Objective:To ensure that only competent graduates are licensed to practice nursing,councils conduct licensing examinations,which may include among others clinical competency assessment.This review explored current pra...Objective:To ensure that only competent graduates are licensed to practice nursing,councils conduct licensing examinations,which may include among others clinical competency assessment.This review explored current practices in clinical competency assessment of nursing students as part of a larger study aimed at developing an evidence-based,context-specific framework for clinical competency assessment in a sub-Saharan African(SSA)country.Methods:A scoping guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews(PRISMA-ScR)was conducted.Results:Findings from 28 out of 1151 studies identified from Scopus,PubMed,CINAHL,Wiley Online Library,and ProQuest were included and synthesized.Results show that a good assessment system must be valid,reliable,transparent,feasible,fair,objective,and must provide feedback and continually improve to have an educational impact.Clinical competency assessment systems must be developed on sound empirical evidence,pilot tested,and involve thorough training and evaluation of the examiners.Continuous evaluation of the assessment system is also essential to ensure the quality and relevance of the assessment system.Only one of the included studies was conducted in Africa.Conclusions:The paucity of clinical competency assessment research in sub-Saharan Africa may lead to benchmarking assessment systems on research conducted outside the context.Sub-Saharan Africa has a set of circumstances that demand a context-specific clinical competency assessment framework to guide clinical competency assessment.展开更多
文摘Objective:To ensure that only competent graduates are licensed to practice nursing,councils conduct licensing examinations,which may include among others clinical competency assessment.This review explored current practices in clinical competency assessment of nursing students as part of a larger study aimed at developing an evidence-based,context-specific framework for clinical competency assessment in a sub-Saharan African(SSA)country.Methods:A scoping guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews(PRISMA-ScR)was conducted.Results:Findings from 28 out of 1151 studies identified from Scopus,PubMed,CINAHL,Wiley Online Library,and ProQuest were included and synthesized.Results show that a good assessment system must be valid,reliable,transparent,feasible,fair,objective,and must provide feedback and continually improve to have an educational impact.Clinical competency assessment systems must be developed on sound empirical evidence,pilot tested,and involve thorough training and evaluation of the examiners.Continuous evaluation of the assessment system is also essential to ensure the quality and relevance of the assessment system.Only one of the included studies was conducted in Africa.Conclusions:The paucity of clinical competency assessment research in sub-Saharan Africa may lead to benchmarking assessment systems on research conducted outside the context.Sub-Saharan Africa has a set of circumstances that demand a context-specific clinical competency assessment framework to guide clinical competency assessment.
