In order to clarify the water-saving technologies and standards in large-scale mechanized production of paddy fields, the water-saving effects and cost-benefit situations of paddy field steeping, seedling transplantin...In order to clarify the water-saving technologies and standards in large-scale mechanized production of paddy fields, the water-saving effects and cost-benefit situations of paddy field steeping, seedling transplanting and different land preparation methods were studied. The results showed that the suitable water layer height for the closing period of mechanized operation was 10 cm, which could save water, facilitate weed control, and lead to better effect and the highest yield. The treatment with a water layer height of 1 cm(Huadashui) for the seedling planting operation achieved better quality of seedling transplanting, lower vacancy rate and higher yield and was water-saving. From the perspective of saving water and taking into account the cost of land preparation, the method of steeping and beating the field was better than the method of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and harrowing in spring, but it was very prone to lodging. From the perspective of high yield creation, the method of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and harrowing in spring was significantly better than the method of steeping and beating the field. In order to reduce the cost of land preparation, it is recommended to change the way of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and hallowing in spring to plowing in autumn and rotary tillage in spring or plowing and hallowing in spring to reduce the cost of one time of rotary tillage, and to simultaneously realize deeper plough layer, which is conducive to preventing lodging and obtaining high yield.展开更多
This experiment was conducted in silty clay loam soil and cultivated with previous season wheat. Tillage for experiment field was applied using moldboard plow with 0.22-0.24 m depth, the rate of tractor velocity was 2...This experiment was conducted in silty clay loam soil and cultivated with previous season wheat. Tillage for experiment field was applied using moldboard plow with 0.22-0.24 m depth, the rate of tractor velocity was 2.45 km hf^-1, as a tillage velocity. Two rates of tractor velocities (first factor) were applied: 3.24 km hr^-1, for the first velocity, and 4.71 km hr^-1 for the second, Three types of tillers (second factor) were used: disk harrow, rotavator tiller, and spring spike tooth harrow. The first velocity rate was: 2.51 km hr-l(with disk harrow as a machinery unit), 2.92 km hr^-1 (with rotivator), and 3.06 km hrl(with spring spike tooth harrow), while the second velocity rate was: 3.19 km hr-1 (with disk harrow as a machinery unit), 4.05 km hrl(with rotivator), and 4.26 km hrl(with spring spike tooth harrow). Split plot design in RCBD with three replicates was used at the constant of soil moisture 11%-13%. Results were analyzed statistically and means were tested with LSD. The results showed the significant differences between both two experiment factors and their interaction for all study parameters which included: slippage percentage, practical productivity, numbers of masses 〉 5 cm m^-2, and the implement width. At the constant of pulverization equipment types, the higher percentage of slippage was 16.45%, the higher rate of practical productivity was 0.677 h hr1, and the higher rate of implement width was 2.05 m, while the rate of masses 〉 5 cm m-2 decreased to 13.8 mass m2. At the constant of velocity, disk harrow achieved higher slippage percentage 17.69%, spring spike tooth harrow tiller achieved higher practical productivity 0.858 h hr^-1 and higher rate of implement width 2.73 m, and the rotivator achieved the lower rate of masses 〉 5 cm m2 and 4.1 mass m2. The comparison among the three pulverization equipment typess was the purpose of this study to give the best studied indexes under two different velocities.展开更多
To solve polynomial systems,Harrow,Hassidim,and Lloyd(HHL)proposed a quantum algorithm called HHL algorithm.Based on the HHL algorithm,Chen et al.presented an algorithm,the solving the Boolean solutions of polynomial ...To solve polynomial systems,Harrow,Hassidim,and Lloyd(HHL)proposed a quantum algorithm called HHL algorithm.Based on the HHL algorithm,Chen et al.presented an algorithm,the solving the Boolean solutions of polynomial systems(PoSSoB)algorithm.Furthermore,Ding et al.introduced the Boolean Macaulay matrix and analyzed the lower bound on the condition number.Inspired by Ding et al.’s research,several related algorithms are proposed in this paper.First,the improved PoSSoB algorithm using the Boolean Macaulay matrix is proved to have lower complexity.Second,for solving equations with errors,a quantum algorithm for the max-polynomial system solving(Max-PoSSo)problem is proposed based on the improved PoSSoB algorithm.Besides,the Max-PoSSo algorithm is extended to the learning with errors(LWE)problem and its special case,the learning parity with noise(LPN)problem,providing a quantitative criterion,the condition number,for the security of these basic problems.展开更多
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province(LH2019C063)National Key R&D Program(2016YFC0400108-3)+4 种基金Heilongjiang Provincial-level Project of National Science and Technology Major Project(GX17B010)Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Research Startup Fund(LBH-Q15134)lHeilongjiang Provincial Leading Talent Echelon Reserve Leader Project(2017)Academy-level project of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(2018KYJL021)Heilongjiang Provincial Modern Agricultural Industry Technology Cooperative Innovation Extension System(2019)。
文摘In order to clarify the water-saving technologies and standards in large-scale mechanized production of paddy fields, the water-saving effects and cost-benefit situations of paddy field steeping, seedling transplanting and different land preparation methods were studied. The results showed that the suitable water layer height for the closing period of mechanized operation was 10 cm, which could save water, facilitate weed control, and lead to better effect and the highest yield. The treatment with a water layer height of 1 cm(Huadashui) for the seedling planting operation achieved better quality of seedling transplanting, lower vacancy rate and higher yield and was water-saving. From the perspective of saving water and taking into account the cost of land preparation, the method of steeping and beating the field was better than the method of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and harrowing in spring, but it was very prone to lodging. From the perspective of high yield creation, the method of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and harrowing in spring was significantly better than the method of steeping and beating the field. In order to reduce the cost of land preparation, it is recommended to change the way of plowing in autumn and rotary tillage and hallowing in spring to plowing in autumn and rotary tillage in spring or plowing and hallowing in spring to reduce the cost of one time of rotary tillage, and to simultaneously realize deeper plough layer, which is conducive to preventing lodging and obtaining high yield.
文摘This experiment was conducted in silty clay loam soil and cultivated with previous season wheat. Tillage for experiment field was applied using moldboard plow with 0.22-0.24 m depth, the rate of tractor velocity was 2.45 km hf^-1, as a tillage velocity. Two rates of tractor velocities (first factor) were applied: 3.24 km hr^-1, for the first velocity, and 4.71 km hr^-1 for the second, Three types of tillers (second factor) were used: disk harrow, rotavator tiller, and spring spike tooth harrow. The first velocity rate was: 2.51 km hr-l(with disk harrow as a machinery unit), 2.92 km hr^-1 (with rotivator), and 3.06 km hrl(with spring spike tooth harrow), while the second velocity rate was: 3.19 km hr-1 (with disk harrow as a machinery unit), 4.05 km hrl(with rotivator), and 4.26 km hrl(with spring spike tooth harrow). Split plot design in RCBD with three replicates was used at the constant of soil moisture 11%-13%. Results were analyzed statistically and means were tested with LSD. The results showed the significant differences between both two experiment factors and their interaction for all study parameters which included: slippage percentage, practical productivity, numbers of masses 〉 5 cm m^-2, and the implement width. At the constant of pulverization equipment types, the higher percentage of slippage was 16.45%, the higher rate of practical productivity was 0.677 h hr1, and the higher rate of implement width was 2.05 m, while the rate of masses 〉 5 cm m-2 decreased to 13.8 mass m2. At the constant of velocity, disk harrow achieved higher slippage percentage 17.69%, spring spike tooth harrow tiller achieved higher practical productivity 0.858 h hr^-1 and higher rate of implement width 2.73 m, and the rotivator achieved the lower rate of masses 〉 5 cm m2 and 4.1 mass m2. The comparison among the three pulverization equipment typess was the purpose of this study to give the best studied indexes under two different velocities.
基金supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2021YFB3100100)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(61972413,61901525)
文摘To solve polynomial systems,Harrow,Hassidim,and Lloyd(HHL)proposed a quantum algorithm called HHL algorithm.Based on the HHL algorithm,Chen et al.presented an algorithm,the solving the Boolean solutions of polynomial systems(PoSSoB)algorithm.Furthermore,Ding et al.introduced the Boolean Macaulay matrix and analyzed the lower bound on the condition number.Inspired by Ding et al.’s research,several related algorithms are proposed in this paper.First,the improved PoSSoB algorithm using the Boolean Macaulay matrix is proved to have lower complexity.Second,for solving equations with errors,a quantum algorithm for the max-polynomial system solving(Max-PoSSo)problem is proposed based on the improved PoSSoB algorithm.Besides,the Max-PoSSo algorithm is extended to the learning with errors(LWE)problem and its special case,the learning parity with noise(LPN)problem,providing a quantitative criterion,the condition number,for the security of these basic problems.