BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be a...BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be accomplished,in part,by analysing long-term outcomes.AIM To analyse minimum 10-year outcomes from 30 patients following arthroscopic anterior stabilisation using metallic anchors.METHODS Prospectively collected data from arthroscopic Bankart repairs performed using metal anchors during 2007P-2010 were retrospectively analysed in this singlesurgeon study.Comprehensive data collection included historical and clinical findings,dislocation details,operative specifics,and follow-up radiological and clinical findings including shoulder scores.The primary outcomes were patientreported scores(Constant,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons[ASES],and Rowe scores)and pain and instability on a visual analogue scale(VAS).RESULTS A 3% recurrence rate of dislocation was noted at the final follow-up.Total constant scores at 10 years postoperatively measured between 76 and 100(mean 89)were significantly better than preoperative scores(mean 62.7).Congruous improvements were also noted in the Rowe and ASES scores and VAS at the 10-year review.CONCLUSION Reliable long-term outcomes with metallic anchors in surgery for shoulder instability can be expected.Our results provide additional evidence of their continued,cost-effective presence in the modern scenario.展开更多
Background: Partial-thickness rotator cufftears (PTRCTs) are being diagnosed more often because of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Compared with articular and bursal side tears, there have been ...Background: Partial-thickness rotator cufftears (PTRCTs) are being diagnosed more often because of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Compared with articular and bursal side tears, there have been few studies about evaluating the clinical and structural outcomes after intratendinous tear repair. Methods: From 2008 to 2012, 33 consecutive patients with intratendinous PTRCTs underwent arthroscopic repair. All of them were retrospectively evaluated. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and constant scores were evaluated before operation and at the final follow-up. Postoperative cuff integrity was determined using MRI according to Sugaya's classification. Results: At the 2-year follow-up, the average UCLA score increased from 16.7± 1.9 to 32.5± 3,5, and the constant score increased from 66.2 ± 10.5 to 92.4 ± 6.9 (P 〈 0.001). Twenty seven patients received follow-up MRI examinations at an average of 15.2 months after surgery. Of these 27 patients, 22 (81.5%) had a healed tendon, and five patients had partial tears. There was no association between functional and anatomic results. Conclusions: For intratendinous PTRCT, clinical outcomes and tendon healing showed good results at a minimum 2-year after arthroscopic repair.展开更多
Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help ...Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help of the PubMed database. Of the articles searched through, three have been chosen to specifically address topics of interest concerning the factors affecting arthroscopic vs mini-open RCR surgical approaches. Discussion: As we continue to progress down the line of factors impacting a clinician’s decision making, we begin to see how postoperative management is unchanged. Tear severity lacks sufficient evidence to base a decision on, but financial, educational, and logistical factors are proven to play a significant role in this decision. Conclusion: As of right now it seems that mini-open RCR is the most cost and time efficient method, especially amongst non-fellowship trained surgeons or ones with lower volume of shoulder scopes. However, further studies should be done to examine cost and efficiency in Sport Medicine fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons to validate these findings.展开更多
BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function...BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be accomplished,in part,by analysing long-term outcomes.AIM To analyse minimum 10-year outcomes from 30 patients following arthroscopic anterior stabilisation using metallic anchors.METHODS Prospectively collected data from arthroscopic Bankart repairs performed using metal anchors during 2007P-2010 were retrospectively analysed in this singlesurgeon study.Comprehensive data collection included historical and clinical findings,dislocation details,operative specifics,and follow-up radiological and clinical findings including shoulder scores.The primary outcomes were patientreported scores(Constant,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons[ASES],and Rowe scores)and pain and instability on a visual analogue scale(VAS).RESULTS A 3% recurrence rate of dislocation was noted at the final follow-up.Total constant scores at 10 years postoperatively measured between 76 and 100(mean 89)were significantly better than preoperative scores(mean 62.7).Congruous improvements were also noted in the Rowe and ASES scores and VAS at the 10-year review.CONCLUSION Reliable long-term outcomes with metallic anchors in surgery for shoulder instability can be expected.Our results provide additional evidence of their continued,cost-effective presence in the modern scenario.
文摘Background: Partial-thickness rotator cufftears (PTRCTs) are being diagnosed more often because of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Compared with articular and bursal side tears, there have been few studies about evaluating the clinical and structural outcomes after intratendinous tear repair. Methods: From 2008 to 2012, 33 consecutive patients with intratendinous PTRCTs underwent arthroscopic repair. All of them were retrospectively evaluated. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and constant scores were evaluated before operation and at the final follow-up. Postoperative cuff integrity was determined using MRI according to Sugaya's classification. Results: At the 2-year follow-up, the average UCLA score increased from 16.7± 1.9 to 32.5± 3,5, and the constant score increased from 66.2 ± 10.5 to 92.4 ± 6.9 (P 〈 0.001). Twenty seven patients received follow-up MRI examinations at an average of 15.2 months after surgery. Of these 27 patients, 22 (81.5%) had a healed tendon, and five patients had partial tears. There was no association between functional and anatomic results. Conclusions: For intratendinous PTRCT, clinical outcomes and tendon healing showed good results at a minimum 2-year after arthroscopic repair.
文摘Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help of the PubMed database. Of the articles searched through, three have been chosen to specifically address topics of interest concerning the factors affecting arthroscopic vs mini-open RCR surgical approaches. Discussion: As we continue to progress down the line of factors impacting a clinician’s decision making, we begin to see how postoperative management is unchanged. Tear severity lacks sufficient evidence to base a decision on, but financial, educational, and logistical factors are proven to play a significant role in this decision. Conclusion: As of right now it seems that mini-open RCR is the most cost and time efficient method, especially amongst non-fellowship trained surgeons or ones with lower volume of shoulder scopes. However, further studies should be done to examine cost and efficiency in Sport Medicine fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons to validate these findings.
文摘BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.