Organ and function preservation in gastrointestinal cancer: Current and future perspectives on endoscopic ablation

The escalating prevalence of gastrointestinal cancers underscores the urgency for transformative approaches.Current treatment costs amount to billions of dollars annually,combined with the risks and comorbidities associated with invasive surgery.This highlights the importance of less invasive alternatives with organ preservation being a central aspect of the treatment paradigm.The current standard of care typically involves neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgical resection.There is a growing interest in organ preservation approaches by way of minimizing extensive surgical resections.Endoscopic ablation has proven to be useful in precursor lesions,as well as in palliative cases of unrese-ctable disease.More recently,there has been an increase in reports on the utility of adjunct endoscopic ablative techniques for downstaging disease as well as contributing to non-surgical complete clinical response.This expansive field within endoscopic oncology holds great potential for advancing patient care.By addressing challenges,fostering collaboration,and embracing technological advancements,the gastrointestinal cancer treatment paradigm can shift towards a more sustainable and patient-centric future emphasizing organ and function preservation.This editorial examines the evolving landscape of endoscopic ablation strategies,emphasizing their potential to improve patient outcomes.We briefly review current applications of endoscopic ablation in the esophagus,stomach,duodenum,pancreas,bile ducts,and colon.

Exclusive Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer in Elderly Women:Clinical Response and Survival over 10 Years

Breast cancer is the first cancer of women in the world and in France.In very elderly patients,the treatment options are often very limited.Neoadjuvant hormone therapy has shown similar or even better results than chemotherapy.This is why we decided to evaluate the clinical response following exclusive hormonal therapy and the 5,then 10 years survival in these very elderly women.This was a retrospective,longitudinal cohort-type study with descriptive and analytical purposes.The study population consisted of 59 patients,with an average age of 85 years.Fifteen(15,25%)of our patients had a complete clinical response after two years of treatment,16(27%)a partial clinical response,23(39%)lesion stabilization and 5(9%)cancer progression.The presence of metastasis at diagnosis increased the risk of cancer progression by 2.84.Overall 5-year survival was 72.5%,and breast cancer mortality 5.88%.The 10-year survival was 27.5%and breast cancer mortality 15%.In the age group 85 and over increased the risk of death by 3.25 in the first 10 years of treatment.The clinical response after 2 years was marked by a low rate of cancer progression.Mortality over 5 and 10 years was mostly related to patient comorbidities.

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer:Current controversies and future directions

According to the main international clinical guidelines,the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.However,doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response(cCR)after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR.Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life(QoL),which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, therehas been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity,including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery isomitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with aspecific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the earlyidentification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questionsabout this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiologicalcriteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, therole of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal followupprotocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review,we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in thisclinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and thecontroversies surrounding this treatment approach.

Added value of systemic inflammation markers for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND Complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(r NACT) elevates the surgical outcomes of patients with breast cancer, however, non-r NACT have a higher risk of death and recurrence.AIM To establish novel machine learning(ML)-based predictive models for predicting probability of r NACT in breast cancer patients who intends to receive NACT.METHODS A retrospective analysis of 487 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Hubei Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2013, and October 1, 2021. The study cohort was divided into internal training and testing datasets in a 70:30 ratio for further analysis. A total of twenty-four variables were included to develop predictive models for r NACT by multiple MLbased algorithms. A feature selection approach was used to identify optimal predictive factors. These models were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve for predictive performance.RESULTS Analysis identified several significant differences between the r NACT and nonr NACT groups, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio, body mass index, platelet count, albumin-to-globulin ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. The areas under the curve of the six models ranged from 0.81 to 0.96. Some ML-based models performed better than models using conventional statistical methods in both ROC curves. The support vector machine(SVM) model with twelve variables introduced was identified as the best predictive model.CONCLUSION By incorporating retreatment serum lipids and serum inflammation markers, it is feasible to develop ML-based models for the preoperative prediction of r NACT and therefore facilitate the choice of treatment, particularly the SVM, which can improve the prediction of r NACT in patients with breast cancer.

Clinical features of autoimmune hepatitis patients with poor response to treatment

Objective To investigate the clinical features of autoimmune hepatitis(AIH)patients with poor response to treatment.Methods A total of 61 AIH patients were enrolled,among whom 49(80.33%)achieved complete response(good response group)and 12(19.67%)had incomplete response(poor response group).The

“Watch and wait”strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer:opportunities and challenges

The"watch and wait"(W&W)strategy has been widely used in rectal cancer patients who have achieved clinical complete response(cCR)after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(nCRT),which can save them from surgery and improve their quality of life.However,this strategy also has many unsolved practical problems,including the improvement of cCR/pCR rate,the search for efficient predictors,the standard follow-up and the methods of rescue surgery,etc.Larger sample size and more standardized clinical trials are still needed to obtain credible evidence.Therefore,we must rationally view the cCR after nCRT for middle and low rectal cancer,understand the risk of W&W strategy,and make a reasonable choice.It is particularly important to emphasize that we should actively carry out prospective multi-center clinical trials to produce high-level evidence suitable for Chinese characteristics,so that more rectal cancer patients can benefit from nCRT.