Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism

AIM： To compare and calculate the 3-year refractive results, higher-order aberrations （HOAs）, contrast sensitivity （CS） and dry eye parameters after small incision lenticule extraction （SMILE） and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis （FS-LASIK） for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS： In this prospective, non-randomized comparative study, 78 eyes with spherical equivalent （SE） of -8.11±1.09 diopters （D） received a SMILE surgery, and 65 eyes with SE of -8.05±1.12 D received a wavefront-guided FS-LASIK surgery with the VisuMax femtosecond laser （Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany） for flap cutting. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, CS, HOAs, ocular surface disease index （OSDI） and tear break-up time （TBUT） were evaluated during a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS： The difference of uncorrected distance visual acuity （UDVA） postoperatively was achieved at lmo and at 3mo, whereas the difference of the mean UDVA between two groups at 3y were not statistically significant （t=-1.59, P=-0.13）. The postoperative change of SE was 0.89 D in the FS-LASIK group （t=5.76, P=0.00）, and 0.14 D in the SMILE group （t=-0.54, P=0.59） from lmo to 3y after surgery. At 3-year postoperatively, both HOAs and spherical aberrations in the SMILE group were obviously less than those in the FS-LASIK group （P=0.00）, but the coma root mean square （RMS） was higher in the SMILE group （0.59±0.26） than in the FS-LASIK group （0.29±0.14, P=0.00）. The mesopic CS values between two groups were not statistically significant at 3y postoperatively. Compared with the FS-LASIK group, lower OSDI scores and longer TBUT values were found in the SMILE group at Imo and 3mo postoperatively. With regard to safety, no eye lost any line of CDVA in both groups at 3y after surgery. CONCLUSION： Both SMILE and wavefront-guided FS- LASIK procedures provide good visual outcomes. Both procedures are effective and safe, but SMILE surgery achieve more stable long-term refractive outcome and better control of early postoperative dry eye as compared to FS-LASIK.

Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis:a Meta-analysis

AIM：To assess the corneal sensitivity and the incidences of dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction（SMILE） and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis（FSLASIK）.METHODS：The Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.3.We searched on Pub Med from inception to March 2016.Summary weighted mean difference（WMD） and 95% confidence intervals（CIs） were used to analyze the datum.Random-effects or fixed-effects models were chosen up to between-study heterogeneity.The main outcomes were composed of the Ocular Surface Disease Index（OSDI） scores,tear film break-up time（TBUT）,Schirmer Test and corneal sensitivity.RESULTS：Eight eligible studies including 772 eyes（386 in SMILE group and 386 in FS-LASIK group） were identified.The parameters have no significiant difference heterogeneity between SMILE and FS-LASIK group preoperatively.There were significant differences between the two groups in OSDI scores at one and three months postoperatively,in TBUT at one and three months postoperatively,in corneal sensitivity at one week,about one month and three months postoperatively.However,there was no significant difference observed in Schirmer Test at the follow-up periods.CONCLUSION：Compare to FS-LASIK,dry eye and the corneal sensitivity recover better in the SMILE group,in first three months after the surgery.

Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia correction

AIM:To compare clinical outcomes and refractive stability of implantable collamer lens(ICL)implantation and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis(FSLASIK)for high myopia correction.METHODS:The Optical Quality Analysis System(OQAS)was used to evaluate clinical outcomes objectively after operation for high myopia correction.We compared the two procedures in terms of 1-year changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA),corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA),safety index,efficacy index,spherical equivalent,modulation transfer function(MTF)cutoff frequency,strehl ratio(SR)and objective scatter index(OSI).RESULTS:At 1 y postoperatively,the safety indices were 1.33±0.27 in ICL group,and 1.17±0.24 in FS-LASIK group.39.58%in the ICL group and 27.59%in the FS-LASIK group gained CDVA in 2 lines or better than that in preoperative CDVA.The efficacy indices were 1.28±0.22 in ICL group,and 1.13±0.26 in FS-LASIK group.The changes of spherical equivalent from 1 wk to 1 y postoperatively was-0.12±0.37 D in ICL group,and-0.79±0.58 D in FS-LASIK group(P<0.05).Spherical equivalent within±0.50 D was achieved in 97.92%in ICL group and 68.97%in FS-LASIK group.MTF cutoff frequency were higher with ICL as compared to FSLASIK(P<0.05)at each postoperative follow-up stage;for postoperative 1 mo later,SR was statistically significant difference between two groups(P<0.05);with no statistically significant difference in OSI between two groups(P>0.05)in postoperative 3 mo later.CONCLUSION:ICL implantation and FS-LASIK procedures both provide good safety and predictability in high myopia correction.ICL implantation provides better clinical outcomes and refractive stability than FS-LASIK.

Above-average defocus curves in photopic and mesopic vision with multifocal intraocular lenses after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis

I am Dr. David P Pifiero from the Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy of the University of Alicante and from the Department of Ophthalmology of Vithas Medimar （Oftalmar） and Vithas Virgen del Carmen （Qvision） hospitals in Spain.

Time Course of Q Value after Myopic Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

Objective To assess the time course of Q value after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis(LASIK) and preliminarily evaluate the determinants of the difference of Q value between before and after LASIK.Methods We performed a retrospective,longitudinal investigation on patients undergoing wavefront optimized LASIK therapy for emmetropization.A total of 418 eyes from 222 cases were examined preoperatively,and partly followed up at one week(172 eyes),one month(134 eyes) and three months(51 eyes) after surgery.The horizontal,vertical and total Q values of cornea were calculated from eccentricity measured at the central 6-mm corneal zones respectively.Potential determinants of the change of Q value were analyzed using multiple linear regressions.Results The mean Q value was-0.17±0.13 preoperatively,and 0.99±0.70,0.97±0.66,and 0.86±0.41 one week,one and three months postoperatively,respectively.One way analysis of variance(ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences between measurements made before surgery and at all postoperative times(at one week,one and three months;all P<0.0001,Bonferroni post hoc),but no significant differences were found among postoperative groups.Significant differences of Q values between horizontal and vertical meridians were found before surgery and at all postoperative times(all P<0.0001).Multiple regression analysis revealed that change of Q value significantly correlated with manifest refraction spherical equivalent(r=0.116,P<0.0001) and axial length(r=0.264,P<0.0001).Conclusions Over the study period,the primary changes in Q value occur within 1 week after surgery,and then become slightly decreased and nearly stable.Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and axial length play a significant role in the change of postoperative Q value.

Clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond laser assisted keratomileusis for correction of high myopia in South Egyptian population

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy(t-PRK) with adjuvant mitomycin C(MMC) versus femtosecond laser assisted keratomileusis(Femto-LASIK) in correction of high myopia.METHODS: Prospective randomized comparative study including 156 eyes of 156 patients with high myopia and a spherical equivalent refraction(SER) <-6.00 D. They were divided randomly into two groups: Group A included 72 eyes treated with t-PRK with adjuvant MMC and Group B included 84 eyes treated with Femto-LASIK. Visual acuity, SER, corneal topography, pachymetry and keratometry were assessed for 12 mo postoperatively.RESULTS: The preoperative mean SER was-8.86±1.81 and-9.25±1.70 D in t-PRK MMC group and Femto-LASIK respectively(P=0.99) which improved to-0.65±0.43 D and-0.69±0.50 D at 12 mo follow up. Mean SER remained stable during the 12 mo of follow-up, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.64). In t-PRK MMC group, only six eyes needed retreatment after six months of follow up. And two eyes showed haze(one reversible haze grade 2, while the other had dense irreversible haze grade 4).CONCLUSION: t-PRK MMC provides safe and satisfactory visual outcomes and acceptable risk as Femto-LASIK in patients with high myopia.

Dislocation,fold and striae of comeal flap with laser assisted in situ keratomileusis after ocular trauma:a case report

Objective,To report the occurrence,management and outcome of late-onset traumatic dehiscence and dislocation of laser assisted in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)flaps.Treatment and Results:One patient occurred late-onset LASIK corneal flap dislocation after ocular trauma 7days after surgery.The flap was lifted,stretched,and repositioned after irrigation and scraping of the stromal bed and the underside of the flap.A bandage contact lens was placed,and topical antibiotic and corticosteroids were given postoperatively.The dislocated corneal flap was successfully repositioned in the case.The dislocated flap was repositioned 7 days after the trauma,and the patient recovered his uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA)of 10/20,20/20 day 1 and day 20 after the procedure,of 20/20 20 days later and had a well-positioned flap with a clear interface.Diffuse lamellar keratitis developed in the patients that resolved with the use of topical corticosteroids.Conclusion:Laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flaps are vulnerable to traumatic dehiscence and dislocation,which should be pay more attention to it for us.

Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a Meta-analysis

AIM：To evaluate the possible differences in visual quality between small incision lenticule extraction（SMILE）and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis（FS-LASIK）for myopia.METHODS：A Meta-analysis was performed.Patients were from previously reported comparative studies treated with SMILE versus FS-LASIK.The Pub Med,EMBASE,Cochrane,Web of Science and Chinese databases（i.e.WANFANG and CNKI）were searched in Nov.of 2016 using Rev Man 5.1 version software.The differences in visual acuity,aberration and biomechanical effects within six months postoperatively were showed.Twenty-seven studies including 4223 eyes were included.RESULTS：No significant differences were observed between SMILE and FS-LASIK in terms of the proportion of eyes that lost one or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity after surgery（P=0.14）,the proportion of eyes achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20or better（P=0.43）,the final refractive spherical equivalent（P=0.89）,the refractive spherical equivalent within±1.00diopter of the target values（P=0.80）,vertical coma（P=0.45）and horizontal coma（P=0.06）.Compared with the FSLASIK group,total higher-order aberration（P〈0.001）and spherical aberration（P〈0.001）were higher and the decrease in corneal hysteresis（P=0.0005）and corneal resistance factor（P=0.02）were lower in the SMILE group.CONCLUSION：SMILE and FS-LASIK are comparable in efficacy,safety and predictability for correcting myopia.However,the aberration in the SMILE group is superior to that in the FS-LASIK group,and the loss of biomechanical effects may occur less frequently after SMILE than after FS-LASIK.

Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome

AIM: To assess and compare the flap morphology using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with Femto LDV femtosecond lasers versus Hansatome mechanical Microkeratome. METHODS: AS-OCT (Visante) was used to compare 1 month postoperatively the morphology of the flaps created with Femto LDV femtosecond lasers or Hansatome Microkeratome. The intendedfiap thickness was 110 mu m and 160 mu m respectively. The thickness of twenty-five points across each flap, which were 0mm, 1.5mm, 2.5mm, and 3.5mm to the corneal vertex on the horizontal, vertical, 45 degrees and 135 degrees meridian respectively, was evaluated. RESULTS: One month postoperative, the central flap thickness in the Femto LDV group was 107.43 +/- 4.70 mu m, while 125.90 +/- 17.50 mu m in the Hansatome group. The difference between the actual and the expectedfiap thickness was 5.61 +/- 3.84 mu m and 31.52 +/- 12.27 mu m, respectively. The Hansatome group had presented a statistically significant result (P<0.001). Flap morphology showed a more regular planar shape in the Femto LDV group and a meniscus shape in the Hansatome group. CONCLUSION: AS-OCT is a direct and fast procedure to assess the flap morphology. The morphology by AS-OCT showed that the flaps created with Femto LDV femtosecond laser were more accurate and regular than the flaps created with Hansatome microkeratome.

Severe Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis Following Laser <i>in Situ</i>Keratomileusis with an Iatrogenic Double Flap

We present a case of an iatrogenic double flap created during laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser microkeratome that resulted in development of severe diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK). The DLK occurred mainly in the second interface, made by the spatula accidentally and not exposed to femtosecond or excimer lasers. Because of differences in the severity of the interface inflammatory reactions between the two layers exposed to the same spatula, an allergic reaction to detergent, bacteria, or other chemicals could not be assumed to be the main cause of DLK. Our observations in this case may suggest an important association of neural factors with DLK, because the inflammatory reaction occurred mainly in the deep stromal layer at the thick corneal nerves.

LASEK和TransPRK及FS-LASIK术后角膜屈光力及视觉质量比较

目的:比较准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)、经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(TransPRK)、飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)三种角膜屈光手术术后角膜屈光力及视觉质量。方法:回顾性研究。选取2021-01/2022-12在我院择期行角膜屈光手术的232例464眼患者作为研究对象,根据患者选择手术方式不同分为LASEK组70例140眼、TransPRK组76例152眼、FS-LASIK组86例172眼。比较三组患者术前,术后1、3 mo时裸眼视力(UCVA)、视觉质量、生物力学稳定性、泪膜破裂时间(BUT)、泪液分泌试验(SⅠt)及生活质量变化情况。结果:术后1、3 mo三组患者裸眼视力较术前均改善,全角膜总高阶像差、球差、水平彗差、垂直彗差均升高,生物学稳定性均降低(均P<0.05)。术后3 mo, TransPRK组、LASEK组生物学稳定性均高于FS-LASIK组(均P<0.05),TransPRK组生活质量评分较LASEK组及FS-LASIK组高(P<0.05)。手术前后三组患者BUT、SⅠt比较均无差异(均P>0.05)。结论:LASEK、TransPRK、FS-LASIK三种角膜屈光手术治疗屈光不正疗效确切,在改善裸眼视力和提高视觉质量方面结果相似,但TransPRK、LASEK较FS-LASIK具有更稳定的生物力学性能,且TransPRK组在改善患者生活质量方面具有更好的效果。

SMILE和WG-FS-LASIK治疗低度无散光近视患者术后早期视觉质量比较

目的比较飞秒激光小切口角膜基质内透镜取出术(SMILE)和波前像差引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(WG-FS-LASIK)治疗低度无散光近视患者术后的早期视觉质量。方法选择2022年3月至6月在广西壮族自治区人民医院视光中心行SMILE治疗的患者15例(30眼,SMILE组),行WG-FS-LASIK治疗的患者15例(30眼,WG-FS-LASIK组)。所有患者术前无散光且最佳矫正视力所需最低球镜度数均≤-3.00 D。于术前和术后1 d、1周、1个月测量视力、全眼像差(慧差、三叶草像差和球差)、客观散射指数(OSI)、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF_(cut-off))、斯特列尔比(SR)、可预测对比度视力(PVA)(包括PVA 100%、PVA 20%、PVA 9%)。比较两组观察指标测量结果。结果两组术后等效球镜、视力情况均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),但两组各时间点比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后OSI、SR、PVA 9%均较术前显著改善(P<0.05)。WG-FS-LASIK组在术后1 d、1周、1个月的OSI水平均显著低于SMILE组(P<0.05)。在术后1个月,WG-FS-LASIK组PVA 9%显著高于SMILE组(P<0.05)。SMILE组和WG-FS-LASIK组术后慧差均呈先上升后下降的趋势,但WG-FS-LASIK组变化幅度更小,在术后1 d、1周、1个月,WG-FS-LASIK组慧差小于SMILE组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论SMILE和WG-FS-LASIK均能提高低度无散光近视患者术后早期视觉质量,但WG-FS-LASIK早期视力恢复更好,且夜间视觉质量改善更优。

FS-LASIK Xtra治疗中高度近视患者术后2a的矫正效果

目的:评估FS-LASIK Xtra治疗中高度近视患者术后2 a的矫正效果及角膜形态的稳定性。方法:回顾性病例对照研究。纳入2019-08/2020-08在我院拟行屈光手术的中高度近视合并散光患者30例58眼,根据术前角膜地形图中圆锥角膜筛查相关指数行不同手术方式,分为FS-LASIK Xtra组15例29眼,FS-LASIK组15例29眼。术前,术后3 mo,1、2 a观察裸眼视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、等效球镜度(SE)及Sirius三维角膜地形图仪测量的不同直径区域(3、5、7 mm)前后表面角膜曲率。结果:两组患者术后不同时间点UCVA均较术前明显提高(均P<0.01),两组间UCVA和SE比较均无差异(P>0.05)。术后2 a,FS-LASIK Xtra组25眼(86%),FS-LASIK组24眼(83%)残余散光为-0.25-0 D。两组实际矫正SE与预矫正SE均呈正相关(均P<0.05)。两组患者术后3 mo,1、2 a不同直径区域(3、5、7 mm)前后表面角膜曲率均较术前有差异(均P<0.05),术后1、2 a FS-LASIK Xtra组角膜直径3、5 mm后表面曲率均高于FS-LASIK组(P<0.05)。结论:FS-LASIK Xtra治疗中高度近视患者有良好的安全性、有效性及可预测性。

SMILE和超薄瓣FS-LASIK矫正中度近视疗效比较

目的比较飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)和超薄瓣飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS‐LASIK)矫正中度近视的临床疗效。方法回顾性病例对照研究。本研究纳入了年龄、性别和角膜厚度匹配合适的中度近视(等效球镜度-3.00~-6.00 D)患者,36例接受SMILE治疗患者的72只眼和36例接受超薄瓣FS‐LASIK治疗患者的72只眼。分别于术前及术后3个月记录所有患者的视力、屈光度及角膜高阶像差等变量,最后进行统计学分析以评估手术疗效。结果在术后随访3个月时,SMILE组和超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组疗效指数和安全指数比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.179和-0.255,P=0.242和0.800)。SMILE组和超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组术后屈光度呈正视并相对稳定,术后等效球镜度比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.206,P=0.837)。SMILE组和超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组患者的角膜后表面曲率和非球面因子Q值比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.852和0.576,P=0.066和0.566)。SMILE组和超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组患者术前的总高阶像差、球差及彗差与术后比较,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。在术后3个月时,SMILE组患者的总高阶像差及球差明显低于超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组(均P<0.05)。结论SMILE和超薄瓣FS‐LASIK两种术式矫治中度近视均安全有效,但SMILE组患者的术后总高阶像差及球差增加量低于超薄瓣FS‐LASIK组。

FS-LASIK矫正中高度近视术后1年屈光回退危险因素及其预测模型构建

目的:探讨飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)矫正中高度近视术后1 a屈光回退的危险因素并构建预测模型。方法:回顾性分析2017-06/2018-11于西安高新医院行FS-LASIK手术矫正中高度近视患者400例800眼临床资料,将患者按照3∶1的比例随机分为建模组(n=300例)和验证组(n=100例),依照患者术后1 a屈光回退发生情况将建模组分为回退组与未回退组两个亚组,观察其角膜曲率和角膜厚度变化情况,采用Logistic回归分析筛选FS-LASIK矫正中高度近视患者术后1 a屈光回退的危险因素,基于回归系数构建预测模型,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估模型区分度。结果:建模组44眼、验证组15眼于术后1 a发生屈光回退。建模组中未回退组术后6、12 mo时角膜前表面曲率低于回退组(均P<0.05);术后1、3、6、12 mo时回退组角膜增生程度大于未回退组(均P<0.05);FS-LASIK矫正中高度近视患者术后1 a屈光回退发生概率值回归方程为:P=1/[1+e^(-(-5.989+0.127×年龄+2.019×术前屈光度-0.022×术前角膜中央厚度+0.043×切削深度-1.569×切削光学区直径))],Hosmer-Lemeshow检测回归方程拟合优度(P=0.818),利用建模组数据进行内部验证,ROC曲线下面积为0.890(95%CI 0.843-0.937),灵敏度为81.82%,特异度为84.71%;利用验证组数据进行外部验证,ROC曲线下面积为0.838(95%CI 0.717-0.959),灵敏度为80.00%,特异度为87.57%。结论:构建的风险模型判别效度良好,可用于识别中高度近视患者行FS-LASIK术后1 a屈光回退高危人群。

FS-LASIK术后视网膜周边离焦及视觉质量变化

目的探讨飞秒激光辅助的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)术后视网膜周边离焦及视觉质量的变化。方法选取2023年3月至5月在成都中医大银海眼科医院行FS-LASIK的近视患者51例(102眼)纳入研究,其中女27例(54眼),男24例(48眼)。使用多光谱屈光地形图仪测量视网膜周边离焦。记录视网膜周边总屈光差异值(TRDV);四个象限的RDV:上方RDV(RDV-S)、下方RDV(RDV-I)、鼻侧RDV(RDV-N)及颞侧RDV(RDV-T);距黄斑中心凹10°、20°、30°、40°及53°相应同心圆环区域的RDV(分别表示为RDV 0°-10°、RDV 10°-20°、RDV 20°-30°、RDV 30°-40°、RDV 40°-53°)。采用视觉质量分析系统测量并记录客观散射指数(OSI)、斯特列尔比(SR),10 c·d^(-1)、20 c·d^(-1)、30 c·d^(-1)空间频率下的调制传递函数(MTF)值(分别表示为10 c·d^(-1) MTF、20 c·d^(-1) MTF、30 c·d^(-1) MTF)以及截止频率(MTF cutoff)。采用iTrace像差仪测量并记录角膜垂直三叶草(Z_(3)^(-3))、垂直彗差(Z_(3)^(-1))、水平彗差(Z_(3)^(1))、水平三叶草(Z_(3)^(3))、垂直四叶草(Z_(4)^(-4))、垂直二次散光(Z_(4)^(-2))、球差(Z_(4)^(0))、水平二次散光(Z_(4)^(2))、水平四叶草(Z_(4)^(4))及总高阶像差(HOA)的数据。对患者术前、术后1个月及术后3个月的测量数据进行比较及相关性分析。结果术前、术后1个月及术后3个月患者视网膜周边TRDV、RDV-S、RDV-N、RDV 20°-30°、RDV 30°-40°、RDV 40°-53°比较,术后1个月及3个月的值均较术前降低,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.001)。术前、术后1个月及术后3个月患者OSI、MTF cutoff及10 c·d^(-1) MTF比较,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。术前、术后1个月及术后3个月患者角膜Z_(3)^(-3)、Z_(3)^(-1)、Z_(3)^(1)、Z_(3)^(3)、Z_(4)^(-4)、Z_(4)^(-2)、Z_(4)^(0)、Z_(4)^(2)、Z_(4)^(4)及HOA比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。Pearson相关分析结果显示,ΔRDV 0°-10°与ΔZ_(3)^(-3)、ΔZ_(3)^(1)、ΔZ_(4)^(-2)、ΔZ_(4)^(0)及ΔZ_(4)^(2)均呈正相关(均为P<0.05);ΔRDV 10°-20°与ΔZ_(4)^(-4)及ΔZ_(4)^(-2)呈正相关(均为P<0.05);ΔRDV 20°-30°与ΔZ_(4)^(-4)及ΔZ_(4)^(4)呈正相关(均为P<0.05);ΔTRDV、ΔRDV 40°-53°均与ΔHOA呈负相关(均为P<0.05)。ΔRDV-S与ΔZ_(3)^(-1)及ΔHOA呈负相关(均为P<0.05),与ΔZ_(4)^(4)呈正相关(P<0.05);ΔRDV-N与ΔZ_(4)^(-4)呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论FS-LASIK能降低近视患者视网膜周边远视离焦,但引入了部分角膜高阶像差,且两者存在一定的相关性。

SMILE与FS-LASIK治疗屈光性近视患者的效果比较

目的:比较飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)与飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗屈光性近视患者的效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年6月至2023年7月该院收治的106例屈光性近视患者的临床资料,按照手术方法不同将其分为对照组和观察组各53例。对照组采用FS-LASIK治疗,观察组采用SMILE治疗。比较两组临床疗效,手术前后眼科指标(裸眼视力、眼压)水平、等效球镜度数,以及并发症发生率。结果:两组治疗总有效率和并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后7 d、1个月,两组眼压水平均低于术前,但观察组术后7 d高于对照组,两组裸眼视力水平均高于术前,且观察组术后7 d高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3、7 d,两组等效球镜度数均低于术前,且术后3 d观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:SMILE治疗屈光性近视患者可改善术后早期眼压、裸眼视力、等效球镜度数,效果优于FS-LASIK治疗,但二者治疗总有效率和并发症发生率相当。

SMILE与FS-LASIK治疗高度近视散光患者5年疗效对比

目的比较飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)与飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗高度近视散光患者5年的临床疗效。方法前瞻性非随机对照研究。根据所接受的手术方式不同患者被分为SMILE组和FS-LASIK组,术后随访5年,对比分析两组患者裸眼远视力(UDVA)、最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)、等效球镜度(SE)、散光、总高阶像差(HOAs)、球差、彗差、泪液分泌功能、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和眼表疾病指数量表(OSDI)评分。采用重复测量资料的方差分析进行统计学分析,采用LSD-t检验进行两两比较,采用独立样本t检验进行组间分析。结果2组患者相比,术后UDVA、SE、HOAs、球差、彗差、泪液分泌试验、TBUT、OSDI评分差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),但BCDVA、散光的差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。SMILE组患者术后1个月的SE低于FS-LASIK组,而术后1~5年的SE均高于FS-LASIK组(均为P<0.05)。SMILE组患者术后3~6个月、3~5年的HOAs均较FS-LASIK组更低(均为P<0.05)。SMILE组患者术后3~5年的球差绝对值均明显低于FS-LASIK组(均为P<0.05);SMILE组患者术后1个月、1~5年的彗差均高于FS-LASIK组(均为P<0.05)。SMILE组患者术后1~6个月的TBUT均明显长于FS-LASIK组(均为P<0.05)。结论SMILE和FS-LASIK均安全有效,但SMILE在长期稳定性方面具有优势。SMILE引入较少的HOAs和球差,但引入较多的彗差。SMILE患者术后干眼症状持续时间更短,恢复更快。

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FOR DEGENERATIVE RETINOSCHISIS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH MYOPIA IN YOUNG ADULTS PRIOR TO LASER-ASSISTED IN SITU KERATOMILEUSIS SURGERY

Objective To discuss the characteristics of degenerative retinoschisis in young adults with medium to high myopia prior to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis(LASIX) surgery and the significance of preventive photocoagulation.Methods A total of 32 eyes in 19 patients suffering from myopia combined with degenerative retinoschisis were included.The mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.82±0.13 and the mean spherical equivalent of the subjective refraction was -(6.50±3.98) Diopter. The patients underwent preventive photocoagulation 1 month before the laser surgery for myopia.Results All the eyes that received preventive photocoagulation for retinoschisis had no further progression or retinal detachment during 4-year period of follow-up.Conclusion The degenerative retinoschisis in young adults should be recognized and treated with preventive photocoagulation.This may prevent further damage of visual field and other complications of slowly progressive retinoschisis after LASIK surgery.

波前像差引导FS-LASIK矫正中高度近视患者术后1年眼前节变化

目的探讨波前像差引导FS-LASIK矫正中高度近视患者术后1年对眼前节结构的影响。方法收集2020年7月至2021年3月在徐州市第一人民医院就诊符合手术适应证且接受波前像差引导FS-LASIK患者共40例78眼的临床资料,分为中度近视组和高度近视组;分别于术前、术后1个月、术后1年行Pentacam AXL眼前节分析仪测量眼前节,包括角膜后表面Q值,全角膜像差,后表面高阶像差、球差、彗差,角膜后表面曲率、顶点高度及最薄点高度,前房深度(ACD)、前房容积(ACV)和前房角(ACA),并对比分析。结果中度近视组患眼角膜后表面曲率和角膜后表面Q值术前与术后1个月、术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),高度近视组患眼角膜后表面最薄点高度和角膜后表面Q值术前与术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。中度近视组患眼角膜后表面垂直彗差术前与术后1个月、术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),高度近视组患眼全角膜像差、角膜后表面球差和垂直彗差术前与术后1个月、术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。中度近视组及高度近视组患眼ACD、ACV术前与术后1个月、术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),ACA术前术后相比差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术后1年和术前球差变化值与术前等效球镜度(SE)相关性分析发现,高度近视组患眼球差变化值与术前SE呈中度相关(r=-0.349,P=0.025),而中度近视组患眼球差变化值与术前SE无明显相关性(r=-0.052,P=0.758)。结论波前像差引导FS-LASIK虽然对患者高阶像差有一定改善,但对角膜后表面和前房结构仍然有一定影响,主要集中在中央区,对周边影响相对较小,术后1年眼前节结构相对稳定。