BACKGROUND Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancerrelated deaths worldwide.Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).D...BACKGROUND Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancerrelated deaths worldwide.Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence.AIM To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE(Ida-TACE)against doxorubicin-based TACE(Dox-TACE)in intermediate stage HCC.METHODS Between January 2012 and December 2014,all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened.Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B,a performance status below or equal to 1,and no prior TACE.Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin.Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients.The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria.RESULTS Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin.There were 93%and 87%of cirrhotic patients and 87%and 70%of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31%and 26%of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7%and 73.3%(P=0.797)with 41.7%and 40.0%complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups,and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Safety profiles were similar in both groups,with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35%of Dox-TACE and 43%of Ida-TACEs.CONCLUSION Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety.Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.展开更多
Objective:To study the different influence of idarubicin + Arac (IA) therapy and daunorubicin + Arac (DA) therapy on malignant molecule expression of acute myelocytic leukemia. Methods: A total of 56 patients who were...Objective:To study the different influence of idarubicin + Arac (IA) therapy and daunorubicin + Arac (DA) therapy on malignant molecule expression of acute myelocytic leukemia. Methods: A total of 56 patients who were diagnosed with acute myelocytic leukemia in Kashgar Prefecture First People's Hospital between January 2014 and September 2017 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into IA group and DA group, and the expression levels of proliferation genes, apoptosis genes and invasion genes in bone marrow tissue were determined after they accepted two courses of different chemotherapy regimens. Results:After two courses of chemotherapy, Daxx, CDX2, MCL1, BCL2, SOX4, S100A6, MMP9, N-cadherin, ICAM-1 and SDF-1 protein expression in bone marrow tissue of IA group were significantly lower than those of DA group whereas SHIP1, Bax and C/EBP protein expression were significantly higher than those of DA group.Conclusion:IA solution for acute myelocytic leukemia can be more effective than DA solution to inhibit the expression of proliferation and invasion genes and increase the expression of apoptosis genes.展开更多
目的:探讨含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗高危儿童急性髓系白血病(AML)的安全性与有效性。方法:收集武汉儿童医院2022年1月至2023年2月应用含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗的AML高危患儿为观察组,对照组为应用去甲氧柔红霉素方案的AML高危患儿,分...目的:探讨含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗高危儿童急性髓系白血病(AML)的安全性与有效性。方法:收集武汉儿童医院2022年1月至2023年2月应用含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗的AML高危患儿为观察组,对照组为应用去甲氧柔红霉素方案的AML高危患儿,分析患儿的临床资料,比较两组患儿治疗后骨髓恢复时间、骨髓完全缓解(CR)率,微小残留病灶(MRD)清除率及治疗相关不良反应等临床特性。结果:患儿接受含米托蒽醌脂质体化疗方案在白细胞(17 vs 21 d)、粒细胞(18 vs 24d)、血小板(17 vs 24 d)及血红蛋白(20 vs 26 d)计数恢复时间上均明显优于去甲氧柔红霉素组(P<0.05)。观察组治疗有效率和MRD转阴率分别为90.9%和72.7%,对照组为94.1%和76.4%,均无显著性统计学差异(P>0.05),两组治疗总有效率类似。结论:含米托蒽醌脂质体化疗方案治疗高危儿童AML疗效不劣于去甲氧柔红霉素方案,但骨髓抑制时间明显缩短,安全性好。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancerrelated deaths worldwide.Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence.AIM To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE(Ida-TACE)against doxorubicin-based TACE(Dox-TACE)in intermediate stage HCC.METHODS Between January 2012 and December 2014,all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened.Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B,a performance status below or equal to 1,and no prior TACE.Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin.Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients.The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria.RESULTS Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin.There were 93%and 87%of cirrhotic patients and 87%and 70%of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31%and 26%of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7%and 73.3%(P=0.797)with 41.7%and 40.0%complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups,and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups,respectively.Safety profiles were similar in both groups,with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35%of Dox-TACE and 43%of Ida-TACEs.CONCLUSION Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety.Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.
文摘Objective:To study the different influence of idarubicin + Arac (IA) therapy and daunorubicin + Arac (DA) therapy on malignant molecule expression of acute myelocytic leukemia. Methods: A total of 56 patients who were diagnosed with acute myelocytic leukemia in Kashgar Prefecture First People's Hospital between January 2014 and September 2017 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into IA group and DA group, and the expression levels of proliferation genes, apoptosis genes and invasion genes in bone marrow tissue were determined after they accepted two courses of different chemotherapy regimens. Results:After two courses of chemotherapy, Daxx, CDX2, MCL1, BCL2, SOX4, S100A6, MMP9, N-cadherin, ICAM-1 and SDF-1 protein expression in bone marrow tissue of IA group were significantly lower than those of DA group whereas SHIP1, Bax and C/EBP protein expression were significantly higher than those of DA group.Conclusion:IA solution for acute myelocytic leukemia can be more effective than DA solution to inhibit the expression of proliferation and invasion genes and increase the expression of apoptosis genes.
文摘目的:探讨含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗高危儿童急性髓系白血病(AML)的安全性与有效性。方法:收集武汉儿童医院2022年1月至2023年2月应用含米托蒽醌脂质体方案治疗的AML高危患儿为观察组,对照组为应用去甲氧柔红霉素方案的AML高危患儿,分析患儿的临床资料,比较两组患儿治疗后骨髓恢复时间、骨髓完全缓解(CR)率,微小残留病灶(MRD)清除率及治疗相关不良反应等临床特性。结果:患儿接受含米托蒽醌脂质体化疗方案在白细胞(17 vs 21 d)、粒细胞(18 vs 24d)、血小板(17 vs 24 d)及血红蛋白(20 vs 26 d)计数恢复时间上均明显优于去甲氧柔红霉素组(P<0.05)。观察组治疗有效率和MRD转阴率分别为90.9%和72.7%,对照组为94.1%和76.4%,均无显著性统计学差异(P>0.05),两组治疗总有效率类似。结论:含米托蒽醌脂质体化疗方案治疗高危儿童AML疗效不劣于去甲氧柔红霉素方案,但骨髓抑制时间明显缩短,安全性好。
