Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 gene 681G>A single nucleotide polynmrphism to clopidogrel resistance after PCI in Chinese

Objectives Clopidogrel is a prodrug that has to be converted to an active metabolite by hepatic cytochrome P450(CYP) isoenzymes to inhibit platelet aggregation.Individualvariability of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel suggests a possibility for genetic factors having a significant influence on clopidogrel responsiveness.In this study,we sought to determine the association between the single nucleotide polymorphism of CYP 2C19 681G】A and the occurrence of clopidogrel resistance(CR) in Chinese.Methods The study enrolled 614 hospitalized patients who underwentsuccessful percutaneouscoronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were received the treatmentwith dual antiplatelet regimen(aspirin plus clopidogrel).All patients received loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg aspirin.20μmol/L ADP-induced platelet aggregation ratio(PAR ) was assessed 24 h after clopi- dogrel administration.The maximum residual PAR≥70%was defined as CR.Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples according to standard protocols,the single nucleotide polymorphism of the CYP2C19 681G】A was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in all the patients.Results CR was found in 126 patients(20.5%).There was CYP2C19 681G】A polymorphism in the study population.The frequencies of the three kinds of genotypes(GG,GA,A A) in CR group and non-CR (NCR)group were 32.5%,47.6%,19.8%and 48.0%, 45.0%,7.0%,respectively.The frequency of AA genotype was significantly higher in NCR group than that in CR group (OR =3.03,95%CI:1.889～5.784,P=0.003).The A allele carriers were more likely to develop clopidogrel resistance compared with that of G allele carriers(OR=1.85,95%CI: 1.392～2.459,P=0.002).Conclusions CYP2C19 681G/A polymorphism is associated with the risk of CR,and the A allele carriers may be a possible genetic susceptibility factor for patients with CR.

Efficacy of tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotype

The cure rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and antimicrobial agents such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole are mainly influenced by bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and the magnitude of the inhibition of acid secretion. Annual cure rates have gradually decreased because of the increased prevalence of H. pylori strains resistant to antimicrobial agents, especially to clarithromycin. Alternative regimens have therefore been developed incorporating different antimicrobial agents. Further, standard PPI therapy (twice-daily dosing) often fails to induce a long-term increase in intragastric pH > 4.0. Increasing the eradication rate requires more frequent and higher doses of PPIs. Therapeutic efficacy related to acid secretion is influenced by genetic factors such as variants of the genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes (e.g., cytochrome P450 2C19, CYP2C19), drug transporters (e.g., multidrug resistance protein-1; ABCB1), and inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin-1β). For example, quadruple daily administration of PPI therapy potently inhibits acid secretion within 24 h, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype. Therefore, tailored H. pylori eradication regimens that address acid secretion and employ optimal antimicrobial agents based on results of antimicrobial agent-susceptibility testing may prove effective in attaining higher eradication rates.

Early effects of Lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets on intragastric pH in CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers

AIM: To compare rabeprazole (RPZ; 10 mg) with Lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets (LPZ; 30 mg OD) in terms of antisecretory activity and blood drug concentration after a single dose. METHODS: Eight H pylori-negative cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 extensive metabolizers were assigned to receive a single oral dose of RPZ 10 mg or LPZ 30 mg OD. Twelve hour intragastric pH monitoring was perform- ed on the day of treatment. Blood samples were also collected after the administration of each drug. RESULTS: LPZ 30 mg OD induced a significantly earlier rise in blood drug concentration than RPZ 10 mg; consequently, LPZ 30 mg OD induced a significantly earlier rise in median pH in the third and fourth hours of the study. CONCLUSION: In H pylori-negative CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, LPZ 30 mg OD induced a significantly faster inhibition of gastric acid secretion than RPZ 10 mg.

Maintenance time of sedative effects after an intravenous infusion of diazepam: A guide for endoscopy using diazepam

AIM: To examine whether the sedative effects assessed by psychomotor tests would depend on the cytochrome P450 (CYP ) 2C19 genotypes after an infusion regimen of diazepam commonly used forgastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan. METHODS: Fifteen healthy Japanese volunteers consisting of three different CYP2C19 genotype groups underwent a critical ? icker fusion test, an eye movement analysis and a postural sway test as a test for physical sedative effects, and a visual analog scale (VAS) symptom assessment method as a test for mental sedative effects during the 336 h period after the intravenous infusion of diazepam (5 mg). RESULTS: The physical sedative effects assessed by the critical flicker test continued for 1 h (t values of 5 min, 30 min and 60 min later: 4.35, 5.00 and 3.19, respectively) and those by the moving radial area of a postural sway test continued for 3 h (t values of 5 h, 30 h, 60 min and 3 h later: -4.05, -3.42, -2.17 and -2.58, respectively), which changed significantly compared with the baseline level before infusion (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the mental sedative effects by the VAS method improved within 1 h. The CYP2C19 genotype-dependent differences in the postinfusion sedative effects were not observed in any of the four psychomotor function tests. CONCLUSION: With the psychomotor tests, the objective sedative effects of diazepam continued for 1 h to 3 h irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype status and the subjective sedative symptoms improved within 1 h. Up to 3 h of clinical care appears to be required after the infusion of diazepam, although patients feel subjectively improved.