A systematic study on the electrical load forecasting for large-scale iron and steel companies was made. After analyzing the electrical load's characteristics, an algorithm framework for the load forecasting in iron ...A systematic study on the electrical load forecasting for large-scale iron and steel companies was made. After analyzing the electrical load's characteristics, an algorithm framework for the load forecasting in iron and steel complex was formulated based on model combination and scheme filtration. The algorithm features data quality self- adaptation, convenient forecasting model extension, easy practical application, etc. , and has been successfully applied in Baoshan Iron and Steel Co Ltd, Shanghai, China, resulting in great economic benefit.展开更多
中尺度气象模式对风场的预报效果与参数化方案的适应性紧密相关。以内蒙古高原丘陵地形、江苏平缓的海陆交界地形2种典型下垫面试验风电场为模拟区域,分别用WRFV3.2(Weather Research and Forecast Model)模式自带的6种物理过程参数化...中尺度气象模式对风场的预报效果与参数化方案的适应性紧密相关。以内蒙古高原丘陵地形、江苏平缓的海陆交界地形2种典型下垫面试验风电场为模拟区域,分别用WRFV3.2(Weather Research and Forecast Model)模式自带的6种物理过程参数化组合方案预报了2010年1月和7月两个风电场区域的风速和风向,对比分析了参数化组合方案差异对风场预报的影响。结果表明:①内蒙古试验区,边界层MRF方案描述的边界层结构较MYJ方案合理;微物理方案WSM3在夏季的风速预报能力优于WSM6,而冬季相反;复杂地形区域的风场预报需考虑陆面过程参数化方案,尤其是夏季降水发生后,陆面过程对于边界层结构的影响增大,选用Noah优于无陆面过程。②江苏试验区,边界层MRF方案描述的边界层结构较MYJ方案合理;1月陆面过程RUC方案优于陆面热量扩散和Noah;7月陆面热量扩散方案优于RUC和Noah。③风向预报6个方案的预报风向统计与实际记录风向统计有较好的一致性,风向概率分布相似,盛行风向一致且稳定。展开更多
基金supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(Grant No.2012CB955203)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41205040,41105055)the Special Scientific Research Project for Public Interest(Grant No.GYHY201306021)
基金Item Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (59937150 ,60274054),863 High Tech Development Plan ofChina (2001AA413910) and National Outstanding Young Investigator Grant (6970025)
文摘A systematic study on the electrical load forecasting for large-scale iron and steel companies was made. After analyzing the electrical load's characteristics, an algorithm framework for the load forecasting in iron and steel complex was formulated based on model combination and scheme filtration. The algorithm features data quality self- adaptation, convenient forecasting model extension, easy practical application, etc. , and has been successfully applied in Baoshan Iron and Steel Co Ltd, Shanghai, China, resulting in great economic benefit.
文摘中尺度气象模式对风场的预报效果与参数化方案的适应性紧密相关。以内蒙古高原丘陵地形、江苏平缓的海陆交界地形2种典型下垫面试验风电场为模拟区域,分别用WRFV3.2(Weather Research and Forecast Model)模式自带的6种物理过程参数化组合方案预报了2010年1月和7月两个风电场区域的风速和风向,对比分析了参数化组合方案差异对风场预报的影响。结果表明:①内蒙古试验区,边界层MRF方案描述的边界层结构较MYJ方案合理;微物理方案WSM3在夏季的风速预报能力优于WSM6,而冬季相反;复杂地形区域的风场预报需考虑陆面过程参数化方案,尤其是夏季降水发生后,陆面过程对于边界层结构的影响增大,选用Noah优于无陆面过程。②江苏试验区,边界层MRF方案描述的边界层结构较MYJ方案合理;1月陆面过程RUC方案优于陆面热量扩散和Noah;7月陆面热量扩散方案优于RUC和Noah。③风向预报6个方案的预报风向统计与实际记录风向统计有较好的一致性,风向概率分布相似,盛行风向一致且稳定。