期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Geochemical Anomaly at the Devonian/Carboniferous Boundary, Huangmao, Gnangxi, China 被引量:5
1
作者 Chai Zhifang~①, Mao Xueying~①, Ma Shulan~①, Bai Shunliang~②,Zhou Yaoqi~①, Ma Jianguo~① and Ning Zhongshan~③ ①Institute of High Energy Physics, Academia Sinica, P. O. Box 2732, Beijing, China②Department of Geology, Beijing University, Beijing, China.③Guangxi Petroleum Exploration & Exploitation Co., Nanning, Guangxi. China. 《Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 1989年第3期271-280,共10页
The abundances of nearly 40 elements, Ir included, have been measured using radio-chemical and instrumental neutron activation analysis (RNAA and INAA) across a Devonian/Carboniferous (D/C) boundary section at Huangma... The abundances of nearly 40 elements, Ir included, have been measured using radio-chemical and instrumental neutron activation analysis (RNAA and INAA) across a Devonian/Carboniferous (D/C) boundary section at Huangmao, Guangxi, China. The Ir anomaly has been found in the D/C boundary bed. Its peak value is 156 ppt, richer by a factor of 12 than that in the underlying strata. Besides, as with Ir, other siderophile and chalcophile elements such as Au. Ni. Co. As and Sb are also enriched. The cause for the abundance anomalies of Ir and other elemets is discussed. Neither volcanic eruption nor extraterrestrial impact can explain it satisfactorily. The real mechanism for the anomalies awaits further study. 展开更多
关键词 OCC geochemical Anomaly at the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary Gnangxi Huangmao China THAN
下载PDF
Regarding an Oceanic Crust/Upper Mantle Geochemical Signature at the KT Boundary:If not from Chicxulub Crater,then Where Did it Come from?
2
作者 Peter OLDS Norm SLEEP 《Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第S1期28-29,共2页
Evidence for a mantle and/or basaltic component in KT boundary distal ejecta is apparently inconsistent with ejection from Chicxulub Crater since it is located on;5km thick continental crust(De Paolo et al.,1983;Mont... Evidence for a mantle and/or basaltic component in KT boundary distal ejecta is apparently inconsistent with ejection from Chicxulub Crater since it is located on;5km thick continental crust(De Paolo et al.,1983;Montanari et al.,1983;Hildebrand and Boynton,1988,1990).This evidence,along with ejected terrestrial chromites(Olds et al.,2016)suggest the impact sampled terrestrial mafic and/or ultramafic target rocks which are not known to exist in the Chicxulub target area.Possible resolutions to the paradox are:1)the existence of an unmapped/unknown suture in Yucatan Platform basement,2)an additional small unmapped/unknown impact site on oceanic lithosphere,or 3)an additional large impact on oceanic lithosphere or continental margin transitional to oceanic lithosphere.The third hypothesis is elaborated here since:1)Ophiolites nearest to Chicxulub crater are found in Cuba and apparently were obducted in latest Cretaceous/earliest Danian times(García-Casco,2008),inconsistent with the documented Eocene collision of Cuba with the Bahamas platform;and 2)Cuba hosts the world’s thickest known KT boundary deposits(Iturralde-Vinent,1992;Kiyokawa et al.,2002;Tada et al.,2003).These and geometric considerations suggest oceanic crust and upper mantle rock,exposed as ophiolite in the Greater Antilles island chain,marks the rim of a roughly 700 km diameter impact basin deformed and dismembered from an originally circular form by at least 50 million years of left-lateral shear displacement along the North American-Caribbeantransform plate boundary. 展开更多
关键词 then Where Did it Come from If not from Chicxulub Crater Regarding an Oceanic Crust/Upper Mantle geochemical Signature at the KT boundary KT
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部