Purpose:To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods:The study group is treated...Purpose:To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods:The study group is treated with PFNA internal fixation.The control group is treated by internal fixation with anatomical locking plate of proximal femur.Results:The time of operation,the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the time of fracture healing in the study group are significantly less than those in the control group.The incidence rate of complication in the study group(3.23%)is significantly lower than that in the control group(17.2%).Data comparison shows P<0.05.Conclusion:The curative effect and prognosis for patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated by PFNA internal fixation are more ideal.展开更多
Purpose To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods The study group is treated...Purpose To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods The study group is treated with PFNA internal fixation.The control group is treated by internal fixation with anatomical locking plate of proximal femur.Results The time of operation,the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the time of fracture healing in the study group are significantly less than those in the control group.The incidence rate of complication in the study group(3.23%)is significantly lower than that in the control group(17.2%).Data comparison shows P<0.05.Conclusion The curative effect and prognosis for patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated by PFNA internal fixation are more ideal.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in young patients are extremely rare,and there is no reference for fracture classification and treatment options.CASE SUMMARY We report a 27-year-old...BACKGROUND Ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in young patients are extremely rare,and there is no reference for fracture classification and treatment options.CASE SUMMARY We report a 27-year-old male patient who sustained ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures and was treated with a proximal femoral locking compression plate(PFLCP).The literature on these fractures was also reviewed.At the last follow-up three years after surgery,the patient had no obvious pain in the hip,and the range of motion in the hip joint was slightly limited,but met the normal life and work needs.There were no complications such as necrosis of the femoral head.CONCLUSION The PFLCP can be used to treat these complex proximal femoral fractures,and selection should be based on the patient's specific fractures.展开更多
背景老年肱骨近端骨折是一种常见的脆性骨折,重建内侧柱稳定性是治疗的关键,但重建方式存在差异。目的比较新型解剖髓内支撑系统与钢板结合髂骨髓内支撑治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析解放军总医院骨科医学部2018年9月...背景老年肱骨近端骨折是一种常见的脆性骨折,重建内侧柱稳定性是治疗的关键,但重建方式存在差异。目的比较新型解剖髓内支撑系统与钢板结合髂骨髓内支撑治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析解放军总医院骨科医学部2018年9月-2021年6月收治的肱骨近端骨折老年患者。根据治疗方式分为新型解剖髓内支撑系统组和钢板结合自体髂骨移植组。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、复位质量、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)以及末次随访时的肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分、生活能力DASH(disability of the arm,shoulder,and hand)评分、并发症等方面的差异。结果共纳入47例老年肱骨近端Neer分型骨折患者,男12例,女35例;三部分骨折25例,四部分骨折22例。新型解剖髓内支撑系统组22例,钢板结合自体髂骨移植组25例,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。平均随访时间为18.4个月,所有患者均获得骨性愈合,观察组的切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间均短于/少于对照组[(6.43±0.78)cm vs(10.74±0.81)cm,(192.27±55.02)mL vs(250±57.8)mL,(101.27±13.8)min vs(116.72±11.24)min],差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。术后3个月与术后第1天相比,观察组颈干角变化值小于对照组[(0.71±0.63)°vs(3.2±1.14)°,P<0.05]。两组在末次随访时VAS疼痛评分、Constant-Murley评分、DASH评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论与自体髂骨联合钢板组相比,新型解剖髓内支撑系统组具有创伤小、维持复位能力强等优点。展开更多
文摘Purpose:To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods:The study group is treated with PFNA internal fixation.The control group is treated by internal fixation with anatomical locking plate of proximal femur.Results:The time of operation,the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the time of fracture healing in the study group are significantly less than those in the control group.The incidence rate of complication in the study group(3.23%)is significantly lower than that in the control group(17.2%).Data comparison shows P<0.05.Conclusion:The curative effect and prognosis for patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated by PFNA internal fixation are more ideal.
文摘Purpose To investigate the clinical value of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anatomical locking plate of proximal femur in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods The study group is treated with PFNA internal fixation.The control group is treated by internal fixation with anatomical locking plate of proximal femur.Results The time of operation,the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the time of fracture healing in the study group are significantly less than those in the control group.The incidence rate of complication in the study group(3.23%)is significantly lower than that in the control group(17.2%).Data comparison shows P<0.05.Conclusion The curative effect and prognosis for patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated by PFNA internal fixation are more ideal.
文摘BACKGROUND Ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in young patients are extremely rare,and there is no reference for fracture classification and treatment options.CASE SUMMARY We report a 27-year-old male patient who sustained ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures and was treated with a proximal femoral locking compression plate(PFLCP).The literature on these fractures was also reviewed.At the last follow-up three years after surgery,the patient had no obvious pain in the hip,and the range of motion in the hip joint was slightly limited,but met the normal life and work needs.There were no complications such as necrosis of the femoral head.CONCLUSION The PFLCP can be used to treat these complex proximal femoral fractures,and selection should be based on the patient's specific fractures.
文摘背景老年肱骨近端骨折是一种常见的脆性骨折,重建内侧柱稳定性是治疗的关键,但重建方式存在差异。目的比较新型解剖髓内支撑系统与钢板结合髂骨髓内支撑治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析解放军总医院骨科医学部2018年9月-2021年6月收治的肱骨近端骨折老年患者。根据治疗方式分为新型解剖髓内支撑系统组和钢板结合自体髂骨移植组。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、复位质量、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)以及末次随访时的肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分、生活能力DASH(disability of the arm,shoulder,and hand)评分、并发症等方面的差异。结果共纳入47例老年肱骨近端Neer分型骨折患者,男12例,女35例;三部分骨折25例,四部分骨折22例。新型解剖髓内支撑系统组22例,钢板结合自体髂骨移植组25例,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。平均随访时间为18.4个月,所有患者均获得骨性愈合,观察组的切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间均短于/少于对照组[(6.43±0.78)cm vs(10.74±0.81)cm,(192.27±55.02)mL vs(250±57.8)mL,(101.27±13.8)min vs(116.72±11.24)min],差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。术后3个月与术后第1天相比,观察组颈干角变化值小于对照组[(0.71±0.63)°vs(3.2±1.14)°,P<0.05]。两组在末次随访时VAS疼痛评分、Constant-Murley评分、DASH评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论与自体髂骨联合钢板组相比,新型解剖髓内支撑系统组具有创伤小、维持复位能力强等优点。
