The practice of international human rights has led to the development of the political notion of human rights in contemporary times and triggered the theoretical reflection on"what are human rights"The natur...The practice of international human rights has led to the development of the political notion of human rights in contemporary times and triggered the theoretical reflection on"what are human rights"The natural rights view,which is based on human nature,regards human rights as universal moral rights owned by everyone against all others.holding a different perspective from the natural rights view,Raz,the representative of the political notion of human rights,bases his view on the political function of human rights in restricting national sovereignty in international practice and defines human rights as the legal rights enjoyed by everyone against the country since the end of the World War ii,which should be enforced by fair and reliable international institutions.Unavoidably,Raz’s concept of human rights has been subject to questioning and criticism by natural right theorists.The controversy around Raz’s concept of human rights shows that:on one hand,the Western academic circle has not readied a basic consensus on the understanding of human rights based on international human rights practice;on the other hand,it deeply reveals the theoretical need for the international community to reach a basic consensus on international human rights practice in the historical context of the changing international legal order.展开更多
The authors focus on the effects of three kinds of views of human beings,i.e.reactive,reactive in depth,and proactive human beings described by G.Allport on psychotherapy.There was a set of differences among three the...The authors focus on the effects of three kinds of views of human beings,i.e.reactive,reactive in depth,and proactive human beings described by G.Allport on psychotherapy.There was a set of differences among three therapeutic orientations that affected by the three kinds of human images.These differences included:focusing on the diseases vs the clients,emphasizing on treatment vs development,teaching vs facilitating,how to deal with the therapeutic relationship,doctors taking responsibility for treatment vs clients taking responsibility for change,and focusing on which one among thinking,feelings,and behaviors.展开更多
基金a phased result project of the China Society for Human Rights Studies(CSHRS)’s Studies on Political Human Rights Theory in the Contemporary West(Project No.CSHRS2020-03ZD)National Social Science Fund of China’s Research on the Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Contemporary China(Project No.:16BFX023)
文摘The practice of international human rights has led to the development of the political notion of human rights in contemporary times and triggered the theoretical reflection on"what are human rights"The natural rights view,which is based on human nature,regards human rights as universal moral rights owned by everyone against all others.holding a different perspective from the natural rights view,Raz,the representative of the political notion of human rights,bases his view on the political function of human rights in restricting national sovereignty in international practice and defines human rights as the legal rights enjoyed by everyone against the country since the end of the World War ii,which should be enforced by fair and reliable international institutions.Unavoidably,Raz’s concept of human rights has been subject to questioning and criticism by natural right theorists.The controversy around Raz’s concept of human rights shows that:on one hand,the Western academic circle has not readied a basic consensus on the understanding of human rights based on international human rights practice;on the other hand,it deeply reveals the theoretical need for the international community to reach a basic consensus on international human rights practice in the historical context of the changing international legal order.
文摘The authors focus on the effects of three kinds of views of human beings,i.e.reactive,reactive in depth,and proactive human beings described by G.Allport on psychotherapy.There was a set of differences among three therapeutic orientations that affected by the three kinds of human images.These differences included:focusing on the diseases vs the clients,emphasizing on treatment vs development,teaching vs facilitating,how to deal with the therapeutic relationship,doctors taking responsibility for treatment vs clients taking responsibility for change,and focusing on which one among thinking,feelings,and behaviors.
