AIM： Autologous blood donation （ABD） is mainly used to reduce the use of banked blood. In fact, ABD can be regarded as acute blood loss. Would ABD 2-3 d before operation affect the CVP level and subsequently result...AIM： Autologous blood donation （ABD） is mainly used to reduce the use of banked blood. In fact, ABD can be regarded as acute blood loss. Would ABD 2-3 d before operation affect the CVP level and subsequently result in less blood loss during liver resection was to be determined.METHODS： Eighty-four patients undergoing living donor left hepatectomy were retrospectively divided as group Ⅰ （GⅠ） and group Ⅱ （GⅡ） according to have donated 250-300 mL blood 2-3 d before living donor hepatectomy or not. The changes of the intraoperative CVP, surgical blood loss,blood products used and the changes of perioperative hemoglobin （Hb） between groups were analyzed and compared by using Mann-Whitney Utest.RESULTS： The results show that the intraoperative CVP changes between GⅠ （n = 35） and GⅡ （n = 49） up to graft procurement were the same, subsequently the blood loss,but ABD resulted in significantly lower perioperative Hb levels in GI.CONCLUSION： Since none of the patients required any blood products perioperatively, all the predonated bloods were discarded after the patients were discharged from the hospital. It indicates that ABD in current series had no any beneficial effects, in term of cost, lowering the CVP, blood loss and reduce the use of banked blood products, but resulted in significant lower Hb in perioperative period.展开更多
Objective：To assess the accuracy of the clinically estimated blood loss （EBL） when compared with the actual blood loss （ABL） in replacement surgeries.Methods：This prospective study was done in Sri Ramachandra Me...Objective：To assess the accuracy of the clinically estimated blood loss （EBL） when compared with the actual blood loss （ABL） in replacement surgeries.Methods：This prospective study was done in Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre from April 2011 to April 2013.Altogether 140 patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement were included with the inclusion criteria being patients with haemoglobin higher than 100 g/ml and coagulation profile within normal limits.Exclusion criteria were intake of antiplatelet drug or anti-coagulant,bleeding disorders,thrombotic episode,and haematological disorders.There were 65 men and 75 women.In this study,the consultants were free to use any clinical method to estimate the blood loss,including counting the blood-soaked mops and gauze pieces （estimating the volume of blood carded in all the mops and gauzes）,measuring blood lost to suction bottles and blood in and around the operative field.The ABL was calculated based on a modification of the Gross＇s formula using haematocrit values.Results：In 42 of the 140 cases,the EBL exceeded the ABL.These cases had a negative difference in blood loss （or DIFF-BL＜0） and were included in the overestimation group,which accounted for 30％ of the study population.Of the remaining 98 cases （70％）,the ABL exceeded the EBL.Therefore they were put into the underestimation group who had a positive difference in blood loss （DIFF-BL＞0）.We found that when the average blood loss was small,the accuracy of estimation was high.But when the average blood loss exceeded 500 ml,the accuracy rate decreased significantly.This suggested that clinical estimation is inaccurate with the increase of blood loss.Conclusion：This study has shown that using clinical estimation alone to guide blood transfusion is inadequate.In this study,70％ of patients had their blood loss underestimated,proving that surgeons often underestimate blood loss in replacement surgeries.展开更多
BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ER...BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration on nursing outcomes after TKA.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent TKA at a tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2022.The patients were divided into two groups according to the nursing mode:the ERAS group(n=40)received ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration,and the conventional group(n=40)received routine nursing.The following indicators were compared between the two groups:length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,intraoperative blood loss,hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,visual analog scale(VAS)score for pain,range of motion(ROM)of the knee joint,Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee score,and postoperative complications.RESULTS The ERAS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay,lower hospitalization cost,less intraoperative blood loss,higher hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,lower VAS score for pain,higher knee joint ROM,and higher HSS knee score than the conventional group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary collaboration with ERAS can reduce blood loss,shorten hospital stay,and improve knee function in patients undergoing TKA.展开更多
目的:对采取股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(dynamic hipscrew,DHS)内固定方法治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折的术中及术后显性、隐性失血量进行分析,为临床围手术期处理提供必要的数据支撑。方...目的:对采取股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(dynamic hipscrew,DHS)内固定方法治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折的术中及术后显性、隐性失血量进行分析,为临床围手术期处理提供必要的数据支撑。方法:回顾性分析2001年12月30日至2010年9月30日间采用PFNA内固定手术治疗的216例及采用DHS内固定手术治疗的168例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,对患者术前、术后血常规以及术中及术后失血、输血情况等指标进行分析,同时对围手术期的显性、隐性失血情况做出评估。结果:采用PFNA治疗的患者平均术中失血(48.9±2.8)mL;术后平均显性失血量为(62.3±3.8)mL,平均隐性失血量为(385.0±6.2)mL。采用DHS治疗的患者平均术中失血(124.9±7.8)mL;术后平均显性失血量为(73.9±4.7)mL,平均隐性失血量为(243.4±6.3)mL。两组相比,DHS术中出血量及术后的显性出血量均多于PFNA(P<0.01),但PFNA术后隐性出血量及PFNA总体出血量均多于DHS(P<0.01)。结论:PFNA和DHS内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折均存在较多的术后隐性失血量,提醒临床医生注意术后患者的生命体征监测以减少并发症的发生。展开更多
目的:通过对Gamma3、股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)及动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip nail,DHS)治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血量的分析,了解老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血的特点。方法:回...目的:通过对Gamma3、股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)及动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip nail,DHS)治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血量的分析,了解老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血的特点。方法:回顾性分析了我科2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日诊治的408例采用Gamma3、PFNA及DHS治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料。使用Gross方程,根据身高、体重、术前和术后的血常规变化,计算围手术期的失血量,并比较Gamma3组、PFNA组及DHS组的失血量区别。结果:Gamma3治疗组患者共96例,平均手术时间为(74.7±25.0)min,平均显性失血量为(103.5±83.0)mL,平均总失血量为(831.9±474.8)mL,平均隐性失血量为(728.3±455.5)mL。PFNA治疗组患者共84例,平均手术时间为(69.0±27.1)min,平均显性失血量为(91.5±111.4)mL,平均总失血量为(825.7±478.0)mL,平均隐性失血量为(734.2±455.7)mL。DHS治疗组患者共40例,平均手术时间为(97.5±25.0)min,平均显性失血量为(283.6±142.1)mL,平均总失血量为(695.7±502.4)mL,平均隐性失血量为(412.1±457.6)mL。结论:通过3种内固定方式的比较发现,DHS治疗粗隆间骨折切口大、手术时间长、术中出血多,Gamma3和PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折虽然具有切口小、手术时间短、术中出血少等优点,但围手术期的隐性失血较多,临床应予以足够的重视,以减少术后并发症的发生。展开更多
目的:研究比较全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)术后是否留置引流管及拔管时间对隐性出血及功能恢复的影响。方法:自2017年7月至2018年6月选取初次行THA术的123例患者作为研究对象,根据是否留置引流管及拔管时间分为3组,A组4...目的:研究比较全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)术后是否留置引流管及拔管时间对隐性出血及功能恢复的影响。方法:自2017年7月至2018年6月选取初次行THA术的123例患者作为研究对象,根据是否留置引流管及拔管时间分为3组,A组41例THA术后不放置引流管,男24例,女17例,年龄53~77岁;B组41例THA术后放置引流管24 h拔除,男26例,女15例,年龄55~74岁;C组41例THA术后放置引流管48 h拔除,男25例,女16例,年龄52~75岁;比较各组术后72 h疼痛VAS评分,术后总失血量和隐性失血量,开始功能锻炼时间;记录各组术后肢体肿胀等发生率。患者出院后均随访1年以上,采用Harris髋关节评分评价术后1年髋关节功能康复程度。结果:A、B、C组隐性失血量分别为(513.6±25.3)、(521.7±33.4)、(519.3±29.8)ml,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组术中失血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B、C组术后显性失血量大于A组(P<0.05)。3组患者术前、术后72 h的VAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组术后下床时间短于B、C组(P<0.05),B组术后下床时间短于C组(P<0.05)。3组术后1年Harris髋关节评分均明显高于术前(P<0.05)。3组术前、术后1年Harris髋关节评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A、B、C组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:THA术后是否留置引流管及拔管时间对隐性失血量及功能恢复无明显影响,但术后不放置引流管可减少术后显性失血,患者术后6 h即可下床,更利于患者恢复及护理。展开更多
文摘AIM： Autologous blood donation （ABD） is mainly used to reduce the use of banked blood. In fact, ABD can be regarded as acute blood loss. Would ABD 2-3 d before operation affect the CVP level and subsequently result in less blood loss during liver resection was to be determined.METHODS： Eighty-four patients undergoing living donor left hepatectomy were retrospectively divided as group Ⅰ （GⅠ） and group Ⅱ （GⅡ） according to have donated 250-300 mL blood 2-3 d before living donor hepatectomy or not. The changes of the intraoperative CVP, surgical blood loss,blood products used and the changes of perioperative hemoglobin （Hb） between groups were analyzed and compared by using Mann-Whitney Utest.RESULTS： The results show that the intraoperative CVP changes between GⅠ （n = 35） and GⅡ （n = 49） up to graft procurement were the same, subsequently the blood loss,but ABD resulted in significantly lower perioperative Hb levels in GI.CONCLUSION： Since none of the patients required any blood products perioperatively, all the predonated bloods were discarded after the patients were discharged from the hospital. It indicates that ABD in current series had no any beneficial effects, in term of cost, lowering the CVP, blood loss and reduce the use of banked blood products, but resulted in significant lower Hb in perioperative period.
文摘Objective：To assess the accuracy of the clinically estimated blood loss （EBL） when compared with the actual blood loss （ABL） in replacement surgeries.Methods：This prospective study was done in Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre from April 2011 to April 2013.Altogether 140 patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement were included with the inclusion criteria being patients with haemoglobin higher than 100 g/ml and coagulation profile within normal limits.Exclusion criteria were intake of antiplatelet drug or anti-coagulant,bleeding disorders,thrombotic episode,and haematological disorders.There were 65 men and 75 women.In this study,the consultants were free to use any clinical method to estimate the blood loss,including counting the blood-soaked mops and gauze pieces （estimating the volume of blood carded in all the mops and gauzes）,measuring blood lost to suction bottles and blood in and around the operative field.The ABL was calculated based on a modification of the Gross＇s formula using haematocrit values.Results：In 42 of the 140 cases,the EBL exceeded the ABL.These cases had a negative difference in blood loss （or DIFF-BL＜0） and were included in the overestimation group,which accounted for 30％ of the study population.Of the remaining 98 cases （70％）,the ABL exceeded the EBL.Therefore they were put into the underestimation group who had a positive difference in blood loss （DIFF-BL＞0）.We found that when the average blood loss was small,the accuracy of estimation was high.But when the average blood loss exceeded 500 ml,the accuracy rate decreased significantly.This suggested that clinical estimation is inaccurate with the increase of blood loss.Conclusion：This study has shown that using clinical estimation alone to guide blood transfusion is inadequate.In this study,70％ of patients had their blood loss underestimated,proving that surgeons often underestimate blood loss in replacement surgeries.
文摘BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies on the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)with multidisciplinary collaboration on the nursing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To explore the effect of ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration on nursing outcomes after TKA.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent TKA at a tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2022.The patients were divided into two groups according to the nursing mode:the ERAS group(n=40)received ERAS with multidisciplinary collaboration,and the conventional group(n=40)received routine nursing.The following indicators were compared between the two groups:length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,intraoperative blood loss,hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,visual analog scale(VAS)score for pain,range of motion(ROM)of the knee joint,Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee score,and postoperative complications.RESULTS The ERAS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay,lower hospitalization cost,less intraoperative blood loss,higher hemoglobin level 24 h after surgery,lower VAS score for pain,higher knee joint ROM,and higher HSS knee score than the conventional group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary collaboration with ERAS can reduce blood loss,shorten hospital stay,and improve knee function in patients undergoing TKA.
文摘目的:对采取股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(dynamic hipscrew,DHS)内固定方法治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折的术中及术后显性、隐性失血量进行分析,为临床围手术期处理提供必要的数据支撑。方法:回顾性分析2001年12月30日至2010年9月30日间采用PFNA内固定手术治疗的216例及采用DHS内固定手术治疗的168例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,对患者术前、术后血常规以及术中及术后失血、输血情况等指标进行分析,同时对围手术期的显性、隐性失血情况做出评估。结果:采用PFNA治疗的患者平均术中失血(48.9±2.8)mL;术后平均显性失血量为(62.3±3.8)mL,平均隐性失血量为(385.0±6.2)mL。采用DHS治疗的患者平均术中失血(124.9±7.8)mL;术后平均显性失血量为(73.9±4.7)mL,平均隐性失血量为(243.4±6.3)mL。两组相比,DHS术中出血量及术后的显性出血量均多于PFNA(P<0.01),但PFNA术后隐性出血量及PFNA总体出血量均多于DHS(P<0.01)。结论:PFNA和DHS内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折均存在较多的术后隐性失血量,提醒临床医生注意术后患者的生命体征监测以减少并发症的发生。
文摘目的:通过对Gamma3、股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)及动力髋螺钉(dynamic hip nail,DHS)治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血量的分析,了解老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者围手术期失血的特点。方法:回顾性分析了我科2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日诊治的408例采用Gamma3、PFNA及DHS治疗的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料。使用Gross方程,根据身高、体重、术前和术后的血常规变化,计算围手术期的失血量,并比较Gamma3组、PFNA组及DHS组的失血量区别。结果:Gamma3治疗组患者共96例,平均手术时间为(74.7±25.0)min,平均显性失血量为(103.5±83.0)mL,平均总失血量为(831.9±474.8)mL,平均隐性失血量为(728.3±455.5)mL。PFNA治疗组患者共84例,平均手术时间为(69.0±27.1)min,平均显性失血量为(91.5±111.4)mL,平均总失血量为(825.7±478.0)mL,平均隐性失血量为(734.2±455.7)mL。DHS治疗组患者共40例,平均手术时间为(97.5±25.0)min,平均显性失血量为(283.6±142.1)mL,平均总失血量为(695.7±502.4)mL,平均隐性失血量为(412.1±457.6)mL。结论:通过3种内固定方式的比较发现,DHS治疗粗隆间骨折切口大、手术时间长、术中出血多,Gamma3和PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折虽然具有切口小、手术时间短、术中出血少等优点,但围手术期的隐性失血较多,临床应予以足够的重视,以减少术后并发症的发生。
