BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factor...BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI and their interactive effects.METHODS We selected 168 SAP patients admitted to our hospital between December 2019 and June 2022.They were divided into AGI group and non-AGI group according to whether AGI was present.Demographic data and laboratory test data were compared between the two groups.The risk factors for SAP with concomitant AGI were analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression,and an analysis of the interaction of the risk factors was performed.RESULTS The percentage of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,acute physiological and chronic health scoring system II(APACHE II)score,white blood cell count and creatinine(CRE)level was higher in the AGI group than in the non-AGI group.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that an APACHE II score>15 and CRE>100μmol/L were risk factors for SAP complicating AGI.The interaction index of APACHE II score and CRE level was 3.123.CONCLUSION An APACHE II score>15 and CRE level>100μmol/L are independent risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI,and there is a positive interaction between them.展开更多
AIM： To identify the risk factors in predicting the out- come of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure pa- tients. METHODS： We retrospectively divided 113 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure-hepatitis ...AIM： To identify the risk factors in predicting the out- come of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure pa- tients. METHODS： We retrospectively divided 113 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure-hepatitis B virus （ACLF-HBV） and without concurrent hepatitis C or D virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma into two groups according to their outcomes after anti-HBV therapy. Their demographic, clinical, and biochemical data on the day of diagnosis and after the first week of treatment were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher＇s exact test, and a multiple logistic regres- sion analysis. RESULTS： The study included 113 patients （87 men and 26 women） with a mean age of 49.84 years. Fifty- two patients survived, and 61 patients died. Liver failure （85.2%）, sepsis （34.4%）, and multiple organ failure （39.3%） were the main causes of death. Mul- tivariate analyses showed that Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE） Ⅱ scores ≥ 12 [odds ratio （OR） = 7.160, 95% CI： 2.834-18.092, P 〈 0.001] and positive blood culture （OR = 13.520, 95% CI： 2.740-66.721, P = 0.001） on the day of diagnosis and model for end-stage liver disease （MELD） scores 28 （OR = 8.182, 95% CI： 1.884-35.527, P = 0.005） after the first week of treatment were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION： APACHE II scores on the day of diag- nosis and MELD scores after the first week of anti-HBV therapy are feasible predictors of outcome in ACLF- HBV patients.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the relationship between peptic ulcer disease(PUD) and acute pancreatitis.METHODS:A cohort of 78 patients with acute pancreatitis were included in this study.The presence of PUD and the Helicobacter py...AIM:To evaluate the relationship between peptic ulcer disease(PUD) and acute pancreatitis.METHODS:A cohort of 78 patients with acute pancreatitis were included in this study.The presence of PUD and the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) status were assessed by an endoscopic method.The severity of acute pancreatitis was assessed using Ranson's score,the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHE) □ score,computed tomography severity indexand the clinical data during hospitalization,all of which were compared between the patients with and without PUD.The risk factors for PUD were also evaluated.RESULTS:Among 78 patients,41 patients(52.6%) with acute pancreatitis suffered from PUD,but only 13(31.7%) patients with PUD were infected by H.pylori.On univariate analysis,male gender,an etiology of alcohol-induced pancreatitis,a history of smoking or alcohol consumption,elevated triglyceride and C-reactive protein levels,and high APACHE □ score were signif icantly associated with PUD.However,on multivariate logistic regressionanalysis,the APACHE □ score(odds ratio:7.69;95% conf idence interval:1.78-33.33;P < 0.01) was found to be the only independent risk factor for PUD.CONCLUSION:Patients with acute pancreatitis are liable to suffer from PUD.PUD is associated with severeacute pancreatitis according to the APACHE □ score,and treatment for PUD should be considered for patients with severe acute pancreatitis.展开更多
目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第...目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。展开更多
背景脓毒症是由感染因素引发机体免疫反应失调而导致的全身炎症反应,可能会导致潜在的危及生命的器官功能障碍。目前对于未成熟血小板比率(IPF)在脓毒症严重程度及预后方面已有一些研究,但关于IPF联合其他指标在脓毒症中应用的研究较少...背景脓毒症是由感染因素引发机体免疫反应失调而导致的全身炎症反应,可能会导致潜在的危及生命的器官功能障碍。目前对于未成熟血小板比率(IPF)在脓毒症严重程度及预后方面已有一些研究,但关于IPF联合其他指标在脓毒症中应用的研究较少。目的探讨IPF联合其他指标在脓毒症严重程度及其预后中的预测价值。方法收集2020年11月—2022年11月复旦大学附属中山医院厦门医院重症医学科收治的60例脓毒症患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。分组情况:严重程度按定义划分,可分为严重脓毒症组24例与脓毒性休克组36例;严重程度按序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分划分,可分为低SOFA组26例(SOFA评分<6分)与高SOFA组34例(SOFA评分≥6分);按预后划分,可分为生存组39例与死亡组21例。对比不同分组患者IPF及其他血液指标[中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值(NAR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、乳酸与白蛋白比值(LAR)]的差异,绘制不同联合指标评估脓毒症严重程度和预后的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)并比较其评估价值。结果死亡组患者肺部疾病所占比例、基线急性生理学与慢性健康状况量表系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、基线SOFA评分高于生存组(P<0.05)。高SOFA组患者肺部疾病所占比例、基线APACHEⅡ评分、死亡所占比例高于低SOFA组(P<0.05)。对于治疗开始48hIPF,脓毒性休克组患者高于严重脓毒症组,高SOFA组患者高于低SOFA组,死亡组患者高于生存组(P<0.05)。因不同组患者治疗开始48 h IPF均存在统计学差异,故截取48 h各实验室检查指标进行进一步研究分析:IPF在预测脓毒性休克及高SOFA评分的AUC分别为0.70(95%CI=0.55~0.83,截断值为3.95%)、0.72(95%CI=0.60~0.86,截断值7.70%),预测死亡的AUC为0.73(95%CI=0.58~0.89,截断值为6.10%)。IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+NLR、IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+LAR预测高SOFA评分的AUC分别为0.91(95%CI=0.84~0.98)和0.93(95%CI=0.84~0.99);IPF+NAR+PLR预测脓毒症患者死亡的AUC为0.90(95%CI=0.81~0.98)。结论IPF联合不同血液指标能够提高临床实践中对脓毒症患者病情严重程度及预后的评估能力,治疗开始48 h IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+治疗开始48 h NLR及治疗开始48 h IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+治疗开始48 h LAR在脓毒症严重程度预测中具有较高效能;而治疗开始48h的IPF+NAR+PLR在预测脓毒症患者预后方面效能较好。展开更多
目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并...目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)的预测价值。方法回顾性选取2019年1月至2021年12月安徽医科大学附属省立医院收治的75例sTBI患者,根据是否合并ALI,将其分为ALI组(n=24)和非ALI组(n=51)。收集患者入院时的基本资料、实验室指标、APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma scale,GCS)评分;采用Logistic回归分析sTBI患者合并ALI的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)评价指标对sTBI合并ALI的预测价值。结果ALI组患者的APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分均显著高于非ALI组,GCS评分、红细胞体积分布宽度显著低于非ALI组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分和LIPS评分升高及GCS评分降低均是sTBI合并ALI的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,LIPS评分、APACHEⅡ评分诊断sTBI合并ALI的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.869和0.754;二者联合检测的AUC为0.916(95%CI:0.855~0.976),敏感度和特异性分别为83.4%和84.3%。结论LIPS评分联合APACHEⅡ评分可有效预测sTBI合并ALI的风险。展开更多
目的分析白介素-4(interleukin-4,IL-4)联合急性生理与慢性健康评分(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHEⅡ)对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii,CRAB)感染的预后评估价值。方...目的分析白介素-4(interleukin-4,IL-4)联合急性生理与慢性健康评分(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHEⅡ)对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii,CRAB)感染的预后评估价值。方法将2021年11月至2023年10月在广东医科大学附属医院接受治疗的143例CRAB感染患者设为研究组,取同期院内治疗的碳青霉烯敏感鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者49例为对照组,根据研究组患者的临床结局区分为死亡组(n=46)和存活组(n=97)。对比研究组与对照组、死亡组与存活组患者IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分差异,采用Pearson相关性分析的方式,计算CRAB感染患者血清IL-4水平同APACHEⅡ评分的相关性,并采用绘制受试者工作(receiver operating characteristic curves,ROC)曲线的方式评估IL-4、APACHEⅡ评分以及联合诊断在预测CRAB感染患者不良临床结局中的应用价值。结果死亡组患者的IL-4水平以及APACHEⅡ评分显著高于存活组患者,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示血清IL-4水平与APACHEⅡ评分具有明显的正相关性(r=0.093,P<0.001)。血清IL-4、APACHEⅡ评分以及联合检测对CRAB感染患者预后评估AUC分别为0.712(95%CI=0.606~0.817,P<0.001)、0.849(95%CI=0.763~0.936,P<0.001)和0.956(95%CI=0.927~0.985,P<0.001)。结论CRAB患者不良预后者血清IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分较存活组显著升高,可以考虑将血清IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分联合应用于此类患者预后评估中,有助于为其临床治疗提供参考。展开更多
基金This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University(Approved No.LYREC2023-k016-01).
文摘BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI and their interactive effects.METHODS We selected 168 SAP patients admitted to our hospital between December 2019 and June 2022.They were divided into AGI group and non-AGI group according to whether AGI was present.Demographic data and laboratory test data were compared between the two groups.The risk factors for SAP with concomitant AGI were analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression,and an analysis of the interaction of the risk factors was performed.RESULTS The percentage of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,acute physiological and chronic health scoring system II(APACHE II)score,white blood cell count and creatinine(CRE)level was higher in the AGI group than in the non-AGI group.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that an APACHE II score>15 and CRE>100μmol/L were risk factors for SAP complicating AGI.The interaction index of APACHE II score and CRE level was 3.123.CONCLUSION An APACHE II score>15 and CRE level>100μmol/L are independent risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI,and there is a positive interaction between them.
基金Supported by Tri-Service General Hospital,No.TSGH-C101-137
文摘AIM： To identify the risk factors in predicting the out- come of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure pa- tients. METHODS： We retrospectively divided 113 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure-hepatitis B virus （ACLF-HBV） and without concurrent hepatitis C or D virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma into two groups according to their outcomes after anti-HBV therapy. Their demographic, clinical, and biochemical data on the day of diagnosis and after the first week of treatment were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher＇s exact test, and a multiple logistic regres- sion analysis. RESULTS： The study included 113 patients （87 men and 26 women） with a mean age of 49.84 years. Fifty- two patients survived, and 61 patients died. Liver failure （85.2%）, sepsis （34.4%）, and multiple organ failure （39.3%） were the main causes of death. Mul- tivariate analyses showed that Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE） Ⅱ scores ≥ 12 [odds ratio （OR） = 7.160, 95% CI： 2.834-18.092, P 〈 0.001] and positive blood culture （OR = 13.520, 95% CI： 2.740-66.721, P = 0.001） on the day of diagnosis and model for end-stage liver disease （MELD） scores 28 （OR = 8.182, 95% CI： 1.884-35.527, P = 0.005） after the first week of treatment were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION： APACHE II scores on the day of diag- nosis and MELD scores after the first week of anti-HBV therapy are feasible predictors of outcome in ACLF- HBV patients.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the relationship between peptic ulcer disease(PUD) and acute pancreatitis.METHODS:A cohort of 78 patients with acute pancreatitis were included in this study.The presence of PUD and the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) status were assessed by an endoscopic method.The severity of acute pancreatitis was assessed using Ranson's score,the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHE) □ score,computed tomography severity indexand the clinical data during hospitalization,all of which were compared between the patients with and without PUD.The risk factors for PUD were also evaluated.RESULTS:Among 78 patients,41 patients(52.6%) with acute pancreatitis suffered from PUD,but only 13(31.7%) patients with PUD were infected by H.pylori.On univariate analysis,male gender,an etiology of alcohol-induced pancreatitis,a history of smoking or alcohol consumption,elevated triglyceride and C-reactive protein levels,and high APACHE □ score were signif icantly associated with PUD.However,on multivariate logistic regressionanalysis,the APACHE □ score(odds ratio:7.69;95% conf idence interval:1.78-33.33;P < 0.01) was found to be the only independent risk factor for PUD.CONCLUSION:Patients with acute pancreatitis are liable to suffer from PUD.PUD is associated with severeacute pancreatitis according to the APACHE □ score,and treatment for PUD should be considered for patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
文摘目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。
文摘背景脓毒症是由感染因素引发机体免疫反应失调而导致的全身炎症反应,可能会导致潜在的危及生命的器官功能障碍。目前对于未成熟血小板比率(IPF)在脓毒症严重程度及预后方面已有一些研究,但关于IPF联合其他指标在脓毒症中应用的研究较少。目的探讨IPF联合其他指标在脓毒症严重程度及其预后中的预测价值。方法收集2020年11月—2022年11月复旦大学附属中山医院厦门医院重症医学科收治的60例脓毒症患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。分组情况:严重程度按定义划分,可分为严重脓毒症组24例与脓毒性休克组36例;严重程度按序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分划分,可分为低SOFA组26例(SOFA评分<6分)与高SOFA组34例(SOFA评分≥6分);按预后划分,可分为生存组39例与死亡组21例。对比不同分组患者IPF及其他血液指标[中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值(NAR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、乳酸与白蛋白比值(LAR)]的差异,绘制不同联合指标评估脓毒症严重程度和预后的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)并比较其评估价值。结果死亡组患者肺部疾病所占比例、基线急性生理学与慢性健康状况量表系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、基线SOFA评分高于生存组(P<0.05)。高SOFA组患者肺部疾病所占比例、基线APACHEⅡ评分、死亡所占比例高于低SOFA组(P<0.05)。对于治疗开始48hIPF,脓毒性休克组患者高于严重脓毒症组,高SOFA组患者高于低SOFA组,死亡组患者高于生存组(P<0.05)。因不同组患者治疗开始48 h IPF均存在统计学差异,故截取48 h各实验室检查指标进行进一步研究分析:IPF在预测脓毒性休克及高SOFA评分的AUC分别为0.70(95%CI=0.55~0.83,截断值为3.95%)、0.72(95%CI=0.60~0.86,截断值7.70%),预测死亡的AUC为0.73(95%CI=0.58~0.89,截断值为6.10%)。IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+NLR、IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+LAR预测高SOFA评分的AUC分别为0.91(95%CI=0.84~0.98)和0.93(95%CI=0.84~0.99);IPF+NAR+PLR预测脓毒症患者死亡的AUC为0.90(95%CI=0.81~0.98)。结论IPF联合不同血液指标能够提高临床实践中对脓毒症患者病情严重程度及预后的评估能力,治疗开始48 h IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+治疗开始48 h NLR及治疗开始48 h IPF+基线APACHEⅡ评分+治疗开始48 h LAR在脓毒症严重程度预测中具有较高效能;而治疗开始48h的IPF+NAR+PLR在预测脓毒症患者预后方面效能较好。
文摘目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)的预测价值。方法回顾性选取2019年1月至2021年12月安徽医科大学附属省立医院收治的75例sTBI患者,根据是否合并ALI,将其分为ALI组(n=24)和非ALI组(n=51)。收集患者入院时的基本资料、实验室指标、APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma scale,GCS)评分;采用Logistic回归分析sTBI患者合并ALI的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)评价指标对sTBI合并ALI的预测价值。结果ALI组患者的APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分均显著高于非ALI组,GCS评分、红细胞体积分布宽度显著低于非ALI组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分和LIPS评分升高及GCS评分降低均是sTBI合并ALI的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,LIPS评分、APACHEⅡ评分诊断sTBI合并ALI的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.869和0.754;二者联合检测的AUC为0.916(95%CI:0.855~0.976),敏感度和特异性分别为83.4%和84.3%。结论LIPS评分联合APACHEⅡ评分可有效预测sTBI合并ALI的风险。
