Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of cluster nursing intervention in preventing central venous catheter-related infection in intensive care unit.Methods:A randomized controlled study was search...Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of cluster nursing intervention in preventing central venous catheter-related infection in intensive care unit.Methods:A randomized controlled study was searched from China National Knowledge Internet(CNKI),Wanfang,Chinese Scientific Journals Database(VIP),Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System(SinoMed),PubMed,Embase and Cochrane library databases from the establishment to May 1,2020.Two reviewers independently evaluated and cross checked the quality of the study.Revman 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis.Results:A total of 21 randomized controlled trials with 6,030 patients were included.Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of central venous catheter-related infection(relative risk(RR)=0.29,95%confidence interval(CI)[0.23,0.37]),the incidence of catheter plugging(RR=0.25,95%CI[0.16,0.39])and catheter prolapse(RR=0.18,95%CI[0.11,0.29])were significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion:Cluster nursing intervention could prevent central venous catheter-related infection in intensive care unit.展开更多
目的:探讨中心静脉导管集束化干预策略(central line bundle,CLB)对恶性血液病患者导管相关性血流感染(catheter related bloodstream infection,CRBSI)的影响效果。方法:参照美国健康促进会(Institution for Healthcare Improvement,I...目的:探讨中心静脉导管集束化干预策略(central line bundle,CLB)对恶性血液病患者导管相关性血流感染(catheter related bloodstream infection,CRBSI)的影响效果。方法:参照美国健康促进会(Institution for Healthcare Improvement,IHI)中心静脉导管相关血流感染预防的集束化干预策略,制定CRBSI集束化干预办法,选择2010年1月至2015年1月在本院留置中心静脉导管行常规护理的252例恶性血液病患者作为对照组,随机选取同期在我院留置中心静脉导管行集束化干预策略的271例恶性血液病患者作为实验组,对常规护理与集束化干预策略后的效果进行比较性分析。结果:对照组股静脉GRBSI平均发生率最高,达26.1‰,集束化干预策略后股静脉置管GRBSI平均发生率7.4‰,对照组股静脉GRBSI平均发生率较实验组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),对照组颈内静脉、锁骨下静脉置管GRBSI平均发生率较实验组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组与实验组的CRBSI发生率分别为13.5‰、6.1‰,集束化干预策略后实验组的CRBSI率(‰)、CRBSI起始时间、留置天数、住院时间和费用及手消毒剂消耗量与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);CRBSI以革兰阳性菌为主,集束化干预策略后实验组与对照组的病原菌构成比比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用集束干预策略可有效降低恶性血液病患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率,缩短患者住院时间,降低住院费用,减轻患者经济负担,提高了恶性血液病患者的生存率和生活质量。展开更多
文摘Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of cluster nursing intervention in preventing central venous catheter-related infection in intensive care unit.Methods:A randomized controlled study was searched from China National Knowledge Internet(CNKI),Wanfang,Chinese Scientific Journals Database(VIP),Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System(SinoMed),PubMed,Embase and Cochrane library databases from the establishment to May 1,2020.Two reviewers independently evaluated and cross checked the quality of the study.Revman 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis.Results:A total of 21 randomized controlled trials with 6,030 patients were included.Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of central venous catheter-related infection(relative risk(RR)=0.29,95%confidence interval(CI)[0.23,0.37]),the incidence of catheter plugging(RR=0.25,95%CI[0.16,0.39])and catheter prolapse(RR=0.18,95%CI[0.11,0.29])were significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion:Cluster nursing intervention could prevent central venous catheter-related infection in intensive care unit.
文摘目的:探讨中心静脉导管集束化干预策略(central line bundle,CLB)对恶性血液病患者导管相关性血流感染(catheter related bloodstream infection,CRBSI)的影响效果。方法:参照美国健康促进会(Institution for Healthcare Improvement,IHI)中心静脉导管相关血流感染预防的集束化干预策略,制定CRBSI集束化干预办法,选择2010年1月至2015年1月在本院留置中心静脉导管行常规护理的252例恶性血液病患者作为对照组,随机选取同期在我院留置中心静脉导管行集束化干预策略的271例恶性血液病患者作为实验组,对常规护理与集束化干预策略后的效果进行比较性分析。结果:对照组股静脉GRBSI平均发生率最高,达26.1‰,集束化干预策略后股静脉置管GRBSI平均发生率7.4‰,对照组股静脉GRBSI平均发生率较实验组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),对照组颈内静脉、锁骨下静脉置管GRBSI平均发生率较实验组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组与实验组的CRBSI发生率分别为13.5‰、6.1‰,集束化干预策略后实验组的CRBSI率(‰)、CRBSI起始时间、留置天数、住院时间和费用及手消毒剂消耗量与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);CRBSI以革兰阳性菌为主,集束化干预策略后实验组与对照组的病原菌构成比比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用集束干预策略可有效降低恶性血液病患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率,缩短患者住院时间,降低住院费用,减轻患者经济负担,提高了恶性血液病患者的生存率和生活质量。