervention, 39 patients either achieved remission or remained stable and only one died of pulmonary infection. Of the 56 patients who underwent WLL for 1 time, 55 remained free from a second WLL and 1 patient died of cancer. Twenty-four required additional treatments after their first WLL. The baseline PaO2, （P = 0.000）, PA-aO2 （P = 0.000）, shunt fraction rate （P = 0.001）, percent of predicted normal diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide （DLCO%Pred） （P = 0.016）, 6-rain walk test （P = 0.013）, carcinoembryonic antigen （CEA） （P = 0.007）, and neuron-specific enolase （NSE） （P = 0.003） showed significant differences among the three groups. The need for a second WLL was significantly associated with PaO2 （P = 0.000）, CEA （P= 0.050）, the 6-minute walk test （P= 0.026）, and DLCO%Pred （P = 0.041 ）. The DLCO%Pred on admission with a cut-off value of42.1% （P = 0.001） may help to distinguish whether patients with PAP require a second WLL. Conclusions： WLL is the optimal treatment method for PAP and provides remarkable improvements for affected patients. The DLCO%Pred on admission with a cut-offvalue of 42.1% may distinguish whether patients with PAP require a second WLL.
文摘Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis （PAP） is a rare diffuse lung disease, characterized by accumulation of surfactant-associated phosphor lipoproteinaceous material in the alvoli. Finding the periodic acid-Schiff （PAS） positive substance in the alveolar lavage can help to make the diagnosis.
