Evolution Characteristics of Government-Industry-University-Research Cooperative Innovation Network for China＇s Agriculture and Influ- encing Factors： Illustrated According to Agricultural Patent Case

Under the special background of China, the cooperative innovation between different government-industry-university-research institutes plays an increasingly important role in the agricultural field. However, the existing literature has paid little attention to it. Considering the cooperation patents, published in the agriculture field stemming from the Full-text Database of China Patents as the study object, the spatial and institutional attribute of the authors as the data source, and by combining the social network and spatial econometrics analysis, this paper analyzes the structure evolution characteristics of cooperative innovation networks of agricultural government-industry-university-research institute in the city level of China in 1985–2014, based on the triple helix theory, with the influence factors discussed. This shows that, 1) since 1985, China's agricultural innovation level has been substantially increased, but the development degree of the cooperative innovation network is low, and the patent cooperation mainly relies on authors in the same unit; 2) enterprises play a leading role in the agricultural cooperative innovation. The effect of the government and hybrid organizations driven by the government is not obvious; 3) the cooperative innovation in the province and city dominates, and a multi-pole pattern has been formed. The cooperative innovation network structure evolves from a single helix empty core and double helix multi core to a double helix hierarchical network; 4) the city's science, education funding and personnel investment are key factors determining the agricultural cooperative innovation, while the agricultural development of the city presents slight negative impacts on it. The spatial mismatch of supply and demand is present in the technical cooperative innovation of China's agriculture. Therefore, the science enhancement and education investment to big agricultural provinces should be promptly implemented.

A Study of Methods to Identify Industry-University-Research Institution Cooperation Partners based on Innovation Chain Theory

Purpose： This study aims at identifying potential industry-university-research collaboration（IURC） partners effectively and analyzes the conditions and dynamics in the IURC process based on innovation chain theory.Design/methodology/approach： The method utilizes multisource data, combining bibliometric and econometrics analyses to capture the core network of the existing collaboration networks and institution competitiveness in the innovation chain. Furthermore, a new identification method is constructed that takes into account the law of scientific research cooperation and economic factors.Findings： Empirical analysis of the genetic engineering vaccine field shows that through the distribution characteristics of creative technologies from different institutions, the analysis based on the innovation chain can identify the more complementary capacities among organizations.Research limitations： In this study, the overall approach is shaped by the theoretical concept of an innovation chain, a linear innovation model with specific types or stages of innovation activities in each phase of the chain, and may, thus, overlook important feedback mechanisms in the innovation process.Practical implications： Industry-university-research institution collaborations are extremely important in promoting the dissemination of innovative knowledge, enhancing the quality of innovation products, and facilitating the transformation of scientific achievements.Originality/value： Compared to previous studies, this study emulates the real conditions of IURC. Thus, the rule of technological innovation can be better revealed, the potential partners of IURC can be identified more readily, and the conclusion has more value.

Meru University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Review System: A SWOT Analysis

The objectives of this article are as follows: 1) to propose a university research ethics system framework, 2) to provide a brief anatomy of the Meru University of Science and Technology (MUST) Institutional Research Ethics Review Committee (MIRERC), 3) to perform a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis of MIRERC, and 4) to make recommendations for improving its performance. The 13-member multi-disciplinary MIRERC was established in April 2017 to provide effective ethical oversight of research undertaken by the University’s scholarly community. Strengths of the MUST research ethics review system include a functional MIRERC, a pertinent national law and ethical guidelines, an Innovation and Enterprise Centre that could house a dedicated MIRERC Secretariat, and a supportive University Management Board. The weaknesses include lack of graduate schools to assure scientific rigor of proposals before submission to the MIRERC, lack of research ethics training in most school’s curricula, absence of a dedicated MIRERC Secretariat, undergraduate research proposals being not ethically reviewed, dearth of faculty trained in research ethics, and lack of an operating budget for MIRERC work. The opportunities include existence of about 22 accredited Institutional Research Ethics Review Committees (IRERC) in Kenya, existence of international standards and operational guidance for ethics review, availability of guidelines and codes of best ethical practices in research, existence of a free automated platform called Research for Health Innovation Organizer (RHInnO) Ethics for managing the ethics review process, and availability of external resources for strengthening IRERCs. In order to improve the performance and sustainability of the MUST research ethics system, there is need to include research ethics training in all undergraduate and post-graduate curricula, create a dynamic database of potential research ethics reviewers, allocate a percentage of the annual MUST research budget for MIRERC operations, charge a graduated fee for proposal ethics review, require all students’ and faculties’ internal and external research proposals be cleared by the MIRERC, and use the RHInnO Ethics platform to manage the ethics review process.

Southwest China Finance and Economics university Population Research Institute

Tbe Poulation Ro arh Iste was esbhediah May 1979,with。esce staf of 12,incuding thee po-consists of four of cesspeialing in population theory,Rplin ad the eompoulot and popilation inforination.

The mechanism of enterprise-university-esearch institute binding to promote higher education and protection measures——For example Tianjin

The Mechanism of Enterprise-university-research institute (EURI) Binding is a market-oriented strategic alliance as the government and industry associations and intermediary organs for auxiliary forces complement, in which enterprises play the leading role and which combines the efforts of enterprises, universities and research institutes. It is the advanced development of enterprise- university-research institute binding cooperation. The development of technology and social economy continue to offer new challenges for higher education. Under this situation, many universities in Tianjin area actively develop their superiority and cooperate with enterprise and research department, trying their best to explore various enterprise- university-research institute binding ways to quicken the pace of technology innovation and transfer in order to make the school's track wider and wider. According to the situation of Tianjin area, this text introduces the cases of mechanism of enterprise-university- research binding about this area's universities and comes up with safeguard measures on the base of analyzing other areas' mechanism of enterprise-university-research institute binding, combining with educational economy and management theory.

Luoyang Institute of Refractories Research Ministry of Metallurgical Industry

The Luoyang Institute of Refracto-ries Research(LIRR) under the Ministry ofMetallurgical Industry was founded in1964 and is a center for research and de-velopment on refractories science and te-chnology in People’ s Republic of China. Itis located in Luoyang on the southernbank of the Yellow River in Henan Provin-ce in Central China. The institute has atotal staff of about 700 members, includ-ing 350 scientific and technical person-nel with 57 senior engineers. The founderand first director of the institute wasProfessor ZHONG Xiangchong (H. S. Chong)who had worked at the United Steel Co.,Research and Development Department inSheffield and received his Ph. D. degree atLeeds University, England in 1949. He hand-ed over his directorship at the end of1984 and is now adviser and chief scien-

Population Research Institute of Tibet University

The Population Research Institute of Tibet University was estab lished in October 1995.It is presently affiliated to.the Geography Department and headed by Mr.Niu Zhifu Vice President of the university a and Mme.Chen Hua.There are six research staff members,halfof them are part time re-searchers.Key researchers are Mme.Chen Hua,Suolang Renqing and Luo Za.The institute's present tasks are regu lar,teaching on popu lation and demographic research.

Research on applying the interests distribution method of enterprise-university-research institute cooperation based on nash model

In order to get an acceptable interests-distribution scheme for each partner of enterprise-university-research institute cooperation in advance,based on Nash model,the paper designs the interest distribution method of enterprise-university-research institute cooperation and provides the basis for determining the weight of each partner in accordance with the interest distribution principles and subjected relations between major factors in enterprise-university-research institute cooperation.Also,in combination with one example,an applicable method is provided to distribute interest in enterprise-university-research institute cooperation.The study gives some references for interests-distribution of enterprise-university-research institute cooperation.

Beijing Research Institute of the Chemical Industry

Founded in 1958 and directly under the Ministry of the Chemical Industry, the Beijing Research Institute of the Chemical Industry (BRICI) engages in research and development in the fields of petrochemicals, fine chemicals, polymer synthesis and processing, and environmental protection. In the past 30 years or more, the institute has achieved many important scientific results of the State level, and it has signed in rccent years several hundred science and research contracts with

新时代高校劳动教育的定位及实施路径

党的十八大以来,新时代劳动教育的格局逐步形成且地位日益凸显,成为当代高校进行人才培养的核心课题。在新时代背景下,高校劳动教育的目标定位是在树立正确劳动价值观的基础上培养“高尚品格的人”、“时代发展中的人”与“全面发展的人”。因此,为了顺利推进劳动教育实践,应基于多维关系与视角综合施策,重点从推动主体间合作互补、建立“科学、综合、开放”的课程体系、确立专业支撑与条件保障、推进产学研融合等四个层面建立多维融合的新时代高校劳动教育体系,培养符合时代发展需求的高层次人才。

电化教育实践建立“政产学研用”协同发展机制

从电化教育专业创建发展的实践中,回顾电化教育发展的历程,用系统科学协同论观点,建立“政产学研用”协同发展机制,即政——事物的管理系统;产——事物的产业系统;学——事物的学科教学系统;研——事物的科研系统;用——事物的事业系统。该机制可以促进教育技术学科发展,同时对中国式现代化建设与发展有重大作用。

协同视域下工科研究生产学研用培养模式探究与实践

加强协同创新是提高工科研究生创新实践能力的内在要求,完善产学研用是建立以创新创业为导向培养机制的必然方式。当前,地方高校工科研究生创新实践能力与经济社会对人才的需求仍存在一定的差距,主要表现在创新意识淡薄、实用成果匮乏、聚焦思考不足,究其原因,问题意识缺乏、知识来源单一、学习氛围封闭是导致问题出现的主要因素。为此,作者团队与行业企业联合建成太阳能光热产业示范基地,以实际需求为导向,以工程示范为载体,以成果转化为驱动,以产业应用为目标,探索产学研用的协同创新工科研究生培养新模式,尝试在多个产业示范基地建立具有鲜明工科特色的“科技小站”,通过模式与实践的高效融合,充分释放研究生的内在创新要素活力。

中国冰雪产业创新生态系统的建构及运行机制研究

如何将“冰雪热”更好地融入经济高质量发展的现代化建设,突破产业创新难关成为关键。借助产业创新生态系统理论、共生理论等视角,探析中国冰雪产业创新生态系统建构的逻辑、模型和运行机制。首先,系统的建构根植于产业联合互融、资源协同整合、系统有机演化3个底层逻辑。其次,政府、冰雪企业、高校/科研机构、中介组织、消费者等创新种群相互作用,结成“政产学研用”一体化的创新群落,并与创新环境共生共演,共同构成系统的整体架构。最后,系统的高效运行离不开稳定均衡的生态机制,包括通过供需循环机制激发可持续价值,基于竞合共生机制建立稳定的结构基础,利用创新驱动机制实现整体跃迁升级,借助激励约束机制建立制度保障,4种机制协同发力,推动系统内生性成长。

产学研合作视角下我国企业关键核心技术突破路径研究——以三峡集团为例

党的二十大报告指出要加强企业主导的产学研融合,强化企业的科技创新主体地位,发挥科技型骨干企业引领支撑作用。从产学研合作创新的视角出发,选择三峡集团作为研究案例,以文本分析与专利分析为手段,探究了三峡集团实现关键核心技术突破的路径。研究发现:该企业关键核心技术的突破遵循“引进、消化、吸收、再创新-集成创新-整合创新”的演化过程。从专利合作网络的视角来看,在集成创新阶段,较高的非冗余性可以帮助企业在合作中占据优势地位,从而提高自身的创新能力;在整合创新阶段,伙伴之间更频繁的合作可以帮助企业接触更多异质性的创新资源,推动关键核心技术的突破。本文对三峡集团核心技术突破路径的研究,对我国解决“卡脖子”问题,实现关键核心技术的创新和突破具有一定的参考意义。

农业科研院所产业研究院建设探索与实践——以江苏省农业科学院为例

新型研发机构产业研究院是科技创新与产业发展融合的新载体,是成果转化的重要平台。科研院所作为国家创新体系的重要组成部分,加强产业研究院的建设,必将促进成果转化率的进一步提高。文章结合江苏省农业科学院近年来产业研究院建设方面的主要做法,分析了产业研究院发展现状、取得的初步成效以及存在的主要问题,提出了明确产业研究院建设原则、创新产业研究院组织形式、加强产业研究院运行管理、强化经费保障顶层设计、优化人力资源配置等加强产业研究院建设的对策建议,以期为农业科研院所产业研究院建设提供参考。

基于蝉变模型的产学研合作风险机制分析和评估

为了准确评估产学研合作中的风险,基于蝉变模型构建了一套产学研合作中的风险预控机制。通过调查研究发现知识认可度不足、知识共享度不充分、知识成果转化率低和知识成果应用的不确定性是合作中风险形成的主要因素。将合作过程节点化,将合作联盟的主体孤立化,使用德尔菲法,构建产学研合作风险评价的指标体系。通过分析比较,选择BP神经网络作为合作风险评估法,利用MATLAB软件处理输入输出的风险指标,形成风险级别的评价模型,并用实例进行验证。

基于产学研协同育人的薄膜物理与技术课程教学模式探索——以长春理工大学为例

在产学研协同育人培养技能型和应用型全面人才的背景下,以长春理工大学薄膜物理与技术课程为例,通过课程内容优化、线上教学资源建设、课内实验及竞赛联合项目设置,教学设计改革、课程测试与评价建设及课程思政建设几方面对产学研协同育人的课程教学模式进行探索,最终提高学生实践创新能力、科研能力及自身就业竞争力。同时,其也是培养合格员工且缩短人才培养周期的最佳途径,另外,也为高校产学研协同育人的课堂教学改革及实践提供一定的参考。

高校有组织科研:形成要素、实施困境及路径对策

有组织科研已成为高校深入推进“双一流”建设、承担五大基本职能的关键内容。高校加强有组织科研,必须准确把握其形成要素,科学认识其功能定位。从国际、国内高校推进有组织科研的实践来看,积累了一些可供参考的经验,形成了一些共性的特点,但也仍然存在使命导向的价值理念尚未深入人心、现有科研管理机制存在障碍、评价体系还没有形成等现实困境。不同类型高校在推进有组织科研路径上存在较大差异,就行业特色高校而言,要加强有组织科研战略谋划、明确主攻方向,创新有组织科研运营机制、实行颠覆性改革,推动学科交叉体系建设、凝练学科优势,优化科研资源分配形式、集中优势资源,突出战略科学家的主导地位、培育创新人才,重构科研成果评价体系、破除恶性竞争。

日本国立丰桥技术科学大学有组织科研的发展动因、平台构建与运行策略

为更好地解决经济社会发展面临的现实问题、满足紧迫需求,高职院校推进有组织科研刻不容缓。在日本,以丰桥技术科学大学为代表的职业本科大学通过跨学科科研平台的实践探索,在有组织科研方面取得了显著成绩。为应对日本社会和人才需求、国家战略定位等外部环境的变化,丰桥技术科学大学以技术科学与创新研究院(RITI)为主体构建了综合性的跨学科科研平台,围绕跨学科科研平台的目标确立、内部协作、外部支持、科研成果管理等方面形成了相对完善的运行保障体系。借鉴丰桥技术科学大学跨学科组织实践的成功经验,我国高职院校推进有组织科研应以服务区域产业发展为目标,明晰高职院校有组织科研功能定位;以组织机构建设为基础,搭建高职院校有组织科研创新平台;以参与主体内部协同为关键,创设高职院校有组织科研创新场域;以配套制度改革为牵引,夯实高职院校有组织科研保障体系。