Hedge funds have traditionally served wealthy individuals and institutional investors with the promise of delivering protection of capital and uncorrelated positive returns irrespective of market direction,allowing th...Hedge funds have traditionally served wealthy individuals and institutional investors with the promise of delivering protection of capital and uncorrelated positive returns irrespective of market direction,allowing them to better manage portfolio risk.However,the financial crisis of 2008 has heightened investor sensitivity to the high fees,illiquidity,lack of transparency,and lockup periods typically associated with hedge funds.Hedge fund replication products,or clones,seek to answer these challenges by providing daily liquidity,transparency,and immediate exposure to a desired hedge fund strategy.Nonetheless,although lowering cost and adding simplicity by using a common set of factors,traditional replication products might offer lower risk-reward performance compared to hedge funds.This research explores hedge fund replication further by examining the importance of constructing clones with specific factors relevant to each hedge fund strategy,and then compares the strategy specific clone risk and reward performance against both actual hedge fund performance and hedge fund clones constructed using a more general set of common factors.Testing shows that using strategy specific factors to replicate common hedge fund strategies can offer superior risk-reward performance compared to previous general model clones.展开更多
The subprime crisis was quite damaging for hedge funds.Using the local projection method(Jordà2004,2005,2009),we forecast the dynamic responses of the betas of hedge fund strategies to macroeconomic and financial...The subprime crisis was quite damaging for hedge funds.Using the local projection method(Jordà2004,2005,2009),we forecast the dynamic responses of the betas of hedge fund strategies to macroeconomic and financial shocks—especially volatility and illiquidity shocks—over the subprime crisis in order to investigate their market timing activities.In a robustness check,using TVAR(Balke 2000),we simulate the reaction of hedge fund strategies’betas in extreme scenarios allowing moderate and strong adverse shocks.Our results show that the behavior of hedge fund strategies regarding the monitoring of systematic risk is highly nonlinear in extreme scenarios—especially during the subprime crisis.We find that countercyclical strategies have an investment technology which differs from procyclical ones.During crises,the former seek to capture non-traditional risk premia by deliberately increasing their systematic risk while the later focus more on minimizing risk.Our results suggest that the hedge fund strategies’betas respond more to illiquidity uncertainty than to illiquidity risk during crises.We find that illiquidity and VIX shocks are the major drivers of systemic risk in the hedge fund industry.展开更多
Non-normality in asset returns is now a common feature of financial markets. However, many practitioners as well as investors do still refer to classic risk adjusted performance measures to assess their investment. Fo...Non-normality in asset returns is now a common feature of financial markets. However, many practitioners as well as investors do still refer to classic risk adjusted performance measures to assess their investment. For example, Sharpe and Treynor ratios are designed for a Gaussian world. Then, employing them for a performance assessment prospect relative to the risk borne is a biased approach. If we look for consistency in risk assessment and in asset performance valuation, we need to look for robust methods or tools. Moreover, the well-known mathematical consistency and numerical tractability concerns drive our preference for simple methods. Under this setting, we propose to account in a simple way and to some extent for the skewness and kurtosis patterns describing the deviations from normality. We adjust therefore the classic Sharpe and Treynor ratios to asymmetries in the downside and upside deviations from the mean values of asset returns. Specifically, the adjusted Sharpe and Treynor ratios are weighted by the upside and downside deviation risks. Accounting for skewness and kurtosis changes generally the ranking of hedge fund performance. Moreover, the obtained adjusted performance measures capture well the skewness and/or kurtosis patterns in hedge fund returns depending on the targeted investment strategy展开更多
Hedge funds have recently become popular because of their low correlation with traditional investments and their ability to generate positive returns with a relatively low volatility.However,a close look at those high...Hedge funds have recently become popular because of their low correlation with traditional investments and their ability to generate positive returns with a relatively low volatility.However,a close look at those high-performing hedge funds raises the questions on whether their performance is truly superior and whether the high management fees are justified.Incurring no alpha costs,passive hedge fund replication strategies raise the question on whether they can similarly perform by improving efficiency at reduced costs.Therefore,this study investigates two different model approaches for the equity long/short strategy,where weighted segmented linear regression models are employed and combined with two-state Markov switching models.The main finding proves a short put option structure,i.e.,short equity market volatility,with the put structure present in all market states.We obtain an evidence that the hedge fund managers decrease their short-volatility profile during turbulent markets.展开更多
基金The Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology provided graduate assistantship funding for Mr.Sujit Subhash.
文摘Hedge funds have traditionally served wealthy individuals and institutional investors with the promise of delivering protection of capital and uncorrelated positive returns irrespective of market direction,allowing them to better manage portfolio risk.However,the financial crisis of 2008 has heightened investor sensitivity to the high fees,illiquidity,lack of transparency,and lockup periods typically associated with hedge funds.Hedge fund replication products,or clones,seek to answer these challenges by providing daily liquidity,transparency,and immediate exposure to a desired hedge fund strategy.Nonetheless,although lowering cost and adding simplicity by using a common set of factors,traditional replication products might offer lower risk-reward performance compared to hedge funds.This research explores hedge fund replication further by examining the importance of constructing clones with specific factors relevant to each hedge fund strategy,and then compares the strategy specific clone risk and reward performance against both actual hedge fund performance and hedge fund clones constructed using a more general set of common factors.Testing shows that using strategy specific factors to replicate common hedge fund strategies can offer superior risk-reward performance compared to previous general model clones.
基金support from the IPAG Business School and from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada(SSHRC)—Grant No.435-2019-0078.
文摘The subprime crisis was quite damaging for hedge funds.Using the local projection method(Jordà2004,2005,2009),we forecast the dynamic responses of the betas of hedge fund strategies to macroeconomic and financial shocks—especially volatility and illiquidity shocks—over the subprime crisis in order to investigate their market timing activities.In a robustness check,using TVAR(Balke 2000),we simulate the reaction of hedge fund strategies’betas in extreme scenarios allowing moderate and strong adverse shocks.Our results show that the behavior of hedge fund strategies regarding the monitoring of systematic risk is highly nonlinear in extreme scenarios—especially during the subprime crisis.We find that countercyclical strategies have an investment technology which differs from procyclical ones.During crises,the former seek to capture non-traditional risk premia by deliberately increasing their systematic risk while the later focus more on minimizing risk.Our results suggest that the hedge fund strategies’betas respond more to illiquidity uncertainty than to illiquidity risk during crises.We find that illiquidity and VIX shocks are the major drivers of systemic risk in the hedge fund industry.
文摘Non-normality in asset returns is now a common feature of financial markets. However, many practitioners as well as investors do still refer to classic risk adjusted performance measures to assess their investment. For example, Sharpe and Treynor ratios are designed for a Gaussian world. Then, employing them for a performance assessment prospect relative to the risk borne is a biased approach. If we look for consistency in risk assessment and in asset performance valuation, we need to look for robust methods or tools. Moreover, the well-known mathematical consistency and numerical tractability concerns drive our preference for simple methods. Under this setting, we propose to account in a simple way and to some extent for the skewness and kurtosis patterns describing the deviations from normality. We adjust therefore the classic Sharpe and Treynor ratios to asymmetries in the downside and upside deviations from the mean values of asset returns. Specifically, the adjusted Sharpe and Treynor ratios are weighted by the upside and downside deviation risks. Accounting for skewness and kurtosis changes generally the ranking of hedge fund performance. Moreover, the obtained adjusted performance measures capture well the skewness and/or kurtosis patterns in hedge fund returns depending on the targeted investment strategy
文摘Hedge funds have recently become popular because of their low correlation with traditional investments and their ability to generate positive returns with a relatively low volatility.However,a close look at those high-performing hedge funds raises the questions on whether their performance is truly superior and whether the high management fees are justified.Incurring no alpha costs,passive hedge fund replication strategies raise the question on whether they can similarly perform by improving efficiency at reduced costs.Therefore,this study investigates two different model approaches for the equity long/short strategy,where weighted segmented linear regression models are employed and combined with two-state Markov switching models.The main finding proves a short put option structure,i.e.,short equity market volatility,with the put structure present in all market states.We obtain an evidence that the hedge fund managers decrease their short-volatility profile during turbulent markets.
