A new approach is demonstrated in which soft experimentation can be performed for MMP measurements, thus replacing the common practice of slim tube displacement laboratory experiments. Recovery potential from oil rese...A new approach is demonstrated in which soft experimentation can be performed for MMP measurements, thus replacing the common practice of slim tube displacement laboratory experiments. Recovery potential from oil reservoirs by miscible flue gas injection was studied by slim tube and field-scale numerical simulation using two flue gases and seven crude oils sampled at different depths in three candidate reservoirs. The soft experimentations were conducted using Eclipse300<sup>TM</sup>, a three-phase compositional simulator. This study investigates minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), a significant miscible gas injection project screening tool. Successful design of the project is contingent to the accurate determination of the MMP. This study evaluates effects of important factors such as injection pressure, oil component composition, and injection gas composition on the MMP and recovery efficiency for slim tube and field-scale displacements. Two applicable MMP correlations were used for comparison and validation purposes.展开更多
Nowadays,the non-hydrocarbon gases are the main sources for gas injection projects in different countries.The main advantages of the flue gas injection are low cost,readily available sources(which consists mainly of N...Nowadays,the non-hydrocarbon gases are the main sources for gas injection projects in different countries.The main advantages of the flue gas injection are low cost,readily available sources(which consists mainly of N2 and CO2)and low compressibility in comparison with other gases like CO2 or CH4(for a given volume at the same conditions).In addition,it occupies more space in the reservoir and it is an appropriate way for CO2 sequestering and consequently reducing greenhouse gases.In the aforementioned method,N2 and/or CO2 is injected into the oil reservoir for miscible and/or immiscible displacement of remaining oil.Moreover,a key parameter in the designing of a gas injection project is the minimum miscibility pressure(MMP)which is commonly calculated by running simulation case or implementing conventional correlations.From technical viewpoints,the lower MMP values are more flavor for miscible gas injection process due to lower injection pressure and consequently lower maintenance and lower injection costs.The main aim of this research is to investigate various gas injection methods(N2,CO2,produced reservoir gas,and flue gas)in one of the northern Persian gulf oil fields by a numerical simulation method.Moreover,for each scenario of gas injection technical and economical considerations are took into account.Finally,an economic analysis is implemented to compare the net present value(NPV)of the different gas injection scenarios in the aforementioned oil field.展开更多
文摘A new approach is demonstrated in which soft experimentation can be performed for MMP measurements, thus replacing the common practice of slim tube displacement laboratory experiments. Recovery potential from oil reservoirs by miscible flue gas injection was studied by slim tube and field-scale numerical simulation using two flue gases and seven crude oils sampled at different depths in three candidate reservoirs. The soft experimentations were conducted using Eclipse300<sup>TM</sup>, a three-phase compositional simulator. This study investigates minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), a significant miscible gas injection project screening tool. Successful design of the project is contingent to the accurate determination of the MMP. This study evaluates effects of important factors such as injection pressure, oil component composition, and injection gas composition on the MMP and recovery efficiency for slim tube and field-scale displacements. Two applicable MMP correlations were used for comparison and validation purposes.
文摘Nowadays,the non-hydrocarbon gases are the main sources for gas injection projects in different countries.The main advantages of the flue gas injection are low cost,readily available sources(which consists mainly of N2 and CO2)and low compressibility in comparison with other gases like CO2 or CH4(for a given volume at the same conditions).In addition,it occupies more space in the reservoir and it is an appropriate way for CO2 sequestering and consequently reducing greenhouse gases.In the aforementioned method,N2 and/or CO2 is injected into the oil reservoir for miscible and/or immiscible displacement of remaining oil.Moreover,a key parameter in the designing of a gas injection project is the minimum miscibility pressure(MMP)which is commonly calculated by running simulation case or implementing conventional correlations.From technical viewpoints,the lower MMP values are more flavor for miscible gas injection process due to lower injection pressure and consequently lower maintenance and lower injection costs.The main aim of this research is to investigate various gas injection methods(N2,CO2,produced reservoir gas,and flue gas)in one of the northern Persian gulf oil fields by a numerical simulation method.Moreover,for each scenario of gas injection technical and economical considerations are took into account.Finally,an economic analysis is implemented to compare the net present value(NPV)of the different gas injection scenarios in the aforementioned oil field.
