Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohor...Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohort retrospective comparative study of population among 4,895 hysterectomies （3,539 LH vs.1,356 AH） between 2007 and 2013 was involved. Operative time （OT）, estimated blood loss （EBL）, intra-operative and post-operative complications, passing flatus; days with indwelling catheter, questionnaires covering pelvic floor functions and sexual functions were assessed. Results： The EBL （174.1±157.4 vs. 263.1±183.2 cc, LH and AH groups, respectively）, passing flatus （38.7±14.1 vs. 48.1±13.2 hours）, days with indwelling catheter （1.5±0.6 vs. 2.2±0.8 days）, use of analgesics （6.5% vs. 73.1%）, intra-operative complication rate （2.4% vs. 4.1%）, post-operative complication rate （2.3 % vs. 5.7%）, post-operative constipation （12.1% vs. 24.6%）, mild and serious stress urinary incontinence （SUI） post-operative （P〈0.001; P=0.014）, and proportion of Female Sexual Functioning Index （FSFI） total score 〈26.55 post-operative （P〈0.001） of the LH group were significantly less than those of AH group. There were no significant differences in OT （106.5±34.5 vs. 106.2±40.3 min） between the two groups. Conclusions： LH is a safe and efficient operation for improving patients＇ long-term quality of life （QoL）, and LH is a cost-effectiveness procedure for treating benign gynecological disease. LH is superior to AH due to reduced EBL, reduced post-operative pain and earlier passing flatus.展开更多
基金supported be Self-financing Research Project of Health and Family Planning commission in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (project number: Z2015626)Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan of Liuzhou Science and Technology Agency in Guangxi (project number: 2015J030508)
文摘Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohort retrospective comparative study of population among 4,895 hysterectomies （3,539 LH vs.1,356 AH） between 2007 and 2013 was involved. Operative time （OT）, estimated blood loss （EBL）, intra-operative and post-operative complications, passing flatus; days with indwelling catheter, questionnaires covering pelvic floor functions and sexual functions were assessed. Results： The EBL （174.1±157.4 vs. 263.1±183.2 cc, LH and AH groups, respectively）, passing flatus （38.7±14.1 vs. 48.1±13.2 hours）, days with indwelling catheter （1.5±0.6 vs. 2.2±0.8 days）, use of analgesics （6.5% vs. 73.1%）, intra-operative complication rate （2.4% vs. 4.1%）, post-operative complication rate （2.3 % vs. 5.7%）, post-operative constipation （12.1% vs. 24.6%）, mild and serious stress urinary incontinence （SUI） post-operative （P〈0.001; P=0.014）, and proportion of Female Sexual Functioning Index （FSFI） total score 〈26.55 post-operative （P〈0.001） of the LH group were significantly less than those of AH group. There were no significant differences in OT （106.5±34.5 vs. 106.2±40.3 min） between the two groups. Conclusions： LH is a safe and efficient operation for improving patients＇ long-term quality of life （QoL）, and LH is a cost-effectiveness procedure for treating benign gynecological disease. LH is superior to AH due to reduced EBL, reduced post-operative pain and earlier passing flatus.
