Background: The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate period for macrolide antibiotic therapy, and to investigate whether this period could be shorter, for patients with chronicrhino sinusitis (CRS) af...Background: The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate period for macrolide antibiotic therapy, and to investigate whether this period could be shorter, for patients with chronicrhino sinusitis (CRS) after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients undergoing FESS for CRS was performed. All patients underwent pre-operative computed tomography (CT). Patients with fungal sinusitis, allergic fungal sinusitis, and eosinophilic sinusitis were excluded. After FESS, normalized sinus mucosa was confirmed by CT and endoscopy in all patients. Postoperative antibiotic therapy consisted of first-line and second-line regimens. Garenoxacin (GRNX), or clarithromycin (CAM, 400 mg/day) was used as the first-line regimens and low-dose macrolide therapy (CAM, 200 mg/day) was used as the second-line regimen and was prescribed at outpatient visits based on our clinical criteria. Results: Second-line antibiotic therapy (low-dose CAM) was not necessary in 12 of 41 (29%) patients, while it was prescribed in 29 of 41 (71%). The mean duration of low-dose CAM therapy after FESS was 36 days (range 7 to 122 days;median, 25 days). Patients who received second-line therapy (n = 29) were divided into two groups based on the choice of first-line therapy, a GRNX group (n = 13) and a non-GRNX group (n = 16). Those in the non-GRNX had longer periods of postoperative CAM therapy than those in the GRNX group. Conclusion: GRNX was associated with a shorter duration of low-dose macrolide therapy after FESS, and 29% of patients did not need any low-dose macrolide therapy postoperatively. Therefore, macrolide antibiotics should not be routinely prescribed after FESS.展开更多
AIM To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a "low dose" of ribavirin for relapsers and non responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.METHODS Thirty-four chron...AIM To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a "low dose" of ribavirin for relapsers and non responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.METHODS Thirty-four chronic hepatitis C virus-infected non-responders to interferon alfa2a monotherapy (a course of at least 3 months treatment) and 13 relapsers to interferon alfa 2a monotherapy (a dose of 3 to 6 million units three times per week for at least 20 weeks but not more than 18 months) were treated with the same dose of interferon alfa-2a used before (3 to 6 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (10 mg/ kg daily) for 6 months. In complete responders, interferon alfa-2a was administered for further 6 months at the same dose used before as monotherapy.RESULTS Seven (20.6%) of 34 non-responders stopped the combined therapy due to adverse events, including two patients with histological and clinical Child A cirrhosis. In 17/27 (63%)non-responders, the combined therapy was stopped after three months because of non-response. Ten of the 27 non-responders completed the 1;2-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 28 months (16- 37 months)after the treatment, 4/10 (15%) previous non-responders still remained complete responders,All 13 previous relapsers completed the 12-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 22months (9 - 36 months) after treatment, 6/13(46%) the previous relapsers were stillsustained complete responders.CONCLUSION Our treatment schedule of the combined therapy for 6 months of interferon alfa2a with a low dose of ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day)followed by 6 months of interferon alfa-2amonotherapy is able to induce a sustainedcomplete response rate in 15% of non-responders and 46% of relapsers with chronic hepatitis C virus-related liver diseases comparable to those obtained with the standarddoses of ribavirin 1000 - 1200 mg/day.Randomized prospective controlled trials using lower total amounts of ribavirin in combination with interferon should be performed.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term combination therapy with alpha interferon and lamivudine in non-responsive patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B.METHODS: 34 patients received com...AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term combination therapy with alpha interferon and lamivudine in non-responsive patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B.METHODS: 34 patients received combination treatment (1 month lamivudine, 12 month lamivudine+interferon, 6month lamivudine), 24 received lamivudine (12 months),24 received interferon (12 months). Interferon was administered at 6 MU tiw and lamivudine at 100 mg orally once daily. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment.RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HBV DNA negativity rates were 88 % with lamivudine+interferon, 99 % with lamivudine and 55 % with interferon, (P=0.004, combination therapy vs. interferon, and P=0.001 lamivudine vs.interferon), and serum transaminase normalization rates were 84 %, 91% and 53 % (P=0.01 combination therapy vs. interferon, and P=0.012 lamivudine vs. interferon). Six months later, HBV DNA negativity rates were 44 % with lamivudine+interferon, 33 % with lamivudine and 25 % with interferon, and serum transaminase normalization rates were 61%, 42 % and 45 %, respectively, without statistical significance. No YMDD variants were observed with lamivudine+interferon (vs. 12 % with lamivudine). The combination therapy appeared to be safe. CONCLUSION: Although viral clearance and transaminase normalization are slower with long-term lamivudine+interferon than that with lamivudine alone, the combination regimen seems to provide more lasting benefits and to protect against the appearance of YMDD variants. Studies with other regimens regarding sequence and duration are needed.展开更多
AIM: To study the effect of rescue monotherapy with adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed drug resistance to lamivudine (LAM).
BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have...BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have analyzed the factors causing therapy failure in some patients.AIM To analyze factors influencing the failure of direct antiviral drugs in the large,multicenter EpiTer-2 cohort in a real-world setting.METHODS The study cohort consisted of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated at 22 Polish centers from 2016-2020.Data collected from the online EpiTer-2 database included the following:hepatitis C virus(HCV)genotype,stage of fibrosis,hematology and liver function parameters,Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores,prior antiviral therapy,concomitant diseases,and drugs used in relation to hepatitis B virus(HBV)and/or human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)coinfections.Adverse events observed during the treatment and follow-up period were reported.Both standard and machine learning methods were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS During analysis,12614 patients with chronic hepatitis C were registered,of which 11938(mean age:52 years)had available sustained virologic response(SVR)data[11629(97%)achieved SVR and 309(3%)did not].Most patients(78.1%)were infected with HCV genotype 1b.Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 2974 patients,while advanced fibrosis(F3)was diagnosed in 1717 patients.We included patients with features of hepatic failure at baseline[ascites in 142(1.2%)and encephalopathy in 68(0.6%)patients].The most important host factors negatively influencing treatment efficacy were liver cirrhosis,clinical and laboratory features of liver failure,history of hepatocellular carcinoma,and higher body mass index.Among viral factors,genotype 3 and viral load also exerted an influence on treatment efficacy.Classical statistical analysis revealed that treatment ineffectiveness seemed to be influenced by the male sex,which was not confirmed by the multivariate analysis using the machine learning algorithm(random forest).Coinfection with HBV(including patients with on-treatment reactivation of HBV infection)or HIV,extrahepatic manifestations,and renal failure did not significantly affect the treatment efficacy.CONCLUSION In patients with advanced liver disease,individualized therapy(testing for resistance-associated variants and response-guided treatment)should be considered to maximize the chance of achieving SVR.展开更多
目的:探讨慢性精神分裂症经脑电生物反馈辅助治疗后的疗效及对认知、社会功能的影响。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年9月我院确诊并接受治疗的慢性精神分裂症患者60例为本次研究的对象,其中30例患者接受抗精神病药物治疗,归为对照组,另30...目的:探讨慢性精神分裂症经脑电生物反馈辅助治疗后的疗效及对认知、社会功能的影响。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年9月我院确诊并接受治疗的慢性精神分裂症患者60例为本次研究的对象,其中30例患者接受抗精神病药物治疗,归为对照组,另30例在抗精神病药物基础上进行脑电生物反馈疗法,归为观察组。比较两组的临床疗效(临床疗效总评量表-疾病严重程度(Clinical Global Impression-SI,CGI-SI))、脑电活动特征(异常不自主运动量表(Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale,AIMS))、症状改善情况(现状精神病症状检查(Present State Examination,PSE))、生活质量(日常生活评定量表(Activity of Daily Living Scale,ADL))及社会功能(社会功能缺点挑选量表(Social Disability Screening Schedule,SDSS))。结果:治疗后两组CGI-SI评分、AIMS评分、PSE各维度评分、ADL评分及SDSS评分均显著改善(P<0.05),且观察组各项评分均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:通过对比分析发现,脑电生物反馈疗法联合药物治疗后,患者临床表现、不自主运动症状及认知功能均可得到明显缓解,而且其生活能力及社会功能也得到不同程度的改善,可作为慢性精神分裂症的有效治疗方案。展开更多
文摘Background: The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate period for macrolide antibiotic therapy, and to investigate whether this period could be shorter, for patients with chronicrhino sinusitis (CRS) after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients undergoing FESS for CRS was performed. All patients underwent pre-operative computed tomography (CT). Patients with fungal sinusitis, allergic fungal sinusitis, and eosinophilic sinusitis were excluded. After FESS, normalized sinus mucosa was confirmed by CT and endoscopy in all patients. Postoperative antibiotic therapy consisted of first-line and second-line regimens. Garenoxacin (GRNX), or clarithromycin (CAM, 400 mg/day) was used as the first-line regimens and low-dose macrolide therapy (CAM, 200 mg/day) was used as the second-line regimen and was prescribed at outpatient visits based on our clinical criteria. Results: Second-line antibiotic therapy (low-dose CAM) was not necessary in 12 of 41 (29%) patients, while it was prescribed in 29 of 41 (71%). The mean duration of low-dose CAM therapy after FESS was 36 days (range 7 to 122 days;median, 25 days). Patients who received second-line therapy (n = 29) were divided into two groups based on the choice of first-line therapy, a GRNX group (n = 13) and a non-GRNX group (n = 16). Those in the non-GRNX had longer periods of postoperative CAM therapy than those in the GRNX group. Conclusion: GRNX was associated with a shorter duration of low-dose macrolide therapy after FESS, and 29% of patients did not need any low-dose macrolide therapy postoperatively. Therefore, macrolide antibiotics should not be routinely prescribed after FESS.
文摘AIM To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a "low dose" of ribavirin for relapsers and non responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.METHODS Thirty-four chronic hepatitis C virus-infected non-responders to interferon alfa2a monotherapy (a course of at least 3 months treatment) and 13 relapsers to interferon alfa 2a monotherapy (a dose of 3 to 6 million units three times per week for at least 20 weeks but not more than 18 months) were treated with the same dose of interferon alfa-2a used before (3 to 6 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (10 mg/ kg daily) for 6 months. In complete responders, interferon alfa-2a was administered for further 6 months at the same dose used before as monotherapy.RESULTS Seven (20.6%) of 34 non-responders stopped the combined therapy due to adverse events, including two patients with histological and clinical Child A cirrhosis. In 17/27 (63%)non-responders, the combined therapy was stopped after three months because of non-response. Ten of the 27 non-responders completed the 1;2-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 28 months (16- 37 months)after the treatment, 4/10 (15%) previous non-responders still remained complete responders,All 13 previous relapsers completed the 12-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 22months (9 - 36 months) after treatment, 6/13(46%) the previous relapsers were stillsustained complete responders.CONCLUSION Our treatment schedule of the combined therapy for 6 months of interferon alfa2a with a low dose of ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day)followed by 6 months of interferon alfa-2amonotherapy is able to induce a sustainedcomplete response rate in 15% of non-responders and 46% of relapsers with chronic hepatitis C virus-related liver diseases comparable to those obtained with the standarddoses of ribavirin 1000 - 1200 mg/day.Randomized prospective controlled trials using lower total amounts of ribavirin in combination with interferon should be performed.
文摘AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term combination therapy with alpha interferon and lamivudine in non-responsive patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B.METHODS: 34 patients received combination treatment (1 month lamivudine, 12 month lamivudine+interferon, 6month lamivudine), 24 received lamivudine (12 months),24 received interferon (12 months). Interferon was administered at 6 MU tiw and lamivudine at 100 mg orally once daily. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment.RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HBV DNA negativity rates were 88 % with lamivudine+interferon, 99 % with lamivudine and 55 % with interferon, (P=0.004, combination therapy vs. interferon, and P=0.001 lamivudine vs.interferon), and serum transaminase normalization rates were 84 %, 91% and 53 % (P=0.01 combination therapy vs. interferon, and P=0.012 lamivudine vs. interferon). Six months later, HBV DNA negativity rates were 44 % with lamivudine+interferon, 33 % with lamivudine and 25 % with interferon, and serum transaminase normalization rates were 61%, 42 % and 45 %, respectively, without statistical significance. No YMDD variants were observed with lamivudine+interferon (vs. 12 % with lamivudine). The combination therapy appeared to be safe. CONCLUSION: Although viral clearance and transaminase normalization are slower with long-term lamivudine+interferon than that with lamivudine alone, the combination regimen seems to provide more lasting benefits and to protect against the appearance of YMDD variants. Studies with other regimens regarding sequence and duration are needed.
文摘AIM: To study the effect of rescue monotherapy with adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed drug resistance to lamivudine (LAM).
文摘BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have analyzed the factors causing therapy failure in some patients.AIM To analyze factors influencing the failure of direct antiviral drugs in the large,multicenter EpiTer-2 cohort in a real-world setting.METHODS The study cohort consisted of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated at 22 Polish centers from 2016-2020.Data collected from the online EpiTer-2 database included the following:hepatitis C virus(HCV)genotype,stage of fibrosis,hematology and liver function parameters,Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores,prior antiviral therapy,concomitant diseases,and drugs used in relation to hepatitis B virus(HBV)and/or human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)coinfections.Adverse events observed during the treatment and follow-up period were reported.Both standard and machine learning methods were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS During analysis,12614 patients with chronic hepatitis C were registered,of which 11938(mean age:52 years)had available sustained virologic response(SVR)data[11629(97%)achieved SVR and 309(3%)did not].Most patients(78.1%)were infected with HCV genotype 1b.Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 2974 patients,while advanced fibrosis(F3)was diagnosed in 1717 patients.We included patients with features of hepatic failure at baseline[ascites in 142(1.2%)and encephalopathy in 68(0.6%)patients].The most important host factors negatively influencing treatment efficacy were liver cirrhosis,clinical and laboratory features of liver failure,history of hepatocellular carcinoma,and higher body mass index.Among viral factors,genotype 3 and viral load also exerted an influence on treatment efficacy.Classical statistical analysis revealed that treatment ineffectiveness seemed to be influenced by the male sex,which was not confirmed by the multivariate analysis using the machine learning algorithm(random forest).Coinfection with HBV(including patients with on-treatment reactivation of HBV infection)or HIV,extrahepatic manifestations,and renal failure did not significantly affect the treatment efficacy.CONCLUSION In patients with advanced liver disease,individualized therapy(testing for resistance-associated variants and response-guided treatment)should be considered to maximize the chance of achieving SVR.
文摘目的:探讨慢性精神分裂症经脑电生物反馈辅助治疗后的疗效及对认知、社会功能的影响。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年9月我院确诊并接受治疗的慢性精神分裂症患者60例为本次研究的对象,其中30例患者接受抗精神病药物治疗,归为对照组,另30例在抗精神病药物基础上进行脑电生物反馈疗法,归为观察组。比较两组的临床疗效(临床疗效总评量表-疾病严重程度(Clinical Global Impression-SI,CGI-SI))、脑电活动特征(异常不自主运动量表(Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale,AIMS))、症状改善情况(现状精神病症状检查(Present State Examination,PSE))、生活质量(日常生活评定量表(Activity of Daily Living Scale,ADL))及社会功能(社会功能缺点挑选量表(Social Disability Screening Schedule,SDSS))。结果:治疗后两组CGI-SI评分、AIMS评分、PSE各维度评分、ADL评分及SDSS评分均显著改善(P<0.05),且观察组各项评分均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:通过对比分析发现,脑电生物反馈疗法联合药物治疗后,患者临床表现、不自主运动症状及认知功能均可得到明显缓解,而且其生活能力及社会功能也得到不同程度的改善,可作为慢性精神分裂症的有效治疗方案。
