To cope with the challenges of CoViD-19,europe has adopted relevant measures of a data-based approach to governance,on which scholars have huge differences,and the related researches are conducive to further discussio...To cope with the challenges of CoViD-19,europe has adopted relevant measures of a data-based approach to governance,on which scholars have huge differences,and the related researches are conducive to further discussion on the differences.By sorting out the challenges posed by the pandemic to public security and data protection in europe,we can summarize the“european Solution”of the data-based approach to governance,including legislation,instruments,supervision,international cooperation,and continuity.The“Solution”has curbed the spread of the pandemic to a certain extent.However,due to the influence of the traditional values of the EU,the“Solution”is too idealistic in the balance between public security and data protection,which intensifies the dilemma and causes many problems,such as ambiguous legislation,inadequate effectiveness and security of instruments,an arduous endeavor in inter national cooperation,and imperfect regulations on digital green certificates.Therefore,in a major public health crisis,there is still a long way to go in exploring a balance between public security and data protection.展开更多
In the post-pandemic era,the global economic and security landscapes are fraught with complexities and uncertainties.Among them,four risk flashpoints merit attention:Certain countries are raising interest rates to sub...In the post-pandemic era,the global economic and security landscapes are fraught with complexities and uncertainties.Among them,four risk flashpoints merit attention:Certain countries are raising interest rates to subdue inflation,despite their already high levels of debt;the bulk commodities market is experiencing volatility,leading to global turbulence and change;trade protectionism is at the forefront of major-power rivalry in political and economic spheres;and regional security crises are compounding international tensions.Behind those flashpoints are contradictions that obstruct world peace and progress,including development imbalances,governance gaps,and structural tensions in global security.In the face of uncertainties,it is crucial for China to seize strategic opportunities and transform crises into favorable situations.China has launched the Global Development Initiative(GDI)and the Global Security Initiative(GSI)to contribute to global prosperity and security.The two initiatives demonstrate China’s commitment to addressing global deficits in peace,development,security,and governance.展开更多
基金the phased achievement of the major research project of the National Social Science Fund of China(Project Approval No.21VGQ010)supported by the 2021 Central University Basic Scientific Research Project of Lanzhou University(Project Approval No.21lzujbkyjd002).
文摘To cope with the challenges of CoViD-19,europe has adopted relevant measures of a data-based approach to governance,on which scholars have huge differences,and the related researches are conducive to further discussion on the differences.By sorting out the challenges posed by the pandemic to public security and data protection in europe,we can summarize the“european Solution”of the data-based approach to governance,including legislation,instruments,supervision,international cooperation,and continuity.The“Solution”has curbed the spread of the pandemic to a certain extent.However,due to the influence of the traditional values of the EU,the“Solution”is too idealistic in the balance between public security and data protection,which intensifies the dilemma and causes many problems,such as ambiguous legislation,inadequate effectiveness and security of instruments,an arduous endeavor in inter national cooperation,and imperfect regulations on digital green certificates.Therefore,in a major public health crisis,there is still a long way to go in exploring a balance between public security and data protection.
基金supported by the key project of the National Social Science Fund of China(NSSFC):“Study on China-Russia Strategic Partnership for the New Era”(Grant No.20AGJ012).
文摘In the post-pandemic era,the global economic and security landscapes are fraught with complexities and uncertainties.Among them,four risk flashpoints merit attention:Certain countries are raising interest rates to subdue inflation,despite their already high levels of debt;the bulk commodities market is experiencing volatility,leading to global turbulence and change;trade protectionism is at the forefront of major-power rivalry in political and economic spheres;and regional security crises are compounding international tensions.Behind those flashpoints are contradictions that obstruct world peace and progress,including development imbalances,governance gaps,and structural tensions in global security.In the face of uncertainties,it is crucial for China to seize strategic opportunities and transform crises into favorable situations.China has launched the Global Development Initiative(GDI)and the Global Security Initiative(GSI)to contribute to global prosperity and security.The two initiatives demonstrate China’s commitment to addressing global deficits in peace,development,security,and governance.
