Reading of The Guiltless from the Perspective of Ethical Literary Criticism

The Guiltless is Hermann Broch’s last novel,and it is also a work that embodies Broch’s literary and artistic view.The novel takes place in a period of social and historical change,and the conflict between the old and the new ethical relations leads to the confusion of the ethical relations,which causes the relationship between the characters to become distorted.This paper tries to analyze the relationship between Baroness W and her family from the perspective of Ethical Literary Criticism in aspects of ethical environment,ethical selection and ethical identity.It reveals that in the period of social and historical change,in the environment of social ethics disorder,the distorted ethical selection of characters and the loss of ethical identity.Hermann Broch attempts to arouse readers’ethical reflection by depicting such an era and such characters.

刑事司法与人权保障

保障人权是现代刑事司法文明、民主的逻辑起点,只有确认无罪推定原则,建立符合我国国情的沉默权制度,强化重实物证据的办案观念,才能使人权保障在我国的刑事司法中得以落实,使我国在人权方面的国际斗争中争取主动。

“无知者无罪”的合理性根据是否存在——从亚里士多德对苏格拉底“作恶出于无知”的反驳看

"无知者无罪"意味着行为者由于无知可以对其行为选择及其结果不承担责任。通常情况下,人们习惯用"无知者无罪"来解释自己的行为过失。这种观点或许可以从苏格拉底关于"无人自愿作恶,作恶出于无知"的命题中找到根据。按照苏格拉底的阐述,"作恶出于无知、明知而故犯"的现象是不存在的。而亚里士多德认为,作恶并非真的纯粹出于无知,"明知而故犯"的现象是存在的。通过对苏格拉底和亚里士多德的命题进行分析,可以看出,作为科学命题,"无知者无罪"的说法有一定的合理性,而作为道德命题,"无知者无罪"的合理性根据是不存在的。

疑罪不诉证明标准之理论分析——从检察机关审查起诉的视角

刑事证明标准是多元化和体系化的。这种多元化和体系化决定了在刑事诉讼的不同阶段,针对不同的证明程度的要求,应适用不同的证明标准。而在我国现行刑事诉讼证明标准中,侦查终结标准、公诉证明标准与法院的有罪证明标准基本相同。其不合理的配置是显而易见的。检察机关在审查起诉时应将证明标准细化,从而使其在实践中更具效率和可行性。