Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of using quality control circle(QCC)techniques to reduce the cost of non-priced consumables in medical oncology.Methods:Analytic statistics were compiled on the performance a...Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of using quality control circle(QCC)techniques to reduce the cost of non-priced consumables in medical oncology.Methods:Analytic statistics were compiled on the performance appraisal form.Aiming at the key points of improvement with respect to the excess cost of non-valuable consumables,the reasons were analyzed,and corresponding measures were formulated to compare the cost before and after the improvement.Results:After the QCC activity,the cost of non-priced consumables decreased from RMB 6.57/bed day to RMB 3.96/bed day.Conclusion:QCC has effectively reduced the cost of non-priced consumables in the oncology department,and it is worthy of promotion.展开更多
目的探讨疾病诊断相关分组(diagnosis related group,DRG)收付费实施对房颤射频消融术费用的影响。方法采用回顾性分析与描述性分析相结合的方法,导出福建省立医院2021年1—6月(实施前)326例,2022年1—6月(实施后)363例进行分析对比。分...目的探讨疾病诊断相关分组(diagnosis related group,DRG)收付费实施对房颤射频消融术费用的影响。方法采用回顾性分析与描述性分析相结合的方法,导出福建省立医院2021年1—6月(实施前)326例,2022年1—6月(实施后)363例进行分析对比。分析DRG实施前后房颤射频消融术各种费用指标(住院天数、药品费、手术费、医务性收入、耗材费、麻醉费、检查化验费)的变化情况。采用多元线性回归分析住院总费用的影响因素,采用方差分析并发症对患者住院总费用的影响。结果DRG收付费实施后住院天数短于实施前,药品费、耗材费、手术费均低于实施前,医务性收入高于实施前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);DRG收付费实施前后检查化验费、麻醉费比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。耗材费、药品费是影响医保支付金额的主要因素(P<0.05);无并发症组的住院总费用为(78290.320±5020.166)元,1个并发症组的住院总费用为(84669.870±20566.278)元,2个并发症组的住院总费用为(84881.250±20369.003)元,3个并发症组的住院总费用为(93440.170±28814.175)元,患者住院总费用比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),并发症越多,患者住院总费用越高。结论DRG收付费制度对优化医疗费用结构有一定作用,实施DRG能有效降低医疗费用,减少居民医疗服务支出,提高医疗服务质量,对推进我国DRG收付费的实施具有重大意义,为进一步推动完善DRG收付费改革提供理论依据,对于遏制医疗费用不合理增长、推动公立医院加强自身运营能力建设具有重要的理论与现实意义,但仍存在一些问题需要完善。展开更多
文摘Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of using quality control circle(QCC)techniques to reduce the cost of non-priced consumables in medical oncology.Methods:Analytic statistics were compiled on the performance appraisal form.Aiming at the key points of improvement with respect to the excess cost of non-valuable consumables,the reasons were analyzed,and corresponding measures were formulated to compare the cost before and after the improvement.Results:After the QCC activity,the cost of non-priced consumables decreased from RMB 6.57/bed day to RMB 3.96/bed day.Conclusion:QCC has effectively reduced the cost of non-priced consumables in the oncology department,and it is worthy of promotion.
文摘目的探讨疾病诊断相关分组(diagnosis related group,DRG)收付费实施对房颤射频消融术费用的影响。方法采用回顾性分析与描述性分析相结合的方法,导出福建省立医院2021年1—6月(实施前)326例,2022年1—6月(实施后)363例进行分析对比。分析DRG实施前后房颤射频消融术各种费用指标(住院天数、药品费、手术费、医务性收入、耗材费、麻醉费、检查化验费)的变化情况。采用多元线性回归分析住院总费用的影响因素,采用方差分析并发症对患者住院总费用的影响。结果DRG收付费实施后住院天数短于实施前,药品费、耗材费、手术费均低于实施前,医务性收入高于实施前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);DRG收付费实施前后检查化验费、麻醉费比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。耗材费、药品费是影响医保支付金额的主要因素(P<0.05);无并发症组的住院总费用为(78290.320±5020.166)元,1个并发症组的住院总费用为(84669.870±20566.278)元,2个并发症组的住院总费用为(84881.250±20369.003)元,3个并发症组的住院总费用为(93440.170±28814.175)元,患者住院总费用比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),并发症越多,患者住院总费用越高。结论DRG收付费制度对优化医疗费用结构有一定作用,实施DRG能有效降低医疗费用,减少居民医疗服务支出,提高医疗服务质量,对推进我国DRG收付费的实施具有重大意义,为进一步推动完善DRG收付费改革提供理论依据,对于遏制医疗费用不合理增长、推动公立医院加强自身运营能力建设具有重要的理论与现实意义,但仍存在一些问题需要完善。