A software framework is an infrastructure or architecture intended to enable the integration and interoperation of a set of software components.A specialized type of software frameworks are those specifically designed...A software framework is an infrastructure or architecture intended to enable the integration and interoperation of a set of software components.A specialized type of software frameworks are those specifically designed to support the composition of models or other components within a simulation system.Such frameworks are intended to simplify the process of assembling a complex model or simulation system from simpler component models as well as to promote the reuse of the component models.Several different types of software frameworks for model composition have been designed and implemented;the various framework types have different component types,processes for composing models,and intended applications.The different framework types and the implemented examples of them vary widely in terms of features and capabilities.Comparing alternative frameworks so as to assess their likely utility for a specific application has heretofore been largely subjective and qualitative,and consequently of uncertain reliability.To address this issue an assessment methodology specifically designed for comparing model composition frameworks is developed and explained.The methodology employs a quantitative metric based on a set of well-defined criteria relating to the features and capabilities of simulation frameworks and is intended to be objective and quantitative.The methodology is illustrated and demonstrated by applying it to a set of existing model composition frameworks.The assessment results suggest that using the methodology can,at a minimum,improve the objectivity and reliability of framework selection decisions.The assessment criteria may also be useful as guidelines when designing and developing a framework.展开更多
We propose short group signature （GS） schemes which are provably secure without random oracles. Our basic scheme is about 14 times shorter than the Boyen-Waters GS scheme at Eurocrypt 2006, and 42% shorter than the ...We propose short group signature （GS） schemes which are provably secure without random oracles. Our basic scheme is about 14 times shorter than the Boyen-Waters GS scheme at Eurocrypt 2006, and 42% shorter than the recent GS schemes due to Ateniese et al. The security proofs are provided in the Universally Composable model, which allows the proofs of security valid not only when our scheme is executed in isolation, but also in composition with other secure cryptographic primitives. We also present several new computational assumptions and justify them in the generic group model. These assumptions are useful in the design of high-level protocols and may be of independent interest.展开更多
文摘A software framework is an infrastructure or architecture intended to enable the integration and interoperation of a set of software components.A specialized type of software frameworks are those specifically designed to support the composition of models or other components within a simulation system.Such frameworks are intended to simplify the process of assembling a complex model or simulation system from simpler component models as well as to promote the reuse of the component models.Several different types of software frameworks for model composition have been designed and implemented;the various framework types have different component types,processes for composing models,and intended applications.The different framework types and the implemented examples of them vary widely in terms of features and capabilities.Comparing alternative frameworks so as to assess their likely utility for a specific application has heretofore been largely subjective and qualitative,and consequently of uncertain reliability.To address this issue an assessment methodology specifically designed for comparing model composition frameworks is developed and explained.The methodology employs a quantitative metric based on a set of well-defined criteria relating to the features and capabilities of simulation frameworks and is intended to be objective and quantitative.The methodology is illustrated and demonstrated by applying it to a set of existing model composition frameworks.The assessment results suggest that using the methodology can,at a minimum,improve the objectivity and reliability of framework selection decisions.The assessment criteria may also be useful as guidelines when designing and developing a framework.
基金This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60473027ARC Discovery Grant of Australia under Grant No.DP0557493China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Grant No.20060400035).
文摘We propose short group signature （GS） schemes which are provably secure without random oracles. Our basic scheme is about 14 times shorter than the Boyen-Waters GS scheme at Eurocrypt 2006, and 42% shorter than the recent GS schemes due to Ateniese et al. The security proofs are provided in the Universally Composable model, which allows the proofs of security valid not only when our scheme is executed in isolation, but also in composition with other secure cryptographic primitives. We also present several new computational assumptions and justify them in the generic group model. These assumptions are useful in the design of high-level protocols and may be of independent interest.
