三电平Buck-Boost变流器具有双向馈能和能量传输高效的特点。针对直流电容器容值衰退和IGBT开路故障两种典型失效模式,提出了一种利用变流器自身传感器同时对直流电容容值衰退和IGBT开路故障非侵入式在线监测的方法。首先,分析了三电平B...三电平Buck-Boost变流器具有双向馈能和能量传输高效的特点。针对直流电容器容值衰退和IGBT开路故障两种典型失效模式,提出了一种利用变流器自身传感器同时对直流电容容值衰退和IGBT开路故障非侵入式在线监测的方法。首先,分析了三电平Buck-Boost变流器开关运行模态及其切换顺序。然后,采用特定开关模态消除直流电容等效串联电阻(equivalent series resistance,ESR)影响,分别推导了子模块电容的容值特征解析表达式。最后,利用每个开关周期计算出的等效容值特征检测和定位IGBT开路故障。仿真和实验结果表明:利用开关模态容值特征能够同时监测三电平Buck-Boost变流器直流电容状态和IGBT开路故障,平均容值监测误差小于1%且可以消除ESR的影响,利用容值特征畸变能够在2~3个开关周期内检测出IGBT开路故障。展开更多
In this study, we investigate the performance of a boost converter regulating its output voltage using two control methods: Proportional-Integral (PI) control and neural control. Both methods are implemented on a simu...In this study, we investigate the performance of a boost converter regulating its output voltage using two control methods: Proportional-Integral (PI) control and neural control. Both methods are implemented on a simulation platform (Matlab/Simulink) and evaluated in terms of accuracy, response speed, and robustness to disturbances. Indeed, the output voltage of converters exhibits imperfections that require a control method to optimize efficiency when applying a variable load. Results show that neural control offers superior performance in terms of accuracy and response time, with faster and more precise regulation of the output voltage. On the other hand, PI control proves to be more robust against disturbances. These findings can help guide the selection of the appropriate control method for a boost converter based on the specific requirements of each application.展开更多
文摘三电平Buck-Boost变流器具有双向馈能和能量传输高效的特点。针对直流电容器容值衰退和IGBT开路故障两种典型失效模式,提出了一种利用变流器自身传感器同时对直流电容容值衰退和IGBT开路故障非侵入式在线监测的方法。首先,分析了三电平Buck-Boost变流器开关运行模态及其切换顺序。然后,采用特定开关模态消除直流电容等效串联电阻(equivalent series resistance,ESR)影响,分别推导了子模块电容的容值特征解析表达式。最后,利用每个开关周期计算出的等效容值特征检测和定位IGBT开路故障。仿真和实验结果表明:利用开关模态容值特征能够同时监测三电平Buck-Boost变流器直流电容状态和IGBT开路故障,平均容值监测误差小于1%且可以消除ESR的影响,利用容值特征畸变能够在2~3个开关周期内检测出IGBT开路故障。
文摘In this study, we investigate the performance of a boost converter regulating its output voltage using two control methods: Proportional-Integral (PI) control and neural control. Both methods are implemented on a simulation platform (Matlab/Simulink) and evaluated in terms of accuracy, response speed, and robustness to disturbances. Indeed, the output voltage of converters exhibits imperfections that require a control method to optimize efficiency when applying a variable load. Results show that neural control offers superior performance in terms of accuracy and response time, with faster and more precise regulation of the output voltage. On the other hand, PI control proves to be more robust against disturbances. These findings can help guide the selection of the appropriate control method for a boost converter based on the specific requirements of each application.
