The life-cycle eco-footprint computing model of building projects was established in the study. It contained the eco-footprint in 4 aspects during the lifecycle: consumed energy, consumed resource, emitted carbon diox...The life-cycle eco-footprint computing model of building projects was established in the study. It contained the eco-footprint in 4 aspects during the lifecycle: consumed energy, consumed resource, emitted carbon dioxide and produced solid waste. Space efficiency of life-cycle eco-footprint index was proposed and used to assess the eco-sustainability of building projects. Then, the eco-footprint and ecosustainability of 4 different structure types(brick-concrete bungalow, multi-storey brick-concrete, multistorey steel-concrete, high-rise steel-concrete) for residential building in severely cold areas were investigated. The results indicated that: 1) Compared with bungalow, high-rise building with relatively smaller shape coefficient and window-wall ratio had higher eco-sustainability; 2) For the buildings with the same storey, shape coefficient and window-wall ratio, steel-concrete building had higher eco-sustainability than brickconcrete building; 3) High-rise steel-concrete structure had the greatest eco-sustainability during the 4 different bui lding structures, so it was more suitable to promote.展开更多
文摘The life-cycle eco-footprint computing model of building projects was established in the study. It contained the eco-footprint in 4 aspects during the lifecycle: consumed energy, consumed resource, emitted carbon dioxide and produced solid waste. Space efficiency of life-cycle eco-footprint index was proposed and used to assess the eco-sustainability of building projects. Then, the eco-footprint and ecosustainability of 4 different structure types(brick-concrete bungalow, multi-storey brick-concrete, multistorey steel-concrete, high-rise steel-concrete) for residential building in severely cold areas were investigated. The results indicated that: 1) Compared with bungalow, high-rise building with relatively smaller shape coefficient and window-wall ratio had higher eco-sustainability; 2) For the buildings with the same storey, shape coefficient and window-wall ratio, steel-concrete building had higher eco-sustainability than brickconcrete building; 3) High-rise steel-concrete structure had the greatest eco-sustainability during the 4 different bui lding structures, so it was more suitable to promote.