Sintilimab-induced autoimmune diabetes:A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND With the widespread application of immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)therapy,the number of immune-related adverse effects(irAEs)has increased over the years.Autoimmune diabetes mellitus(DM)is a rare irAEs of ICIs and can be troublesome and life threatening.CASE SUMMARY We report a 78-year-old woman with no history of diabetes who presented with hyperglycemia up to 23.4 mmol/L(random blood glucose level)after 14 courses of sintilimab.Hemoglobin A1c was 8.2%,fasting insulin was 0.29 mIU/mL,and fasting C-peptide was decreased to a level with negative autoantibodies.Combing her medical history and laboratory examination,she was diagnosed with programmed cell death(PD)-1-inhibitor-induced,new-onset autoimmune DM.After controlling her blood glucose,she was treated with daily insulin by subcutaneous injection.She was allowed to continue anti-PD-1 therapy and she still obtained some therapeutic efficacy.We also reviewed some published cases(n=36)of PD-1/PD-ligand 1(PD-L1)inhibitor-induced DM.We also discuss potential pathogenic mechanisms,clinical features,prognostic markers(βcell antibodies,human leukocyte antigen type,PD-L1 Level)of this rare adverse effect.CONCLUSION It is important for all clinicians to be aware of DM as an irAEs of ICIs.

Blood and Histopathological Biomarkers of Immune-related Adverse Effects of Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been a recent major breakthrough in the management of tumors.They have broadened the scope of management in medical oncology,which has been heavily dependent on chemotherapy.Immune checkpoint inhibitors have renewed the hope of many patients for a more effective treatment.However,Immune checkpoint inhibitors are also associated with a variety of adverse effects,most commonly immunerelated adverse events,and these are often different from the known chemotherapy-induced toxicities.Hence,there is a need to identify specific biomarkers which are able to predict or diagnose these immune-related adverse events.

Comparison of the effect and safety of Kuntai capsule and hormone replacement therapy in patients with perimenopausal syndrome:a systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of Kuntai capsule and hormone replacement therapy in treatment of perimenopausal syndrome.METHODS: Articles were retrieved from the databases Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,Pub Med, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Database. Only randomized controlled trials were included; 15 trials involving1243 patients were identified from January 2005 to April 2015. A systemic review and Meta-analysis of publications was performed. The review was limit-ed to randomized controlled trials that compared Kuntai capsule and hormone replacement therapy to treat perimenopausal syndrome for at least 3months. The primary outcome assessed was the treatment efficacy at 3 months, including effective rate of Kupperman menopausal scores, Kupperman menopausal scores, and blood estradiol(E2) or blood follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) levels.Other outcomes assessed were safety or adverse events, such as gastrointestinal complaints, breast distending pain, or vaginal bleeding.RESULTS: Kupperman menopausal scores showed no significant difference in effective rate [odds ratio(OR): 1.05, 95% confidence intervals(CI): 0.71 to1.55] and changes in FSH level [mean difference(MD): 2.14, 95% CI:-2.36 to 6.65]. There was a significant statistical difference in Kupperman menopausal scores(MD:-1.14, 95% CI:-2.03 to-0.25)and changes in E2level(MD:-16.41, 95% CI:-18.83to-13.69). There were fewer adverse events in the Kuntai capsule group than in the hormone replacement therapy group(OR: = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25 to0.48, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Compared with hormone replacement therapy, Kuntai capsule can improve perimenopausal symptoms and blood E2 levels, and reduce the incidence of adverse events.