The Freudian notion of the compulsion repetition governed by the death drive beyond the pleasure principle with its inherent persistence of a nostalgic dream both to restore the earlier state of things and to return t...The Freudian notion of the compulsion repetition governed by the death drive beyond the pleasure principle with its inherent persistence of a nostalgic dream both to restore the earlier state of things and to return to the inanimate state has attracted philosophers,particularly Deleuze and Derrida,to revise,enrich,and broaden the concept in their theories of difference in repetition and the archives.Deleuze reconnects it with Nietzsche’s notion of eternal return to tackle with the phenomenon of the events returning in difference of repetition.As to Lacan,the post-Freudian psychoanalyst,the death drive is in search of the lost Object,the original loss within the subject,Derrida theorizes the concept of archives in the unconscious memories to further elaborate that the death drive,in its interiorly-dialectical conflicts on the way to search for“a priori,”namely,“the origin,”has encountered the loss.Thus,the death drive,haunted by the specters of the past,develops the archive fever with the persistent passion to reach trembling sublimity.The movie,The Legend of 1900,directed by Giuseppe Tornatore,helps understand the problem that the talented pianist,1900,abandoned in the ship by his birth parents when he was born and raised by a black worker as his foster father who died by accident,chooses to die with the ruined ship,“his only home,”in absolute solitude although he was once driven by his passionate love for a woman to get off the ship and he failed the chance.The 1900’s official identity is the lost archive on the land;he has been haunted by the lost archive:no memories of his birth parents.展开更多
萨德(Marquis de Sade)的著作影响法国文坛至深,他对变态行为的描述无疑也是弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)的先驱。然而,萨德的变态幻想并不止于想象,而是背后有着某种坚定的意志支持。而拉康(Jacques Lacan)对萨德的阅读则试图找出这个晦涩...萨德(Marquis de Sade)的著作影响法国文坛至深,他对变态行为的描述无疑也是弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)的先驱。然而,萨德的变态幻想并不止于想象,而是背后有着某种坚定的意志支持。而拉康(Jacques Lacan)对萨德的阅读则试图找出这个晦涩力量背后的"理性"根据。在拉康眼中,萨德的《寝室里的哲学》(La philosophie dans le boudoir)不仅符合康德(Immanuel Kant)《实践理性批判》(Kritik der praktischen Vernunft)的理性精神,甚至补充并道出了其中的真理,因而彰显出其颠覆性的精华。于是,在精神分析所开启的欲望向度中,拉康让萨德和康德一起走在弗洛伊德的前面,让萨德继承了代表传统伦理学之转折点的康德,继而开启了精神分析的伦理学颠覆。而在拉康之前,萨德这个人的经验以及其著作的重要性从来没有以其伦理学面貌被发掘。本文随着拉康的阅读,一一检视萨德与康德彼此依存的一体性,道德律法与"绝爽"(jouissance)的关系,以及萨德的"二度死亡"(seconde mort)与弗洛伊德的"死亡欲力"玄想。展开更多
文摘The Freudian notion of the compulsion repetition governed by the death drive beyond the pleasure principle with its inherent persistence of a nostalgic dream both to restore the earlier state of things and to return to the inanimate state has attracted philosophers,particularly Deleuze and Derrida,to revise,enrich,and broaden the concept in their theories of difference in repetition and the archives.Deleuze reconnects it with Nietzsche’s notion of eternal return to tackle with the phenomenon of the events returning in difference of repetition.As to Lacan,the post-Freudian psychoanalyst,the death drive is in search of the lost Object,the original loss within the subject,Derrida theorizes the concept of archives in the unconscious memories to further elaborate that the death drive,in its interiorly-dialectical conflicts on the way to search for“a priori,”namely,“the origin,”has encountered the loss.Thus,the death drive,haunted by the specters of the past,develops the archive fever with the persistent passion to reach trembling sublimity.The movie,The Legend of 1900,directed by Giuseppe Tornatore,helps understand the problem that the talented pianist,1900,abandoned in the ship by his birth parents when he was born and raised by a black worker as his foster father who died by accident,chooses to die with the ruined ship,“his only home,”in absolute solitude although he was once driven by his passionate love for a woman to get off the ship and he failed the chance.The 1900’s official identity is the lost archive on the land;he has been haunted by the lost archive:no memories of his birth parents.
文摘萨德(Marquis de Sade)的著作影响法国文坛至深,他对变态行为的描述无疑也是弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)的先驱。然而,萨德的变态幻想并不止于想象,而是背后有着某种坚定的意志支持。而拉康(Jacques Lacan)对萨德的阅读则试图找出这个晦涩力量背后的"理性"根据。在拉康眼中,萨德的《寝室里的哲学》(La philosophie dans le boudoir)不仅符合康德(Immanuel Kant)《实践理性批判》(Kritik der praktischen Vernunft)的理性精神,甚至补充并道出了其中的真理,因而彰显出其颠覆性的精华。于是,在精神分析所开启的欲望向度中,拉康让萨德和康德一起走在弗洛伊德的前面,让萨德继承了代表传统伦理学之转折点的康德,继而开启了精神分析的伦理学颠覆。而在拉康之前,萨德这个人的经验以及其著作的重要性从来没有以其伦理学面貌被发掘。本文随着拉康的阅读,一一检视萨德与康德彼此依存的一体性,道德律法与"绝爽"(jouissance)的关系,以及萨德的"二度死亡"(seconde mort)与弗洛伊德的"死亡欲力"玄想。
