The prediction model of the demand of the book market in China from the quantitative angle is established,and the total demand of the books for years from 2002 to 2004 is predicted.The effects of the gross domestic pr...The prediction model of the demand of the book market in China from the quantitative angle is established,and the total demand of the books for years from 2002 to 2004 is predicted.The effects of the gross domestic product,household consumption,price and population on the demand of books are also analyzed.In the end,it is summarized that the acceleration of the development of Chinese book industry,the refinement of the books,the innovation of the advertisement,the series of the structure and the steady increase of the price will become the remarkable characteristics of the book market.展开更多
Status quo and future trends of 2015children’s publications released by the Shanghai Press and Publication shows that in the past decade,the domestic children’s book market is developing rapidly with an average annu...Status quo and future trends of 2015children’s publications released by the Shanghai Press and Publication shows that in the past decade,the domestic children’s book market is developing rapidly with an average annual growth of 10%.Children’s books are seeing an increasing ratio with a market share of over 40%.展开更多
In this study, we use Chinese A-share stock market data from 1995 to 2005 to test the persistence of the size and valueeffect and the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor model in explaining the variation in sto...In this study, we use Chinese A-share stock market data from 1995 to 2005 to test the persistence of the size and valueeffect and the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor model in explaining the variation in stock returns.Wefind that the three-factor model can explain the common variation in stock returns well.However, it is mis-specifiedfor the Chinese stock market.We demonstrate that the size effect and the book-to-market effect are significant andpersistent over our sample period.Interestingly, the book-to-market effect for China is much stronger than the averageones in mature markets and other emerging markets documented by Fama and French (1998).Moreover, we find noevidence to support the argument that seasonal effects can explain the results of the multifactor model.Last, our mixedobservations on firm-specific fundamentals suggest that the risk-based explanation proposed by Fama and French(1995) cannot shed light on the size and BM effect for China.In view of the features of the Chinese stock market, weinstead argue that China’s size and book-to-market effect may be attributed to syndicate speculators’ manipulation andmispricing caused by irrational investor behavior.展开更多
尽管多因素定价模型为学术界广泛接受,但其因子有效性源于公司基本面风险差异还是投资者预期差,依然存在分歧。选取账面—市值比B/M测度价值溢价,将其分解为账面—价值比(B/V)和价值—市值比(V/M),研究已有记载的7种风险假说是否能够充...尽管多因素定价模型为学术界广泛接受,但其因子有效性源于公司基本面风险差异还是投资者预期差,依然存在分歧。选取账面—市值比B/M测度价值溢价,将其分解为账面—价值比(B/V)和价值—市值比(V/M),研究已有记载的7种风险假说是否能够充分呈现价值溢价的因果逻辑。结果发现,B/M对预期收益率的解释力与V/M相当,而B/V的差异则不能解释预期收益率差异。进一步地,财务困境风险假说、个股现金流风险假说,既不能一致地解释B/M之间的差异,亦不能解释V/M之间的差异;股权隐含违约风险假说、系统性风险敏感性假说、市场现金流风险假说、营运杠杆风险假说、股权久期风险假说这五类理论,虽可解释B/V的差异,但无法解释V/M的差异。基于线性外推偏差假说和套利风险理论,讨论了V/M在市场上产生和持续存在的原因。研究支持行为金融学中价值溢价成因的预期差假说,对以Fama and French(1993)为代表的多因素模型在中国A股市场上是否可由风险理论所解释提出质疑,由此基于“价值溢价消失之谜”这一前沿学术问题提供了重要参考。展开更多
文摘The prediction model of the demand of the book market in China from the quantitative angle is established,and the total demand of the books for years from 2002 to 2004 is predicted.The effects of the gross domestic product,household consumption,price and population on the demand of books are also analyzed.In the end,it is summarized that the acceleration of the development of Chinese book industry,the refinement of the books,the innovation of the advertisement,the series of the structure and the steady increase of the price will become the remarkable characteristics of the book market.
文摘Status quo and future trends of 2015children’s publications released by the Shanghai Press and Publication shows that in the past decade,the domestic children’s book market is developing rapidly with an average annual growth of 10%.Children’s books are seeing an increasing ratio with a market share of over 40%.
文摘In this study, we use Chinese A-share stock market data from 1995 to 2005 to test the persistence of the size and valueeffect and the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor model in explaining the variation in stock returns.Wefind that the three-factor model can explain the common variation in stock returns well.However, it is mis-specifiedfor the Chinese stock market.We demonstrate that the size effect and the book-to-market effect are significant andpersistent over our sample period.Interestingly, the book-to-market effect for China is much stronger than the averageones in mature markets and other emerging markets documented by Fama and French (1998).Moreover, we find noevidence to support the argument that seasonal effects can explain the results of the multifactor model.Last, our mixedobservations on firm-specific fundamentals suggest that the risk-based explanation proposed by Fama and French(1995) cannot shed light on the size and BM effect for China.In view of the features of the Chinese stock market, weinstead argue that China’s size and book-to-market effect may be attributed to syndicate speculators’ manipulation andmispricing caused by irrational investor behavior.
文摘尽管多因素定价模型为学术界广泛接受,但其因子有效性源于公司基本面风险差异还是投资者预期差,依然存在分歧。选取账面—市值比B/M测度价值溢价,将其分解为账面—价值比(B/V)和价值—市值比(V/M),研究已有记载的7种风险假说是否能够充分呈现价值溢价的因果逻辑。结果发现,B/M对预期收益率的解释力与V/M相当,而B/V的差异则不能解释预期收益率差异。进一步地,财务困境风险假说、个股现金流风险假说,既不能一致地解释B/M之间的差异,亦不能解释V/M之间的差异;股权隐含违约风险假说、系统性风险敏感性假说、市场现金流风险假说、营运杠杆风险假说、股权久期风险假说这五类理论,虽可解释B/V的差异,但无法解释V/M的差异。基于线性外推偏差假说和套利风险理论,讨论了V/M在市场上产生和持续存在的原因。研究支持行为金融学中价值溢价成因的预期差假说,对以Fama and French(1993)为代表的多因素模型在中国A股市场上是否可由风险理论所解释提出质疑,由此基于“价值溢价消失之谜”这一前沿学术问题提供了重要参考。
