AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were co...AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were collected shortly after the accident event at the scene.With these data,a technical and medical analysis was performed,including Injury Severity Score,Abbreviated Injury Scale and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale.The method of data collection is named the German InDepth Accident Study and can be seen as representative.RESULTS:A total of 4430 injured seniors in traffic accidents were evaluated.The incidence of sustaining severe injuries to extremities,head and maxillofacial region was significantly higher in the group of elderly people compared to a younger age(P<0.05).The number of accident-related injuries was higher in the group of seniors compared to other groups.CONCLUSION:Seniors are more likely to be involved in traffic injuries and to sustain serious to severe injuries compared to other groups.展开更多
AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was perfor...AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was performed. The trauma registry was used to identify level 1 and level 2 trauma codes for each injury. The computed tomography scans in all patients were classified as stable or unstable using the Abbreviated Injury Scale. Pelvic injury classifications in level 1 and level 2 groups were compared. Patient disposition at discharge in level 1 and level 2 groups were also compared.RESULTS: There were 108 level 1 and 130 level 2 blunt trauma admissions. In the level 1 group, 67% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 33% were classified as unstable. In the level 2 group, 62% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 38% were classified as unstable. level 1 trauma code was not associated with odds of having an unstable fracture pattern(OR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.48-1.41, P = 0.485). In the level 1 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 33% were discharged to home, 36% to a rehabilitation facility, and 32% died. In the level 2 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 65% were discharged to home, 31% to a rehabilitation facility, and 4% died. For those with unstable pelvic fractures(n = 85), assignment of a level 2 trauma code was associated with reduced odds of death(OR = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.35, P = 0.001) as compared to being discharged to home.CONCLUSION: Trauma code level assignment is not correlated with severity of pelvic injury. Because an unstable pelvis can lead to hemodynamic instability, these injuries may be undertriaged.展开更多
目的探讨（modified early warning system，MEWS）评分在急诊批量伤员救治中的实践意义。方法将2011年6月-2016年10月新疆军区总医院急诊科救治的459例批量伤员使用MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分进行一致性分析，并与现存的各评分比较推测近...目的探讨（modified early warning system，MEWS）评分在急诊批量伤员救治中的实践意义。方法将2011年6月-2016年10月新疆军区总医院急诊科救治的459例批量伤员使用MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分进行一致性分析，并与现存的各评分比较推测近、远期死亡率。结果根据Kappa一致性分析，本研究Kappa值为0．691，P=0．000〈0．005有统计学意义，提示一致性好。通过c—statistics显示推测MEWS远期死亡率为0．945（95％CI 0．879-0．961），短期死亡率为0．962（95％CI 0．901-0．973）。结论在院内急救批量伤员拣伤分类中，MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分一致性好，MEWS评分推测死亡率与现存的各评分相近或更优，可以应用于急诊科的批量伤员检伤分类。展开更多
目的:目前脊髓损伤仍缺乏十分有效的治疗手段,细胞治疗可能是一种很有前景的治疗手段,其中人脐带间充质干细胞由于其具有易获取、低成本、伦理争议少和免疫原性低等优点受到广泛关注。但目前临床上并没有大范围使用人脐带间充质干细胞,...目的:目前脊髓损伤仍缺乏十分有效的治疗手段,细胞治疗可能是一种很有前景的治疗手段,其中人脐带间充质干细胞由于其具有易获取、低成本、伦理争议少和免疫原性低等优点受到广泛关注。但目前临床上并没有大范围使用人脐带间充质干细胞,对其有效性和安全性还有争议。文章使用Meta分析来评价人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的有效性和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索英文数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane、EMbase)和中文数据库(中国知网、万方医学网和维普数据库),搜集人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的临床研究文献,检索时间为各数据库建库至2021年4月。由2位研究人员独立阅读纳入文献、提取资料和评价质量,随机对照试验使用改良Jadad评分量表对纳入文献进行评分,并使用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行偏倚风险评估,队列研究采用NOS量表进行评价,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10篇文献,370例患者,包括6篇随机对照试验,4篇队列研究,文献总体质量较高。Meta分析结果显示:①人脐带间充质干细胞移植组的ASIA感觉功能评分(MD=5.20,95%CI:3.50-6.90,P<0.00001)、AIS分级改善率(RR=2.26,95%CI:1.40-3.65,P=0.0008)、日常生活能力评分(Barthel指数)(MD=5.12,95%CI:1.04-9.20,P=0.01)均高于对照组;②人脐带间充质干细胞移植组在ASIA运动功能评分(MD=3.48,95%CI:-0.14-7.10,P=0.06)、ASIA感觉功能评分中细化的针刺觉(MD=7.58,95%CI:-0.44-15.59,P=0.06)、轻触觉(MD=7.67,95%CI:-0.42-15.77,P=0.06)评分方面,与对照组相比差异无显著性意义;③敏感性分析结果显示,在人脐带间充质干细胞移植组ASIA运动功能评分高于对照组(MD=6.14,95%CI:4.46-7.81,P<0.00001),在日常生活能力评分方面,结论与之前保持一致。纳入的10篇文献中,均报道未有严重不良反应发生,但是个别病例存在轻微的不良反应,经对症治疗后均消失。结论:现有的临床证据表明,人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤安全有效,患者的感觉和运动功能以及日常生活能力可得到显著改善。展开更多
基金Supported by Federal Highway Research Institute(BASt)the German Research Association of the Automotive Technology,a department of the VDA(German Association of the Automotive Industry)
文摘AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were collected shortly after the accident event at the scene.With these data,a technical and medical analysis was performed,including Injury Severity Score,Abbreviated Injury Scale and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale.The method of data collection is named the German InDepth Accident Study and can be seen as representative.RESULTS:A total of 4430 injured seniors in traffic accidents were evaluated.The incidence of sustaining severe injuries to extremities,head and maxillofacial region was significantly higher in the group of elderly people compared to a younger age(P<0.05).The number of accident-related injuries was higher in the group of seniors compared to other groups.CONCLUSION:Seniors are more likely to be involved in traffic injuries and to sustain serious to severe injuries compared to other groups.
文摘AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was performed. The trauma registry was used to identify level 1 and level 2 trauma codes for each injury. The computed tomography scans in all patients were classified as stable or unstable using the Abbreviated Injury Scale. Pelvic injury classifications in level 1 and level 2 groups were compared. Patient disposition at discharge in level 1 and level 2 groups were also compared.RESULTS: There were 108 level 1 and 130 level 2 blunt trauma admissions. In the level 1 group, 67% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 33% were classified as unstable. In the level 2 group, 62% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 38% were classified as unstable. level 1 trauma code was not associated with odds of having an unstable fracture pattern(OR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.48-1.41, P = 0.485). In the level 1 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 33% were discharged to home, 36% to a rehabilitation facility, and 32% died. In the level 2 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 65% were discharged to home, 31% to a rehabilitation facility, and 4% died. For those with unstable pelvic fractures(n = 85), assignment of a level 2 trauma code was associated with reduced odds of death(OR = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.35, P = 0.001) as compared to being discharged to home.CONCLUSION: Trauma code level assignment is not correlated with severity of pelvic injury. Because an unstable pelvis can lead to hemodynamic instability, these injuries may be undertriaged.
文摘目的:目前脊髓损伤仍缺乏十分有效的治疗手段,细胞治疗可能是一种很有前景的治疗手段,其中人脐带间充质干细胞由于其具有易获取、低成本、伦理争议少和免疫原性低等优点受到广泛关注。但目前临床上并没有大范围使用人脐带间充质干细胞,对其有效性和安全性还有争议。文章使用Meta分析来评价人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的有效性和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索英文数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane、EMbase)和中文数据库(中国知网、万方医学网和维普数据库),搜集人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的临床研究文献,检索时间为各数据库建库至2021年4月。由2位研究人员独立阅读纳入文献、提取资料和评价质量,随机对照试验使用改良Jadad评分量表对纳入文献进行评分,并使用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行偏倚风险评估,队列研究采用NOS量表进行评价,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10篇文献,370例患者,包括6篇随机对照试验,4篇队列研究,文献总体质量较高。Meta分析结果显示:①人脐带间充质干细胞移植组的ASIA感觉功能评分(MD=5.20,95%CI:3.50-6.90,P<0.00001)、AIS分级改善率(RR=2.26,95%CI:1.40-3.65,P=0.0008)、日常生活能力评分(Barthel指数)(MD=5.12,95%CI:1.04-9.20,P=0.01)均高于对照组;②人脐带间充质干细胞移植组在ASIA运动功能评分(MD=3.48,95%CI:-0.14-7.10,P=0.06)、ASIA感觉功能评分中细化的针刺觉(MD=7.58,95%CI:-0.44-15.59,P=0.06)、轻触觉(MD=7.67,95%CI:-0.42-15.77,P=0.06)评分方面,与对照组相比差异无显著性意义;③敏感性分析结果显示,在人脐带间充质干细胞移植组ASIA运动功能评分高于对照组(MD=6.14,95%CI:4.46-7.81,P<0.00001),在日常生活能力评分方面,结论与之前保持一致。纳入的10篇文献中,均报道未有严重不良反应发生,但是个别病例存在轻微的不良反应,经对症治疗后均消失。结论:现有的临床证据表明,人脐带间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤安全有效,患者的感觉和运动功能以及日常生活能力可得到显著改善。
